Saccharin from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77382-77383 [E6-22080]
Download as PDF
77382
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 26, 2006 / Notices
PSF FROM THE PRC - WEIGHTED–AVERAGE DUMPING MARGINS—Continued
Exporter & Producer
Weighted–Average Deposit Rate
Zhejiang Waysun Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd.. .......................................................................................
PRC–Wide Rate ..................................................................................................................................
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d) of
the Act, we will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to
suspend liquidation of all entries of PSF
from the PRC as described in the ‘‘Scope
of Investigation’’ section, entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption from Ningo Dafa, Cixi
Jiangnan, the Separate Rate Applicants
and the PRC–wide entity on or after the
date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register. We will instruct CBP
to require a cash deposit or the posting
of a bond equal to the weighted–average
amount by which the normal value
exceeds U.S. price, as indicated above.
For Far Eastern, we will direct CBP to
suspend liquidation of any entries of
PSF from the PRC as described in the
‘‘Scope of Investigation’’ section, that
are entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
90 days prior to the date of publication
in the Federal Register of our
preliminary determination. The
suspension of liquidation will remain in
effect until further notice.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
International Trade Commission
Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of
the Act, we have notified the ITC of our
preliminary affirmative determination of
sales at less than fair value. Section
735(b)(2) of the Act requires the ITC to
make its final determination as to
whether the domestic industry in the
United States is materially injured, or
threatened with material injury, by
reason of imports of PSF, or sales (or the
likelihood of sales) for importation, of
the subject merchandise within 45 days
of our final determination.
Public Comment
Case briefs or other written comments
may be submitted to the Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration no
later than seven days after the date of
the final verification report is issued in
this proceeding and rebuttal briefs
limited to issues raised in case briefs no
later than five days after the deadline
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Dec 22, 2006
Jkt 211001
date for case briefs. A list of authorities
used and an executive summary of
issues should accompany any briefs
submitted to the Department. This
summary should be limited to five pages
total, including footnotes.
In accordance with section 774 of the
Act, we will hold a public hearing, if
requested, to afford interested parties an
opportunity to comment on arguments
raised in case or rebuttal briefs. If a
request for a hearing is made, we intend
to hold the hearing three days after the
deadline of submission of rebuttal briefs
at the U.S. Department of Commerce,
14th Street and Constitution Ave, NW,
Washington, DC 20230, at a time and
location to be determined. Parties
should confirm by telephone the date,
time, and location of the hearing two
days before the scheduled date.
Interested parties who wish to request
a hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, Room 1870, within 30
days after the date of publication of this
notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Requests
should contain the party’s name,
address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, and a list of the
issues to be discussed. At the hearing,
each party may make an affirmative
presentation only on issues raised in
that party’s case brief and may make
rebuttal presentations only on
arguments included in that party’s
rebuttal brief.
We will make our final determination
no later than 75 days after the date of
publication of this preliminary
determination, pursuant to section
735(a) of the Act.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 15, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–22071 Filed 12–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9.25%
44.30%
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–878
Saccharin from the People’s Republic
of China: Notice of Partial Rescission
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
interested parties, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated
an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on saccharin
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’), covering the period July 1,
2005, through June 30, 2006. Based on
the withdrawal of the requests for
review with respect to two companies,
we are rescinding this administrative
review, in part.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 26, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Moats, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 8, Import Administration, Room
1870, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 3, 2006, the Department
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on saccharin
from the PRC. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 71
FR 37890, (July 3, 2006). We received
timely requests for review from Amgal
Chemical Products (1989) Ltd.
(‘‘Amgal’’), Shanghai Fortune Chemical
Company, Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Fortune’’),
and Suzhou Fine Chemical Co. Group
Ltd. (‘‘Suzhou’’).
On August 30, 2006, the Department
published a notice of the initiation of
the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on saccharin
from the PRC for the period July 1, 2005,
through June 30, 2006. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 26, 2006 / Notices
Revocation in Part, 71 FR 51573,
(August 30, 2006). On October 16, 2006,
Suzhou withdrew its request for an
administrative review. On November 14,
2006, Amgal withdrew its request for an
administrative review.
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–22080 Filed 12–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Rescission of Review
The Department’s regulations, at 19
CFR 351.213(d)(1), provide that the
Department will rescind an
administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its
request for review within 90 days of the
date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review, or
withdraws its request at a later date if
the Department determines that it is
reasonable to extend the time limit for
withdrawing the request. Suzhou and
Amgal, the only parties to request a
review for these companies,
respectively, withdrew their requests
within the 90-day limit. Therefore, we
are rescinding these reviews of the
antidumping duty order on saccharin
from the PRC covering the period July
1, 2005, through June 30, 2006, with
respect to Suzhou and Amgal.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For the companies
for which these reviews are rescinded,
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue instructions to CBP 15
days after the date of publication of this
notice.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Dec 22, 2006
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(C–475–817)
Oil Country Tubular Goods from Italy:
Final Results of Five-year (Sunset)
Review and Revocation of the
Countervailing Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 1, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal
Register the notice of initiation of the
second five-year sunset review of the
countervailing duty order on oil country
tubular goods (OCTG) from Italy,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See
Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews, 71 FR 31153 (June 1, 2006)
(Second Sunset Review). The
Department has conducted an expedited
sunset review as provided for in section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C). As a result of this
sunset review, the Department finds that
revocation of the countervailing duty
order would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of a
countervailable subsidy. Therefore, the
Department is revoking this
countervailing duty order.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 25, 2006
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jun
Jack Zhao or Sean Carey, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1396 or (202) 482–
3964, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The countervailing duty order on
OCTG from Italy was published in the
Federal Register on August 10, 1995.
See Notice of Countervailing Duty
Order: Oil Country Tubular Goods
(‘‘OCTG’’) From Italy, 60 FR 40822
(August 10, 1995). On March 8, 2001,
the Department published in the
Federal Register the final results of the
first sunset review of the countervailing
duty order on OCTG from Italy,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77383
pursuant to the Act. See Oil Country
Tubular Goods (‘‘OCTG’’) From Italy;
Final Results of Sunset Review of
Countervailing Duty Order, 66 FR 13910
(March 8, 2001). In that review, the
Department determined that the
revocation of the CVD order would
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of countervailable subsidies
at the same rate as found in the final
determination. Following the
affirmative injury determination by the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
and pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(4),
the Department published a notice of
continuation of the order. See
Continuation of Countervailing and
Antidumping Duty Orders on Oil
Country Tubular Goods From Argentina,
Italy, Japan, Korea and Mexico, and
Partial Revocation of Those Orders
From Argentina and Mexico With
Respect to Drill Pipe, 66 FR 38630 (July
25, 2001) (Continuation of Orders).
On June 1, 2006, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act, the Department
initiated the second sunset review of the
countervailing duty order on OCTG
from Italy. See Second Sunset Review.
The Department received notices of
intent to participate from United States
Steel Corporation, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc.,
Lone Star Steel Company, Koppel Steel
(NS Group), Maverick Tube
Corporation, Newport Steel (NS Group),
V&M Star LP (collectively, ‘‘domestic
interested parties’’), within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).
Domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as U.S.
manufacturers of the domestic like
product. Moreover, certain domestic
interested parties were petitioners in the
original investigation and have
participated in subsequent reviews
before the Department.
The Department received substantive
responses within the deadline specified
in section 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i) from
domestic interested parties, the
Government of Italy (GOI), the European
Union/Delegation of the European
Commission (EU), Dalmine S.p.A.
(Dalmine), and Arvedi Tubi Acciaio
S.p.A. (Arvedi).1 The Department also
received timely filed rebuttal comments
from the domestic interested parties.2
1 Dalmine is a manufacturer and exporter of the
subject merchandise. Arvedi indicated in its
substantive response that it no longer produces the
merchandise subject to this order. Therefore, Arvedi
is not an interested party in accordance with
771(9)(A) of the Act.
2 On June 29 and July 5, 2006, the Department
received a substantive response and rebuttal
comments, respectively, from IPSCO Tubulars, Inc.,
Lone Star Steel Company, Koppel Steel (NS Group),
Maverick Tube Corporation, Newport Steel (NS
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
Continued
26DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77382-77383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-22080]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-570-878
Saccharin from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the
Department of Commerce (``the Department'') initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on saccharin from the People's
Republic of China (``PRC''), covering the period July 1, 2005, through
June 30, 2006. Based on the withdrawal of the requests for review with
respect to two companies, we are rescinding this administrative review,
in part.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 26, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Moats, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 8, Import Administration, Room 1870, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 3, 2006, the Department published a notice of opportunity
to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
saccharin from the PRC. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review, 71 FR 37890, (July 3, 2006). We received timely
requests for review from Amgal Chemical Products (1989) Ltd.
(``Amgal''), Shanghai Fortune Chemical Company, Ltd. (``Shanghai
Fortune''), and Suzhou Fine Chemical Co. Group Ltd. (``Suzhou'').
On August 30, 2006, the Department published a notice of the
initiation of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order
on saccharin from the PRC for the period July 1, 2005, through June 30,
2006. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
[[Page 77383]]
Revocation in Part, 71 FR 51573, (August 30, 2006). On October 16,
2006, Suzhou withdrew its request for an administrative review. On
November 14, 2006, Amgal withdrew its request for an administrative
review.
Rescission of Review
The Department's regulations, at 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), provide that
the Department will rescind an administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its request for review within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested
review, or withdraws its request at a later date if the Department
determines that it is reasonable to extend the time limit for
withdrawing the request. Suzhou and Amgal, the only parties to request
a review for these companies, respectively, withdrew their requests
within the 90-day limit. Therefore, we are rescinding these reviews of
the antidumping duty order on saccharin from the PRC covering the
period July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006, with respect to Suzhou and
Amgal.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For
the companies for which these reviews are rescinded, antidumping duties
shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
The Department intends to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of this notice.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-22080 Filed 12-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S