Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Japan: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76976-76977 [E6-21999]
Download as PDF
76976
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 246 / Friday, December 22, 2006 / Notices
Dated: September 18, 2006.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–21919 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–55–P
their use of government services and/or
facilities; (4) obtain certain certifications
from companies interested in
participating in DOC trade events; and
(5) obtain additional information
needed to judge the eligibility and
suitability of companies to participate in
DOC-sponsored business missions.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
II. Method of Collection
Office of the Secretary
The respondents can use one of the
following:
(1) Electronically by completing and
submitting an Internet form included on
the mission-specific Web site; (2)
electronically—by downloading,
completing, and e-mailing—a pdf or
Word form from the mission-specific
website; or (3) electronically—by
requesting a pdf or Word form,
completing and e-mailing or faxing.
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Business Mission
Application
Office of the Secretary, Office
of Business Liaison.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before February 20,
2007.
Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Jennifer Andberg (202–482–
1360 or via internet at
JAndberg@doc.gov).
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
I. Abstract
The purpose of collecting the
information requested in the Business
Mission Application is to enable the
Department of Commerce to ensure that
companies that wish to participate in a
business mission meet the standards
established by the Secretary for
participation and allow the Department
to make the best possible selection of
participants for trade missions.
Without this information, the Office
of the Secretary would be unable to: (1)
Determine either the number of firms or
the identities of individual companies
participating in its trade events; (2)
account for user fees received from
firms in a manner consistent with GAO
accounting practices; (3) would have no
written contract with firms covering
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:45 Dec 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
III. Data
OMB Number: 0690–0023.
Form Number:
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; Not-for-profit
institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
300.
Estimated Time Per Response: 40
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 200.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $42,000.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–21922 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–588–850
Certain Large Diameter Carbon and
Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and
Pressure Pipe from Japan: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from
United States Steel Corporation, the
Department of Commerce initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain large
diameter carbon and alloy seamless
standard, line, and pressure pipe from
Japan, covering the period June 1, 2005,
through May 31, 2006. Because this
request was later withdrawn, we are
rescinding the review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Saliha Loucif at (202) 482–1779; AD/
CVD Operations Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On June 26, 2000, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published,
in the Federal Register, the
antidumping duty order on certain large
diameter carbon and alloy seamless
standard, line, and pressure pipe
(seamless pipe) from Japan. See Notice
of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain
Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy
Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure
Pipe from Japan; and Certain Small
Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless
Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From
Japan and the Republic of South Africa,
65 FR 39360 (June 26, 2000).
On June 2, 2006, the Department
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order of seamless
pipe for the period of review covering
June 1, 2005, through May 31, 2006 (the
period of review). See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 71
FR 32032 (June 2, 2006).
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), on June 30, 2006, United
States Steel Corporation (the petitioner)
requested an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on seamless
pipe from Japan, for JFE Steel
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 246 / Friday, December 22, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Corporation, Nippon Steel Corporation,
NKK Tubes, and Sumitomo Metal
Industries, Ltd. (collectively, the
respondents). None of the respondents
requested a review. On July 27, 2006, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department
published in the Federal Register the
initiation of an administrative review of
the antidumping order on seamless pipe
from Japan. See Notice of Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 71 FR 42626 (July
27, 2006). On August 1, 2006, the
Department issued its antidumping
questionnaire. In August 2006,
respondents submitted letters claiming
that they did not have sales of subject
merchandise during the period of
review. On November 28, 2006, the
petitioner withdrew its request for an
administrative review of seamless pipe
from Japan.
Rescission of Review
The Department’s regulations at
351.213(d)(1) provide that the
Department will rescind an
administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its
request for a review within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. The
regulations further provide that the
Secretary ‘‘may extend this time limit if
the Secretary decides that it is
reasonable to do so.’’ Although the
petitioner’s November 28, 2006,
withdrawal request for this review was
not within the 90-day time limit as
prescribed in 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we
find that, under the circumstances of
this review, it is appropriate to accept
the withdrawal request and rescind the
review. In response to the Department’s
August 1, 2006, antidumping
questionnaire, the respondents have
claimed no shipments of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the period of review, and, therefore, the
Department has neither issued
supplemental questionnaires nor
conducted verification at this point in
the proceeding. Continuing the review
would only require the petitioner,
respondents, and the Department to
expend time and resources on a review
in which the only party that requested
the review is no longer interested.
Accordingly, the Department does not
believe the administrative review has
proceeded to a point at which it would
be ‘‘unreasonable’’ to rescind the
review. The Department, therefore, finds
that it is reasonable to extend the 90-day
time limit and to rescind the
administrative review. The Department
will issue appropriate assessment
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:45 Dec 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
76977
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection after 15 days of publication
of this notice.
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
tubular goods (OCTG), other than drill
pipe, from Korea. See Oil Country
Tubular Goods, Other Than Drill Pipe,
from Korea: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 71 FR 51797 (August 31, 2006)
(Preliminary Results). We received case
briefs on October 2, 2006 and rebuttal
briefs on October 10, 2006. On October
24, 2006, the Department decided to
permit an additional rebuttal from each
petitioner with respect to one issue. The
Department received these rebuttal
briefs from counsel representing IPSCO
Tubulars, Inc., Lone Star Steel
Company, and Maverick Tube
Corporations on October 30, 2006, as
well as from U.S. Steel Corporation on
November 1, 2006.
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–21999 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
Extension of Time Limits for Final
Results
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–580–825
Notice of Extension of Time Limit for
Final Results of Administrative
Review: Oil Country Tubular Goods,
Other Than Drill Pipe, From Korea
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Lindsay, Nicholas Czajkowski, or
Dara Iserson, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0780, (202) 482–1395, or (202) 482–
4052, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On September 28, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of
initiation for this antidumping duty
administrative review. See Notice of
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 70 FR 56631 (September 28, 2005).
On August 31, 2006, the Department
published the preliminary results of this
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on oil country
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to issue the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an
antidumping duty order for which a
review is requested, and issue the final
results within 120 days after the date on
which the preliminary results are
published. However, if the Department
finds it is not practicable to complete
the review within the time period,
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows
the Department to extend these
deadlines to a maximum of 365 days
and 180 days, respectively.
We determine that it is not practicable
to complete the final results of this
review within current statutory limits.
Due to the complexity of issues raised
in the interested parties’ case briefs,
specifically regarding the treatment of
inventory carrying costs and CEP profit,
the Department requires additional time
to evaluate these issues properly.
Therefore, we are extending the
deadline for the final results of this
review by 60 days, from December 29,
2006 until no later than February 27,
2006, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1), 751(a)(3)(A), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–21988 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510–DS–S
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76976-76977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-21999]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-588-850
Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line,
and Pressure Pipe from Japan: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from United States Steel Corporation,
the Department of Commerce initiated an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain large diameter carbon and alloy
seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe from Japan, covering the
period June 1, 2005, through May 31, 2006. Because this request was
later withdrawn, we are rescinding the review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Saliha Loucif at (202) 482-1779; AD/
CVD Operations Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14\th\ Street &
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 26, 2000, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published, in the Federal Register, the antidumping duty order on
certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and
pressure pipe (seamless pipe) from Japan. See Notice of Antidumping
Duty Orders: Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard,
Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan; and Certain Small Diameter Carbon
and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Japan and the
Republic of South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26, 2000).
On June 2, 2006, the Department published a notice of opportunity
to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order of
seamless pipe for the period of review covering June 1, 2005, through
May 31, 2006 (the period of review). See Antidumping or Countervailing
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 71 FR 32032 (June 2, 2006).
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), on June 30, 2006, United
States Steel Corporation (the petitioner) requested an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on seamless pipe from Japan, for
JFE Steel
[[Page 76977]]
Corporation, Nippon Steel Corporation, NKK Tubes, and Sumitomo Metal
Industries, Ltd. (collectively, the respondents). None of the
respondents requested a review. On July 27, 2006, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department published in the Federal Register
the initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping order on
seamless pipe from Japan. See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation
in Part, 71 FR 42626 (July 27, 2006). On August 1, 2006, the Department
issued its antidumping questionnaire. In August 2006, respondents
submitted letters claiming that they did not have sales of subject
merchandise during the period of review. On November 28, 2006, the
petitioner withdrew its request for an administrative review of
seamless pipe from Japan.
Rescission of Review
The Department's regulations at 351.213(d)(1) provide that the
Department will rescind an administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its request for a review within 90 days
of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested
review. The regulations further provide that the Secretary ``may extend
this time limit if the Secretary decides that it is reasonable to do
so.'' Although the petitioner's November 28, 2006, withdrawal request
for this review was not within the 90-day time limit as prescribed in
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we find that, under the circumstances of this
review, it is appropriate to accept the withdrawal request and rescind
the review. In response to the Department's August 1, 2006, antidumping
questionnaire, the respondents have claimed no shipments of subject
merchandise to the United States during the period of review, and,
therefore, the Department has neither issued supplemental
questionnaires nor conducted verification at this point in the
proceeding. Continuing the review would only require the petitioner,
respondents, and the Department to expend time and resources on a
review in which the only party that requested the review is no longer
interested.
Accordingly, the Department does not believe the administrative
review has proceeded to a point at which it would be ``unreasonable''
to rescind the review. The Department, therefore, finds that it is
reasonable to extend the 90-day time limit and to rescind the
administrative review. The Department will issue appropriate assessment
instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection after 15 days of
publication of this notice.
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-21999 Filed 12-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S