Improving Literacy Through School Libraries, 76280-76281 [E6-21754]
Download as PDF
76280
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Notices
Rita
C. Manak, Head, Technology Transfer
Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375–
5320, telephone 202–767–3083. Due to
temporary U.S. Postal Service delays,
please fax 202–404–7920, e-mail:
rita.manak@nrl.navy.mil, or use courier
delivery to expedite response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404)
Dated: December 6, 2006.
M.A. Harvison,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–21715 Filed 12–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Improving Literacy Through School
Libraries
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
Elementary and Secondary Education
proposes a priority under the Improving
Literacy Through School Libraries
Program. The Assistant Secretary may
use this priority for competitions in
fiscal year (FY) 2007 and later years. We
take this action to allow for the best use
of Federal funding to improve school
library media centers in low-income
communities. We intend for this priority
to help strengthen the connection
between school libraries and the
instructional programs in these schools
and districts.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before January 19, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this proposed priority to Irene
Harwarth, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 3W227, Washington, DC 20202–
6200. If you prefer to send your
comments through the Internet, use the
following address: lslcomments@ed.gov.
You must include the term ‘‘Comments
on FY 2007 LSL Priority’’ in the subject
line of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Harwarth at (202) 401–3751 or
Miriam Lund at (202) 401–2871. If you
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal
Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments
regarding this proposed priority. We
invite you to assist us in complying
with the specific requirements of
Executive Order 12866 and its overall
requirement of reducing regulatory
burden that might result from this
proposed priority. Please let us know of
any further opportunities we should
take to reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of
the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this proposed priority in room
3W227, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC, between the hours of
8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern time,
Monday through Friday of each week
except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an
appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this proposed priority. If you
want to schedule an appointment for
this type of aid, please contact one of
the persons listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
General
The purpose of the Improving
Literacy Through School Libraries
Program is to improve student reading
skills and academic achievement by
providing students with increased
access to up-to-date school library
materials; well-equipped,
technologically advanced school library
media centers; and well-trained,
professionally certified school library
media specialists. Entities eligible for
funding are local educational agencies
(LEAs) in which 20 percent of the
students served by the LEA are from
families with incomes below the
poverty line. These entities include
public school districts, and may also
include charter schools, regional service
agencies, and State-administered
schools that are considered public
school districts by their State
educational agency. Grantees use this
funding to update their school library
media center collections, improve
technology and Internet access for their
school library media centers, extend the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
hours of their school library media
centers, and provide professional
development for school library media
specialists.
Background of the Priority
This program has been in existence
for four years. Over this four-year
period, we have found that the most
successful projects are similar in the
following two ways: (1) They have
provided a comprehensive array of
services (such as extended library hours
and professional development); and (2)
they have had significant support from
principals, teachers, and parents.
Based on what we know to be
successful practice, we seek to establish
a priority that more closely links the
proposed project to the school and
district through alignment with a school
or district improvement plan. We also
intend that this priority will encourage
applicants to offer a comprehensive
array of allowable program services.
We will announce the final priority in
a notice in the Federal Register. We will
determine the final priority after
considering responses to this notice and
other information available to the
Department. This notice does not
preclude us from proposing or funding
additional priorities, subject to meeting
applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this proposed priority, we invite
applications through a notice in the Federal
Register. When inviting applications we
designate each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority we consider only applications that
meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a
competitive preference priority we give
competitive preference to an application by
either (1) awarding additional points,
depending on how well or the extent to
which the application meets the competitive
priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the
competitive priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the
priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational
priority we are particularly interested in
applications that meet the invitational
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the invitational
priority a competitive or absolute preference
over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priority
Proposed Priority
Under this proposed priority, we
would give priority to projects that
demonstrate in their grant applications
that the proposed literacy project
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Notices
services are comprehensive and aligned
with a school or district improvement
plan. A school improvement plan may
include the required two-year plan
(under section 1116(b)(3) of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended by the No
Child Left Behind Act of 2001) that
addresses the academic issues that
caused a school to be identified as in
need of improvement. The plan could
also include a voluntary plan developed
by the school or district to improve
academic achievement. The applicant
must clearly describe the improvement
plan that is in place, whether it is for
the school or the entire district, the
reasons why the plan was put in place,
and how the proposed project and the
operation of the school library media
center will directly support the
academic goals established in the
improvement plan.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed priority has
been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
the notice of proposed priority are those
resulting from statutory requirements
and those we have determined as
necessary for administering this
program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this notice of proposed
priority, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed priority justify
the costs.
We have also determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
Document Form (PDF) on the Internet at
the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister.
To use PDF, you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 84.364A Improving Literacy
Through School Libraries Program)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6383.
Dated: December 15, 2006.
Henry L. Johnson,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. E6–21754 Filed 12–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Procedural Manual for the Election
Assistance Commission’s Voting
System Testing and Certification
Program
United States Election
Assistance Commission (EAC).
ACTION: Notice; publication of Voting
System Testing and Certification
Manual.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Election Assistance
Commission (EAC) is publishing a
procedural manual for its Voting System
Testing and Certification Program. This
program sets the administrative
procedures for obtaining an EAC
Certification for voting systems.
Participation in the program is strictly
voluntary. The program is mandated by
the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) at
42 U.S.C. 15371.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Hancock, Director, Voting System
Certification, Washington, DC, (202)
566–3100, Fax: (202) 566–1392.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. HAVA requires that the
EAC certify and decertify voting
systems. Section 231(a)(1) of HAVA (42
U.S.C. 15371) specifically requires the
EAC to ‘‘... provide for the testing,
certification, decertification and
recertification of voting system
hardware and software by accredited
laboratories.’’ To meet this obligation,
the EAC has created a voluntary
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76281
program to test voting systems to
Federal voting system standards. The
Voting System Testing and Certification
Manual, published below, will set the
procedures for this program.
In creating the Certification Manual
the EAC sought input from experts and
stakeholders. Specifically, the EAC
conducted meetings with
representatives from the voting system
test laboratory and voting system
manufacturing community. The
Commission also held a public hearing
in which it received testimony from
State election officials, the National
Institute of Standards and Technology,
academics, electronic voting system
experts and public interest groups.
Finally, the EAC sought input from the
public. A draft version of the EAC
Voting System Testing and Certification
Program Manual was published with a
request for public comment on October
2, 2006. (71 FR 57934). The pubic
comment period was open until 5 p.m.
e.d.t. on October 31, 2006. While this
publication and public comment period
were not required under the rulemaking,
adjudicative or licensing provisions of
the Administrative Procedures Act, all
comments received were considered in
the drafting of this final administrative
manual.
Discussion of Comments. The EAC
received over 400 comments from the
public. The majority of these comments
came from voting system test
laboratories, voting system
manufacturers, and public interest
groups. The EAC also received a number
of comments from State and local
officials and private individuals.
The majority of comments received by
the Commission raised concerns or
questioned the meaning or application
of various provisions of the manual.
These comments were requests for
clarification. Another significant block
of comments were less specific and
focused on the fundamental purpose
behind the program or its basic
methodology. Comments in this
category included individuals who
noted that electronic voting machines
should not be used in Federal elections
and those who disagreed with the
program’s fundamental structure which
utilizes EAC accredited laboratories to
test voting systems through direct
contracting with the system’s
manufacturer. Finally, there were a
range of specific recommendations on a
wide variety of topics. Examples
include: (1) Comments from
manufacturers and interest groups
requesting the EAC to provide specific
timeframes or response times for various
program elements or activities; (2)
recommendations that the EAC Mark of,
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76280-76281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-21754]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Improving Literacy Through School Libraries
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education
proposes a priority under the Improving Literacy Through School
Libraries Program. The Assistant Secretary may use this priority for
competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2007 and later years. We take this
action to allow for the best use of Federal funding to improve school
library media centers in low-income communities. We intend for this
priority to help strengthen the connection between school libraries and
the instructional programs in these schools and districts.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before January 19, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this proposed priority to Irene
Harwarth, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room
3W227, Washington, DC 20202-6200. If you prefer to send your comments
through the Internet, use the following address: lslcomments@ed.gov.
You must include the term ``Comments on FY 2007 LSL Priority'' in the
subject line of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Harwarth at (202) 401-3751 or
Miriam Lund at (202) 401-2871. If you use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-
800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding this proposed priority.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific requirements
of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from this proposed priority. Please
let us know of any further opportunities we should take to reduce
potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this proposed priority in room 3W227, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Eastern time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for this proposed priority. If you want to schedule
an appointment for this type of aid, please contact one of the persons
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
General
The purpose of the Improving Literacy Through School Libraries
Program is to improve student reading skills and academic achievement
by providing students with increased access to up-to-date school
library materials; well-equipped, technologically advanced school
library media centers; and well-trained, professionally certified
school library media specialists. Entities eligible for funding are
local educational agencies (LEAs) in which 20 percent of the students
served by the LEA are from families with incomes below the poverty
line. These entities include public school districts, and may also
include charter schools, regional service agencies, and State-
administered schools that are considered public school districts by
their State educational agency. Grantees use this funding to update
their school library media center collections, improve technology and
Internet access for their school library media centers, extend the
hours of their school library media centers, and provide professional
development for school library media specialists.
Background of the Priority
This program has been in existence for four years. Over this four-
year period, we have found that the most successful projects are
similar in the following two ways: (1) They have provided a
comprehensive array of services (such as extended library hours and
professional development); and (2) they have had significant support
from principals, teachers, and parents.
Based on what we know to be successful practice, we seek to
establish a priority that more closely links the proposed project to
the school and district through alignment with a school or district
improvement plan. We also intend that this priority will encourage
applicants to offer a comprehensive array of allowable program
services.
We will announce the final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final priority after considering
responses to this notice and other information available to the
Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing or funding
additional priorities, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking
requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this proposed priority, we invite
applications through a notice in the Federal Register. When inviting
applications we designate each priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational. The effect of each type of priority
follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority we give competitive preference to an application by either
(1) awarding additional points, depending on how well or the extent
to which the application meets the competitive priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting an application that meets the
competitive priority over an application of comparable merit that
does not meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the invitational
priority. However, we do not give an application that meets the
invitational priority a competitive or absolute preference over
other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priority
Proposed Priority
Under this proposed priority, we would give priority to projects
that demonstrate in their grant applications that the proposed literacy
project
[[Page 76281]]
services are comprehensive and aligned with a school or district
improvement plan. A school improvement plan may include the required
two-year plan (under section 1116(b)(3) of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of
2001) that addresses the academic issues that caused a school to be
identified as in need of improvement. The plan could also include a
voluntary plan developed by the school or district to improve academic
achievement. The applicant must clearly describe the improvement plan
that is in place, whether it is for the school or the entire district,
the reasons why the plan was put in place, and how the proposed project
and the operation of the school library media center will directly
support the academic goals established in the improvement plan.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed priority has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the notice of proposed priority
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this notice of proposed priority, we have
determined that the benefits of the proposed priority justify the
costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State
and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Form (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.364A Improving
Literacy Through School Libraries Program)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6383.
Dated: December 15, 2006.
Henry L. Johnson,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. E6-21754 Filed 12-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P