Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 76003-76004 [E6-21587]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 19, 2006 / Notices
and did not change the staff’s original
no significant hazards consideration
determination.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendments is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated December 4,
2006.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket
Nos. 50–259 Browns Ferry Nuclear
Plant, Unit 1, Limestone County,
Alabama
Date of application for amendment:
October 12, 2004, as supplemented by
letters dated September 7 and November
1, 2006.
Brief description of amendment: To
remove License Condition 2.C(4).
Date of issuance: November 28, 2006.
Effective date: As of date of issuance,
to be implemented within 30 days.
Amendment No.: 265
Renewed Facility Operating License
Nos. DPR–33: Amendment revised the
Renewed Operating License.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: August 15, 2006 (71 FR 46937).
The supplements dated September 7
and November 1, 2006, provided
additional information that clarified the
application, did not expand the scope of
the application as originally noticed,
and did not change the staff’s original
proposed no significant hazards
consideration determination as
published in the Federal Register.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated November 28,
2006.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket
Nos. 50–327 and 50–328, Sequoyah
Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Hamilton
County, Tennessee
Date of application for amendments:
May 25, 2006, as supplemented by letter
dated September 1, 2006.
Brief description of amendments: The
requested changes provide a revision to
the design and licensing basis for the
containment sump debris transport
analysis as described in the Sequoyah
Nuclear Plant (SQN) Updated Final
Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR). The
current transport analysis for SQN is a
two-dimensional physical transport
model, and Tennessee Valley Authority
(TVA) is requesting to update the
analysis to a three-dimensional
computational fluid dynamics transport
model. The results of the reanalysis will
be used to size the flow area of the
advanced design containment sump
strainers which will replace the original
sump intake structure.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
76003
Date of issuance: November 7, 2006.
Effective date: Implementation of the
amendment is the incorporation into the
next UFSAR update made in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.71(e), of the changes to
the description of the facility as
described in TVA’s application dated
May 25, 2006, as supplemented by letter
dated September 1, 2006, and evaluated
in the staff’s Safety Evaluation attached
to this amendment.
Amendment Nos. 313 and 302.
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–
77 and DPR–79: Amendments revised
the Updated Final Safety Analysis
Report.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: June 20, 2006 (71 FR 35460).
The supplemental letter dated
September 1, 2006, provided clarifying
information that was within the scope of
the initial notice and did not change the
initial proposed no significant hazards
consideration determination.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendments is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated November 7,
2006.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
Union Electric Company, Docket No.
50–483, Callaway Plant, Unit 1,
Callaway County, Missouri
Date of application for amendment:
September 20, 2006, as supplemented
by letter dated November 20, 2006.
Brief description of amendment: The
amendment revised (1) the definition of
the Pressure and Temperature Limits
Report (PTLR) in Technical
Specification (TS) 1.1, ‘‘Definitions,’’
and (2) TS 5.6.6, ‘‘Reactor Coolant
System (RCS) PRESSURE AND
TEMPERATURE LIMITS REPORT
(PTLR).’’
Date of issuance: December 5, 2006.
Effective date: As of its date of
issuance, and shall be implemented
within 90 days of the date of issuance.
Amendment No.: 177.
Facility Operating License No. NPF–
30: The amendment revised the
Operating License and Technical
Specifications.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: October 6, 2006 (71 FR 59136).
The supplemental letter dated
November 20, 2006, provided additional
clarifying information, did not expand
the scope of the application as originally
noticed, and did not change the staff’s
original proposed no significant hazards
consideration determination published
in the Federal Register.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated December 5,
2006.
Date of application for amendments:
November 9, 2006 (TS–458).
Description of amendments request:
The proposed amendment would delete
the Technical Specification Surveillance
Requirement to verify the position of a
low pressure coolant injection crosstie
valve.
Date of publication of individual
notice in the Federal Register: November
20, 2006 (71 FR 67166).
Expiration date of individual notice:
December 20, 2006 (Public comments)
and January 19, 2007 (Hearing requests).
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Previously Published Notices of
Consideration of Issuance of
Amendments to Facility Operating
Licenses, Proposed No Significant
Hazards Consideration Determination,
and Opportunity for a Hearing
The following notices were previously
published as separate individual
notices. The notice content was the
same as above. They were published as
individual notices either because time
did not allow the Commission to wait
for this biweekly notice or because the
action involved exigent circumstances.
They are repeated here because the
biweekly notice lists all amendments
issued or proposed to be issued
involving no significant hazards
consideration.
For details, see the individual notice
in the Federal Register on the day and
page cited. This notice does not extend
the notice period of the original notice.
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket No.
50–259, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant,
Unit 1, Limestone County, Alabama
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day
of December 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Catherine Haney,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6–21346 Filed 12–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon written request, copies available
from: Securities and Exchange
Commission Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension: Rule 206(3)–2; SEC File No. 270–
216; OMB Control No. 3235–0243.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
76004
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 19, 2006 / Notices
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for extension of the
previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
Rule 206(3)–2, (17 CFR 275.206(3)–2)
which is entitled ‘‘Agency Cross
Transactions for Advisory Clients,’’
permits investment advisers to comply
with section 206(3) of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’) (15
U.S.C. 80b–6(3)) by obtaining a client’s
blanket consent to enter into agency
cross transactions (i.e., a transaction in
which an adviser acts as a broker to both
the advisory client and the opposite
party to the transaction). Rule 206(3)–2
applies to all registered investment
advisers. In relying on the rule,
investment advisers must provide
certain disclosures to their clients.
Advisory clients can use the disclosures
to monitor agency cross transactions
that affect their advisory account. The
Commission also uses the information
required by Rule 206(3)–2 in connection
with its investment adviser inspection
program to ensure that advisers are in
compliance with the rule. Without the
information collected under the rule,
advisory clients would not have
information necessary for monitoring
their adviser’s handling of their
accounts and the Commission would be
less efficient and effective in its
inspection program.
The information requirements of the
rule consist of the following: (1) Prior to
obtaining the client’s consent,
appropriate disclosure must be made to
the client as to the practice of, and the
conflicts of interest involved in, agency
cross transactions; (2) at or before the
completion of any such transaction, the
client must be furnished with a written
confirmation containing specified
information and offering to furnish
upon request certain additional
information; and (3) at least annually,
the client must be furnished with a
written statement or summary as to the
total number of transactions during the
period covered by the consent and the
total amount of commissions received
by the adviser or its affiliated brokerdealer attributable to such transactions.
The Commission estimates that
approximately 693 respondents use the
rule annually, necessitating about 32
responses per respondent each year, for
a total of 22,176 responses. Each
response requires an estimated 0.5
hours, for a total of 11,088 hours. The
estimated average burden hours are
made solely for the purposes of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 18, 2006
Jkt 211001
Paperwork Reduction Act and are not
derived from a comprehensive or
representative survey or study of the
cost of Commission rules and forms.
This collection of information is
found at (17 CFR 275.206(3)–2) and is
necessary in order for the investment
adviser to obtain the benefits of Rule
206(3)–2. The collection of information
requirements under the rule is
mandatory. Information subject to the
disclosure requirements of Rule 206(3)–
2 does not require submission to the
Commission; and, accordingly, the
disclosure pursuant to the rule is not
kept confidential.
Commission-registered investment
advisers are required to maintain and
preserve certain information required
under Rule 206(3)–2 for five (5) years.
The long-term retention of these records
is necessary for the Commission’s
inspection program to ascertain
compliance with the Advisers Act.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
General comments regarding the
above information should be directed to
the following persons: (1) Desk Officer
for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10202,
New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or e-mail to:
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) R.
Corey Booth, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria,
VA, 22312; or send an e-mail to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
Dated: December 11, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–21587 Filed 12–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon written request, copies available
from: Securities and Exchange
Commission Office of Filings and
Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension: Rule 30e–2; SEC File No. 270–
437; OMB Control No. 3235–0494.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice is hereby given that, under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 350l–3520), the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for extension of the
previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
Section 30(e) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–
29(e)) (the ‘‘Investment Company Act’’
or ‘‘Act’’) and Rule 30e–2 1 thereunder
(17 CFR 270.30e–2) require registered
unit investment trusts (‘‘UITs’’) that
invest substantially all of their assets in
securities of a management investment
company 2 (‘‘fund’’) to send to
shareholders at least semi-annually a
report containing certain financial
statements and other information.
Specifically, Rule 30e–2 requires that
the report contain the financial
statements and other information that
Rule 30e–1 under the Act (17 CFR
270.30e–1) requires to be included in
the report of the underlying fund for the
same fiscal period. Rule 30e–1 requires
that the underlying fund’s report
contain, among other things, the
financial statements and other
information that is required to be
included in such report by the fund’s
registration form.
The purpose of this requirement is to
apprise current shareholders of the
operational and financial condition of
the UIT. Absent the requirement to
disclose all material information in
reports, investors would be unable to
obtain accurate information upon which
to base investment decisions and
consumer confidence in the securities
industry might be adversely affected.
Requiring the submission of these
reports to the Commission permits us to
verify compliance with securities law
requirements. In addition, Rule 30e–2
permits, under certain conditions,
delivery of a single shareholder report to
investors who share an address
(‘‘householding’’). Specifically, Rule
30e–2 permits householding of annual
and semi-annual reports by UITs to
satisfy the delivery requirements of Rule
30e–2 if, in addition to the other
conditions set forth in the rule, the UIT
1 Rule 30e–2 was originally adopted as Rule 30d–
2, but was redesignated as Rule 30e–2 effective
February 15, 2001. See Role of Independent
Directors of Investment Companies, Investment
Company Act Release No. 24816 (Jan. 2, 2001) (66
FR 3734 (Jan. 16, 2001)).
2 Management investment companies are defined
in Section 4(3) of the Investment Company Act as
any investment company other than a face-amount
certificate company or a unit investment trust, as
those terms are defined in Sections 4(1) and 4(2) of
the Investment Company Act. See 15 U.S.C. 80a–
4.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76003-76004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-21587]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Upon written request, copies available from: Securities and Exchange
Commission Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.
Extension: Rule 206(3)-2; SEC File No. 270-216; OMB Control No.
3235-0243.
[[Page 76004]]
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for extension of the previously approved
collection of information discussed below.
Rule 206(3)-2, (17 CFR 275.206(3)-2) which is entitled ``Agency
Cross Transactions for Advisory Clients,'' permits investment advisers
to comply with section 206(3) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(the ``Act'') (15 U.S.C. 80b-6(3)) by obtaining a client's blanket
consent to enter into agency cross transactions (i.e., a transaction in
which an adviser acts as a broker to both the advisory client and the
opposite party to the transaction). Rule 206(3)-2 applies to all
registered investment advisers. In relying on the rule, investment
advisers must provide certain disclosures to their clients. Advisory
clients can use the disclosures to monitor agency cross transactions
that affect their advisory account. The Commission also uses the
information required by Rule 206(3)-2 in connection with its investment
adviser inspection program to ensure that advisers are in compliance
with the rule. Without the information collected under the rule,
advisory clients would not have information necessary for monitoring
their adviser's handling of their accounts and the Commission would be
less efficient and effective in its inspection program.
The information requirements of the rule consist of the following:
(1) Prior to obtaining the client's consent, appropriate disclosure
must be made to the client as to the practice of, and the conflicts of
interest involved in, agency cross transactions; (2) at or before the
completion of any such transaction, the client must be furnished with a
written confirmation containing specified information and offering to
furnish upon request certain additional information; and (3) at least
annually, the client must be furnished with a written statement or
summary as to the total number of transactions during the period
covered by the consent and the total amount of commissions received by
the adviser or its affiliated broker-dealer attributable to such
transactions.
The Commission estimates that approximately 693 respondents use the
rule annually, necessitating about 32 responses per respondent each
year, for a total of 22,176 responses. Each response requires an
estimated 0.5 hours, for a total of 11,088 hours. The estimated average
burden hours are made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act and are not derived from a comprehensive or
representative survey or study of the cost of Commission rules and
forms.
This collection of information is found at (17 CFR 275.206(3)-2)
and is necessary in order for the investment adviser to obtain the
benefits of Rule 206(3)-2. The collection of information requirements
under the rule is mandatory. Information subject to the disclosure
requirements of Rule 206(3)-2 does not require submission to the
Commission; and, accordingly, the disclosure pursuant to the rule is
not kept confidential.
Commission-registered investment advisers are required to maintain
and preserve certain information required under Rule 206(3)-2 for five
(5) years. The long-term retention of these records is necessary for
the Commission's inspection program to ascertain compliance with the
Advisers Act.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
General comments regarding the above information should be directed
to the following persons: (1) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or e-mail to: David--
Rostker@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA, 22312; or send an e-
mail to: PRA--Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must be submitted to OMB within
30 days of this notice.
Dated: December 11, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-21587 Filed 12-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
