Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Financial Responsibility, Operational Capability, Insolvency, and Ceasing To Act, 75283-75284 [E6-21234]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Notices
thereunder because it constitutes a
stated policy, practice, or interpretation
with respect to the meaning,
administration, or enforcement of an
existing rule. At any time within 60
days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submission
should refer to File No. SR–DTC–2006–
13 and should be submitted on or before
January 4, 2007.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–DTC–2006–13 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–DTC–2006–13. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will
be available for inspection and copying
at DTC’s principal office and on DTC’s
Web site at https://www.dtc.org/impNtc/
mor/. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211000
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–21277 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54879; File No. SR–FICC–
2006–12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Financial Responsibility,
Operational Capability, Insolvency, and
Ceasing To Act
December 6, 2006.
On June 15, 2006 the Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed a
proposed rule change with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and on September 22,
2006, amended the proposed rule
change. Notice of the proposal was
published in the Federal Register on
October 4, 2006.2 No comment letters
were received. For the reasons
discussed below, the Commission is
approving the proposed rule change.
I. Description
The rule change will amend FICC’s
Government Securities Division’s
(‘‘GSD’’) and Mortgage Backed
Securities Division’s (‘‘MBSD’’) rules
relating to members’ or applicants’
financial responsibility, operational
capability, and insolvency and to FICC
ceasing to act for members.
A. Cease To Act and Insolvency Rules
FICC will amend GSD’s rules
governing when FICC will cease to act
for a member in a noninsolvency
situation, GSD Rule 21, and in an
insolvency situation, GSD Rule 22. Such
changes will conform GSD’s rules to the
rules of FICC’s clearing agency affiliate,
the National Securities Clearing
Corporation (‘‘NSCC’’).
10 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54570 (Oct.
4, 2006), 71 FR 60591.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75283
GSD Rule 21, which addressed
noninsolvency situations, will be
renamed ‘‘Restriction on Access to
Services’’ and will be similar to NSCC
Rule 46. While revised Rule 21 is
triggered by essentially the same criteria
that are contained in the old GSD rule,3
the revised rule expands the remedies
that FICC could exercise beyond only
‘‘ceasing to act’’ or ‘‘ceasing to accept
data’’ on behalf of the member.
Specifically, FICC, after notifying and
providing an opportunity to request a
hearing to the member, will be able to
suspend, prohibit, or limit a member’s
access to one or more of FICC’s services.
GSD Rule 22, which addresses
insolvency situations, remains
essentially in its old form except that its
close-out provisions are amended and
are being moved to new Rule 22A.
New Rule 22A sets forth the
procedures that FICC will follow when
it ceases to act for a member pursuant
to either Rule 21 or Rule 22. Under new
Rule 22A, FICC will initiate the closeout process with respect to a member for
which it has ceased to act for any reason
permitted by its rules.4 In addition, the
term Cut-Off Time for noninsolvency
situations will be added to Rule 22A.5
Although this term is similar to the
Time of Insolvency term used in old
Rule 22, a key difference between the
terms is that members will be notified
in advance of the Cut-Off Time.
The rule change also makes technical
changes to conform existing references
to Rules 21 and 22 throughout GSD’s
rules to these revisions.6
B. General Continuance Standards
FICC will add new language to
Section 5 of GSD Rule 3 and a new
Section 18, Article III, Rule 1 to MBSD’s
rules, which will be similar to NSCC
Rule 15, that enables FICC when it
deems necessary or advisable to assure
itself of a member’s or an applicant’s
financial responsibility and operational
capability. To assure itself, FICC may,
but is not limited to: restrict or modify
the member’s use of any or all of FICC’s
services; require additional reporting by
the member of its financial or
operational condition; increase the
member’s clearing fund collateral; alter
the proportions of cash, eligible netting
3 Such triggers include the member failing to
perform its obligations to FICC and FICC’s
determination that the member is in or is
approaching financial difficulty.
4 Currently, the close-out process applies only
when FICC deems a member insolvent.
5 As used in Rule 22A, the term Cut Off Time
means the time that is specified in advance by FICC
in a notice to members to be the time when FICC
is deemed to have ceased to act for a member.
6 Technical, conforming changes are being made
to Rules 1, 3A, 4, 6A, 14 and new Rule 22A.
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
75284
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Notices
securities, and letters of credit
contributing to the member’s required
clearing fund deposits; and prohibit the
member from withdrawing excess
clearing fund deposits.7
Because the proposed rule change
gives FICC the general authority to
require additional clearing fund
collateral when FICC is seeking
additional assurances from a member or
applicant, the provisions in GSD’s Rule
4 that require the posting of additional
collateral for specific circumstances are
being deleted.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–21234 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
C. Technical Amendments
FICC will make several technical
amendments to GSD’s and MBSD’s
rules. The terms ‘‘Board’’ and ‘‘Board of
Directors’’ will be redefined to include
a committee of FICC’s Board of Directors
that is acting under delegated authority
of the Board. Accordingly, references to
specific board committees throughout
both divisions’ rules will be replaced
simply by the term ‘‘Board,’’ which will
include any such board committees.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Establishing New
Reporting Processes To Support the
Bilateral Comparison of Pool Details
Associated With Specified Pool Trade
Activity
II. Discussion
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 8
requires that the rules of a clearing
agency assure the safeguarding of
securities and funds that are in the
custody or control of the clearing agency
or for which it is responsible. The
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with this
obligation because it should enhance
FICC’s ability to identify members that
present greater financial and operational
risk and expands the remedies available
to FICC to protect itself when dealing
with such members. As a result, the
proposed rule change should improve
FICC’s capacity to safeguard securities
and funds in its custody or control or for
which it is responsible.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
III. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and in particular with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act 9
and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
FICC–2006–12) be, and hereby is,
approved.10
7 These proposed actions are similar to those that
FICC has proposed to undertake with respect to a
member undergoing a wind-down in a rule filing
pending with the Commission. SR–FICC–2006–05.
8 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
9 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
10 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211000
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54899; File No. SR–FICC–
2006–11]
December 8, 2006.
On June 15, 2006, the Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and on
June 30, 2006, amended the proposed
rule change. Notice of the proposed rule
change was published in the Federal
Register on October 24, 2006.2 No
comment letters were received. For the
reasons discussed below, the
Commission is approving the proposed
rule change.
I. Description
The proposed rule change will add
new rules to FICC’s Mortgage Backed
Securities Division (‘‘MBSD’’) Rulebook
to establish new reporting processes to
support the bilateral comparison of pool
details associated with specified pool
trade (‘‘SPT’’) activity. Specifically,
FICC will enable MBSD members to
submit the pool number and original
face value for all SPT activity through
its real time trade matching (‘‘RTTM’’)
service. This rule filing will not change
how MBSD currently manages risk for
these trades at the TBA level in that
MBSD’s rules will continue to stipulate
that SPT’s may be treated as TBA’s in
instances of member insolvency.
In conjunction with establishing this
new service, FICC will make two new
reports available to members: The
RTTM Purchase and Sale Report and the
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54609 (Oct.
16, 2006), 71 FR 62324.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
RTTM Open Commitment Report.3
These reports will reflect the
submission of pool number and original
face value 4 as matching criteria
submitted by members. Finally, FICC
will include new fees for the submission
of SPTs to the Schedule of Charges in
the MBSD Rulebook.
II. Discussion
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 5
requires that the rules of a clearing
agency be designed to promote the
prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
this requirement because it will provide
a more efficient process for MBSD
members to report and compare SPT
transaction information and thereby
should promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
such transactions.
III. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and in particular with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act 6
and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
FICC–2006–11) be, and hereby is,
approved.7
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–21278 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
3 These reports will not replace MBSD’s Purchase
and Sale Report or Open Commitment Report,
which will continue to reflect specified pool trades
as TBA trades.
4 In addition to pool number and original face
value, existing matching fields (such as TBA CUSIP
and price) will continue to be populated by
members.
5 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
6 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
7 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75283-75284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-21234]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54879; File No. SR-FICC-2006-12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Financial
Responsibility, Operational Capability, Insolvency, and Ceasing To Act
December 6, 2006.
On June 15, 2006 the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'')
filed a proposed rule change with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and on September 22,
2006, amended the proposed rule change. Notice of the proposal was
published in the Federal Register on October 4, 2006.\2\ No comment
letters were received. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission
is approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54570 (Oct. 4, 2006), 71
FR 60591.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Description
The rule change will amend FICC's Government Securities Division's
(``GSD'') and Mortgage Backed Securities Division's (``MBSD'') rules
relating to members' or applicants' financial responsibility,
operational capability, and insolvency and to FICC ceasing to act for
members.
A. Cease To Act and Insolvency Rules
FICC will amend GSD's rules governing when FICC will cease to act
for a member in a noninsolvency situation, GSD Rule 21, and in an
insolvency situation, GSD Rule 22. Such changes will conform GSD's
rules to the rules of FICC's clearing agency affiliate, the National
Securities Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'').
GSD Rule 21, which addressed noninsolvency situations, will be
renamed ``Restriction on Access to Services'' and will be similar to
NSCC Rule 46. While revised Rule 21 is triggered by essentially the
same criteria that are contained in the old GSD rule,\3\ the revised
rule expands the remedies that FICC could exercise beyond only
``ceasing to act'' or ``ceasing to accept data'' on behalf of the
member. Specifically, FICC, after notifying and providing an
opportunity to request a hearing to the member, will be able to
suspend, prohibit, or limit a member's access to one or more of FICC's
services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Such triggers include the member failing to perform its
obligations to FICC and FICC's determination that the member is in
or is approaching financial difficulty.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
GSD Rule 22, which addresses insolvency situations, remains
essentially in its old form except that its close-out provisions are
amended and are being moved to new Rule 22A.
New Rule 22A sets forth the procedures that FICC will follow when
it ceases to act for a member pursuant to either Rule 21 or Rule 22.
Under new Rule 22A, FICC will initiate the close-out process with
respect to a member for which it has ceased to act for any reason
permitted by its rules.\4\ In addition, the term Cut-Off Time for
noninsolvency situations will be added to Rule 22A.\5\ Although this
term is similar to the Time of Insolvency term used in old Rule 22, a
key difference between the terms is that members will be notified in
advance of the Cut-Off Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Currently, the close-out process applies only when FICC
deems a member insolvent.
\5\ As used in Rule 22A, the term Cut Off Time means the time
that is specified in advance by FICC in a notice to members to be
the time when FICC is deemed to have ceased to act for a member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The rule change also makes technical changes to conform existing
references to Rules 21 and 22 throughout GSD's rules to these
revisions.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Technical, conforming changes are being made to Rules 1, 3A,
4, 6A, 14 and new Rule 22A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. General Continuance Standards
FICC will add new language to Section 5 of GSD Rule 3 and a new
Section 18, Article III, Rule 1 to MBSD's rules, which will be similar
to NSCC Rule 15, that enables FICC when it deems necessary or advisable
to assure itself of a member's or an applicant's financial
responsibility and operational capability. To assure itself, FICC may,
but is not limited to: restrict or modify the member's use of any or
all of FICC's services; require additional reporting by the member of
its financial or operational condition; increase the member's clearing
fund collateral; alter the proportions of cash, eligible netting
[[Page 75284]]
securities, and letters of credit contributing to the member's required
clearing fund deposits; and prohibit the member from withdrawing excess
clearing fund deposits.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ These proposed actions are similar to those that FICC has
proposed to undertake with respect to a member undergoing a wind-
down in a rule filing pending with the Commission. SR-FICC-2006-05.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the proposed rule change gives FICC the general authority
to require additional clearing fund collateral when FICC is seeking
additional assurances from a member or applicant, the provisions in
GSD's Rule 4 that require the posting of additional collateral for
specific circumstances are being deleted.
C. Technical Amendments
FICC will make several technical amendments to GSD's and MBSD's
rules. The terms ``Board'' and ``Board of Directors'' will be redefined
to include a committee of FICC's Board of Directors that is acting
under delegated authority of the Board. Accordingly, references to
specific board committees throughout both divisions' rules will be
replaced simply by the term ``Board,'' which will include any such
board committees.
II. Discussion
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \8\ requires that the rules of a
clearing agency assure the safeguarding of securities and funds that
are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible. The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with this obligation because it should enhance FICC's
ability to identify members that present greater financial and
operational risk and expands the remedies available to FICC to protect
itself when dealing with such members. As a result, the proposed rule
change should improve FICC's capacity to safeguard securities and funds
in its custody or control or for which it is responsible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \9\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-FICC-2006-12) be, and hereby
is, approved.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-21234 Filed 12-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P