In the Matter of Certain Display Controllers and Products Containing Same and Certain Display Controllers With Upscaling Functionality and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination of the Administrative Law Judge Terminating the Enforcement Proceeding Based on a Settlement Agreement, 71554 [E6-21008]

Download as PDF 71554 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 2006 / Notices Oneida County INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Camroden Presbyterian Church, 8049 E. Floyd Rd., Floyd, 06001204 [Inv. No. 337–TA–491; Inv. No. 337–TA–481 (consolidated) Enforcement Proceeding] Onondaga County Borodino District School #8, 1845 Rose Hill Rd., Borodino, 06001206 Schenectady County Swart House and Tavern, 130 Johnson Rd., Glenville, 06001211 Suffolk County Wereholme, 5500 S. Bay Ave., Islip, 06001208 TENNESSEE In the Matter of Certain Display Controllers and Products Containing Same and Certain Display Controllers With Upscaling Functionality and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination of the Administrative Law Judge Terminating the Enforcement Proceeding Based on a Settlement Agreement U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Obion County Whitesell, Jesse Farm (Boundary Increase), KY 116 W of Purchase Pkwy., Fulton, 06001199 VIRGINIA Richmond Independent City Lee, Robert E., Monument, 1700 Monument Ave., jct. of Monument and Allen Aves., Richmond (Independent City), 06001213 WASHINGTON SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 46) terminating the above-captioned enforcement proceeding based on a settlement agreement. Clark County FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vancouver National Historic Reserve Historic District, Roughly bounded by an alley N of Officers’ Row, East Reserve St., Columbia River, and I–5, Vancouver, 06001216 Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3061. Copies of all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov/. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on the matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 20, 2004, the Commission terminated the above-captioned investigation and issued a limited exclusion order (‘‘the Order’’) which denies entry to certain display controllers manufactured, inter alia, by respondent MStar Semiconductor, Inc. (‘‘MStar’’) and covered by claims 2, 3, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, 17, 33–36, 38, and 39 of U.S. Patent 5,739,867. On April 24, 2006, complainant Genesis Microchip (Delaware) Inc. (‘‘Genesis’’) filed a complaint for enforcement of the King County YWCA Building—Seattle, 1118 Fifth Ave., Seattle, 06001215 Pierce County Balfour Dock Building, 705 Dock St., Tacoma, 06001214 To assist in the preservation of this historic property the comment period has been shortened to five (5) days: KENTUCKY Jefferson County Bannon, Martin Jeff (M.J.), House, 5112 Bannon Crossing, Louisville, 06001196 [FR Doc. E6–20926 Filed 12–8–06; 8:45 am] mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4312–51–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:15 Dec 08, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Commission’s Order under Commission Rule 210.75. Genesis asserted that respondent MStar had violated the Commission’s Order by importing its allegedly infringing Tsunami display controllers into the United States. On June 23, 2006, the Commission issued a ‘‘Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding.’’ See 71 Fed. Reg. 37096 (June 29, 2006). On October 25, 2006, complainant Genesis and respondent MStar filed a joint motion to terminate the enforcement proceeding on the basis of a settlement agreement pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21. See 19 CFR. 210.21. On November 6, 2006, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion. On November 8, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 46) granting the motion. No party petitioned for review of Order No. 46. The Commission has determined not to review Order No. 46. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)). By order of the Commission. Dated: December 6, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–21008 Filed 12–8–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–471 and 472 (Second Review)] Silicon Metal From Brazil and China Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from Brazil would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission also determined that revocation of the antidumping duty order on silicon metal from China would be likely to lead to continuation 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 71554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-21008]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-491; Inv. No. 337-TA-481 (consolidated) Enforcement 
Proceeding]


In the Matter of Certain Display Controllers and Products 
Containing Same and Certain Display Controllers With Upscaling 
Functionality and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission 
Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination of the Administrative 
Law Judge Terminating the Enforcement Proceeding Based on a Settlement 
Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 46) 
terminating the above-captioned enforcement proceeding based on a 
settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3061. Copies of all 
nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
edis.usitc.gov/. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on the matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on 202-205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 20, 2004, the Commission 
terminated the above-captioned investigation and issued a limited 
exclusion order (``the Order'') which denies entry to certain display 
controllers manufactured, inter alia, by respondent MStar 
Semiconductor, Inc. (``MStar'') and covered by claims 2, 3, 5, 6, 12, 
13, 16, 17, 33-36, 38, and 39 of U.S. Patent 5,739,867. On April 24, 
2006, complainant Genesis Microchip (Delaware) Inc. (``Genesis'') filed 
a complaint for enforcement of the Commission's Order under Commission 
Rule 210.75. Genesis asserted that respondent MStar had violated the 
Commission's Order by importing its allegedly infringing Tsunami 
display controllers into the United States.
    On June 23, 2006, the Commission issued a ``Notice of Institution 
of Formal Enforcement Proceeding.'' See 71 Fed. Reg. 37096 (June 29, 
2006). On October 25, 2006, complainant Genesis and respondent MStar 
filed a joint motion to terminate the enforcement proceeding on the 
basis of a settlement agreement pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21. See 
19 CFR. 210.21. On November 6, 2006, the Commission investigative 
attorney filed a response in support of the motion.
    On November 8, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 46) granting 
the motion. No party petitioned for review of Order No. 46.
    The Commission has determined not to review Order No. 46.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)).

    By order of the Commission.

    Dated: December 6, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E6-21008 Filed 12-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P