Silicon Metal From Brazil and China, 71554-71555 [E6-21007]
Download as PDF
71554
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 2006 / Notices
Oneida County
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Camroden Presbyterian Church, 8049 E.
Floyd Rd., Floyd, 06001204
[Inv. No. 337–TA–491; Inv. No. 337–TA–481
(consolidated) Enforcement Proceeding]
Onondaga County
Borodino District School #8, 1845 Rose Hill
Rd., Borodino, 06001206
Schenectady County
Swart House and Tavern, 130 Johnson Rd.,
Glenville, 06001211
Suffolk County
Wereholme, 5500 S. Bay Ave., Islip,
06001208
TENNESSEE
In the Matter of Certain Display
Controllers and Products Containing
Same and Certain Display Controllers
With Upscaling Functionality and
Products Containing Same; Notice of
Commission Decision Not To Review
an Initial Determination of the
Administrative Law Judge Terminating
the Enforcement Proceeding Based on
a Settlement Agreement
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Obion County
Whitesell, Jesse Farm (Boundary Increase),
KY 116 W of Purchase Pkwy., Fulton,
06001199
VIRGINIA
Richmond Independent City
Lee, Robert E., Monument, 1700 Monument
Ave., jct. of Monument and Allen Aves.,
Richmond (Independent City), 06001213
WASHINGTON
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 46) terminating the
above-captioned enforcement
proceeding based on a settlement
agreement.
Clark County
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vancouver National Historic Reserve Historic
District, Roughly bounded by an alley N of
Officers’ Row, East Reserve St., Columbia
River, and I–5, Vancouver, 06001216
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3061. Copies of all nonconfidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov/. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
the matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
20, 2004, the Commission terminated
the above-captioned investigation and
issued a limited exclusion order (‘‘the
Order’’) which denies entry to certain
display controllers manufactured, inter
alia, by respondent MStar
Semiconductor, Inc. (‘‘MStar’’) and
covered by claims 2, 3, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16,
17, 33–36, 38, and 39 of U.S. Patent
5,739,867. On April 24, 2006,
complainant Genesis Microchip
(Delaware) Inc. (‘‘Genesis’’) filed a
complaint for enforcement of the
King County
YWCA Building—Seattle, 1118 Fifth Ave.,
Seattle, 06001215
Pierce County
Balfour Dock Building, 705 Dock St.,
Tacoma, 06001214
To assist in the preservation of this
historic property the comment period
has been shortened to five (5) days:
KENTUCKY
Jefferson County
Bannon, Martin Jeff (M.J.), House, 5112
Bannon Crossing, Louisville, 06001196
[FR Doc. E6–20926 Filed 12–8–06; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Dec 08, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission’s Order under Commission
Rule 210.75. Genesis asserted that
respondent MStar had violated the
Commission’s Order by importing its
allegedly infringing Tsunami display
controllers into the United States.
On June 23, 2006, the Commission
issued a ‘‘Notice of Institution of Formal
Enforcement Proceeding.’’ See 71 Fed.
Reg. 37096 (June 29, 2006). On October
25, 2006, complainant Genesis and
respondent MStar filed a joint motion to
terminate the enforcement proceeding
on the basis of a settlement agreement
pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21.
See 19 CFR. 210.21. On November 6,
2006, the Commission investigative
attorney filed a response in support of
the motion.
On November 8, 2006, the ALJ issued
an ID (Order No. 46) granting the
motion. No party petitioned for review
of Order No. 46.
The Commission has determined not
to review Order No. 46.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42(h)).
By order of the Commission.
Dated: December 6, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–21008 Filed 12–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–471 and 472
(Second Review)]
Silicon Metal From Brazil and China
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the
Act), that revocation of the antidumping
duty order on silicon metal from Brazil
would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time. The Commission also determined
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on silicon metal from China
would be likely to lead to continuation
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 2006 / Notices
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on January 3, 2006 (71 FR 138)
and determined on April 10, 2006 that
it would conduct full reviews (71 FR
23947, April 25, 2006). Notice of the
scheduling of the Commission’s reviews
and of a public hearing to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register on July 17, 2006 (71 FR
40543). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on September 19,
2006, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on December 6,
2006. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3892
(December 2006), entitled Silicon Metal
from Brazil and China: Investigation
Nos. 731–TA–471 and 472 (Second
Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 6, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–21007 Filed 12–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Drug Enforcement Administration
[OMB Number 1117–0042]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested
60-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review; National
Clandestine Laboratory Seizure Report.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
ACTION:
The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA), has
submitted the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted
until February 9, 2007. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
15:15 Dec 08, 2006
of their law enforcement duties and
responsibilities.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: There are ninety-two (92) total
respondents for this information
collection. Seven thousand three
hundred twenty-eight (7328) responded
using paper at 1 hour a response and
one thousand one hundred sixty-three
(1163) responded electronically at 1
hour a response, for eight thousand four
hundred ninety-one (8491) annual
responses.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: It is estimated that there are
8491 annual burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: December 6, 2006.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, Department of
Justice.
[FR Doc. E6–21006 Filed 12–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Overview of This Information
Collection
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
VerDate Aug<31>2005
If you have comments, especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Clark R. Fleming, Field
Division Counsel, El Paso Intelligence
Center, 11339 SSG Sims Blvd., El Paso,
TX 79908.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
71555
Jkt 211001
Orlando Wholesale, L.L.C. Denial of
Application
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure
Report.
(3) Agency form number, if any and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Form number: EPIC Form 143.
Component: El Paso Intelligence
Center, Drug Enforcement
Administration, U.S. Department of
Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: State, Local or Tribal
Government.
Other: None.
Abstract: Records in this system are
used to provide clandestine laboratory
seizure information to the El Paso
Intelligence Center, Drug Enforcement
Administration, and other Law
enforcement agencies, in the discharge
On November 18, 2005, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Orlando Wholesale,
L.L.C., of Orlando, Florida
(Respondent). The Show Cause Order
proposed to deny Respondent’s pending
application for a DEA Certificate of
Registration as a distributor of List I
chemicals on the ground that its
registration would be inconsistent with
the public interest. See 21 U.S.C. 823(h)
and 824(a).
The Show Cause Order specifically
alleged that Respondent was proposing
to distribute List I chemical products
containing pseudoephedrine, a
precursor chemical which is used to
manufacture methamphetamine, to
convenience stores in the Orlando area
and that methamphetamine
manufacturers often obtain the chemical
from convenience stores. See Show
Cause Order at 1–2. The Show Cause
Order alleged that during DEA’s pre-
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71554-71555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-21007]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-471 and 472 (Second Review)]
Silicon Metal From Brazil and China
Determinations
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission)
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on silicon metal from Brazil would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission also
determined that revocation of the antidumping duty order on silicon
metal from China would be likely to lead to continuation
[[Page 71555]]
or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted these reviews on January 3, 2006 (71 FR
138) and determined on April 10, 2006 that it would conduct full
reviews (71 FR 23947, April 25, 2006). Notice of the scheduling of the
Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on July 17, 2006 (71
FR 40543). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on September 19,
2006, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to
appear in person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to
the Secretary of Commerce on December 6, 2006. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3892 (December 2006),
entitled Silicon Metal from Brazil and China: Investigation Nos. 731-
TA-471 and 472 (Second Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 6, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-21007 Filed 12-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P