Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements, 71238-71240 [E6-20936]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
71238
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
Electronically Controlled Pneumatic
(ECP) brakes. The petition implicitly
requests, as well, exemption from
certain provisions of Chapter 204, Title
49, United States Code. The petitioners
believe that implementation of ECP
brakes requires a substantial capital
investment, and relief from certain
provisions of 49 CFR Part 232 will
permit them to initiate pilot train
operations. In addition, BNSF and NS
believe that this relief will permit them
to implement this pilot program on an
expedited basis, allow FRA and the
industry to identify definable savings
with ECP brake equipped train
operations, and evaluate changes to the
CFR to accommodate these operations
on a permanent basis.
BNSF and NS specifically request
relief from the following subsections of
49 CFR Part 232: 232.207 Class IA Brake
Test, 232.15(a)(7) Movement of
defective equipment, 232.103 (d) and
232.103(g) General requirement for train
braking system, 232.109 Dynamic brake
requirements, 232.111(b)(3) and (4)
Train handling information, 232.205
Class I brake test, 232.205(c)(3), (c)(4)
and (c)(5), 232.209(a)(1) Class II brake
inspection, 232.211 Class III brake
inspection, 232.217(c)(3) Train brake
tests conducted using yard air, 232.305
Single car airbrake tests, 232.505(e) Prerevenue service acceptance testing plan,
and elimination of all Subpart E—End
of train devices. In addition, the
petitioners request relief from the
requirements to perform daily
inspections for locomotives (49 CFR
229.21) in service on ECP brake
equipped trains, performing only a trip
inspection. Petitioners also represent
that this requested relief should provide
a framework for an expedited
rulemaking by FRA which will
encourage further investment in ECP
brake technology throughout the
railroad industry.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA anticipates scheduling
a public hearing in connection with
these proceedings in the near future, at
a time and place yet to be determined,
as the facts appear to warrant a hearing.
Interested parties are advised that the
petition appears to present issues that
would require findings under 49 U.S.C.
§ 20306 (Exemption for technological
improvements). The petitioners should
be present at the hearing and prepared
to support any required findings with
evidence that any requirements of
Chapter 204, title 49, United States
Code, sought to be waived ‘‘preclude the
development or implementation of more
efficient railroad transportation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
equipment or other transportation
innovations under existing law.’’
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2006–
26435) and must be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Clerk, DOT
Central Docket Management Facility,
Room Pl–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Communications received within
45 days of the date of this notice will
be considered by FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at DOT
Central Docket Management Facility,
Room Pl–401 (Plaza Level), 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington. All documents
in the public docket are also available
for inspection and copying on the
Internet at the docket facility’s Web site
at https://dms.dot.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19377–78). The
statement may also be found at https://
dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 4,
2006.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E6–20831 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[DOT Docket No. NHTSA–06–26554]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice solicits public
comment on continuation of the
requirements for the collection of
information on safety standards. Before
a Federal agency can collect certain
information from the public, it must
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
receive approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). Under
procedures established by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before seeking OMB approval, Federal
agencies must solicit public comment
on proposed collections of information,
including extensions and reinstatement
of previously approved collections.
This document describes a collection
of information associated with 49 CFR
Part 574, Tire Identification and
Recordkeeping.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 6, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments must refer to the
docket notice number cited at the
beginning of this notice and be
submitted to Docket Management, Room
PL–401, 400 Seventh St., SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. It is requested,
but not required, that 2 copies of the
comment be provided. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
am to 5 pm except for Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Complete copies of each request for
collection of information may be
obtained from Mr. George Soodoo,
NVS–122, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Mr.
Soodoo’s telephone number is: (202)
366–5274.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before a proposed collection of
information is submitted to OMB for
approval, Federal agencies msut first
publish a document in the Federal
Register providing a 60-day comment
period and otherwise consult with
members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulation (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comment on the following proposed
collection of information:
Title: 49 CFR Part 574, Tire
Identification and Recordkeeping.
OMB Control Number: 2127–0050.
Form Number: None.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: Three years from the
approval date.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: 49 U.S.C. 30117(b) requires
each tire manufacturer to collect and
maintain records of the names and
addresses of the first purchasers of new
tires. To carry out this mandate, 49 CFR
Part 574 requires tire dealers and
distributors to record the names and
addresses of retail purchasers of new
tires and the identification number(s) of
the tires sold. A specific form is
provided to tire dealers and distributors
by tire manufacturers for recording this
information. The completed forms are
returned to the tire manufacturers where
they are to remain for three years after
the date received by the manufacturer.
Additionally, motor vehicle
manufacturers are required to record the
names and addresses of the first
purchasers of new motor vehicles,
together with the identification numbers
of the tires on the new vehicles.
The Motor Vehicle Safety and Cost
Savings Authorization Act of 1982 (P.L.
97–311) prohibited NHTSA from
enforcing the mandatory tire registration
provisions in 49 CFR Part 574 against
dealers and distributors whose business
is not owned or controlled by a tire
manufacturer (hereinafter referred to as
‘‘independent dealers’’). For
independent dealers, Congress specified
that a voluntary registration system
would take effect as soon as this agency
specified the format and content of the
voluntary tire registration forms and
standardized the information for all
independent dealers.
The previously specified mandatory
tire registration requirements remain
applicable to all dealers and distributors
other than independent dealers and that
the requirements for tire and vehicle
manufacturers are unchanged.
Description of the Need for the
Information and the Proposed Use of
the Information: The information is
used by a tire manufacturer, when it
determines that some of its tires either
fail to comply with an applicable safety
standard or contain a safety related
defect. With the information, the tire
manufacturer can notify the first
purchaser of the tire and provide the
purchaser with any necessary
information or instructions.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information): It is
estimated that this collection of
information affects 10 million
respondents annually. This group
consists of approximately 8 tire
manufacturers, 12,000 new tire dealers
and distributors, and 10 million
consumers who choose to register their
tire purchasers with the tire
manufacturers. A response is required
by motor vehicle manufacturers upon
each sale of a new vehicle and by nonindependent tire dealers with each sale
of a new tire. A consumer may elect to
respond when purchasing a new tire
from an independent dealer.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of
Information: The estimated burden is as
follows:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
New tire dealers and distributors ...................................................................................................................................................
Consumers ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Total tire registrations (manually) ..................................................................................................................................................
Total registration hours (manual) ...................................................................................................................................................
Recordkeeping hours (manual) .......................................................................................................................................................
Total annual tire registration and recordkeeping hours ...............................................................................................................
In addition, before this collection of
information is approved, OMB has
asked NHTSA to respond to the
following questions:
1. Solicit public comment on how
NHTSA can cost-effectively reduce the
collection of information burden and
enhance the practical utility of this
information collection.
2. Estimate the percentage of
individual purchasers of replacement
tires for which contact information is
maintained that is adequate to contact
them, for two recent years of tire
purchases. For comparison, similarly
estimate the percentage of new vehicles
for which there is adequate contact
information maintained for tire recalls,
for two recent years of vehicle
purchases.
3. Provide each NHTSA evaluation of
the success of procedures for keeping
records on first purchasers of tires,
under 49 U.S.C. 30117(b)(3), including
‘‘the extent to which distributors and
dealers have encouraged first purchasers
of tires to register the tires’’ and a
‘‘detailed statement of the decision and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
an explanation of the reasons for the
decision.’’ Also, estimate the extent to
which such mandated recordkeeping is
or is not cost-effective.
4. Respond to the following: Does 49
CFR 574.7 specify a form to be used?
Why is a form set in a final rule? If that
form is actually required or offered,
provide it to OMB. It should include a
currently valid control number and the
consequences of failure to provide a
valid number. Include any such form in
the notices—which should specify
collecting information for tire recalls—
and solicit comment on: (a) Whether
that is an efficient and effective way to
collect the information needed for
recalls; (b) whether electronic or
telephonic collection of information
would be more efficient; and (c)
generally, what form(s) of information
collection would most efficiently and
effectively encourage tire sellers and
purchasers to provide recall
information.
5. Determine whether or not, under 49
U.S.C. 3017(b) or otherwise, the DOT
Secretary has the authority by rule or
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71239
12,000.
10,000,000.
54,000,000.
225,000 hours.
25,000 hours.
250,000 hours.
otherwise to allow electronic (e.g., via
the Internet) or telephonic collection—
in lieu of paper-based collection—of the
information pertinent to that provision.
In the opinion of DOT/NHTSA can such
information collection procedures
change without a change in this rule?
Please explain why or why not. If new
rulemaking is needed, shouldn’t that
occur to better achieve the goals of both
the authorizing statute and the PRA?
6. Clarify whether, under the statute
and regulation, this collection of
information is voluntary or mandatory
for the tire dealer and similarly, for the
tire purchaser.
7. Refer to the letter of July 18, 2003
from the NHTSA Chief Counsel to Ann
Wilson of the Rubber Manufacturers
Association. Kindly explain why
telephone or electronic registration may
be a supplement to the required mail-in
form, but not in lieu of it Since burden
is properly estimated by the actual time
taken, not by whether any approach is
voluntary or not, wouldn’t registration
that only supplements a paper form lead
to additional burdens? At the same time
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
71240
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
couldn’t an alternative—not a
supplementary—approach reduce total
burden and be more effective?
8. Verify whether or not the statute
and rule require the contact/registration
information be kept for at least five
years, not three years.
Comments on these issues raised by
OMB are solicited. NHTSA will take
these comments into consideration in its
submission to OMB asking for an
extension of OMB Clearance No. 2127–
0050.
Authority: 44 U.S.C.3506(c); delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: December 5, 2006.
H. Keith Brewer,
Director, Crash Avoidance Standards.
[FR Doc. E6–20936 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34938]
Stillwater Central Railroad—Trackage
Rights Exemption—BNSF Railway
Company
Pursuant to a written trackage rights
agreement, Stillwater Central Railroad
(SLWC) has agreed to grant overhead
trackage rights to BNSF Railway
Company (BNSF) over SLWC’s rail line
extending between milepost 668.73 at
Long, OK, and milepost 438.9 at
Sapulpa, OK, a distance of
approximately 229.83 miles.
The transaction is scheduled to be
consummated on or before January 1,
2007.1 The purpose of the trackage
rights is to allow for the movement of
BNSF’s trains overhead between (a)
Long, OK, and Oklahoma City, OK, and
(b) Long, OK, and Sapulpa, OK.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employees affected by the trackage
rights will be protected by the
conditions imposed in Norfolk and
Western Ry. Co.—Trackage Rights—BN,
354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as modified in
Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.—Lease and
Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
1 The trackage rights agreement provides for an
initial term of 15 years. The parties must seek
appropriate Board authority for the trackage rights
to expire at the end of that time period.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
This notice is filed under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(7). If the notice contains false
or misleading information, the
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C.
10502(d) may be filed at any time. The
filing of a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 34938, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 1925
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on Sidney L.
Strickland Jr., Sidney Strickland and
Associates, PLLC, 3050 K Street, NW.,
Suite 101, Washington, DC 20007.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at ‘‘https://
www.stb.dot.gov.’’
Decided: December 1, 2006.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–20903 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB–33 (Sub–No. 238X)]
Union Pacific Railroad Company—
Discontinuance of Service
Exemption—in Yuba County, CA
On November 20, 2006, Union Pacific
Railroad Company (UP) filed with the
Board a petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502
for exemption from the provisions of 49
U.S.C. 10903 to discontinue service over
an approximately 4.77-mile line of
railroad known as the Pearson Industrial
Lead, extending from milepost 133.29,
near Alicia, to milepost 129.91, near
Pearson, and milepost 0.00 to milepost
1.39, near Pearson, in Yuba County, CA.
The line traverses U.S. Postal Service
Zip Code 95901, and serves stations at
Pearson and Reed.
The line does not contain federally
granted rights-of-way. Any
documentation in the possession of the
railroad will be made available
promptly to those requesting it.
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The interest of railroad employees
will be protected by the conditions set
forth in Oregon Short Line R. Co.—
Abandonment—Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91
(1979).
By issuing this notice, the Board is
instituting an exemption proceeding
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502(b). A final
decision will be issued by March 9,
2007.
Any offer of financial assistance
(OFA) to subsidize continued rail
service under 49 CFR 1152.27(b)(2) will
be due no later than 10 days after
service of a decision granting the
petition for exemption. Each OFA must
be accompanied by a $1,300 filing fee.
See 49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25).1
All filings in response to this notice
must refer to STB Docket No. AB–33
(Sub-No. 238X) and must be sent to: (1)
Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001; and (2) Mack H. Shumate, Jr.,
Senior General Attorney, 101 North
Wacker Drive, Room 1920, Chicago, IL
60606. Replies to the petition are due on
or before December 28, 2006.
Persons seeking further information
concerning discontinuance procedures
may contact the Board’s Office of Public
Services at (202) 565–1592 or refer to
the full abandonment or discontinuance
regulations at 49 CFR part 1152.
Questions concerning environmental
issues may be directed to the Board’s
Section of Environmental Analysis at
(202) 565–1539. [Assistance for the
hearing impaired is available through
the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.]
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: December 1, 2006.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–20789 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
1 Because this is a discontinuance of service
proceeding and not an abandonment, trail use/rail
banking and public use conditions are not
appropriate. Similarly, no environmental or historic
documentation is required under 49 CFR
1105.6(c)(2) and 1105.8(e).
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71238-71240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20936]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[DOT Docket No. NHTSA-06-26554]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice solicits public comment on continuation of the
requirements for the collection of information on safety standards.
Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatement of previously approved collections.
This document describes a collection of information associated with
49 CFR Part 574, Tire Identification and Recordkeeping.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 6, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments must refer to the docket notice number cited at the
beginning of this notice and be submitted to Docket Management, Room
PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. It is requested,
but not required, that 2 copies of the comment be provided. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10 am to 5 pm except for Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Complete copies of each request for
collection of information may be obtained from Mr. George Soodoo, NVS-
122, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Mr. Soodoo's telephone number is:
(202) 366-5274.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before a proposed collection of information is submitted to OMB for
approval, Federal agencies msut first publish a document in the Federal
Register providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with
members of the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has promulgated regulations
describing what must be included in such a document. Under OMB's
regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment
on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological
[[Page 71239]]
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comment on the following proposed collection of information:
Title: 49 CFR Part 574, Tire Identification and Recordkeeping.
OMB Control Number: 2127-0050.
Form Number: None.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from the
approval date.
Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Summary of the Collection of Information: 49 U.S.C. 30117(b)
requires each tire manufacturer to collect and maintain records of the
names and addresses of the first purchasers of new tires. To carry out
this mandate, 49 CFR Part 574 requires tire dealers and distributors to
record the names and addresses of retail purchasers of new tires and
the identification number(s) of the tires sold. A specific form is
provided to tire dealers and distributors by tire manufacturers for
recording this information. The completed forms are returned to the
tire manufacturers where they are to remain for three years after the
date received by the manufacturer. Additionally, motor vehicle
manufacturers are required to record the names and addresses of the
first purchasers of new motor vehicles, together with the
identification numbers of the tires on the new vehicles.
The Motor Vehicle Safety and Cost Savings Authorization Act of 1982
(P.L. 97-311) prohibited NHTSA from enforcing the mandatory tire
registration provisions in 49 CFR Part 574 against dealers and
distributors whose business is not owned or controlled by a tire
manufacturer (hereinafter referred to as ``independent dealers''). For
independent dealers, Congress specified that a voluntary registration
system would take effect as soon as this agency specified the format
and content of the voluntary tire registration forms and standardized
the information for all independent dealers.
The previously specified mandatory tire registration requirements
remain applicable to all dealers and distributors other than
independent dealers and that the requirements for tire and vehicle
manufacturers are unchanged.
Description of the Need for the Information and the Proposed Use of
the Information: The information is used by a tire manufacturer, when
it determines that some of its tires either fail to comply with an
applicable safety standard or contain a safety related defect. With the
information, the tire manufacturer can notify the first purchaser of
the tire and provide the purchaser with any necessary information or
instructions.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information):
It is estimated that this collection of information affects 10 million
respondents annually. This group consists of approximately 8 tire
manufacturers, 12,000 new tire dealers and distributors, and 10 million
consumers who choose to register their tire purchasers with the tire
manufacturers. A response is required by motor vehicle manufacturers
upon each sale of a new vehicle and by non-independent tire dealers
with each sale of a new tire. A consumer may elect to respond when
purchasing a new tire from an independent dealer.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information: The estimated burden is
as follows:
New tire dealers and distributors...... 12,000.
Consumers.............................. 10,000,000.
Total tire registrations (manually).... 54,000,000.
Total registration hours (manual)...... 225,000 hours.
Recordkeeping hours (manual)........... 25,000 hours.
Total annual tire registration and 250,000 hours.
recordkeeping hours.
In addition, before this collection of information is approved, OMB
has asked NHTSA to respond to the following questions:
1. Solicit public comment on how NHTSA can cost-effectively reduce
the collection of information burden and enhance the practical utility
of this information collection.
2. Estimate the percentage of individual purchasers of replacement
tires for which contact information is maintained that is adequate to
contact them, for two recent years of tire purchases. For comparison,
similarly estimate the percentage of new vehicles for which there is
adequate contact information maintained for tire recalls, for two
recent years of vehicle purchases.
3. Provide each NHTSA evaluation of the success of procedures for
keeping records on first purchasers of tires, under 49 U.S.C.
30117(b)(3), including ``the extent to which distributors and dealers
have encouraged first purchasers of tires to register the tires'' and a
``detailed statement of the decision and an explanation of the reasons
for the decision.'' Also, estimate the extent to which such mandated
recordkeeping is or is not cost-effective.
4. Respond to the following: Does 49 CFR 574.7 specify a form to be
used? Why is a form set in a final rule? If that form is actually
required or offered, provide it to OMB. It should include a currently
valid control number and the consequences of failure to provide a valid
number. Include any such form in the notices--which should specify
collecting information for tire recalls-- and solicit comment on: (a)
Whether that is an efficient and effective way to collect the
information needed for recalls; (b) whether electronic or telephonic
collection of information would be more efficient; and (c) generally,
what form(s) of information collection would most efficiently and
effectively encourage tire sellers and purchasers to provide recall
information.
5. Determine whether or not, under 49 U.S.C. 3017(b) or otherwise,
the DOT Secretary has the authority by rule or otherwise to allow
electronic (e.g., via the Internet) or telephonic collection--in lieu
of paper-based collection--of the information pertinent to that
provision. In the opinion of DOT/NHTSA can such information collection
procedures change without a change in this rule? Please explain why or
why not. If new rulemaking is needed, shouldn't that occur to better
achieve the goals of both the authorizing statute and the PRA?
6. Clarify whether, under the statute and regulation, this
collection of information is voluntary or mandatory for the tire dealer
and similarly, for the tire purchaser.
7. Refer to the letter of July 18, 2003 from the NHTSA Chief
Counsel to Ann Wilson of the Rubber Manufacturers Association. Kindly
explain why telephone or electronic registration may be a supplement to
the required mail-in form, but not in lieu of it Since burden is
properly estimated by the actual time taken, not by whether any
approach is voluntary or not, wouldn't registration that only
supplements a paper form lead to additional burdens? At the same time
[[Page 71240]]
couldn't an alternative--not a supplementary--approach reduce total
burden and be more effective?
8. Verify whether or not the statute and rule require the contact/
registration information be kept for at least five years, not three
years.
Comments on these issues raised by OMB are solicited. NHTSA will
take these comments into consideration in its submission to OMB asking
for an extension of OMB Clearance No. 2127-0050.
Authority: 44 U.S.C.3506(c); delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: December 5, 2006.
H. Keith Brewer,
Director, Crash Avoidance Standards.
[FR Doc. E6-20936 Filed 12-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P