Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 71194-71196 [E6-20832]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
71194
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
[FR Doc. E6–20841 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Dated: November 30, 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–20833 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,831]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Water Pik, Inc. Personal Healthcare
Products Including Former On-Site
Leased Workers of AppleOne Currently
Employed With Employment Solutions,
Loveland, CO; Amended Certification
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on March 24, 2006,
applicable to workers of Water Pik, Inc.,
Personal Healthcare Products, including
on-site leased workers of AppleOne,
Loveland, Colorado. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
April 12, 2006 (71 FR 18772).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of water treatment filtration and shower
heads.
New information shows that in
August 2006, the leased workers of
AppleOne, employed on-site at the
Loveland, Colorado location of Water
Pik, Inc., Personal Healthcare Products,
became employees of Employment
Solutions due to a change in contracting
firms.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending this certification to properly
reflect this matter.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers
employed at Water Pik, Inc., Personal
Healthcare Products, Loveland,
Colorado who were adversely affected
by a shift in production to China.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–58,831 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Water Pik, Inc., Personal
Healthcare Products, including former on-site
leased workers of AppleOne, currently
employed with Employment Solutions,
Loveland, Colorado, who became totally or
partially separated from employment on or
after February 10, 2005, through March 24,
2008, are eligible to apply for adjustment
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of November 20 through
November 24, 2006.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issued a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–60,325; West Tennessee
Machining, Camden, TN: October
27, 2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–60,245; R.L. Stowe Mills,
Chronicle Division, Sewing
Department, Belmont, NC: October
12, 2005.
TA–W–60,320; Agilent Technologies,
Global Infrastructure Organization,
Santa Clara, CA: October 24, 2005.
TA–W–60,378; Chemtrade Performance
Chemical US, LLC, A Wholly
Owned Subsidiary of Chemtrade
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
Logistics, Carlisle, SC: November 3,
2005.
TA–W–60,173; LeRocato Manufacturing,
Plainfield, CT: September 29, 2005.
TA–W–60,286; Himmelberger Harrison
Mfg Co., Frame Components
Division, Morehouse, MO: October
24, 2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–60,291; Photometrics, A Division
of Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ:
October 20, 2005.
TA–W–60,330; Paige Electric,
McConnellsburg, PA: October 24,
2005.
TA–W–60,336; Ward Products LLC, New
Jersey Division, North Brunswick,
NJ: October 30, 2005.
TA–W–60,345; Pride Manufacturing Co.,
A Subsidiary of Cintsa Corporation,
Cutting Line, Portal, GA: October
25, 2005.
TA–W–60,350; Clariant Corporation,
Pigments and Additives Division,
Coventry, RI: October 27, 2005.
TA–W–60,416; Moore’s Machine Co., Of
Fayetteville, Inc., Fayetteville, NC:
November 9, 2005.
TA–W–60,423; 3M Company, Electronic
Solutions Division, Columbia, MO:
November 13, 2005.
TA–W–60,441; ITW Tomco, Bryan, OH:
November 13, 2005.
TA–W–60,279; Aquaria, Inc., dba
Marineland, Consumer Division,
Moorpark, CA: October 20, 2005.
TA–W–60,289; Vesuvius USA, Beaver
Falls, PA: October 24, 2005.
TA–W–60,452; Coleman Cable, Siler
City, NC: November 15, 2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
TA–W–60,185; Southern Steel and Wire
Co., A Subsidiary of SSW Holding
Co., Fort Smith, AR: October 2,
2005.
TA–W–60,377; Springfield LLC,
Customer Service and
Administrative Center, Rockhill, SC:
November 3, 2005.
TA–W–60,379; Springfield LLC,
Limestone Plant, Gaffney, SC:
November 3, 2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and Section
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71195
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
TA–W–60,325; West Tennessee
Machining, Camden, TN: October
27, 2005.
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
None.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–60,182; Oaklawn Packaging, Inc.,
Fort Smith, AR.
TA–W–60,365; KHS USA, Inc.,
Waukesha Division, Waukesha, WI.
TA–W–60,422; Ahlstrom Corporation,
LLC, Mt. Holly Springs, PA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–60,236; Tracewell Electronics,
Cuba, NY.
TA–W–60,295; Hickory Springs
Manufacturing Co., Bedding
Division, Micaville, NC.
TA–W–60,300; Wak Industries,
Gastonia, NC.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
71196
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
TA–W–60,366; Jones Apparel Group, NY
Better Apparel Production, New
York, NY.
TA–W–60,159; Brown International
Corporation, Covina, CA.
The investigation revealed that the
predominate cause of worker
separations is unrelated to criteria
(a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a
foreign country under a free trade
agreement or a beneficiary country
under a preferential trade agreement, or
there has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports).
None.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–60,265; Physical Rehab Works,
Working Onsite at Maytag Corp.,
Herrin, IL.
TA–W–60,265A; Executive Security
Specialists, Working Onsite at
Maytag Corp., Herrin, IL.
TA–W–60,272; Elder Manufacturing Co.,
Dexter Facility, Dexter, MO.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned
determinations were issued during the period
of November 20 through November 24, 2006.
Copies of these determinations are available
for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during
normal business hours or will be mailed to
persons who write to the above address.
Dated: November 30, 2006.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–20832 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–60,429]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Xyron Inc., Garden Grove, CA; Notice
of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on November
14, 2006, in response to a petition filed
on behalf of workers of Xyron Inc.,
Garden Grove, California. The workers
produced adhesive coated liners.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
This petitioning group of workers is
covered by an earlier petition (TA–W–
60,355) filed on November 2, 2006, that
is the subject of an ongoing
investigation for which a determination
has not yet been issued. Accordingly,
further investigation in this case would
serve no purpose and this investigation
has been terminated.
Dated: November 29, 2006.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–20837 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Approval for Missouri for
Avoidance of 2006 Credit Reduction
Under the Federal Unemployment Tax
Act
Sections 3302(c)(2) and 3302(d)(3) of
the Federal Unemployment Tax Act
(FUTA) provide that employers in a
state that has an outstanding balance of
advances under Title XII of the Social
Security Act on January 1 of two or
more consecutive years are subject to a
reduction in credits otherwise available
against the FUTA tax for a calendar
year, if a balance of advances remains
on November 10 of that year. Because
the account of Missouri in the
Unemployment Trust Fund had a
balance of advances on January 1 of
2004, 2005, and 2006, and still had a
balance of advances on November 10,
2006, Missouri employers were
potentially liable for a reduction in their
FUTA offset credit for 2006.
Section 3302(g) of FUTA provides
that a state may avoid credit reduction
for a year by meeting certain criteria.
Missouri applied for avoidance of the
2006 credit reduction under this
section. Pursuant to delegation of
authority to me under Secretary’s Order
4–75, I have determined that Missouri
meets all of the criteria of section
3302(g) and thus qualifies for credit
reduction avoidance. Therefore,
Missouri employers will have no
reduction in FUTA offset credit for
calendar year 2006.
Dated: November 24, 2006.
Emily Stover DeRocco,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and
Training.
[FR Doc. E6–20910 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
COORDINATION OFFICE
Nanoscale Science, Engineering and
Technology Subcommittee, National
Science and Technology Council,
Committee on Technology; Research
Needs and Priorities Related to the
Environmental, Health, and Safety
Aspects of Engineered Nanoscale
Materials: Public Meeting
ACTION:
Notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: The National Nanotechnology
Coordination Office (NNCO), on behalf
of the Nanoscale Science, Engineering,
and Technology (NSET) Subcommittee
of the Committee on Technology,
National Science and Technology
Council (NSTC), will hold a public
meeting on January 4, 2007, to receive
input on research needs related to the
environmental, health, and safety
aspects of engineered nanoscale
materials (hereafter referred to as
nanomaterials). Specifically, the NSET
Subcommittee is seeking comment on
the research needs and prioritization
criteria for the research identified in the
NSET Subcommittee document
Environmental, Health, and Safety
Research Needs for Engineered
Nanoscale Materials, which was
released on September 15, 2006.
Date and Address: The public
meeting will be held on Thursday,
January 4, 2007, beginning at 8:30 a.m.
at the FDIC Training Center, 3501 North
Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22226. A
schedule will be published prior to the
meeting. Directions to the facility are
available on the registration web page
(see below).
Registration: Persons interested in
attending the meeting may register at
https://www.nano.gov/public_ehs.html
prior to the meeting. Due to space
limitations, early registration is
suggested. On-site registration will be
available on a first-come basis, space
permitting.
Persons interested in presenting
comments at the meeting also should
register at https://www.nano.gov/
public_ehs.html and should do so no
later than Wednesday, December 20,
2006.
Written or electronic comments may
be submitted on the same web page
until January 31, 2007.
Information on this meeting also will
be posted on https://www.nano.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: For
information regarding this Notice,
please contact Cate Alexander Brennan,
National Nanotechnology Coordination
Office. Telephone: (703) 292–4399.
E-mail: calexand@nnco.nano.gov.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71194-71196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20832]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of November
20 through November 24, 2006.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued
a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
[[Page 71195]]
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-60,325; West Tennessee Machining, Camden, TN: October 27, 2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-60,245; R.L. Stowe Mills, Chronicle Division, Sewing Department,
Belmont, NC: October 12, 2005.
TA-W-60,320; Agilent Technologies, Global Infrastructure Organization,
Santa Clara, CA: October 24, 2005.
TA-W-60,378; Chemtrade Performance Chemical US, LLC, A Wholly Owned
Subsidiary of Chemtrade Logistics, Carlisle, SC: November 3, 2005.
TA-W-60,173; LeRocato Manufacturing, Plainfield, CT: September 29,
2005.
TA-W-60,286; Himmelberger Harrison Mfg Co., Frame Components Division,
Morehouse, MO: October 24, 2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-60,291; Photometrics, A Division of Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ:
October 20, 2005.
TA-W-60,330; Paige Electric, McConnellsburg, PA: October 24, 2005.
TA-W-60,336; Ward Products LLC, New Jersey Division, North Brunswick,
NJ: October 30, 2005.
TA-W-60,345; Pride Manufacturing Co., A Subsidiary of Cintsa
Corporation, Cutting Line, Portal, GA: October 25, 2005.
TA-W-60,350; Clariant Corporation, Pigments and Additives Division,
Coventry, RI: October 27, 2005.
TA-W-60,416; Moore's Machine Co., Of Fayetteville, Inc., Fayetteville,
NC: November 9, 2005.
TA-W-60,423; 3M Company, Electronic Solutions Division, Columbia, MO:
November 13, 2005.
TA-W-60,441; ITW Tomco, Bryan, OH: November 13, 2005.
TA-W-60,279; Aquaria, Inc., dba Marineland, Consumer Division,
Moorpark, CA: October 20, 2005.
TA-W-60,289; Vesuvius USA, Beaver Falls, PA: October 24, 2005.
TA-W-60,452; Coleman Cable, Siler City, NC: November 15, 2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA-W-60,185; Southern Steel and Wire Co., A Subsidiary of SSW Holding
Co., Fort Smith, AR: October 2, 2005.
TA-W-60,377; Springfield LLC, Customer Service and Administrative
Center, Rockhill, SC: November 3, 2005.
TA-W-60,379; Springfield LLC, Limestone Plant, Gaffney, SC: November 3,
2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.
TA-W-60,325; West Tennessee Machining, Camden, TN: October 27, 2005.
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
None.
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
TA-W-60,182; Oaklawn Packaging, Inc., Fort Smith, AR.
TA-W-60,365; KHS USA, Inc., Waukesha Division, Waukesha, WI.
TA-W-60,422; Ahlstrom Corporation, LLC, Mt. Holly Springs, PA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-60,236; Tracewell Electronics, Cuba, NY.
TA-W-60,295; Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co., Bedding Division,
Micaville, NC.
TA-W-60,300; Wak Industries, Gastonia, NC.
[[Page 71196]]
TA-W-60,366; Jones Apparel Group, NY Better Apparel Production, New
York, NY.
TA-W-60,159; Brown International Corporation, Covina, CA.
The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker
separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a foreign country
under a free trade agreement or a beneficiary country under a
preferential trade agreement, or there has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports).
None.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-60,265; Physical Rehab Works, Working Onsite at Maytag Corp.,
Herrin, IL.
TA-W-60,265A; Executive Security Specialists, Working Onsite at Maytag
Corp., Herrin, IL.
TA-W-60,272; Elder Manufacturing Co., Dexter Facility, Dexter, MO.
The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified
eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of November 20 through November 24, 2006.
Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room
C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed
to persons who write to the above address.
Dated: November 30, 2006.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-20832 Filed 12-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
