Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed-Circumstances Review and Revocation of Order in Part: Stainless Steel Bar from Japan, 70959-70960 [E6-20780]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
Dated: December 1, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–20773 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–588–833]
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed–Circumstances Review and
Revocation of Order in Part: Stainless
Steel Bar from Japan
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 8, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of
preliminary results of changed–
circumstances review with the intent to
revoke, in part, the antidumping duty
order on stainless steel bar from Japan,
as described below. See Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Changed–
Circumstances Review and Notice of
Intent to Revoke Order in Part: Stainless
Steel Bar from Japan, 71 FR 65465
(November 8, 2006) (Preliminary
Results). In our Preliminary Results, we
invited interested parties to comment on
the preliminary determination to
exclude 21–2N modified valve/stem
stainless steel round bar from Japan
(product in question), as described
below, from the scope of the order. The
Department received no comments and
is, therefore, revoking the order in part.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 7, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0665 or (202) 482–
1690.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Background
The Department published the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar from Japan on February 21,
1995. See Notices of Antidumping Duty
Orders: Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil,
India, and Japan, 60 FR 9661 (February
21, 1995). On August 28, 2006, TRW
Fuji Valve, Inc. (TRW), a U.S. importer
of the subject merchandise, requested a
changed–circumstances review to
exclude from the antidumping duty
order on stainless steel bar from Japan
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
imports meeting the following
description: certain valve/stem stainless
steel round bar of 21–2N modified
grade, having a diameter of 5.7
millimeters (with a tolerance of 0.025
millimeters), in length no greater than
15 meters, having a chemical
composition consisting of a minimum of
0.50 percent and a maximum of 0.60
percent of carbon, a minimum of 7.50
percent and a maximum of 9.50 percent
of manganese, a maximum of 0.25
percent of silicon, a maximum of 0.04
percent of phosphorus, a maximum of
0.03 percent of sulfur, a minimum of
20.0 percent and a maximum of 22.00
percent of chromium, a minimum of
2.00 percent and a maximum of 3.00
percent of nickel, a minimum of 0.20
percent and a maximum of 0.40 percent
of nitrogen, a minimum of 0.85 percent
of the combined content of carbon and
nitrogen, and a balance minimum of
iron, having a maximum core hardness
of 385 HB and a maximum surface
hardness of 425 HB, with a minimum
hardness of 270 HB for annealed
material. See TRW’s letter to the
Secretary, dated August 28, 2006. TRW
requested that the Department revoke
the order in part retroactively to
February 1, 2006, the beginning of the
anniversary month of the order. On
September 18, 2006, the petitioners and
domestic interested parties1 provided a
letter attesting to their expressed lack of
interest in having this merchandise
continue to be subject to the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar from Japan.
In response to the request made by the
interested party, TRW, within the
meaning of section 771(9) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and
the expressed lack of interest from the
petitioners and domestic interested
parties, on October 16, 2006, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of a changed–circumstances
review of the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel bar from Japan. See
Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Changed–Circumstances Review:
Stainless Steel Bar from Japan, 71 FR
60691 (October 16, 2006) (Initiation
Notice). In the Initiation Notice, the
Department indicated that interested
parties could submit comments for
consideration in the Department’s
preliminary results no later than 15 days
after publication of the initiation of this
review. The Department did not receive
comments from interested parties.
1 The petitioners and domestic interested parties
include Carpenter Technology Corp., Crucible
Specialty Metals Division of Crucible Materials
Corp., Electralloy Corp., North American Stainless,
Universal Stainless and Alloy Products, Inc., and
Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70959
Absent any comments, the
Department concluded preliminarily
that producers accounting for
substantially all of the production of the
domestic like product to which this
order pertains lacked interest in the
relief provided by this order with
respect to the product in question. See
Preliminary Results. The Department
invited interested parties to comment on
its preliminary determination to revoke
the order, in part. The Department did
not receive comments from any
interested parties.
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order covers
stainless steel bar (SSB). The term SSB
with respect to the order means articles
of stainless steel in straight lengths that
have been either hot–rolled, forged,
turned, cold–drawn, cold–rolled or
otherwise cold–finished, or ground,
having a uniform solid cross section
along their whole length in the shape of
circles, segments of circles, ovals,
rectangles (including squares), triangles,
hexagons, octagons or other convex
polygons. SSB includes cold–finished
SSBs that are turned or ground in
straight lengths, whether produced from
hot–rolled bar or from straightened and
cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars that
have indentations, ribs, grooves, or
other deformations produced during the
rolling process. Except as specified
above, the term does not include
stainless steel semi–finished products,
cut–length flat–rolled products (i.e.,
cut–length rolled products which if less
than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width
measuring at least 10 times the
thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in
thickness having a width which exceeds
150 mm and measures at least twice the
thickness), wire (i.e., cold–formed
products in coils, of any uniform solid
cross section along their whole length,
which do not conform to the definition
of flat–rolled products), and angles,
shapes and sections. The SSB subject to
this order is currently classifiable under
subheadings 7222.10.0005,
7222.10.0050, 7222.20.0005,
7222.20.0045, 7222.20.0075, and
7222.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
Final Result of Review and Revocation
of Antidumping Duty Order, In Part
Pursuant to sections 751(d)(1) and
782(h)(2) of the Act, the Department
may revoke an antidumping duty order
based on a review under section 751(b)
of the Act (i.e., a changed–
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
70960
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
circumstances review). Section 751(b)(1)
of the Act requires a changed–
circumstances review to be conducted
upon receipt of a request which shows
changed circumstances sufficient to
warrant a review.
In the instant review, based on the
information provided by TRW and the
lack of comments from the petitioners
and domestic interested parties, the
Department found preliminarily that the
continued relief provided by the order
with respect to the product in question
from Japan is no longer of interest to the
domestic industry. See Preliminary
Results, 71 FR at 65466. We did not
receive any comments on our
Preliminary Results. Therefore, the
Department is revoking the order on
stainless steel bar from Japan with
regard to the product that meets the
following specifications: certain valve/
stem stainless steel round bar of 21–2N
modified grade, having a diameter of 5.7
millimeters (with a tolerance of 0.025
millimeters), in length no greater than
15 meters, having a chemical
composition consisting of a minimum of
0.50 percent and a maximum of 0.60
percent of carbon, a minimum of 7.50
percent and a maximum of 9.50 percent
of manganese, a maximum of 0.25
percent of silicon, a maximum of 0.04
percent of phosphorus, a maximum of
0.03 percent of sulfur, a minimum of
20.0 percent and a maximum of 22.00
percent of chromium, a minimum of
2.00 percent and a maximum of 3.00
percent of nickel, a minimum of 0.20
percent and a maximum of 0.40 percent
of nitrogen, a minimum of 0.85 percent
of the combined content of carbon and
nitrogen, and a balance minimum of
iron, having a maximum core hardness
of 385 HB and a maximum surface
hardness of 425 HB, with a minimum
hardness of 270 HB for annealed
material.
We will instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate
without regard to antidumping duties
and to refund any estimated
antidumping duties collected on entries
of all shipments of the product in
question that are not covered by the
final results of an administrative review
or automatic liquidation. The most
recent period for which the Department
has completed an administrative review
or ordered automatic liquidation under
19 CFR 351.212(c) is February 1, 2005,
through January 31, 2006. Any prior
entries are subject to either the final
results of review or automatic
liquidation. Therefore, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate, without regard to
antidumping duties, shipments of
stainless steel bar from Japan meeting
the specifications of the product in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
question entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
February 1, 2006. We will also instruct
CBP to release any cash deposits or
bonds and pay interest on such refunds
in accordance with section 778 of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.222(g)(4).
This changed–circumstances review,
partial revocation of antidumping duty
order, and notice are completed and
published in accordance with sections
751(b) and (d), 782(h), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act and sections 351.216(e) and
351.222(g)(3)(vii) of the Department’s
regulations.
Dated: November 30, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–20780 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies at the levels
indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of
Review’’ section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 7, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Darla Brown at (202) 482–2849
(Argentina, Indonesia), Preeti Tolani at
(202) 482–0395 (India), Elfi Blum at
(202) 482–0197 (South Africa), Myrna
Lobo at (202)482–2371 (Thailand), or
Dana Mermelstein at (202) 482–1391,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
On August 1, 2006, the Department
initiated the first sunset reviews of the
countervailing duty orders on hot–
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
rolled steel from Argentina, India,
International Trade Administration
Indonesia, South Africa, and Thailand,
[C–357–815, C–533–821, C–560–813, C–791– pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.
See First Sunset Reviews. The
810, C–549–818]
Department received notices of intent to
Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products participate from United States Steel
from Argentina, India, Indonesia, South Corporation (U.S. Steel), Mittal Steel
Africa, and Thailand: Final Results of
USA Inc. (Mittal USA), Nucor
Expedited Five–Year (Sunset) Reviews Corporation (Nucor), Gallatin Steel Co.,
of the Countervailing Duty Orders
IPSCO Steel Inc. (IPSCO), Steel
Dynamics, Inc. (collectively, domestic
AGENCY: Import Administration,
interested parties), and the United Steel,
International Trade Administration,
Paper and Forestry, Rubber,
Department of Commerce.
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied
SUMMARY: On August 1, 2006, the
Industrial and Service Workers
Department of Commerce (the
International Union, AFL–CIO-CLC
Department) published in the Federal
(USW), within the deadline specified in
Register the notice of initiation of the
19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). Domestic
first five–year sunset reviews of the
interested parties and USW claimed
countervailing duty orders on certain
interested party status under sections
hot–rolled carbon steel flat products
(hot–rolled steel) from Argentina, India, 771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act, as U.S.
producers and a certified union engaged
Indonesia, South Africa, and Thailand,
in the manufacture, production, or
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
wholesale of hot–rolled steel in the
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See
Initiation of Five–Year (Sunset) Reviews, United States.
On August 31, 2006, the Department
71 FR 43443 (August 1, 2006) (Initiation
of First Sunset Reviews). On the basis of received a substantive response for each
order from domestic interested parties
notices of intent to participate and
adequate substantive responses filed on within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did
behalf of domestic interested parties,
not receive any responses from any
and inadequate responses from
respondent interested party to this
respondent interested parties (in these
proceeding. In accordance with 19 CFR
cases, no responses from the
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(1), the Department
governments of Argentina, India,
notified the International Trade
Indonesia, South Africa, and Thailand,
Commission (ITC) that respondent
or any of the respondent companies
interested parties to the CVD orders on
covered by the orders), the Department
has conducted expedited sunset reviews hot–rolled steel from Argentina, India,
Indonesia, South Africa, and Thailand,
of these orders pursuant to section
provided inadequate responses to the
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
Initiation of First Sunset Reviews. The
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B). As a result of these
Department, therefore, has conducted
sunset reviews, the Department finds
expedited sunset reviews of the
that revocation of the countervailing
countervailing duty orders, pursuant to
duty orders is likely to lead to
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70959-70960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20780]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-833]
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed-Circumstances Review
and Revocation of Order in Part: Stainless Steel Bar from Japan
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 8, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of preliminary results of changed-
circumstances review with the intent to revoke, in part, the
antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from Japan, as described
below. See Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed-
Circumstances Review and Notice of Intent to Revoke Order in Part:
Stainless Steel Bar from Japan, 71 FR 65465 (November 8, 2006)
(Preliminary Results). In our Preliminary Results, we invited
interested parties to comment on the preliminary determination to
exclude 21-2N modified valve/stem stainless steel round bar from Japan
(product in question), as described below, from the scope of the order.
The Department received no comments and is, therefore, revoking the
order in part.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 7, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0665 or (202)
482-1690.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar from Japan on February 21, 1995. See Notices of Antidumping
Duty Orders: Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, India, and Japan, 60 FR
9661 (February 21, 1995). On August 28, 2006, TRW Fuji Valve, Inc.
(TRW), a U.S. importer of the subject merchandise, requested a changed-
circumstances review to exclude from the antidumping duty order on
stainless steel bar from Japan imports meeting the following
description: certain valve/stem stainless steel round bar of 21-2N
modified grade, having a diameter of 5.7 millimeters (with a tolerance
of 0.025 millimeters), in length no greater than 15 meters, having a
chemical composition consisting of a minimum of 0.50 percent and a
maximum of 0.60 percent of carbon, a minimum of 7.50 percent and a
maximum of 9.50 percent of manganese, a maximum of 0.25 percent of
silicon, a maximum of 0.04 percent of phosphorus, a maximum of 0.03
percent of sulfur, a minimum of 20.0 percent and a maximum of 22.00
percent of chromium, a minimum of 2.00 percent and a maximum of 3.00
percent of nickel, a minimum of 0.20 percent and a maximum of 0.40
percent of nitrogen, a minimum of 0.85 percent of the combined content
of carbon and nitrogen, and a balance minimum of iron, having a maximum
core hardness of 385 HB and a maximum surface hardness of 425 HB, with
a minimum hardness of 270 HB for annealed material. See TRW's letter to
the Secretary, dated August 28, 2006. TRW requested that the Department
revoke the order in part retroactively to February 1, 2006, the
beginning of the anniversary month of the order. On September 18, 2006,
the petitioners and domestic interested parties\1\ provided a letter
attesting to their expressed lack of interest in having this
merchandise continue to be subject to the antidumping duty order on
stainless steel bar from Japan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The petitioners and domestic interested parties include
Carpenter Technology Corp., Crucible Specialty Metals Division of
Crucible Materials Corp., Electralloy Corp., North American
Stainless, Universal Stainless and Alloy Products, Inc., and
Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to the request made by the interested party, TRW,
within the meaning of section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and the expressed lack of interest from the
petitioners and domestic interested parties, on October 16, 2006, the
Department published a notice of initiation of a changed-circumstances
review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from Japan.
See Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed-Circumstances Review:
Stainless Steel Bar from Japan, 71 FR 60691 (October 16, 2006)
(Initiation Notice). In the Initiation Notice, the Department indicated
that interested parties could submit comments for consideration in the
Department's preliminary results no later than 15 days after
publication of the initiation of this review. The Department did not
receive comments from interested parties.
Absent any comments, the Department concluded preliminarily that
producers accounting for substantially all of the production of the
domestic like product to which this order pertains lacked interest in
the relief provided by this order with respect to the product in
question. See Preliminary Results. The Department invited interested
parties to comment on its preliminary determination to revoke the
order, in part. The Department did not receive comments from any
interested parties.
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order covers stainless steel bar (SSB). The term
SSB with respect to the order means articles of stainless steel in
straight lengths that have been either hot-rolled, forged, turned,
cold-drawn, cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, or ground, having a
uniform solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of
circles, segments of circles, ovals, rectangles (including squares),
triangles, hexagons, octagons or other convex polygons. SSB includes
cold-finished SSBs that are turned or ground in straight lengths,
whether produced from hot-rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod
or wire, and reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or
other deformations produced during the rolling process. Except as
specified above, the term does not include stainless steel semi-
finished products, cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cut-length
rolled products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width
measuring at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in
thickness having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least
twice the thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed products in coils, of any
uniform solid cross section along their whole length, which do not
conform to the definition of flat-rolled products), and angles, shapes
and sections. The SSB subject to this order is currently classifiable
under subheadings 7222.10.0005, 7222.10.0050, 7222.20.0005,
7222.20.0045, 7222.20.0075, and 7222.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, our written description of the scope of this order is
dispositive.
Final Result of Review and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, In
Part
Pursuant to sections 751(d)(1) and 782(h)(2) of the Act, the
Department may revoke an antidumping duty order based on a review under
section 751(b) of the Act (i.e., a changed-
[[Page 70960]]
circumstances review). Section 751(b)(1) of the Act requires a changed-
circumstances review to be conducted upon receipt of a request which
shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review.
In the instant review, based on the information provided by TRW and
the lack of comments from the petitioners and domestic interested
parties, the Department found preliminarily that the continued relief
provided by the order with respect to the product in question from
Japan is no longer of interest to the domestic industry. See
Preliminary Results, 71 FR at 65466. We did not receive any comments on
our Preliminary Results. Therefore, the Department is revoking the
order on stainless steel bar from Japan with regard to the product that
meets the following specifications: certain valve/stem stainless steel
round bar of 21-2N modified grade, having a diameter of 5.7 millimeters
(with a tolerance of 0.025 millimeters), in length no greater than 15
meters, having a chemical composition consisting of a minimum of 0.50
percent and a maximum of 0.60 percent of carbon, a minimum of 7.50
percent and a maximum of 9.50 percent of manganese, a maximum of 0.25
percent of silicon, a maximum of 0.04 percent of phosphorus, a maximum
of 0.03 percent of sulfur, a minimum of 20.0 percent and a maximum of
22.00 percent of chromium, a minimum of 2.00 percent and a maximum of
3.00 percent of nickel, a minimum of 0.20 percent and a maximum of 0.40
percent of nitrogen, a minimum of 0.85 percent of the combined content
of carbon and nitrogen, and a balance minimum of iron, having a maximum
core hardness of 385 HB and a maximum surface hardness of 425 HB, with
a minimum hardness of 270 HB for annealed material.
We will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
liquidate without regard to antidumping duties and to refund any
estimated antidumping duties collected on entries of all shipments of
the product in question that are not covered by the final results of an
administrative review or automatic liquidation. The most recent period
for which the Department has completed an administrative review or
ordered automatic liquidation under 19 CFR 351.212(c) is February 1,
2005, through January 31, 2006. Any prior entries are subject to either
the final results of review or automatic liquidation. Therefore, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate, without regard to antidumping duties,
shipments of stainless steel bar from Japan meeting the specifications
of the product in question entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after February 1, 2006. We will also instruct CBP to
release any cash deposits or bonds and pay interest on such refunds in
accordance with section 778 of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(g)(4).
This changed-circumstances review, partial revocation of
antidumping duty order, and notice are completed and published in
accordance with sections 751(b) and (d), 782(h), and 777(i)(1) of the
Act and sections 351.216(e) and 351.222(g)(3)(vii) of the Department's
regulations.
Dated: November 30, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-20780 Filed 12-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S