Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Moldova, the People's Republic of China, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus; Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 70509-70511 [E6-20549]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Notices Antidumping Duty Sunset Review of Solid Agricultural Grade Ammonium Nitrate from Ukraine,’’ (September 20, 2006). On October 10, 2006, the domestic interested parties submitted comments supporting the Department’s adequacy determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department has conducted an expedited sunset review of this antidumping duty order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order are solid, fertilizer grade ammonium nitrate (‘‘ammonium nitrate’’ or ‘‘subject merchandise’’) products, whether prilled, granular or in other solid form, with or without additives or coating, and with a bulk density equal to or greater than 53 pounds per cubic foot. Specifically excluded from this scope is solid ammonium nitrate with a bulk density less than 53 pounds per cubic foot (commonly referred to as industrial or explosive grade ammonium nitrate). The merchandise subject to this investigation is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) at subheading 3102.30.00.00. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these reviews are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Solid Agricultural Grade Ammonium Nitrate from Ukraine; Final Results’’ (‘‘Decision Memo’’) from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration (November 29, 2006), which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Decision Memo include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the order were to be revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in these reviews and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file in room B–099 of the main Department building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be accessed directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memo are identical in content. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:14 Dec 04, 2006 Jkt 211001 Final Results of Review The Department determines that revocation of the antidumping duty order on ammonium nitrate from Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the rates listed below: 70509 Department’’) initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on steel concrete reinforcing bars from Moldova, the People’s Republic of China, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). The Department has conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews for Producers/Exporters Margin (percent) these orders pursuant to 19 CFR J.S.C. ‘‘Concern’’ Stirol 156.29 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of All Others rate1 ............. 156.29 these sunset reviews, the Department 1 As of February 1, 2006, Ukraine graduated finds that revocation of the antidumping to market economy status (see Final Results duty orders would be likely to lead to of Inquiry Into Ukraine’s Status as a Non-Mar- continuation or recurrence of dumping. ket Economy Country, February 24, 2006 (71 FR 9520)). As a result, the Ukraine-wide rate EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2006. is now the All Others rate. See Certain Cut-to- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Length Carbon Steel Plate from Romania: No- Audrey Twyman, Damian Felton, or tice of Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Re- Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD view, 71 FR 12651 (March 15, 2005) and ac- Operations, Office 1, Import companying Issues and Decision Memo- Administration, International Trade randum at Comment 2. Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Notification regarding Administrative Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; Protective Order telephone: (202) 482–3534, (202) 482– This notice also serves as the only 0133, and (202) 482–4136, respectively. reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: of their responsibility concerning the Background return or destruction of proprietary On August 1, 2006, the Department information disclosed under APO in published the notice of initiation of the accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. sunset reviews of the antidumping duty Timely notification of the return or orders on steel concrete reinforcing bars destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is (‘‘rebar’’) from Moldova, the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), South hereby requested. Failure to comply Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus with the regulations and terms of an pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. APO is a violation which is subject to See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) sanction. Reviews, 71 FR 43443 (August 1, 2006) We are issuing and publishing the (‘‘Notice of Initiation’’). results and notice in accordance with On August 11, 2006, the Department sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of received a notice of intent to participate the Act. from the following domestic parties: the Dated: November 29, 2006. Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its Joseph A. Spetrini, individual producer members, Nucor Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Corporation, CMC Steel Group, and Administration. Gerdau Ameristeel, as well as domestic [FR Doc. E6–20551 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am] producers TAMCO Steel and Schnitzer Billing Code: 3510–DS–S Steel Industries, Inc. (‘‘Schnitzer’’) (collectively ‘‘domestic interested parties’’), within the deadline specified DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The companies claimed interested party International Trade Administration status under section 771(9)(C) of the A–822–804, A–570–860, A–560–811, A–841– Act, as manufacturers of a domestic–like 804, A–455–803, A–580–844 product in the United States. On August 31, 2006, the Department Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from received a complete substantive Moldova, the People’s Republic of response to the notice of initiation from China, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, the domestic interested parties within and Belarus; Final Results of the the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR Expedited Sunset Reviews of the 351.218(d)(3)(i). In this response, Antidumping Duty Orders Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. (‘‘Cascade’’) was substituted for AGENCY: Import Administration, Schnitzer as a domestic interested party. International Trade Administration, Cascade is a wholly owned subsidiary of Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 1, 2006, the Schnitzer. Also, Steel Dynamics, Inc. Department of Commerce (‘‘the (‘‘SDI’’) was added as a domestic PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1 70510 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Notices producer. Because SDI did not file a notice of intent to participate in this review, it is not eligible to file a substantive response. See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(iii)(A). Therefore, the domestic interested parties are now the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual producer members, Nucor Corporation, CMC Steel Group, and Gerdau Ameristeel, as well as TAMCO Steel, and Cascade. We received no responses from respondent interested parties with respect to any of the orders covered by these sunset reviews except Moldova. On August 31, 2006, the Department received a substantive response from respondent interested party, JSCC Moldova Steel Works, which was within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). On September 20, 2006, the Department determined that JSCC Moldova Steel Works did not account for more than 50 percent of exports by volume of the subject merchandise, because it reported that it had no exports during the 2001–2005 sunset review period. Therefore, the Department found that JSCC Moldova Steel Works did not submit an adequate substantive response to the Department’s Notice of Initiation. See Memorandum to Susan H. Kuhbach entitled, ‘‘Adequacy Determination in Antidumping Duty Sunset Review of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Moldova,’’ (September 20, 2006). As a result of an inadequate response from Moldova and no substantive response from the PRC, South Korea, Indonesia, Belarus, and Poland, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of these orders. Scope of the Orders The product covered by these orders is all steel concrete reinforcing bars sold in straight lengths, currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under item numbers 7214.20.00, 7228.30.8050, 7222.11.0050, 7222.30.0000, 7228.60.6000, 7228.20.1000, or any other tariff item number. Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., non– deformed or smooth bars) and rebar that has been further processed through bending or coating. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these reviews are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Moldova, the People’s Republic of China, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus; Final Results’’ from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration (November 29, 2006), which is hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Decision Memo’’). The issues discussed in the Decision Memo include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the orders were to be revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in these reviews and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file in room B–099 of the main Department building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be accessed directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memo are identical in content. Final Results of Reviews We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on rebar from Moldova, the PRC, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the following weighted–average percentage margins: Weighted Average Margin (percent) Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES Moldova. Moldova–Wide Rate .......................................................................................................................................................... PRC. Laiwu Steel Group ............................................................................................................................................................. PRC–Wide Rate ................................................................................................................................................................ South Korea. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd./Korea Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. ................................................................................................ Hanbo Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. ............................................................................................................................................. All Others ........................................................................................................................................................................... Indonesia. PT Gunung Gahapi Sakti .................................................................................................................................................. PT Bhirma Steel ................................................................................................................................................................ Krakatau Wajatama ........................................................................................................................................................... PT Jakarta Steel Perdana Industri .................................................................................................................................... PT Hanil Jaya Metal Works ............................................................................................................................................... PT Pulogadung Steel ......................................................................................................................................................... PT Jakarta Cakra Tunggal ................................................................................................................................................ PT The Master Steel Manufacturing Co. ........................................................................................................................... All Others ........................................................................................................................................................................... Poland. Stalexport ........................................................................................................................................................................... All Others ........................................................................................................................................................................... Belarus. Belarus–Wide Rate ............................................................................................................................................................ This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:14 Dec 04, 2006 Jkt 211001 concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 232.86 133.00 133.00 22.89 102.28 22.89 71.01 71.01 71.01 71.01 71.01 71.01 71.01 71.01 60.46 52.07 47.13 114.53 return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Notices of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: November 29, 2006. Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–20549 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology Jointly Owned Invention Available for Licensing National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The invention listed below is jointly owned by the U.S. Government, as represented by the Department of Commerce, and Cree Inc. The Department of Commerce’s interest in the invention is available for licensing, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 to achieve expeditious commercialization of results of federally funded research and development. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical and licensing information on this invention may be obtained by writing to: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Office of Technology Partnerships, Attn: Mary Clague, Building 222, Room A155, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Information is also available via telephone: 301–975– 4188, fax 301–869–2751, or e-mail: mary.clague@nist.gov. Any request for information should include the NIST Docket number or Patent number and title for the invention as indicated below. The invention available for licensing is: SUMMARY: ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES [DOCKET NUMBER 06–008US] Title: Power Switching Semiconductor Devices Including Rectifying Junction-Shunts. Abstract: A semiconductor device includes a drift layer having a first conductivity type and a body region adjacent the drift layer. The body region has a second conductivity type opposite the first conductivity type and forms a p-n junction with the drift layer. The device further includes a contactor region in the body region and having the first conductivity type, and a shunt channel region extending through the body region from the contactor region to VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:14 Dec 04, 2006 Jkt 211001 the drift layer. The shunt channel region has the first conductivity type. The device further includes a first terminal in electrical contact with the body region and the contactor region, and a second terminal in electrical contact with the drift layer. The shunt channel region has a length, thickness and doping concentration selected that: (1) The shunt channel region is fully depleted when zero voltage is applied across the first and second terminals, (2) the shunt channel becomes conductive at voltages less than the built-in potential of the drift layer to body region p-n junction, and/or (3) the shunt channel is not conductive for voltages that reverse biase the p–n junction between the drift region and the body region. Dated: November 29, 2006. James E. Hill, Acting Deputy Director. [FR Doc. E6–20582 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–13–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Fisheries Certificate of Origin National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before February 5, 2007. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to William G. Jacobson, 562– 980–4035 or Bill.Jacobson@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract The information required by the International Dolphin Conservation PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 70511 Program Act, amendment to the Marine Mammal Protection Act, is needed: To document the dolphin-safe status of tuna import shipments; to verify that import shipments of fish were not harvested by large scale, high seas driftnets; and to verify that imported tuna was not harvested by an embargoed nation or one that is otherwise prohibited from exporting tuna to the United States. Forms are submitted by importers and processors. II. Method of Collection Forms may be submitted by mail or electronically. III. Data OMB Number: 0648–0335. Form Number: NOAA Form 370. Type of Review: Regular submission. Affected Public: Business or other forprofits organizations. Estimated Number of Respondents: 350. Estimated Time Per Response: 20 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,663. Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $3,397. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: November 30, 2006. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. E6–20513 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 5, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70509-70511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

A-822-804, A-570-860, A-560-811, A-841-804, A-455-803, A-580-844


Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Moldova, the People's 
Republic of China, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus; Final 
Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 1, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders 
on steel concrete reinforcing bars from Moldova, the People's Republic 
of China, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus pursuant to 
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). The 
Department has conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews for these 
orders pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of these 
sunset reviews, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping 
duty orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
dumping.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Twyman, Damian Felton, or 
Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-3534, (202) 482-0133, and (202) 482-4136, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 1, 2006, the Department published the notice of 
initiation of the sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on 
steel concrete reinforcing bars (``rebar'') from Moldova, the People's 
Republic of China (``PRC''), South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and 
Belarus pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of Five-
year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 71 FR 43443 (August 1, 2006) (``Notice of 
Initiation'').
    On August 11, 2006, the Department received a notice of intent to 
participate from the following domestic parties: the Rebar Trade Action 
Coalition and its individual producer members, Nucor Corporation, CMC 
Steel Group, and Gerdau Ameristeel, as well as domestic producers TAMCO 
Steel and Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (``Schnitzer'') 
(collectively ``domestic interested parties''), within the deadline 
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The companies claimed interested 
party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of a 
domestic-like product in the United States.
    On August 31, 2006, the Department received a complete substantive 
response to the notice of initiation from the domestic interested 
parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(3)(i). In this response, Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. 
(``Cascade'') was substituted for Schnitzer as a domestic interested 
party. Cascade is a wholly owned subsidiary of Schnitzer. Also, Steel 
Dynamics, Inc. (``SDI'') was added as a domestic

[[Page 70510]]

producer. Because SDI did not file a notice of intent to participate in 
this review, it is not eligible to file a substantive response. See 19 
CFR 351.218(d)(iii)(A). Therefore, the domestic interested parties are 
now the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual producer 
members, Nucor Corporation, CMC Steel Group, and Gerdau Ameristeel, as 
well as TAMCO Steel, and Cascade.
    We received no responses from respondent interested parties with 
respect to any of the orders covered by these sunset reviews except 
Moldova. On August 31, 2006, the Department received a substantive 
response from respondent interested party, JSCC Moldova Steel Works, 
which was within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). On 
September 20, 2006, the Department determined that JSCC Moldova Steel 
Works did not account for more than 50 percent of exports by volume of 
the subject merchandise, because it reported that it had no exports 
during the 2001-2005 sunset review period. Therefore, the Department 
found that JSCC Moldova Steel Works did not submit an adequate 
substantive response to the Department's Notice of Initiation. See 
Memorandum to Susan H. Kuhbach entitled, ``Adequacy Determination in 
Antidumping Duty Sunset Review of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from 
Moldova,'' (September 20, 2006).
    As a result of an inadequate response from Moldova and no 
substantive response from the PRC, South Korea, Indonesia, Belarus, and 
Poland, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department 
conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of these orders.

Scope of the Orders

    The product covered by these orders is all steel concrete 
reinforcing bars sold in straight lengths, currently classifiable in 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') under 
item numbers 7214.20.00, 7228.30.8050, 7222.11.0050, 7222.30.0000, 
7228.60.6000, 7228.20.1000, or any other tariff item number. 
Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., non-deformed or smooth 
bars) and rebar that has been further processed through bending or 
coating. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes. The written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in these reviews are addressed in the ``Issues 
and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the 
Antidumping Duty Orders on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from 
Moldova, the People's Republic of China, South Korea, Indonesia, 
Poland, and Belarus; Final Results'' from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, 
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration (November 29, 2006), 
which is hereby adopted by this notice (``Decision Memo''). The issues 
discussed in the Decision Memo include the likelihood of continuation 
or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to 
prevail if the orders were to be revoked. Parties can find a complete 
discussion of all issues raised in these reviews and the corresponding 
recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file in room B-
099 of the main Department building.
    In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be 
accessed directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper 
copy and electronic version of the Decision Memo are identical in 
content.

Final Results of Reviews

    We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on 
rebar from Moldova, the PRC, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and 
Belarus would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of 
dumping at the following weighted-average percentage margins:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Weighted Average Margin
       Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers                (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moldova.......................................
Moldova-Wide Rate.............................                    232.86
PRC...........................................
Laiwu Steel Group.............................                    133.00
PRC-Wide Rate.................................                    133.00
South Korea...................................
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd./Korea Iron &                          22.89
 Steel Co., Ltd...............................
Hanbo Iron & Steel Co., Ltd...................                    102.28
All Others....................................                     22.89
Indonesia.....................................
PT Gunung Gahapi Sakti........................                     71.01
PT Bhirma Steel...............................                     71.01
Krakatau Wajatama.............................                     71.01
PT Jakarta Steel Perdana Industri.............                     71.01
PT Hanil Jaya Metal Works.....................                     71.01
PT Pulogadung Steel...........................                     71.01
PT Jakarta Cakra Tunggal......................                     71.01
PT The Master Steel Manufacturing Co..........                     71.01
All Others....................................                     60.46
Poland........................................
Stalexport....................................                     52.07
All Others....................................                     47.13
Belarus.......................................
Belarus-Wide Rate.............................                    114.53
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms

[[Page 70511]]

of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance 
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: November 29, 2006.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-20549 Filed 12-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S