Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Moldova, the People's Republic of China, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus; Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 70509-70511 [E6-20549]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Notices
Antidumping Duty Sunset Review of
Solid Agricultural Grade Ammonium
Nitrate from Ukraine,’’ (September 20,
2006). On October 10, 2006, the
domestic interested parties submitted
comments supporting the Department’s
adequacy determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
has conducted an expedited sunset
review of this antidumping duty order.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order are solid, fertilizer grade
ammonium nitrate (‘‘ammonium
nitrate’’ or ‘‘subject merchandise’’)
products, whether prilled, granular or in
other solid form, with or without
additives or coating, and with a bulk
density equal to or greater than 53
pounds per cubic foot. Specifically
excluded from this scope is solid
ammonium nitrate with a bulk density
less than 53 pounds per cubic foot
(commonly referred to as industrial or
explosive grade ammonium nitrate). The
merchandise subject to this
investigation is classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) at subheading
3102.30.00.00. HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes. The written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Solid Agricultural Grade Ammonium
Nitrate from Ukraine; Final Results’’
(‘‘Decision Memo’’) from Stephen J.
Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration (November 29, 2006),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
The issues discussed in the Decision
Memo include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margins likely
to prevail if the order were to be
revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in these
reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in room
B–099 of the main Department building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The paper copy and electronic version
of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Dec 04, 2006
Jkt 211001
Final Results of Review
The Department determines that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on ammonium nitrate from
Ukraine would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the rates listed below:
70509
Department’’) initiated sunset reviews of
the antidumping duty orders on steel
concrete reinforcing bars from Moldova,
the People’s Republic of China, South
Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).
The Department has conducted
expedited (120-day) sunset reviews for
Producers/Exporters
Margin (percent)
these orders pursuant to 19 CFR
J.S.C. ‘‘Concern’’ Stirol
156.29 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of
All Others rate1 .............
156.29 these sunset reviews, the Department
1 As of February 1, 2006, Ukraine graduated
finds that revocation of the antidumping
to market economy status (see Final Results duty orders would be likely to lead to
of Inquiry Into Ukraine’s Status as a Non-Mar- continuation or recurrence of dumping.
ket Economy Country, February 24, 2006 (71
FR 9520)). As a result, the Ukraine-wide rate EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2006.
is now the All Others rate. See Certain Cut-to- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Length Carbon Steel Plate from Romania: No- Audrey Twyman, Damian Felton, or
tice of Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Re- Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD
view, 71 FR 12651 (March 15, 2005) and ac- Operations, Office 1, Import
companying Issues and Decision Memo- Administration, International Trade
randum at Comment 2.
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Notification regarding Administrative
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
Protective Order
telephone: (202) 482–3534, (202) 482–
This notice also serves as the only
0133, and (202) 482–4136, respectively.
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of their responsibility concerning the
Background
return or destruction of proprietary
On August 1, 2006, the Department
information disclosed under APO in
published the notice of initiation of the
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
sunset reviews of the antidumping duty
Timely notification of the return or
orders on steel concrete reinforcing bars
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is (‘‘rebar’’) from Moldova, the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), South
hereby requested. Failure to comply
Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus
with the regulations and terms of an
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.
APO is a violation which is subject to
See Initiation of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’)
sanction.
Reviews, 71 FR 43443 (August 1, 2006)
We are issuing and publishing the
(‘‘Notice of Initiation’’).
results and notice in accordance with
On August 11, 2006, the Department
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
received a notice of intent to participate
the Act.
from the following domestic parties: the
Dated: November 29, 2006.
Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its
Joseph A. Spetrini,
individual producer members, Nucor
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Corporation, CMC Steel Group, and
Administration.
Gerdau Ameristeel, as well as domestic
[FR Doc. E6–20551 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am]
producers TAMCO Steel and Schnitzer
Billing Code: 3510–DS–S
Steel Industries, Inc. (‘‘Schnitzer’’)
(collectively ‘‘domestic interested
parties’’), within the deadline specified
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The
companies claimed interested party
International Trade Administration
status under section 771(9)(C) of the
A–822–804, A–570–860, A–560–811, A–841– Act, as manufacturers of a domestic–like
804, A–455–803, A–580–844
product in the United States.
On August 31, 2006, the Department
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from
received a complete substantive
Moldova, the People’s Republic of
response to the notice of initiation from
China, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland,
the domestic interested parties within
and Belarus; Final Results of the
the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
351.218(d)(3)(i). In this response,
Antidumping Duty Orders
Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.
(‘‘Cascade’’) was substituted for
AGENCY: Import Administration,
Schnitzer as a domestic interested party.
International Trade Administration,
Cascade is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 1, 2006, the
Schnitzer. Also, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
(‘‘SDI’’) was added as a domestic
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
70510
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Notices
producer. Because SDI did not file a
notice of intent to participate in this
review, it is not eligible to file a
substantive response. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(iii)(A). Therefore, the
domestic interested parties are now the
Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its
individual producer members, Nucor
Corporation, CMC Steel Group, and
Gerdau Ameristeel, as well as TAMCO
Steel, and Cascade.
We received no responses from
respondent interested parties with
respect to any of the orders covered by
these sunset reviews except Moldova.
On August 31, 2006, the Department
received a substantive response from
respondent interested party, JSCC
Moldova Steel Works, which was within
the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). On September 20, 2006,
the Department determined that JSCC
Moldova Steel Works did not account
for more than 50 percent of exports by
volume of the subject merchandise,
because it reported that it had no
exports during the 2001–2005 sunset
review period. Therefore, the
Department found that JSCC Moldova
Steel Works did not submit an adequate
substantive response to the
Department’s Notice of Initiation. See
Memorandum to Susan H. Kuhbach
entitled, ‘‘Adequacy Determination in
Antidumping Duty Sunset Review of
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from
Moldova,’’ (September 20, 2006).
As a result of an inadequate response
from Moldova and no substantive
response from the PRC, South Korea,
Indonesia, Belarus, and Poland,
pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset review of these orders.
Scope of the Orders
The product covered by these orders
is all steel concrete reinforcing bars sold
in straight lengths, currently classifiable
in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under
item numbers 7214.20.00, 7228.30.8050,
7222.11.0050, 7222.30.0000,
7228.60.6000, 7228.20.1000, or any
other tariff item number. Specifically
excluded are plain rounds (i.e., non–
deformed or smooth bars) and rebar that
has been further processed through
bending or coating. HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes. The written
description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders on Steel Concrete Reinforcing
Bars from Moldova, the People’s
Republic of China, South Korea,
Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus; Final
Results’’ from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration (November 29, 2006),
which is hereby adopted by this notice
(‘‘Decision Memo’’). The issues
discussed in the Decision Memo include
the likelihood of continuation or
recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the orders were to be revoked.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in these reviews and
the corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum which is on
file in room B–099 of the main
Department building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The paper copy and electronic version
of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on rebar from
Moldova, the PRC, South Korea,
Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at the following
weighted–average percentage margins:
Weighted Average Margin
(percent)
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Moldova.
Moldova–Wide Rate ..........................................................................................................................................................
PRC.
Laiwu Steel Group .............................................................................................................................................................
PRC–Wide Rate ................................................................................................................................................................
South Korea.
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd./Korea Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. ................................................................................................
Hanbo Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. .............................................................................................................................................
All Others ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Indonesia.
PT Gunung Gahapi Sakti ..................................................................................................................................................
PT Bhirma Steel ................................................................................................................................................................
Krakatau Wajatama ...........................................................................................................................................................
PT Jakarta Steel Perdana Industri ....................................................................................................................................
PT Hanil Jaya Metal Works ...............................................................................................................................................
PT Pulogadung Steel .........................................................................................................................................................
PT Jakarta Cakra Tunggal ................................................................................................................................................
PT The Master Steel Manufacturing Co. ...........................................................................................................................
All Others ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Poland.
Stalexport ...........................................................................................................................................................................
All Others ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Belarus.
Belarus–Wide Rate ............................................................................................................................................................
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders
(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Dec 04, 2006
Jkt 211001
concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305. Timely notification of the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
232.86
133.00
133.00
22.89
102.28
22.89
71.01
71.01
71.01
71.01
71.01
71.01
71.01
71.01
60.46
52.07
47.13
114.53
return or destruction of APO materials
or conversion to judicial protective
orders is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Notices
of an APO is a violation which is subject
to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: November 29, 2006.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–20549 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Jointly Owned Invention Available for
Licensing
National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Commerce
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The invention listed below is
jointly owned by the U.S. Government,
as represented by the Department of
Commerce, and Cree Inc. The
Department of Commerce’s interest in
the invention is available for licensing,
in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37
CFR part 404 to achieve expeditious
commercialization of results of federally
funded research and development.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Technical and licensing information on
this invention may be obtained by
writing to: National Institute of
Standards and Technology, Office of
Technology Partnerships, Attn: Mary
Clague, Building 222, Room A155,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Information is
also available via telephone: 301–975–
4188, fax 301–869–2751, or e-mail:
mary.clague@nist.gov. Any request for
information should include the NIST
Docket number or Patent number and
title for the invention as indicated
below.
The invention available for licensing
is:
SUMMARY:
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
[DOCKET NUMBER 06–008US]
Title: Power Switching
Semiconductor Devices Including
Rectifying Junction-Shunts.
Abstract: A semiconductor device
includes a drift layer having a first
conductivity type and a body region
adjacent the drift layer. The body region
has a second conductivity type opposite
the first conductivity type and forms a
p-n junction with the drift layer. The
device further includes a contactor
region in the body region and having the
first conductivity type, and a shunt
channel region extending through the
body region from the contactor region to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Dec 04, 2006
Jkt 211001
the drift layer. The shunt channel region
has the first conductivity type. The
device further includes a first terminal
in electrical contact with the body
region and the contactor region, and a
second terminal in electrical contact
with the drift layer. The shunt channel
region has a length, thickness and
doping concentration selected that: (1)
The shunt channel region is fully
depleted when zero voltage is applied
across the first and second terminals, (2)
the shunt channel becomes conductive
at voltages less than the built-in
potential of the drift layer to body
region p-n junction, and/or (3) the shunt
channel is not conductive for voltages
that reverse biase the p–n junction
between the drift region and the body
region.
Dated: November 29, 2006.
James E. Hill,
Acting Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. E6–20582 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Fisheries
Certificate of Origin
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before February 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to William G. Jacobson, 562–
980–4035 or Bill.Jacobson@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The information required by the
International Dolphin Conservation
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70511
Program Act, amendment to the Marine
Mammal Protection Act, is needed: To
document the dolphin-safe status of
tuna import shipments; to verify that
import shipments of fish were not
harvested by large scale, high seas
driftnets; and to verify that imported
tuna was not harvested by an embargoed
nation or one that is otherwise
prohibited from exporting tuna to the
United States. Forms are submitted by
importers and processors.
II. Method of Collection
Forms may be submitted by mail or
electronically.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0648–0335.
Form Number: NOAA Form 370.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
350.
Estimated Time Per Response: 20
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,663.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $3,397.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: November 30, 2006.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–20513 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 5, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70509-70511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20549]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-822-804, A-570-860, A-560-811, A-841-804, A-455-803, A-580-844
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Moldova, the People's
Republic of China, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus; Final
Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 1, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on steel concrete reinforcing bars from Moldova, the People's Republic
of China, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and Belarus pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). The
Department has conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews for these
orders pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of these
sunset reviews, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping
duty orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 5, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Twyman, Damian Felton, or
Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-3534, (202) 482-0133, and (202) 482-4136, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 1, 2006, the Department published the notice of
initiation of the sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on
steel concrete reinforcing bars (``rebar'') from Moldova, the People's
Republic of China (``PRC''), South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and
Belarus pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of Five-
year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 71 FR 43443 (August 1, 2006) (``Notice of
Initiation'').
On August 11, 2006, the Department received a notice of intent to
participate from the following domestic parties: the Rebar Trade Action
Coalition and its individual producer members, Nucor Corporation, CMC
Steel Group, and Gerdau Ameristeel, as well as domestic producers TAMCO
Steel and Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (``Schnitzer'')
(collectively ``domestic interested parties''), within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The companies claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of a
domestic-like product in the United States.
On August 31, 2006, the Department received a complete substantive
response to the notice of initiation from the domestic interested
parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). In this response, Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.
(``Cascade'') was substituted for Schnitzer as a domestic interested
party. Cascade is a wholly owned subsidiary of Schnitzer. Also, Steel
Dynamics, Inc. (``SDI'') was added as a domestic
[[Page 70510]]
producer. Because SDI did not file a notice of intent to participate in
this review, it is not eligible to file a substantive response. See 19
CFR 351.218(d)(iii)(A). Therefore, the domestic interested parties are
now the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual producer
members, Nucor Corporation, CMC Steel Group, and Gerdau Ameristeel, as
well as TAMCO Steel, and Cascade.
We received no responses from respondent interested parties with
respect to any of the orders covered by these sunset reviews except
Moldova. On August 31, 2006, the Department received a substantive
response from respondent interested party, JSCC Moldova Steel Works,
which was within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). On
September 20, 2006, the Department determined that JSCC Moldova Steel
Works did not account for more than 50 percent of exports by volume of
the subject merchandise, because it reported that it had no exports
during the 2001-2005 sunset review period. Therefore, the Department
found that JSCC Moldova Steel Works did not submit an adequate
substantive response to the Department's Notice of Initiation. See
Memorandum to Susan H. Kuhbach entitled, ``Adequacy Determination in
Antidumping Duty Sunset Review of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from
Moldova,'' (September 20, 2006).
As a result of an inadequate response from Moldova and no
substantive response from the PRC, South Korea, Indonesia, Belarus, and
Poland, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of these orders.
Scope of the Orders
The product covered by these orders is all steel concrete
reinforcing bars sold in straight lengths, currently classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') under
item numbers 7214.20.00, 7228.30.8050, 7222.11.0050, 7222.30.0000,
7228.60.6000, 7228.20.1000, or any other tariff item number.
Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., non-deformed or smooth
bars) and rebar that has been further processed through bending or
coating. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes. The written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are addressed in the ``Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from
Moldova, the People's Republic of China, South Korea, Indonesia,
Poland, and Belarus; Final Results'' from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration (November 29, 2006),
which is hereby adopted by this notice (``Decision Memo''). The issues
discussed in the Decision Memo include the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the orders were to be revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in these reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file in room B-
099 of the main Department building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper
copy and electronic version of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on
rebar from Moldova, the PRC, South Korea, Indonesia, Poland, and
Belarus would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the following weighted-average percentage margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Average Margin
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moldova.......................................
Moldova-Wide Rate............................. 232.86
PRC...........................................
Laiwu Steel Group............................. 133.00
PRC-Wide Rate................................. 133.00
South Korea...................................
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd./Korea Iron & 22.89
Steel Co., Ltd...............................
Hanbo Iron & Steel Co., Ltd................... 102.28
All Others.................................... 22.89
Indonesia.....................................
PT Gunung Gahapi Sakti........................ 71.01
PT Bhirma Steel............................... 71.01
Krakatau Wajatama............................. 71.01
PT Jakarta Steel Perdana Industri............. 71.01
PT Hanil Jaya Metal Works..................... 71.01
PT Pulogadung Steel........................... 71.01
PT Jakarta Cakra Tunggal...................... 71.01
PT The Master Steel Manufacturing Co.......... 71.01
All Others.................................... 60.46
Poland........................................
Stalexport.................................... 52.07
All Others.................................... 47.13
Belarus.......................................
Belarus-Wide Rate............................. 114.53
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms
[[Page 70511]]
of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 29, 2006.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-20549 Filed 12-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
