Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Allow Certain Institutional Customers To Elect Not To Receive Account Statements, 69161-69162 [E6-20217]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 / Notices
current rule.67 The Commission finds
that these proposed changes are
consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the
Exchange Act as they adequately reflect
the structure and obligations of the
NASD’s committee with respect to
NASD Rule 11890 upon Nasdaq’s
complete separation from the NASD.
In Amendment No. 2, the NASD
clarified that the Consolidated
Quotation Service referred to in NASD
Rule 6320 is the ITS/CAES System. The
Commission finds that this proposed
change is consistent with Section
15A(b)(6) of the Exchange Act 68
because it clarifies NASD’s rule and
reflects the fact that CQS Market
Makers, who are required to be
registered as ITS/CAES Market Makers,
will send their quotations to the ITS/
CAES System. In Amendment No. 2, the
NASD also amended NASD Rule
6420(d)(3)(B), which relates to riskless
principal transactions in the proposed
ITS/CAES System so that it would
conform to NASD Rule 4632(d)(3)(B),
which relates to the same transactions
in the NASD/Nasdaq TRF. The NASD
also amended NASD Rule 11890(b)(2),
which relates to clearly erroneous
transactions to provide that officers
designated by an Executive Vice
President of NASD’s Market Regulation
Committee or NASD’s Transparency
Services Department could also take
action under that rule. The Commission
finds that these proposed changes are
consistent with the Section 15A(b)(6) of
the Exchange Act since they clarify the
NASD’s rules and accurately reflect
NASD’s proposed ITS/CAES System
and its review of clearly erroneous
transactions. For these reasons, the
Commission finds good cause for
approving Amendment No. 2 to the
proposal prior to the 30th day after the
date of publication of filing thereof in
the Federal Register. Accordingly, the
Commission finds that it is consistent
with Section 15A(b)(6) and Rule 19(b)(2)
of the Exchange Act 69 to approve
Amendment No. 2 on an accelerated
basis.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
D. Effective Date of Proposed Rule
Change
The NASD proposes that the changes
to its governing documents, including
the Delegation Plan, and its rules
become effective on the date on which
the Nasdaq Exchange commences
operation as a national securities
exchange for CTA Plan Securities. The
67 See supra notes 50–51 and accompanying text.
In contrast to the MORC’s decisions, decisions by
UPC Committee may be submitted by the parties to
arbitration. See NASD Rule 11890(c)
68 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
69 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6) and 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
Commission finds that this effective
date is consistent with Section 15A of
the Exchange Act because until the
Nasdaq Exchange begins operations, the
NASD must maintain its current rules to
fulfill its statutory and regulatory
obligations.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning Amendment No.
2, including whether Amendment No. 2
is consistent with the Exchange Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
69161
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,
that the proposed rule change (SR–
NASD–2006–104), as amended by
Amendment No. 1, is approved and that
Amendment No. 2 is approved on an
accelerated basis.70
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.71
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–20215 Filed 11–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–NASD–2006–104 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–NASD–2006–104. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the NASD. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–NASD–2006–104 and should be
submitted on or before December 20,
2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54811; File No. SR–NASD–
2006–066]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Allow
Certain Institutional Customers To
Elect Not To Receive Account
Statements
November 22, 2006.
On May 23, 2006, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed
amendment to NASD rule 2340
(Customer Account Statements). On
August 17, 2006, NASD filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.3 The proposed rule change, as
amended by Amendment No. 1, was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on October 16, 2006.4 The
Commission received one comment on
the proposal.5 This order approves the
proposed rule change, as amended.
70 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
71 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, NASD proposed to
partially amend the text of proposed amended Rule
2340.
4 See Exchange Act Release No. 54566 (Oct. 3,
2006), 71 FR 60784 (Oct. 16, 2006).
5 See letter from Noland Cheng, Chairman,
Operations Committee, Securities Industry and
Financial Markets Association (‘‘SIFMA’’), to Nancy
M. Morris, Secretary, Commission, dated November
3, 2006 (‘‘SIFMA letter’’) (available for review on
the Commission’s Web site at https://www.sec.gov/
comments/sr-nasd-2006-066/nasd2006066-1.pdf).
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
69162
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 29, 2006 / Notices
I. Description
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
The proposed amendment to NASD
Rule 2340 would allow institutional
customers with Delivery versus
Payment/Receive versus Payment
(‘‘DVP/RVP’’) accounts to elect not to
receive quarterly account statements.6 A
DVP/RVP account is an arrangement
whereby payment for securities
purchased is made to the selling
customer’s agent/and or delivery of
securities sold is made to the buying
customer’s agent in exchange for
payment at the time of settlement,
usually in the form of cash.
Rule 2340, in pertinent part, requires
any member that conducts a general
securities business and also carries
customer accounts or holds customer
funds or securities to send account
statements to customers at least once
each calendar quarter. The statement of
account must contain a description of
any securities positions, money
balances, or account activity, and must
be sent to each customer whose account
had a security position, money balance,
or account activity during the time since
the last statement was sent.
The proposed amendment would
provide relief from this requirement
with regard to customer accounts that
are carried solely for the purpose of
DVP/RVP transactions. NASD states that
account statements for DVP/RVP
accounts (chiefly institutional accounts)
generally do not reflect any cash balance
or security position at the end of a
quarter, and that DVP/RVP customers
generally rely on trade runs or customer
confirmations issued pursuant to Rule
10b–10 under the Exchange Act for
transaction-related information.
The proposed amendment would
relieve members from the obligation to
send quarterly statements to customers
with DVP/RVP accounts if: (1) The
customer’s account is carried solely for
the purpose of execution on a DVP/RVP
basis; (2) all transactions in the account
are handled on a DVP/RVP basis in
conformity with Rule 11860;7 (3) there
are no securities or cash positions in the
account at the end of the quarter (other
than positions of a temporary nature,
such as those arising from fails to
receive or deliver, errors, questioned
6 The proposed rule change is similar to a rule
change proposed by the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. (now known as New York Stock Exchange
LLC). See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
53826 (May 18, 2006), 71 FR 30211 (May 25, 2006).
7 Prior to accepting an order in a DVP/RVP
account, a member must comply with Rule 11860,
which requires, among other things, that the
member obtain certain information from the
customer, including the name and address of the
agent and the account number of the customer on
file with the agent.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Nov 28, 2006
Jkt 211001
trades, dividend or bond interest entries
and other similar transactions); (4) the
customer consents to the suspension in
writing and the member maintains such
consents in a manner consistent with
NASD Rule 3110 and Rule 17a–4 under
the Exchange Act;8 (5) the member
undertakes to provide any particular
statement or statements to the customer
promptly upon request; and (6) the
member undertakes to promptly
reinstate the delivery of such statements
to the customer upon request. The
proposed rule change specifies that Rule
2340 does not qualify or condition the
obligations of a member under Rule
15c3–2 under the Exchange Act
concerning quarterly notices of free
credit balances on statements.9 The
proposed rule change would also define
‘‘DVP/RVP account’’ for purposes of
Rule 2340.10 Finally, the proposed rule
change includes a technical amendment
that would replace the reference to ‘‘the
Association’’ in paragraph (e) of Rule
2340 with ‘‘NASD.’’
II. Summary of Comments
The Commission received one
comment on the proposal, which was
supportive, did not suggest any changes
to the proposal, and did not require a
response from NASD.11
III. Discussion and Findings
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act, and in particular, with section
15A(b)(6) of the Act,12 which requires,
among other things, that NASD rules be
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
8 Under NASD Rule 3110(a), NASD members are,
among other things, required to make and preserve
books and records as prescribed by Rule 17a–3
under the Exchange Act. Rule 3110(a) also states
that the recordkeeping format, medium, and
retention period must comply with Rule 17a–4
under the Exchange Act. Rule 17a–4 specifies the
manner in which broker-dealers must maintain the
records created in accordance with Rule 17a–3, and
certain other records produced by broker-dealers,
and the required retention periods for these records.
9 Rule 15c3–2 under the Exchange Act requires
broker-dealers to provide each of their customers
for whom a free credit balance is carried, not less
frequently than once every three months, a written
statement informing the customer of the amount
due to the customer, and written notice that the
funds are not segregated and may be used in the
broker-dealer’s business operations, and that the
funds are payable on the customer’s demand.
10 Proposed Rule 2340(d)(6) would define a
‘‘DVP/RVP account’’ as ‘‘an arrangement whereby
payment for securities purchased is made to the
selling customer’s agent and/or delivery of
securities sold is made to the buying customer’s
agent in exchange for payment at time of settlement,
usually in the form of cash.’’
11 See SIFMA letter, footnote 5, supra.
12 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and national market system, and in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Commission
believes that the proposed rule change,
as amended, should remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and national market system by removing
an unnecessary and potentially costly
obligation on firms to deliver quarterly
account statements to DVP/RVP
customers. At the same time, the
proposal maintains certain investor
protections (i.e., requiring NASD
members to obtain affirmative consent
to the suspension of quarterly account
statements, preserving the ability of
customers to obtain particular
statements upon request and to resume
receipt of statements promptly upon
request, and precluding member
organizations from unilaterally
terminating delivery of such
statements). The Commission therefore
believes the proposal is consistent with
the Exchange Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act 13 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NASD–2006–
066) be, and hereby is, approved,14
effective immediately.15
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–20217 Filed 11–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
13 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission notes that it has considered the
proposed rule change’s impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
15 NASD initially requested that the effective date
of the proposed rule change be 30 days following
NASD’s publication, within 60 days of the
Commission’s approval of the rule change, of a
Notice to Members announcing the rule change.
NASD withdrew its request to delay effectiveness
of the proposal in a telephone conversation between
Shirley Weiss, Associate General Counsel, NASD,
and Brice Prince, Special Counsel, Division of
Market Regulation, Commission, on November 21,
2006.
16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
14 In
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69161-69162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20217]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54811; File No. SR-NASD-2006-066]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1
Thereto To Allow Certain Institutional Customers To Elect Not To
Receive Account Statements
November 22, 2006.
On May 23, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission''), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed amendment to NASD rule 2340 (Customer Account
Statements). On August 17, 2006, NASD filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.\3\ The proposed rule change, as amended by
Amendment No. 1, was published for comment in the Federal Register on
October 16, 2006.\4\ The Commission received one comment on the
proposal.\5\ This order approves the proposed rule change, as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ In Amendment No. 1, NASD proposed to partially amend the
text of proposed amended Rule 2340.
\4\ See Exchange Act Release No. 54566 (Oct. 3, 2006), 71 FR
60784 (Oct. 16, 2006).
\5\ See letter from Noland Cheng, Chairman, Operations
Committee, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
(``SIFMA''), to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Commission, dated
November 3, 2006 (``SIFMA letter'') (available for review on the
Commission's Web site at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasd-2006-
066/nasd2006066-1.pdf).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 69162]]
I. Description
The proposed amendment to NASD Rule 2340 would allow institutional
customers with Delivery versus Payment/Receive versus Payment (``DVP/
RVP'') accounts to elect not to receive quarterly account
statements.\6\ A DVP/RVP account is an arrangement whereby payment for
securities purchased is made to the selling customer's agent/and or
delivery of securities sold is made to the buying customer's agent in
exchange for payment at the time of settlement, usually in the form of
cash.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The proposed rule change is similar to a rule change
proposed by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (now known as New York
Stock Exchange LLC). See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53826
(May 18, 2006), 71 FR 30211 (May 25, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 2340, in pertinent part, requires any member that conducts a
general securities business and also carries customer accounts or holds
customer funds or securities to send account statements to customers at
least once each calendar quarter. The statement of account must contain
a description of any securities positions, money balances, or account
activity, and must be sent to each customer whose account had a
security position, money balance, or account activity during the time
since the last statement was sent.
The proposed amendment would provide relief from this requirement
with regard to customer accounts that are carried solely for the
purpose of DVP/RVP transactions. NASD states that account statements
for DVP/RVP accounts (chiefly institutional accounts) generally do not
reflect any cash balance or security position at the end of a quarter,
and that DVP/RVP customers generally rely on trade runs or customer
confirmations issued pursuant to Rule 10b-10 under the Exchange Act for
transaction-related information.
The proposed amendment would relieve members from the obligation to
send quarterly statements to customers with DVP/RVP accounts if: (1)
The customer's account is carried solely for the purpose of execution
on a DVP/RVP basis; (2) all transactions in the account are handled on
a DVP/RVP basis in conformity with Rule 11860;\7\ (3) there are no
securities or cash positions in the account at the end of the quarter
(other than positions of a temporary nature, such as those arising from
fails to receive or deliver, errors, questioned trades, dividend or
bond interest entries and other similar transactions); (4) the customer
consents to the suspension in writing and the member maintains such
consents in a manner consistent with NASD Rule 3110 and Rule 17a-4
under the Exchange Act;\8\ (5) the member undertakes to provide any
particular statement or statements to the customer promptly upon
request; and (6) the member undertakes to promptly reinstate the
delivery of such statements to the customer upon request. The proposed
rule change specifies that Rule 2340 does not qualify or condition the
obligations of a member under Rule 15c3-2 under the Exchange Act
concerning quarterly notices of free credit balances on statements.\9\
The proposed rule change would also define ``DVP/RVP account'' for
purposes of Rule 2340.\10\ Finally, the proposed rule change includes a
technical amendment that would replace the reference to ``the
Association'' in paragraph (e) of Rule 2340 with ``NASD.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Prior to accepting an order in a DVP/RVP account, a member
must comply with Rule 11860, which requires, among other things,
that the member obtain certain information from the customer,
including the name and address of the agent and the account number
of the customer on file with the agent.
\8\ Under NASD Rule 3110(a), NASD members are, among other
things, required to make and preserve books and records as
prescribed by Rule 17a-3 under the Exchange Act. Rule 3110(a) also
states that the recordkeeping format, medium, and retention period
must comply with Rule 17a-4 under the Exchange Act. Rule 17a-4
specifies the manner in which broker-dealers must maintain the
records created in accordance with Rule 17a-3, and certain other
records produced by broker-dealers, and the required retention
periods for these records.
\9\ Rule 15c3-2 under the Exchange Act requires broker-dealers
to provide each of their customers for whom a free credit balance is
carried, not less frequently than once every three months, a written
statement informing the customer of the amount due to the customer,
and written notice that the funds are not segregated and may be used
in the broker-dealer's business operations, and that the funds are
payable on the customer's demand.
\10\ Proposed Rule 2340(d)(6) would define a ``DVP/RVP account''
as ``an arrangement whereby payment for securities purchased is made
to the selling customer's agent and/or delivery of securities sold
is made to the buying customer's agent in exchange for payment at
time of settlement, usually in the form of cash.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of Comments
The Commission received one comment on the proposal, which was
supportive, did not suggest any changes to the proposal, and did not
require a response from NASD.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See SIFMA letter, footnote 5, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Findings
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Act, and in particular, with section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\12\
which requires, among other things, that NASD rules be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and national
market system, and in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. The Commission believes that the proposed rule change, as
amended, should remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a
free and open market and national market system by removing an
unnecessary and potentially costly obligation on firms to deliver
quarterly account statements to DVP/RVP customers. At the same time,
the proposal maintains certain investor protections (i.e., requiring
NASD members to obtain affirmative consent to the suspension of
quarterly account statements, preserving the ability of customers to
obtain particular statements upon request and to resume receipt of
statements promptly upon request, and precluding member organizations
from unilaterally terminating delivery of such statements). The
Commission therefore believes the proposal is consistent with the
Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\13\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASD-2006-066) be, and hereby
is, approved,\14\ effective immediately.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\14\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposed rule change's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\15\ NASD initially requested that the effective date of the
proposed rule change be 30 days following NASD's publication, within
60 days of the Commission's approval of the rule change, of a Notice
to Members announcing the rule change. NASD withdrew its request to
delay effectiveness of the proposal in a telephone conversation
between Shirley Weiss, Associate General Counsel, NASD, and Brice
Prince, Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, Commission,
on November 21, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-20217 Filed 11-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P