Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Returning Excess Clearing Fund Collateral, 68664-68665 [E6-19984]
Download as PDF
68664
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 227 / Monday, November 27, 2006 / Notices
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will
be available for inspection and copying
at the principal office of DTC and on
DTC’s Web site at https://www.dtc.org.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR-DTC–2006–14 and should
be submitted on or before December 18,
2006.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–19961 Filed 11–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54787; File No. SR–
FICC–2006–14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating To Returning Excess Clearing
Fund Collateral
November 20, 2006.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on
September 22, 2006, the Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared primarily by FICC.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of this rule filing is to
amend FICC’s Government Securities
9 17
1 15
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Nov 24, 2006
Jkt 211001
Division’s (‘‘GSD’’) rules to permit GSD
members to request the return of their
excess clearing fund collateral held on
deposit with FICC on a more frequent
basis than is currently allowed under
GSD’s rules.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FICC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. FICC has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.2
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
Currently, GSD members generally are
permitted to request the return of excess
clearing fund collateral once per
month.3 In addition, on any business
day, if a GSD member has an excess
clearing fund deposit in the amount of
$5 million or more, the member may
request the return of the excess deposit
provided, among other requirements,
that the member retain on deposit with
GSD the greater of at least 110 percent
of its calculated required clearing fund
deposit or $1 million more than its
calculated required clearing fund
deposit.
In an effort to harmonize GSD’s
process with respect to the return of
excess collateral with the processes of
other Depository Trust & Clearing
Corporation (‘‘DTCC’’) subsidiary
clearing agencies, FICC proposes to
change GSD’s rules to give GSD the
discretion to return excess clearing fund
more frequently whether or not the
excess reaches 110 percent of the
required clearing fund deposit or $5
million.4 Under the proposal, GSD
members would be able to request the
2 The Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by FICC.
3 Excess clearing fund is the amount of collateral
held on deposit at GSD that is greater than a
member’s required clearing fund deposit as set forth
in GSD Rule 4 (Clearing Fund, Watch List and Loss
Allocation).
4 The rules of the National Securities Clearing
Corporation (‘‘NSCC’’) and FICC’s Mortgage Backed
Securities Division (‘‘MBSD’’) permit their
respective members to request (under normal
circumstances) the return of their excess clearing
fund more frequently than once per month.
Currently, NSCC’s and MBSD’s procedures allow
members to request the return of excess collateral
on a daily basis.
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
return of excess clearing fund on a daily
basis. GSD would retain the right,
however, to deny the return of some or
all of a member’s excess collateral in the
following instances: (i) If, the member
has an outstanding payment obligation
to FICC; (ii) if a member’s funds-only
settlement amounts or net settlement
positions over the upcoming 90 days
may reasonably be expected to be
materially different than those of the
preceding 90 days; (iii) if the member is
on the watch list; or (iv) when the return
of excess clearing fund will cause the
member to be in violation of another
GSD rule. In addition, excess clearing
fund would not be returned to a member
if doing so would reduce a member’s
cross-guaranty repayment deposit or
cross-margining repayment deposit to
the clearing fund below the required
amount.5
FICC believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act
and the rules thereunder because by
enabling FICC members to request and
receive an earlier return of excess
clearing fund collateral held on deposit
at FICC while maintaining the GSD’s
ability to deny the return of excess
collateral in order to protect FICC from
undue risk, the proposed rule change
should not adversely affect FICC’s
ability to safeguard securities and funds
in its possession or control or for which
it is responsible and at the same time
should enhance member liquidity.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
FICC does not believe that the
proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on
competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
FICC has not solicited written
comments relating to the proposed rule
change. FICC will notify the
Commission of any written comments it
receives.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
5 Under GSD’s rules, a ‘‘cross-guaranty repayment
deposit’’ is a deposit to the clearing fund required
to be made by a cross-guaranty beneficiary member
pursuant to Rule 41, Section 4 of GSD’s rules. A
‘‘cross-margining repayment deposit’’ is a deposit to
the clearing fund required to be made by a crossmargining beneficiary participant pursuant to Rule
43, Section 6 of GSD’s rules.
E:\FR\FM\27NON1.SGM
27NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 227 / Monday, November 27, 2006 / Notices
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–FICC–2006–14 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
No. SR–FICC–2006–14. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will
be available for inspection and copying
at FICC’s principal office and on FICC’s
Web site at . All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Nov 24, 2006
Jkt 211001
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submission should refer to File No. SR–
FICC–2006–14 and should be submitted
on or before December 18, 2006.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–19984 Filed 11–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54773; File No. SR–NASD–
2006–120]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1
Thereto To Extend the Hours of
Operation of the NASD/Nasdaq TRF,
the OTC Reporting Facility and the
Trade Reporting of Non-Nasdaq
Exchange-Listed Securities Under the
NASD Rule 6400 Series
November 17, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder, 2
notice is hereby given that on
October 27, 2006, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by NASD. On
November 3, 2006, NASD filed
Amendment No. 1. NASD filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder, 4 which renders
it effective upon filing with the
Commission. 5 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
6 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
5 For purposes of calculating the 60-day
abrogation period, the Commission considers the
period to have commenced on November 3, 2006,
the date NASD filed Amendment No. 1.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68665
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NASD proposes to extend the hours of
operation of (1) the Trade Reporting
Facility established by NASD and the
Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘NASD/
Nasdaq TRF’’); 6 (2) the trade reporting
of non-Nasdaq exchange-listed
securities under the NASD Rule 6400
Series; and (3) the trade reporting of
OTC Equity Securities to the OTC
Reporting Facility (‘‘ORF’’) 7 under the
NASD Rule 6600 Series, until 8 p.m.
Eastern Time (‘‘ET’’). The text of the
proposed rule change is available at
NASD, on the NASD Web site at
https://www.nasd.com, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room. 8
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
NASD included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any
6 During the initial transitional period, the NASD/
Nasdaq TRF is used to report transactions executed
otherwise than on an exchange in all Nasdaq Global
Market, Nasdaq Capital Market securities and
convertible bonds listed on Nasdaq. See NASD Rule
4000 Series and 6100 Series. NASD filed a separate
proposed rule change to expand the scope of the
NASD/Nasdaq TRF rules to include trade reporting
in non-Nasdaq exchange-listed securities. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54451
(September 15, 2006), 71 FR 55243 (September 21,
2006) (SR–NASD–2006–104).
7 For purposes of the NASD Rule 6600 Series, the
ORF is the service provided by NASD that
accommodates reporting and dissemination of last
sale reports in OTC Equity Securities. Regarding
those OTC Equity Securities that are not eligible for
clearance and settlement through the facilities of
the National Securities Clearing Corporation, the
ORF comparison function is not available.
However, the ORF supports the entry and
dissemination of last sale data on such securities.
See NASD Rule 6610(k).
8 NASD has proposed changes to NASD Rule
4623(e), among other NASD rules, in SR–NASD–
2006–104, which is currently pending at the
Commission. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 54451 (September 15, 2006), 71 FR 55243
(September 21, 2006). Those proposed changes
include the insertion of ‘‘NASD/Nasdaq’’ before
each reference to the Trade Reporting Facility in
NASD Rule 4632, which also is reflected in the
proposed rule text. Further, the Commission has
approved changes to NASD Rules 4632(e), 6420(e)
and 6620(e) in SR–NASD–2006–055, which
becomes effective on December 1, 2006. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53977
(June 12, 2006), 71 FR 34976 (June 16, 2006) (SR–
NASD–2006–055) (approval order). Lastly, the
Commission also has approved changes to NASD
Rule 6420, among others, in SR–NASD–2006–091,
which is scheduled to become effective on February
5, 2007. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
54537 (September 28, 2006), 71 FR 59173 (October
6, 2006). Upon the implementation of SR–NASD–
2006–091, the requirements in NASD Rule 6420,
among others, will no longer be necessary as they
will be incorporated directly into NASD’s
Alternative Display Facility rules.
E:\FR\FM\27NON1.SGM
27NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 227 (Monday, November 27, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68664-68665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19984]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54787; File No. SR-FICC-2006-14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Returning Excess
Clearing Fund Collateral
November 20, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on September 22, 2006, the
Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'') filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
primarily by FICC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of this rule filing is to amend FICC's Government
Securities Division's (``GSD'') rules to permit GSD members to request
the return of their excess clearing fund collateral held on deposit
with FICC on a more frequent basis than is currently allowed under
GSD's rules.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, FICC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FICC has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by FICC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
Currently, GSD members generally are permitted to request the
return of excess clearing fund collateral once per month.\3\ In
addition, on any business day, if a GSD member has an excess clearing
fund deposit in the amount of $5 million or more, the member may
request the return of the excess deposit provided, among other
requirements, that the member retain on deposit with GSD the greater of
at least 110 percent of its calculated required clearing fund deposit
or $1 million more than its calculated required clearing fund deposit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Excess clearing fund is the amount of collateral held on
deposit at GSD that is greater than a member's required clearing
fund deposit as set forth in GSD Rule 4 (Clearing Fund, Watch List
and Loss Allocation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an effort to harmonize GSD's process with respect to the return
of excess collateral with the processes of other Depository Trust &
Clearing Corporation (``DTCC'') subsidiary clearing agencies, FICC
proposes to change GSD's rules to give GSD the discretion to return
excess clearing fund more frequently whether or not the excess reaches
110 percent of the required clearing fund deposit or $5 million.\4\
Under the proposal, GSD members would be able to request the return of
excess clearing fund on a daily basis. GSD would retain the right,
however, to deny the return of some or all of a member's excess
collateral in the following instances: (i) If, the member has an
outstanding payment obligation to FICC; (ii) if a member's funds-only
settlement amounts or net settlement positions over the upcoming 90
days may reasonably be expected to be materially different than those
of the preceding 90 days; (iii) if the member is on the watch list; or
(iv) when the return of excess clearing fund will cause the member to
be in violation of another GSD rule. In addition, excess clearing fund
would not be returned to a member if doing so would reduce a member's
cross-guaranty repayment deposit or cross-margining repayment deposit
to the clearing fund below the required amount.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The rules of the National Securities Clearing Corporation
(``NSCC'') and FICC's Mortgage Backed Securities Division (``MBSD'')
permit their respective members to request (under normal
circumstances) the return of their excess clearing fund more
frequently than once per month. Currently, NSCC's and MBSD's
procedures allow members to request the return of excess collateral
on a daily basis.
\5\ Under GSD's rules, a ``cross-guaranty repayment deposit'' is
a deposit to the clearing fund required to be made by a cross-
guaranty beneficiary member pursuant to Rule 41, Section 4 of GSD's
rules. A ``cross-margining repayment deposit'' is a deposit to the
clearing fund required to be made by a cross-margining beneficiary
participant pursuant to Rule 43, Section 6 of GSD's rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FICC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the rules thereunder because
by enabling FICC members to request and receive an earlier return of
excess clearing fund collateral held on deposit at FICC while
maintaining the GSD's ability to deny the return of excess collateral
in order to protect FICC from undue risk, the proposed rule change
should not adversely affect FICC's ability to safeguard securities and
funds in its possession or control or for which it is responsible and
at the same time should enhance member liquidity.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
FICC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
FICC has not solicited written comments relating to the proposed
rule change. FICC will notify the Commission of any written comments it
receives.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal
[[Page 68665]]
Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-FICC-2006-14 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-FICC-2006-14. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at FICC's principal office and on FICC's Web
site at <https://ficc.com/gov/gov.docs.jsp?NS-query=#rf>. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submission should refer to File No. SR-FICC-2006-14 and should be
submitted on or before December 18, 2006.
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-19984 Filed 11-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P