Label World Incorporated Rochester, NY, Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration, 67645-67646 [E6-19716]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
shown below, not later than December
4, 2006.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room C–5311, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210.
67645
Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of
November 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
APPENDIX
[TAA Petitions Instituted Between 11/6/06 and 11/9/06]
Subject Firm
(Petitioners)
Location
KHS USA Inc. (Comp) ..........................................................
Jones Apparel Group (Wkrs) ................................................
Ford Motor Company (UAW) ...............................................
Ross Mould, Inc. (USWA) ....................................................
Hoover Precision Products, Inc. (Comp) ..............................
Radio Frequency Systems, Inc. (Wkrs) ...............................
Groupo Antolin North America (Wkrs) .................................
International Truck and Engine (Comp) ...............................
Admiral Tool & Mfg. Co. of Illinois (Comp) ..........................
Alarama Jewelry Inc. (Wkrs) ................................................
Paramount Cards, Inc. (Comp) ............................................
Creative Engineered Polymer Products (Union) ..................
Springfield LLC (Comp) ........................................................
Chemtrade Logistics (Wkrs) .................................................
Springfield LLC—Limestone Plant (Comp) ..........................
Delta Woodside Industries (Comp) ......................................
Creative Engineered Polymer Products (Union) ..................
Guide Anderson LLC (UAW) ................................................
Bernard Chaus, Inc. (Union) ................................................
Roanoke Furniture (Wkrs) ....................................................
Maxtor Corporation (Wkrs) ...................................................
Willamette Dental/Lab (Comp) .............................................
Arimon Technologies (Comp) ...............................................
Hartz & Co (Wkrs) ................................................................
Starkey Lab, Inc. (Wkrs) .......................................................
Everett Charles Technologies (Wkrs) ..................................
TI Group Automotive Systems, LLC (Wkrs) .........................
Carolina Toll Manufacturing Inc. (Wkrs) ...............................
RR Donelley Warsaw Division (Wkrs) ..................................
Airtomic (Comp) ....................................................................
Wellman, Inc.—Johnsonville, SC Plant (Comp) ...................
Suntec Industries, Inc. (Wkrs) ..............................................
Waukesha, WI .......................
New York, NY .......................
Norfolk, VA ............................
Washington, PA ....................
East Granby, CT ...................
Meriden, CT ..........................
Auburn Hills, MI ....................
Warrenville, IL .......................
Chicago, IL ............................
Long Island City, NY .............
Huntersville, NC ....................
Middlefield, OH .....................
Rockhill, SC ..........................
Carlisle, SC ...........................
Gaffney, SC ..........................
Wallace, SC ..........................
Canton, OH ...........................
Anderson, IN .........................
New York, NY .......................
Columbus, OH ......................
Longmont, CO .......................
Vancouver, WA .....................
Manitowoc, WI ......................
New York, NY .......................
Glencoe, MN .........................
San Jose, CA ........................
Washington Courthouse, OH
Baton Rouge, LA ..................
Warsaw, IN ...........................
Jeffersonville, IN ...................
Johnsonville, SC ...................
Glasgow, KY .........................
TA–W
60365
60366
60367
60368
60369
60370
60371
60372
60373
60374
60375
60376
60377
60378
60379
60380
60381
60382
60383
60384
60385
60386
60387
60388
60389
60390
60391
60392
60393
60394
60395
60396
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
[FR Doc. E6–19712 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,847]
pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Label World Incorporated Rochester,
NY, Notice of Revised Determination
on Reconsideration
By letter dated October 5, 2006, a
company official requested
administrative reconsideration
regarding the Department’s Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance, applicable to the workers of
Label World Incorporated, Rochester,
New York (subject firm). The
Department’s determination was issued
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
on August 25, 2006. The Department’s
Notice of determination was published
in the Federal Register on September
13, 2006 (71 FR 54095). Workers
produce die-cut thermal media and
labels for home photo printing.
The petition alleges that the subject
firm shifted production abroad and
provided information that implied that
the subject firm’s major customer was
importing from Mexico.
The denial was based on the
Department’s findings that the subject
firm did not shift abroad, that neither
the subject firm nor the firm’s customer
increased imports of thermal media or
labels during the relevant period, and
that the firm’s major customer is
transferring its reliance of thermal
media and labels from the subject firm
to a Mexican facility but will not import
like or directly competitive articles.
In the request for reconsideration, the
company official states that the subject
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
11/06/06
11/06/06
11/06/06
11/06/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/08/06
11/08/06
11/08/06
11/08/06
11/08/06
11/08/06
11/08/06
11/08/06
11/08/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
Date of
petition
11/03/06
11/03/06
10/31/06
10/27/06
10/19/06
11/06/06
11/06/06
11/02/06
11/04/06
11/03/06
11/07/06
11/07/06
11/03/06
11/03/06
11/03/06
11/02/06
11/06/06
11/07/06
11/03/06
11/07/06
11/06/06
11/06/06
11/01/06
11/06/06
11/08/06
11/09/06
11/02/06
11/08/06
10/05/06
10/19/06
10/27/06
11/06/06
firm supplied a component part of an
article that was produced by a customer
who shifted production of the final
product to Mexico.
Although secondary impact (the
subject firm is a supplier of a
component part for a TAA-certified firm
and loss of business with the TAAcertified customer contributed
importantly to the workers’ separations)
was not apparent in the petition, the
Department determined that to conduct
such an investigation is in the best
interest of the separated workers.
The reconsideration investigation
revealed that the subject firm produced
and packaged cut media paper, which
was supplied to a TAA-certified firm
(Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester
Film Finishing Division, Rochester,
New York; TA–W–58,105) to be
incorporated into the final product
(Kodak Color Cartridge and Photo Paper
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
67646
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of
November 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–19693 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
Kit). Following the loss of cut media
paper business with this company, the
subject firm ceased production of cut
media paper and separated the subject
workers (July 2006).
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
In accordance with Section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of its
investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for
older workers.
[TA–W–57,274]
In order for the Department to issue
a certification of eligibility to apply for
ATAA, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246 of the
Trade Act must be met. The Department
has determined in this case that the
requirements of Section 246 have been
met.
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974,
(26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on June 10, 2005, applicable
to workers of Laidlaw Corporation,
Monticello, Wisconsin. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
July 14, 2005 (70 FR 40741).
A significant number of workers at the
firm are age 50 or over and possess
skills that are not easily transferable.
Competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
information obtained in the
reconsideration investigation, I
determine that workers of Label World
Incorporated, Rochester, New York
qualify as adversely affected secondary
workers under Section 222 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended. In accordance
with the provisions of the Act, I make
the following certification:
All workers of Label World Incorporated,
Rochester, New York, who became totally or
partially separated from employment on or
after July 26, 2005 through two years from
the date of this certification, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC this 9th day of
November 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–19716 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am]
pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Nov 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
Employment and Training
Administration
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Laidlaw Corporation, Currently Known
as Laidlaw Company LLC, Monticello,
WI; Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of wire garment hangers.
The subject firm originally named
Laidlaw Corporation was renamed
Laidlaw Company LLC in May 2006 due
to a change in ownership. The State
agency reports that workers wages at the
subject firm are being reported under
the Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax
account for Laidlaw Company LLC,
Monticello, Wisconsin.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending the certification to properly
reflect this matter.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
Laidlaw Corporation, currently known
as Laidlaw Company LLC who were
adversely affected by increased
company imports.
The amended notice applicable to TAW–57,274 is hereby issued as follows:
All workers of Laidlaw Corporation,
currently known as Laidlaw Company LLC,
Monticello, Wisconsin, who became totally
or partially separated from employment on or
after May 27, 2004, through June 10, 2007,
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974,
and are also eligible to apply for alternative
trade adjustment assistance under Section
246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than December 4, 2006.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
shown below, not later than December
4, 2006.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room C–5311, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of
November 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67645-67646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19716]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-59,847]
Label World Incorporated Rochester, NY, Notice of Revised
Determination on Reconsideration
By letter dated October 5, 2006, a company official requested
administrative reconsideration regarding the Department's Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance, applicable to the workers of Label World Incorporated,
Rochester, New York (subject firm). The Department's determination was
issued on August 25, 2006. The Department's Notice of determination was
published in the Federal Register on September 13, 2006 (71 FR 54095).
Workers produce die-cut thermal media and labels for home photo
printing.
The petition alleges that the subject firm shifted production
abroad and provided information that implied that the subject firm's
major customer was importing from Mexico.
The denial was based on the Department's findings that the subject
firm did not shift abroad, that neither the subject firm nor the firm's
customer increased imports of thermal media or labels during the
relevant period, and that the firm's major customer is transferring its
reliance of thermal media and labels from the subject firm to a Mexican
facility but will not import like or directly competitive articles.
In the request for reconsideration, the company official states
that the subject firm supplied a component part of an article that was
produced by a customer who shifted production of the final product to
Mexico.
Although secondary impact (the subject firm is a supplier of a
component part for a TAA-certified firm and loss of business with the
TAA-certified customer contributed importantly to the workers'
separations) was not apparent in the petition, the Department
determined that to conduct such an investigation is in the best
interest of the separated workers.
The reconsideration investigation revealed that the subject firm
produced and packaged cut media paper, which was supplied to a TAA-
certified firm (Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester Film Finishing
Division, Rochester, New York; TA-W-58,105) to be incorporated into the
final product (Kodak Color Cartridge and Photo Paper
[[Page 67646]]
Kit). Following the loss of cut media paper business with this company,
the subject firm ceased production of cut media paper and separated the
subject workers (July 2006).
In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C.
2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results
of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply
for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility
to apply for ATAA, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246 of
the Trade Act must be met. The Department has determined in this case
that the requirements of Section 246 have been met.
A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and
possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions
within the industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the information obtained in the
reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of Label World
Incorporated, Rochester, New York qualify as adversely affected
secondary workers under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
All workers of Label World Incorporated, Rochester, New York,
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or
after July 26, 2005 through two years from the date of this
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC this 9th day of November 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-19716 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P