Label World Incorporated Rochester, NY, Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration, 67645-67646 [E6-19716]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than December 4, 2006. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C–5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. 67645 Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of November 2006. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. APPENDIX [TAA Petitions Instituted Between 11/6/06 and 11/9/06] Subject Firm (Petitioners) Location KHS USA Inc. (Comp) .......................................................... Jones Apparel Group (Wkrs) ................................................ Ford Motor Company (UAW) ............................................... Ross Mould, Inc. (USWA) .................................................... Hoover Precision Products, Inc. (Comp) .............................. Radio Frequency Systems, Inc. (Wkrs) ............................... Groupo Antolin North America (Wkrs) ................................. International Truck and Engine (Comp) ............................... Admiral Tool & Mfg. Co. of Illinois (Comp) .......................... Alarama Jewelry Inc. (Wkrs) ................................................ Paramount Cards, Inc. (Comp) ............................................ Creative Engineered Polymer Products (Union) .................. Springfield LLC (Comp) ........................................................ Chemtrade Logistics (Wkrs) ................................................. Springfield LLC—Limestone Plant (Comp) .......................... Delta Woodside Industries (Comp) ...................................... Creative Engineered Polymer Products (Union) .................. Guide Anderson LLC (UAW) ................................................ Bernard Chaus, Inc. (Union) ................................................ Roanoke Furniture (Wkrs) .................................................... Maxtor Corporation (Wkrs) ................................................... Willamette Dental/Lab (Comp) ............................................. Arimon Technologies (Comp) ............................................... Hartz & Co (Wkrs) ................................................................ Starkey Lab, Inc. (Wkrs) ....................................................... Everett Charles Technologies (Wkrs) .................................. TI Group Automotive Systems, LLC (Wkrs) ......................... Carolina Toll Manufacturing Inc. (Wkrs) ............................... RR Donelley Warsaw Division (Wkrs) .................................. Airtomic (Comp) .................................................................... Wellman, Inc.—Johnsonville, SC Plant (Comp) ................... Suntec Industries, Inc. (Wkrs) .............................................. Waukesha, WI ....................... New York, NY ....................... Norfolk, VA ............................ Washington, PA .................... East Granby, CT ................... Meriden, CT .......................... Auburn Hills, MI .................... Warrenville, IL ....................... Chicago, IL ............................ Long Island City, NY ............. Huntersville, NC .................... Middlefield, OH ..................... Rockhill, SC .......................... Carlisle, SC ........................... Gaffney, SC .......................... Wallace, SC .......................... Canton, OH ........................... Anderson, IN ......................... New York, NY ....................... Columbus, OH ...................... Longmont, CO ....................... Vancouver, WA ..................... Manitowoc, WI ...................... New York, NY ....................... Glencoe, MN ......................... San Jose, CA ........................ Washington Courthouse, OH Baton Rouge, LA .................. Warsaw, IN ........................... Jeffersonville, IN ................... Johnsonville, SC ................... Glasgow, KY ......................... TA–W 60365 60366 60367 60368 60369 60370 60371 60372 60373 60374 60375 60376 60377 60378 60379 60380 60381 60382 60383 60384 60385 60386 60387 60388 60389 60390 60391 60392 60393 60394 60395 60396 ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ [FR Doc. E6–19712 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–59,847] pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES Label World Incorporated Rochester, NY, Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration By letter dated October 5, 2006, a company official requested administrative reconsideration regarding the Department’s Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to the workers of Label World Incorporated, Rochester, New York (subject firm). The Department’s determination was issued VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:25 Nov 21, 2006 Jkt 211001 on August 25, 2006. The Department’s Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on September 13, 2006 (71 FR 54095). Workers produce die-cut thermal media and labels for home photo printing. The petition alleges that the subject firm shifted production abroad and provided information that implied that the subject firm’s major customer was importing from Mexico. The denial was based on the Department’s findings that the subject firm did not shift abroad, that neither the subject firm nor the firm’s customer increased imports of thermal media or labels during the relevant period, and that the firm’s major customer is transferring its reliance of thermal media and labels from the subject firm to a Mexican facility but will not import like or directly competitive articles. In the request for reconsideration, the company official states that the subject PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Date of institution 11/06/06 11/06/06 11/06/06 11/06/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/08/06 11/08/06 11/08/06 11/08/06 11/08/06 11/08/06 11/08/06 11/08/06 11/08/06 11/09/06 11/09/06 11/09/06 11/09/06 11/09/06 11/09/06 11/09/06 11/09/06 Date of petition 11/03/06 11/03/06 10/31/06 10/27/06 10/19/06 11/06/06 11/06/06 11/02/06 11/04/06 11/03/06 11/07/06 11/07/06 11/03/06 11/03/06 11/03/06 11/02/06 11/06/06 11/07/06 11/03/06 11/07/06 11/06/06 11/06/06 11/01/06 11/06/06 11/08/06 11/09/06 11/02/06 11/08/06 10/05/06 10/19/06 10/27/06 11/06/06 firm supplied a component part of an article that was produced by a customer who shifted production of the final product to Mexico. Although secondary impact (the subject firm is a supplier of a component part for a TAA-certified firm and loss of business with the TAAcertified customer contributed importantly to the workers’ separations) was not apparent in the petition, the Department determined that to conduct such an investigation is in the best interest of the separated workers. The reconsideration investigation revealed that the subject firm produced and packaged cut media paper, which was supplied to a TAA-certified firm (Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester Film Finishing Division, Rochester, New York; TA–W–58,105) to be incorporated into the final product (Kodak Color Cartridge and Photo Paper E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM 22NON1 67646 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 225 / Wednesday, November 22, 2006 / Notices Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of November 2006. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6–19693 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] Kit). Following the loss of cut media paper business with this company, the subject firm ceased production of cut media paper and separated the subject workers (July 2006). DEPARTMENT OF LABOR In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers. [TA–W–57,274] In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for ATAA, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246 of the Trade Act must be met. The Department has determined in this case that the requirements of Section 246 have been met. In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on June 10, 2005, applicable to workers of Laidlaw Corporation, Monticello, Wisconsin. The notice was published in the Federal Register on July 14, 2005 (70 FR 40741). A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. Conclusion After careful review of the information obtained in the reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of Label World Incorporated, Rochester, New York qualify as adversely affected secondary workers under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: All workers of Label World Incorporated, Rochester, New York, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after July 26, 2005 through two years from the date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed in Washington, DC this 9th day of November 2006. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6–19716 Filed 11–21–06; 8:45 am] pwalker on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4510–30–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:25 Nov 21, 2006 Jkt 211001 Employment and Training Administration BILLING CODE 4510–30–P Laidlaw Corporation, Currently Known as Laidlaw Company LLC, Monticello, WI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of wire garment hangers. The subject firm originally named Laidlaw Corporation was renamed Laidlaw Company LLC in May 2006 due to a change in ownership. The State agency reports that workers wages at the subject firm are being reported under the Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax account for Laidlaw Company LLC, Monticello, Wisconsin. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of Laidlaw Corporation, currently known as Laidlaw Company LLC who were adversely affected by increased company imports. The amended notice applicable to TAW–57,274 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Laidlaw Corporation, currently known as Laidlaw Company LLC, Monticello, Wisconsin, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 27, 2004, through June 10, 2007, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than December 4, 2006. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than December 4, 2006. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C–5311, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of November 2006. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM 22NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67645-67646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19716]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-59,847]


Label World Incorporated Rochester, NY, Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration

    By letter dated October 5, 2006, a company official requested 
administrative reconsideration regarding the Department's Negative 
Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance, applicable to the workers of Label World Incorporated, 
Rochester, New York (subject firm). The Department's determination was 
issued on August 25, 2006. The Department's Notice of determination was 
published in the Federal Register on September 13, 2006 (71 FR 54095). 
Workers produce die-cut thermal media and labels for home photo 
printing.
    The petition alleges that the subject firm shifted production 
abroad and provided information that implied that the subject firm's 
major customer was importing from Mexico.
    The denial was based on the Department's findings that the subject 
firm did not shift abroad, that neither the subject firm nor the firm's 
customer increased imports of thermal media or labels during the 
relevant period, and that the firm's major customer is transferring its 
reliance of thermal media and labels from the subject firm to a Mexican 
facility but will not import like or directly competitive articles.
    In the request for reconsideration, the company official states 
that the subject firm supplied a component part of an article that was 
produced by a customer who shifted production of the final product to 
Mexico.
    Although secondary impact (the subject firm is a supplier of a 
component part for a TAA-certified firm and loss of business with the 
TAA-certified customer contributed importantly to the workers' 
separations) was not apparent in the petition, the Department 
determined that to conduct such an investigation is in the best 
interest of the separated workers.
    The reconsideration investigation revealed that the subject firm 
produced and packaged cut media paper, which was supplied to a TAA-
certified firm (Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester Film Finishing 
Division, Rochester, New York; TA-W-58,105) to be incorporated into the 
final product (Kodak Color Cartridge and Photo Paper

[[Page 67646]]

Kit). Following the loss of cut media paper business with this company, 
the subject firm ceased production of cut media paper and separated the 
subject workers (July 2006).
    In accordance with Section 246 the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 
2813), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents the results 
of its investigation regarding certification of eligibility to apply 
for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers.
    In order for the Department to issue a certification of eligibility 
to apply for ATAA, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246 of 
the Trade Act must be met. The Department has determined in this case 
that the requirements of Section 246 have been met.
    A significant number of workers at the firm are age 50 or over and 
possess skills that are not easily transferable. Competitive conditions 
within the industry are adverse.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the information obtained in the 
reconsideration investigation, I determine that workers of Label World 
Incorporated, Rochester, New York qualify as adversely affected 
secondary workers under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the 
following certification:

    All workers of Label World Incorporated, Rochester, New York, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after July 26, 2005 through two years from the date of this 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 9th day of November 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-19716 Filed 11-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.