Notice of Final Results and Final Rescission in Part of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Taiwan, 67098-67099 [E6-19611]
Download as PDF
67098
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 223 / Monday, November 20, 2006 / Notices
Dated: November 9, 2006.
Russell T. Davis,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. E6–19501 Filed 11–17–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–583–816)
BILLING CODE 3410–XT–P
Notice of Final Results and Final
Rescission in Part of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Stainless Steel Butt–Weld Pipe Fittings
From Taiwan
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign–Trade Zones Board
Order No. 1487
Expansion of Foreign–Trade Zone 163,
Ponce, Puerto Rico, Area
Pursuant to its authority under the
Foreign–Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign–
Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, Codezol, C.D., grantee of
FTZ 163, submitted an application to
the Board for authority to expand FTZ
163 to include a site (Site 8 - 6 acres,
Lugo warehouse) in Hormigueros,
Puerto Rico, adjacent to the Ponce
Customs port of entry (FTZ Docket 10–
2006; filed 4/3/06);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (71 FR 18276, 4/11/06), and the
application has been processed
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that the proposal is in the public
interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to expand FTZ 163 is
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.28, and subject to a sunset
provision that would terminate further
authority for the proposed site on
November 1, 2011, unless the site is
activated during that time period
pursuant to 19 CFR Part 146 of the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
regulations.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of
November 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commercefor Import
Administration, Alternate Chairman,
Foreign–Trade Zones Board.
Attest:
Pierre V. Duy,
Acting Executive Secretary
[FR Doc. E6–19599 Filed 11–17–06; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510–DS–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Nov 17, 2006
Jkt 211001
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 13, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the order on
certain stainless steel butt–weld pipe
fittings from Taiwan. See Certain
Stainless Steel Butt–Weld Pipe Fittings
From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Notice of Intent To Rescind
in Part, 71 FR 39663 (July 13, 2006)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). The
merchandise covered by this order is
certain stainless steel butt–weld pipe
fittings from Taiwan as described in the
‘‘Scope of the Order’’ section of this
notice. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is
June 1, 2004, through May 31, 2005. We
gave interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the preliminary results.
Based upon our analysis of the
comments received, we made one
change to the margin calculation. The
final weight–averaged dumping margin
is listed below in the section titled
‘‘Final Results of Review.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 20, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Helen Kramer or Judy Lao, Office 7, AD/
CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0405 or (202) 482–
7924, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The Department’s preliminary results
of review were published on July 13,
2006. See Preliminary Results. We
invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. We received
written comments on August 14, 2006,
from Flowline Division of Markovitz
Enterprise, Inc., Shaw Allow Piping
Products, Inc., Gerlin, Inc., and Taylor
Forge Stainless, Inc., (collectively,
‘‘petitioners’’), and from Ta Chen
Stainless Steel Pipe, Ltd. (‘‘Ta Chen’’).
On August 21, 2006, we received
rebuttal comments from petitioners and
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ta Chen. The Department is conducting
this administrative review in
accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’).
Scope of the Order
The products subject to this order are
certain stainless steel butt–weld pipe
fittings, whether finished or unfinished,
under 14 inches inside diameter.
Certain welded stainless steel butt–weld
pipe fittings (‘‘pipe fittings’’) are used to
connect pipe sections in piping systems
where conditions require welded
connections. The subject merchandise is
used where one or more of the following
conditions is a factor in designing the
piping system: (1) Corrosion of the
piping system will occur if material
other than stainless steel is used; (2)
contamination of the material in the
system by the system itself must be
prevented; (3) high temperatures are
present; (4) extreme low temperatures
are present; and (5) high pressures are
contained within the system. Pipe
fittings come in a variety of shapes, with
the following five shapes the most basic:
‘‘elbows,’’ ‘‘tees,’’ ‘‘reducers,’’ ‘‘stub
ends,’’ and ‘‘caps.’’ The edges of
finished pipe fittings are beveled.
Threaded, grooved, and bolted fittings
are excluded from this review. The pipe
fittings subject to this review are
classifiable under subheading
7307.23.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, our written
description of the scope of this review
is dispositive. Pipe fittings
manufactured to American Society of
Testing and Materials specification
A774 are included in the scope of this
order.
Partial Rescission of Review
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department issued a notice of intent to
rescind the review with respect to Liang
Feng Stainless Steel Fitting Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Liang Feng’’), Tru–Flow Industrial
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tru–Flow’’), Censor
International Corporation (‘‘Censor’’)
and PFP Taiwan Co., Ltd. (‘‘PFP’’),
because we found that they had no
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR. See Preliminary Results at
39663. As the Department received no
comments on this notice of intent to
rescind we continue to find that
rescission of the review concerning
Liang Feng, Tru–Flow, Censor, and PFP
is appropriate. Therefore, the
Department is rescinding the review
with respect to Liang Feng, Tru–Flow,
Censor, and PFP.
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 223 / Monday, November 20, 2006 / Notices
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs, as
well as the Department’s findings, in
this administrative review are addressed
in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Administrative
Review of Certain Stainless Steel Butt–
Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review (‘‘Decision
Memorandum’’), dated November 13,
2006, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. A list of the issues raised and to
which we have responded, all of which
are in the Decision Memorandum, is
appended to this notice. The Decision
Memorandum is on file in the Central
Records Unit in room B–099 of the main
Commerce building, and can also be
accessed directly on the Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov. The paper copy and
electronic version of the public version
of the Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made a
minor correction to include deductions
reported in the field BILLADJU (U.S.
billing adjustments) in the discount and
rebates adjustment to U.S. price. This
did not change the margin. See the
Decision Memorandum at Comment 5
and Sales Analysis Memorandum for
the Final Results of Administrative
Review of Certain Stainless Steel Pipe
Butt–weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan:
Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe Co., Ltd.
and Ta Chen International (CA) Corp.,
(November 13, 2006).
importer. Where the assessment rate is
above de minimis, we will instruct CBP
to assess duties on all entries of subject
merchandise produced by Ta Chen.
Antidumping duties for the rescinded
companies, Liang Feng, Tru–Flow,
Censor, and PFP, shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(I). The Department will
issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP within 15
days of publication of these final results
of review.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This
clarification applies to POR entries of
subject merchandise produced by
companies examined in this review (i.e.,
companies for which a dumping margin
was calculated) where the companies
did not know that their merchandise
was destined for the United States. In
such instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the all–
others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
Final Results of Review
of stainless steel butt–weld pipe fittings
As a result of our review, we
from Taiwan entered, or withdrawn
determine that the following weighted–
from warehouse, for consumption on or
average margin exists for the period
after the publication date of these final
June 1, 2004, through May 31, 2005:
results, as provided by section 751(a) of
the Act: (1) for the companies covered
Weightedby this review, the cash deposit rate will
Average
Company
be the rate listed above; (2) for
Margin
(percent)
merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but
Ta Chen Stainless Pipe Co.,
covered in the less–than-fair–value
Ltd .........................................
0.79 investigation, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company–specific
Assessment Rates
rate from the most recent review; (3) if
The Department will determine, and
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
review, a prior review, or less–than-fair–
(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping
value the investigation, but the producer
duties on all appropriate entries,
is, the cash deposit rate will be that
pursuant to section 751(a)(1)(B) of the
established for the most recent period
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). The
for the producer of the merchandise;
Department calculated importer–
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
specific duty assessment rates on the
producers or exporters will be 51.01
basis of the ratio of the total amount of
percent, the ‘‘All Others’’ rate
antidumping duties calculated for the
established in the less–than-fair–value
examined sales to the total entered
investigation. These deposit
value of the examined sales for that
requirements shall remain in effect until
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Nov 17, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67099
publication of the final results of the
next administrative review.
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402 (f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred, and in the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
This notice also is the only reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: November 13, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
Appendix – Issues in Decision
Memorandum
Issues
1. Reliability of Ta Chen’s Financial
Statements
2. CEP Offset
3. CEP Profit Calculation
4. Calculation of Margin on Weight
Basis
5. Alleged Calculation Errors
[FR Doc. E6–19611 Filed 11–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–890]
Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order/Pursuant to Court Decision:
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 223 (Monday, November 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67098-67099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19611]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-583-816)
Notice of Final Results and Final Rescission in Part of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Stainless Steel Butt-
Weld Pipe Fittings From Taiwan
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 13, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published in the Federal Register the preliminary results
of the administrative review of the order on certain stainless steel
butt-weld pipe fittings from Taiwan. See Certain Stainless Steel Butt-
Weld Pipe Fittings From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Notice of Intent To Rescind in Part, 71 FR
39663 (July 13, 2006) (``Preliminary Results''). The merchandise
covered by this order is certain stainless steel butt-weld pipe
fittings from Taiwan as described in the ``Scope of the Order'' section
of this notice. The period of review (``POR'') is June 1, 2004, through
May 31, 2005. We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on
the preliminary results. Based upon our analysis of the comments
received, we made one change to the margin calculation. The final
weight-averaged dumping margin is listed below in the section titled
``Final Results of Review.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 20, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen Kramer or Judy Lao, Office 7,
AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0405 or (202) 482-7924, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department's preliminary results of review were published on
July 13, 2006. See Preliminary Results. We invited parties to comment
on the Preliminary Results. We received written comments on August 14,
2006, from Flowline Division of Markovitz Enterprise, Inc., Shaw Allow
Piping Products, Inc., Gerlin, Inc., and Taylor Forge Stainless, Inc.,
(collectively, ``petitioners''), and from Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe,
Ltd. (``Ta Chen''). On August 21, 2006, we received rebuttal comments
from petitioners and Ta Chen. The Department is conducting this
administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').
Scope of the Order
The products subject to this order are certain stainless steel
butt-weld pipe fittings, whether finished or unfinished, under 14
inches inside diameter. Certain welded stainless steel butt-weld pipe
fittings (``pipe fittings'') are used to connect pipe sections in
piping systems where conditions require welded connections. The subject
merchandise is used where one or more of the following conditions is a
factor in designing the piping system: (1) Corrosion of the piping
system will occur if material other than stainless steel is used; (2)
contamination of the material in the system by the system itself must
be prevented; (3) high temperatures are present; (4) extreme low
temperatures are present; and (5) high pressures are contained within
the system. Pipe fittings come in a variety of shapes, with the
following five shapes the most basic: ``elbows,'' ``tees,''
``reducers,'' ``stub ends,'' and ``caps.'' The edges of finished pipe
fittings are beveled. Threaded, grooved, and bolted fittings are
excluded from this review. The pipe fittings subject to this review are
classifiable under subheading 7307.23.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of this review is dispositive. Pipe
fittings manufactured to American Society of Testing and Materials
specification A774 are included in the scope of this order.
Partial Rescission of Review
In the Preliminary Results, the Department issued a notice of
intent to rescind the review with respect to Liang Feng Stainless Steel
Fitting Co., Ltd. (``Liang Feng''), Tru-Flow Industrial Co., Ltd.
(``Tru-Flow''), Censor International Corporation (``Censor'') and PFP
Taiwan Co., Ltd. (``PFP''), because we found that they had no entries
of subject merchandise during the POR. See Preliminary Results at
39663. As the Department received no comments on this notice of intent
to rescind we continue to find that rescission of the review concerning
Liang Feng, Tru-Flow, Censor, and PFP is appropriate. Therefore, the
Department is rescinding the review with respect to Liang Feng, Tru-
Flow, Censor, and PFP.
[[Page 67099]]
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs, as well as the Department's
findings, in this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of Certain Stainless
Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan; Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review (``Decision Memorandum''), dated November
13, 2006, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues
raised and to which we have responded, all of which are in the Decision
Memorandum, is appended to this notice. The Decision Memorandum is on
file in the Central Records Unit in room B-099 of the main Commerce
building, and can also be accessed directly on the Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov. The paper copy and electronic version of the public
version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made a
minor correction to include deductions reported in the field BILLADJU
(U.S. billing adjustments) in the discount and rebates adjustment to
U.S. price. This did not change the margin. See the Decision Memorandum
at Comment 5 and Sales Analysis Memorandum for the Final Results of
Administrative Review of Certain Stainless Steel Pipe Butt-weld Pipe
Fittings from Taiwan: Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. and Ta
Chen International (CA) Corp., (November 13, 2006).
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we determine that the following
weighted-average margin exists for the period June 1, 2004, through May
31, 2005:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
Average
Company Margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ta Chen Stainless Pipe Co., Ltd............................ 0.79
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries, pursuant to section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.212(b). The Department calculated importer-specific duty
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total
entered value of the examined sales for that importer. Where the
assessment rate is above de minimis, we will instruct CBP to assess
duties on all entries of subject merchandise produced by Ta Chen.
Antidumping duties for the rescinded companies, Liang Feng, Tru-Flow,
Censor, and PFP, shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit
of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(I). The Department will issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP within 15 days of publication of these
final results of review.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This clarification applies to POR entries of
subject merchandise produced by companies examined in this review
(i.e., companies for which a dumping margin was calculated) where the
companies did not know that their merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full
discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6,
2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Taiwan
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
publication date of these final results, as provided by section 751(a)
of the Act: (1) for the companies covered by this review, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate listed above; (2) for merchandise
exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but
covered in the less-than-fair-value investigation, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate from the most recent
review; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or less-than-fair-value the investigation, but the
producer is, the cash deposit rate will be that established for the
most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will be 51.01
percent, the ``All Others'' rate established in the less-than-fair-
value investigation. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect
until publication of the final results of the next administrative
review.
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402 (f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred, and in the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This notice also is the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: November 13, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
Appendix - Issues in Decision Memorandum
Issues
1. Reliability of Ta Chen's Financial Statements
2. CEP Offset
3. CEP Profit Calculation
4. Calculation of Margin on Weight Basis
5. Alleged Calculation Errors
[FR Doc. E6-19611 Filed 11-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S