In the Matter of Certain High-Brightness Light Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint, 66195 [E6-19071]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 218 / Monday, November 13, 2006 / Notices cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Shenzhen Everbest Machinery, Industry Co., Ltd., Room 302, No. 5, Kefa Road, Science Industry Park, Shenzhen, China. ShenZhen Hongda Electronic Co., Ltd., East. 6/F, 14 Bagua-4 Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, China. Shenzhen Victor Hi-Tech Co., Ltd., 3/F, Building 412, Bagua 4th Road, Futian District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China, 518029. Sinometer Instruments Co. Ltd., Ginza International Building, 1056, Shennan Avenue, Shenzhen, China. TechBuys, LLC, 1813 Yeager Avenue, La Verne, CA 91750. Velleman Inc., 7354 Tower Street, Fort Worth, TX 76118. (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401–R, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Charles E. Bullock is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 6, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–19073 Filed 11–9–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:22 Nov 09, 2006 Jkt 211001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–556] In the Matter of Certain HighBrightness Light Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Motion To Amend the Complaint International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting complainant’s motion to amend the complaint in the abovecaptioned investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on December 8, 2005, based on a complaint filed by Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC (‘‘Lumileds’’) of San Jose, California. 70 FR 73026. The complaint, as amended and supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. **1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain highbrightness light emitting diodes (‘‘LEDs’’) and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,008,718; claims 1–3, 8–9, 16, 18, and 23–28 of U.S. Patent No. 5,376,580; and claims PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 66195 12–16 of U.S. Patent No. 5,502,316. The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s notice of investigation named Epistar Corporation (‘‘Epistar’’) of Hsinchu, Taiwan, and United Epitaxy Company (‘‘UEC’’) of Hsinchu, Taiwan as respondents. On April 28, 2006, Lumileds moved to amend the complaint to: (1) Remove UEC as a named respondent, (2) change the complainant’s full name from Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC to Philips Lumileds Lighting Company LLC, and (3) identify additional Epistar LEDs alleged to infringe one or more patentsin-suit. The remaining respondent did not oppose the motion. On October 23, 2006, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting Lumileds’ motion, and further ordering that the Notice of Investigation be amended to identify the actual parties in the abovecaptioned investigation. No party petitioned for review of the ID pursuant to 19 CFR 210.43(a), and the Commission found no basis for ordering a review on its own initiative pursuant to 19 CFR 210.44. The Commission has determined not to review this ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in sections 210.14 and 210.42(c)) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14, 210.42(c)). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 6, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–19071 Filed 11–9–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as Amended (‘‘CERCLA’’) Pursuant to 29 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on October 31, 2006, a proposed consent decree in United States v. Bill D. Stallings and Stallings Salvage, Inc., Civil action No. 3:05CV247–H, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. This Consent decree will resolve claims asserted by the United States in a complaint previously filed against defendants Bill D. Stallings and Stallings Salvage, Inc., for past costs incurred by EPA at the Stallings Salvage Site in Monroe, North Carolina. A E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 218 (Monday, November 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 66195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-19071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-556]


In the Matter of Certain High-Brightness Light Emitting Diodes 
and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To 
Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend 
the Complaint

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') granting 
complainant's motion to amend the complaint in the above-captioned 
investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on December 8, 2005, based on a complaint filed by Lumileds Lighting 
U.S., LLC (``Lumileds'') of San Jose, California. 70 FR 73026. The 
complaint, as amended and supplemented, alleges violations of section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. **1337, in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain high-
brightness light emitting diodes (``LEDs'') and products containing 
same by reason of infringement of claims 1 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,008,718; claims 1-3, 8-9, 16, 18, and 23-28 of U.S. Patent No. 
5,376,580; and claims 12-16 of U.S. Patent No. 5,502,316. The complaint 
further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission's 
notice of investigation named Epistar Corporation (``Epistar'') of 
Hsinchu, Taiwan, and United Epitaxy Company (``UEC'') of Hsinchu, 
Taiwan as respondents.
    On April 28, 2006, Lumileds moved to amend the complaint to: (1) 
Remove UEC as a named respondent, (2) change the complainant's full 
name from Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC to Philips Lumileds Lighting 
Company LLC, and (3) identify additional Epistar LEDs alleged to 
infringe one or more patents-in-suit. The remaining respondent did not 
oppose the motion.
    On October 23, 2006, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting 
Lumileds' motion, and further ordering that the Notice of Investigation 
be amended to identify the actual parties in the above-captioned 
investigation. No party petitioned for review of the ID pursuant to 19 
CFR 210.43(a), and the Commission found no basis for ordering a review 
on its own initiative pursuant to 19 CFR 210.44. The Commission has 
determined not to review this ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in sections 210.14 and 210.42(c)) of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14, 210.42(c)).

    By order of the Commission.

     Issued: November 6, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E6-19071 Filed 11-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P