Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Participant Fees and Credits, 64590-64594 [E6-18481]
Download as PDF
64590
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 212 / Thursday, November 2, 2006 / Notices
purchases and paired optional
redemptions of the MACRO Holding
Shares held in the MACRO Tradeable
Trusts, which may only be effected in
MACRO Units by Authorized
Participants. The Information Circular
will advise members of their suitability
obligations with respect to
recommended transactions to customers
in the MACRO Tradeable Shares. The
Information Circular will also discuss
any relief, if granted, by the Commission
or the staff from any rules under the
Act.
Surveillance
Exchange surveillance procedures
applicable to trading in the proposed
MACRO Tradeable Shares will be
similar to those applicable to trust
issued receipts, Portfolio Depository
Receipts and Index Fund Shares
currently trading on the Exchange. The
AMEX surveillance systems use data
published over CTS (e.g., the IIVs) in its
normal course of business. In the event
this group needs additional information
to audit transactions in MACRO
Tradeable Shares, the NYMEX and
Amex have executed an information
sharing agreement to support the
surveillance responsibilities of the two
exchanges.
2. Statutory Basis
The Amex believes that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of
the Act 45 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),46 of the Act
in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change, as amended,
will impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended.
45 15
46 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:49 Nov 01, 2006
Jkt 211001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
(i) as the Commission may designate up
to 90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change, as amended, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
The Commission is considering
granting accelerated approval of the
proposed rule change at the end of a
15-day comment period.47
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Exchange Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Amex–2006–82 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2006–82. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
47 The Amex has requested accelerated approval
of this proposed rule change prior to the 30th day
after the date of publication of the notice of the
filing thereof, following the conclusion of a 15-day
comment period. Telephone conference among
Brian Trackman and Michou H.M. Nguyen, Special
Counsels, Division of Market Regulation,
Commission, and William Love, Associate General
Counsel, Exchange, on October 25, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Amex. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex–2006–82 and should
be submitted on or before November 17,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.48
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–18478 Filed 11–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54657; File No. SR–CHX–
2006–29]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to
Participant Fees and Credits
October 26, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 29, 2006, the Chicago Stock
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘CHX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the CHX. On
October 20, 2006, the CHX filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.3 The CHX has designated this
48 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 1 made technical changes to
correct the marking of the proposed rule text and
made clarifying changes to the discussion in the
purpose section. Amendment No. 1 made no
changes to the proposed fees as set forth in the
original filing.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 212 / Thursday, November 2, 2006 / Notices
proposal as one establishing or changing
a member due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the CHX under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,4 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,5 which renders
the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The CHX proposes to revise its
Schedule of Participant Fees and Credits
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to provide for fees,
charges and credits contemplated by the
Exchange’s new trading model being
implemented by the CHX this fall. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available on the CHX’s Web site
(https://www.chx.com/rules/
proposed_rules.htm), at the principal
office of the CHX, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
CHX included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The CHX has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Throughout 2006, the Exchange has
been working on the design and
development of a new trading model
centered around a core matching system
that will provide for fully automated
electronic matching of orders
(‘‘Matching System’’), as well as
corresponding rules and regulatory
initiatives. On September 29, 2006, the
Exchange’s proposed rules relating to
the new trading model were approved
by the Commission.6 The Exchange
anticipates making the transition to its
new trading model commencing the
4 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54550
(September 29, 2006); 71 FR 59563 (October 10,
2006) (SR–CHX–2006–05) (referred to as the ‘‘NTM
Approval Order’’).
5 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:49 Nov 01, 2006
Jkt 211001
week of October 23, 2006. As further
detailed in SR–CHX–2006–05, the
Exchange’s new trading model differs
from the current CHX structure in
several notable ways. First, the CHX
will no longer operate from a traditional
physical exchange floor, but rather will
operate an entirely electronic facility.
Second, the CHX will no longer
maintain a specialist program, in which
specialists maintain books of orders in
designated issues.7 Finally, as noted
above, orders will be matched by a fully
automated Matching System.8
This fundamental shift in the
Exchange’s trading model necessitates
certain changes in the Exchange’s
business model, including the fees,
charges and credits that it assesses its
participants (‘‘Participants’’). After
significant deliberation, including a
comprehensive review of other selfregulatory organizations and their
respective billing structures, the
Exchange has formulated a revised Fee
Schedule that the Exchange believes
more closely resembles the fee
structures that have been implemented
in connection with other electronic
trading facilities.
Summarized below are the provisions
of the Fee Schedule that will change
from the previous version. To facilitate
an orderly transition to the new trading
model, the Fee Schedule contemplates
charging Participants under current
rates, with new Fee Schedule provisions
to become applicable as issues are
transitioned to the new trading model
and become eligible for trading in the
Matching System. The Fee Schedule
delineates which fees will be ‘‘phased
out’’ during and after the transition to
the new trading model.
Participant Access & Registration
(Sections A–D)
• Permit Fees: In connection with the
Exchange’s demutualization on
February 9, 2005, the Exchange’s rules
were amended to require that each
Participant hold at least one Trading
Permit in order to access the CHX.9 The
7 In the new trading model, Participants may
register as either market makers or institutional
brokers (formerly known as floor brokers), or may
simply operate as unregistered order-sending firms
that route orders to the CHX for execution.
8 The CHX new trading model does contemplate
special handling of orders by CHX institutional
brokers, but all such orders must be entered by
institutional brokers into an electronic functionality
known as Brokerplex. Brokered orders must clear
the Matching System prior to execution and must
otherwise be executed in accordance with the rules
set forth in new CHX Article 17, which governs
institutional brokers, as well as applicable law,
including Regulation NMS.
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51149
(February 8, 2005), 70 FR 7531 (February 14, 2005)
(SR–CHX–2004–26). Prior to demutualization, the
Exchange’s rules provided for access by ‘‘members’’
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64591
Exchange’s Fee Schedule was amended
to provide for annual Trading Permit
fees in lieu of annual member dues; the
amount of the Trading Permit Annual
Fee ($6,000) was identical to the amount
of member dues immediately prior to
demutualization. Trading Permit fees
have not increased for nearly two years,
since the demutualization transaction.
Pursuant to a recent proposed rule
change (the ‘‘Trading Permit Rule
Changes’’), each Participant Firm will be
required to hold only one Trading
Permit per firm, regardless of the
number of its registered
representatives.10 These rule changes
reflect the Exchange’s transition from a
floor-based exchange (where it was
appropriate to require multiple Trading
Permits if a Participant Firm had
multiple representatives on the CHX
floor) to an electronic facility (where all
Participant Firms have equivalent
electronic access to the Exchange’s
facilities).
The revised proposed Fee Schedule
provides that the annual fee for each
Trading Permit will increase from
$6,000 to $7,200 for each Trading
Permit purchased or renewed after
October 1, 2006. The Trading Permit
cancellation fee will increase to the
lesser of $2,400 or $600 per month for
the remainder of the one-year term of
the permit, effective with the renewal of
each Trading Permit after October 1,
2006.11
The CHX believes that these changes
to the Trading Permit fee structure are
reasonable under the circumstances.
The Trading Permit Annual Fee has not
increased for some time, warranting a
modest increase. Moreover, the Trading
Permit Rule Changes will result in
aggregate savings to CHX Participants.12
With respect to the Trading Permit
cancellation fee, as set forth in previous
proposed rule changes relating to
charges for cancellation of Trading
who owned or leased CHX ‘‘seats.’’ The
demutualization rule changes provide for access by
‘‘Participants’’ who hold ‘‘trading permits.’’
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54494
(September 25, 2006); 71 FR 58023 (October 2,
2006) (SR–CHX–2006–23). The Exchange believes
that the Trading Permit Rule Changes will provide
for an even more equitable allocation of fees among
Exchange Participants, because no firm will be
required to bear a disproportionate share of total
Trading Permit fees by holding multiple Trading
Permits. Instead, each Participant’s Trading Permit
fee will be identical, because each Participant will
only hold one Trading Permit.
11 See Section A of the Fee Schedule.
12 Although not all CHX Participant firms will
realize savings due to a reduction in the number of
Trading Permits, total Trading Permit fees will be
reduced substantially. In order to offset a portion
of this aggregate reduction, the Exchange believes
that the proposed modest increase in annual
Trading Permit fees is appropriate.
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
64592
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 212 / Thursday, November 2, 2006 / Notices
Permits,13 the CHX believes that it is
reasonable to provide for some fee relief
for Participants whose trading permits
are cancelled intrayear. The Exchange
also believes, however, that it is
necessary for the Exchange to have an
adequate basis on which to budget and
project annual revenues. Accordingly,
the Exchange believes that a Trading
Permit cancellation fee, including a
modest increase thereof, remains
appropriate.
• SRO Fee: This fee will increase
from $100/month to $250/month. This
fee will be assessed per Trading
Permit.14 As set forth above with respect
to Trading Permit fees, this slight
increase in the per permit fee is offset
by the aggregate savings that will be
achieved by CHX Participants due to the
new ‘‘one firm, one permit’’ rule made
effective by the Trading Permit Rule
Changes.
• Registration Fees: The CHX will
continue to assess a $500 annual fee for
each trader who is engaged in
proprietary securities trading for an offExchange Participant Firm that is solely
a CHX Participant and for which the
CHX is the Designated Examining
Authority (‘‘DEA’’).15 This fee will be
pro-rated in the first year of a trader’s
registration, based on the quarter in
which that registration occurs.16
Other changes to Section C of the Fee
Schedule reflect the transition away
from a floor-based trading environment,
with references to the floor modified to
reflect access to the Exchange’s
facilities. The fee for floor clerks has
also been eliminated.
• Matching System Port Charges: The
revised proposed Fee Schedule provides
for a port charge of $400 per month for
each Participant connection to the
Matching System, other than
connections through the Brokerplex
functionality that is used by CHX
institutional brokers.17 This fee is a new
Transaction and Order Routing Fees
(Section E)
Transaction fees will be modified in
several ways as the Exchange transitions
to its new trading model.19
• Matching System: Section E of the
Fee Schedule sets forth the transaction
fees that will be charged for executions
in the Matching System once it is
operative, including Matching System
routing fees. This section also contains
an odd-lot Matching System transaction
fee, which is charged to the Participant
that submits the odd-lot order to the
Matching System. The Exchange
believes that the new transaction fees
for the Matching System are fair and
reasonable, particularly in light of the
fee structures implemented in
connection with other electronic
facilities. The Exchange believes that
the ‘‘take/provide’’ model has become a
widely-recognized industry model, and
the Exchange’s rates are in line with
other similarly-situated market centers.
To facilitate an orderly transition,
Section E.7 of the Fee Schedule
preserves the pre- new trading model
fee structure, which will continue to
provide the basis for transaction and
order processing fees if an issue is not
yet traded in the Matching System, but
will no longer be applicable once an
issue transitions to the new trading
model and is available for trading in the
Matching System. Section E.7 of the Fee
Schedule also contains a new provision
establishing a charge for outbound ITS
or NMS Linkage Plan orders.20
13 See
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52815
(November 21, 2005), 70 FR 71572 (November 29,
2005) (SR–CHX 2005–31); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 54495 (September 25, 2006), 71 FR
58025 (October 2, 2006) (SR–CHX–2006–27)
(providing for a cancellation fee in the event a
Trading Permit is cancelled intrayear).
14 See Section B of the Fee Schedule.
15 See Section C of the Fee Schedule.
16 This provision formerly provided for a $500
initial registration fee and $500 annual fee (with no
proration for partial years) for each off-floor trader
who was engaged in proprietary securities trading
for a Participant Firm for which the CHX is the
DEA. Given the elimination of the $500 initial
registration fee and the addition of the proration
language, the changes to this provision will result
in net savings by affected Participant Firms.
17 See Section D of the Fee Schedule. Section D
formerly contained provisions relating to
assignment of issues to CHX specialists. This
process will no longer occur because all specialist
issues are being migrated to the new trading model.
addition to the Fee Schedule and
reflects the Exchange’s transition to a
fully-electronic trading platform instead
of a floor-based market. The Exchange
believes that, in the new trading model,
the port charge provides a reasonable
means of allocating a portion of
Matching System expenses to those
Participant Firms that maintain
connectivity to the Matching System.18
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:49 Nov 01, 2006
Jkt 211001
Accordingly, all former text of Section D has been
deleted in its entirety.
18 The former Fee Schedule allocated a portion of
these costs by means of various MAX-related
connectivity charges, which will be eliminated for
issues as they migrate from MAX (the Exchange’s
current semi-automated execution platform) to the
new trading model.
19 See Section E of the Fee Schedule.
20 This provision is necessary in order to
implement the CHX’s participation in the exchangeto-exchange billing arrangement associated with the
‘‘Plan for the Purpose of Creating and Operating an
Intermarket Communications Linkage Pursuant to
Section 11A(a)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934’’ (‘‘Linkage Plan’’), which took effect on
October 1, 2006. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 54548 (September 29, 2008), 71 FR
59159 (October 6, 2006) (SR–CHX–2006–28)
(approving Linkage Plan exchange-to-exchange
billing procedures); Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 54551 (September, 2006), 71 FR 59148
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Institutional Broker Agency Fees:
Section E.3 of the Fee Schedule outlines
the fees that will be charged to the
Participant Firm that executes an order
through an institutional broker, if the
broker facilitates the execution of the
order on the Exchange or in another
market over ITS or any later linkage
plan. These fees have not changed from
the fees set forth in Section F.4(e) and
(f) of the previous Fee Schedule; only
their location within the Fee Schedule
has changed.21
Credits (Section F)
The Exchange’s credit structure has
been revised to adjust for the new
trading model as well as Regulation
NMS, which impacts allocation and
payment of market data fees.22
• Institutional Brokers: In lieu of the
previous formula used for floor broker
credits, which incorporated significant
variables including market data fees,
each institutional broker will be eligible
for a monthly transaction fee credit
equal to 18% of the transaction fees
received by the Exchange each month
for agency trades executed through the
institutional broker.23
• Specialist Credits: These credits
will continue to be available to
specialists in issues that they trade as
specialist during the transition to the
new trading model.24 As an issue moves
into the Matching System for trading,
specialist credits will be pro-rated or
eliminated for that issue, based on the
date that the issue becomes eligible for
trading in the Matching System.
Specialists (or other eligible
Participants) who elect to register as
market makers in the new trading model
may then earn market data rebates for
liquidity-providing trades or crosses
submitted to the Matching System.
• Market Data Rebates for Matching
System Trades: Each Participant Firm 25
(October 6, 2006) (approving Linkage Plan). When
an outbound Linkage Plan commitment is executed
on another Linkage Participant market, such market
will directly invoice the CHX for a transaction fee
equal to the transaction fee that it would charge its
own member for such an execution. The CHX is
then responsible for payment of such invoice. The
new CHX Fee Schedule provision permits the CHX
to collect a corresponding fee from the Participant
who generated the outbound Linkage Plan
commitment.
21 Reference to ‘‘floor’’ broker also has changed to
‘‘institutional’’ broker.
22 See Section F of the Fee Schedule.
23 This new institutional broker credit replaces
the former floor broker credit provision set forth in
Section M.2 of the previous Fee Schedule.
24 Formerly set forth in Section M.1, the specialist
credit provisions are unchanged and will remain in
place until an issue migrates to the new trading
model.
25 Institutional brokers are not eligible to receive
tape credits; they are instead eligible for the
transaction fee credits previously described.
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 212 / Thursday, November 2, 2006 / Notices
will be eligible for a tape credit, applied
on a quarterly basis, equal to 50% of
monthly tape revenue from the
Consolidated Tape Association (less all
direct CTA costs) generated by liquidityproviding trades or crosses submitted to
the Matching System by a Participant
Firm in a particular Tape A or Tape B
security. By its terms, this credit is not
available unless an issue has migrated to
the Matching System.
The terms of this credit are identical
to the terms of the Specialist Credit
discussed above. However, the CHX has
added a provision indicating that tape
credits will be applied on a quarterly
basis, after the Exchange receives its
payments from the reporting plans.26
The identical nature of the credits is
intentional. As set forth above, the
Specialist Credit is available until an
issue migrates to the CHX Matching
System, at which point Specialist
Credits will no longer be available,27 but
the former specialist (or another eligible
Participant) may receive a Market Data
Rebate in lieu of the Specialist Credit,
on account of liquidity-providing trades
or crosses submitted to the Matching
System.
• Other Credit Provisions: Section F.4
of the Fee Schedule, relating to TwoSided Quote Providers, remains
unchanged but has been relocated from
former Section M.4. Section F.5 of the
Fee Schedule, governing unavailability
of credits if a Participant’s payment to
the Exchange is more than 60 days past
due, also is unchanged from the version
that became effective shortly before this
Fee Schedule was submitted.28
Co-Location Fees (Section G)
These provisions have not changed;
they merely have been relocated from
former Section H to current Section G of
the Fee Schedule.
Clearing Support Fees (Section H)
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
There are no changes to this section,
which formerly was Section I of the Fee
Schedule, except that the Exchange is
deleting provisions relating to CUSIP
fees.
26 The Exchange has also added a provision
indicating that the tape credit will be based on the
tape revenue generated by liquidity-providing trades
or Crosses submitted to the Matching System by the
Participant Firm. (emphasis added). Telephone
conversation between Kathleen Boege, Vice
President and Associate General Counsel, CHX,
Joseph Morra, Special Counsel, Division of Market
Regulation (‘‘Division’’), Commission, and Sara
Gillis, Attorney, Division, Commission, on October
24, 2006.
27 There will no longer be a specialist assigned to
such issue.
28 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54522
(September 27, 2006), 71 FR 58456 (October 3,
2006) (SR–CHX–2006–26).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:49 Nov 01, 2006
Jkt 211001
Listing Fees (Section I)
There are no substantive changes to
this section, which formerly was
Section J.
Market Regulation and Market
Surveillance Fees (Section J)
There are no changes to this section,
which formerly was Section K of the Fee
Schedule, except that the provision
relating to DEA Examination Fees has
been modified to delete a footnote
relating to exemptions and to clarify
that the charge is assessed per
Participant Firm.
Specialist Fixed Fees (Section K)
These provisions have not changed
with respect to calculation of the
aggregate fixed fees; they merely have
been relocated from former Section E to
current Section K of the Fee Schedule.
This provision has also been modified
to reflect the transition to the new
trading model and to provide a basis for
pro rating the fixed fees as issues
migrate to the new trading model over
the next several months. Fixed fees will
continue to be charged for issues traded
by CHX specialists; once an issue
migrates to the new trading model and
is no longer traded by a CHX specialist,
the fixed fee due from the specialist for
that month will be prorated based on
the transition date.
Space Charges (Section L)
The rule changes relating to the new
trading model provide that the
Exchange will no longer be considered
to have a physical trading floor from a
regulatory perspective, although the
current trading floor space will remain
available for leasing by Participants (and
ultimately perhaps by non-Participants).
During the transitional period this fall,
the existing billing structure for booth
space, post space and electrical or
structural modifications to such space
will remain in place, through December
31, 2006. After that date, any applicable
space charges will be incorporated into
separate lease agreements between the
Exchange and entities that lease space
on the Exchange’s former trading
floor.29 The Exchange is in the process
of finalizing its comprehensive space
plan for the former trading floor,
including the terms under which it will
offer space for lease to Participants.
These terms, and corresponding lease
documentation, will be available for
consideration by Participants later this
fall.
29 See
PO 00000
Section L of the Fee Schedule.
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64593
Equipment, Information Services &
Technology Charges (Section M)
As with space charges, these fees will
remain in place until December 31,
2006. Except as set forth below, there
are no substantive changes to this
section. Most changes are intended to
delete obsolete provisions relating to the
Exchange’s former OTC specialist
program.
• Broker Connectivity Charge/Credit:
All network and connectivity charges
are rebilled monthly to institutional
brokers that access the network, based
on the proportion of each firm’s use of
the network during the month.30 Until
completion of the new trading model
rollout, institutional brokers will be
eligible for a monthly network/
connectivity fee credit, equal to a total
monthly credit of $15,000, allocated
among institutional broker firms based
on each firm’s respective percentage of
total monthly transaction fee credits.31
Supplies, Rulebooks and Reports
(Section N)
This section includes two new
charges:
• Brokerplex Report Charge: There
will be a charge of $50 per month to
provide reports of Participant Firm
activity, by trader.32
• Trade and order data: This charge is
intended to help the Exchange defray
the expenses of responding to
Participants’ data requests, which often
require significant customization and
other accommodation of specific
requests.33
Late Fees (Section O)
These provisions have not changed;
they merely have been relocated from
former Section N to current Section O
of the Fee Schedule.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 34 in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among its members and is in line with
other self-regulatory organizations that
have implemented trading platforms
similar to the CHX new trading model.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition.
30 See
Section M of the Fee Schedule.
Section F.2 of the Fee Schedule for a
description of this credit.
32 See Section N.3 of the Fee Schedule.
33 See Section N.4 of the Fee Schedule.
34 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
31 See
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
64594
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 212 / Thursday, November 2, 2006 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change establishes or changes a member
due, fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 35 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 36
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.37
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–CHX–2006–29 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CHX–2006–29. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
35 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 19b–4(f)(2).
37 For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
within which the Commission may summarily
abrogate the proposed rule change under Section
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers
the period to commence on October 20, 2006, the
date on which the CHX filed Amendment No. 1. See
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
36 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:49 Nov 01, 2006
Jkt 211001
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the CHX. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CHX–2006–29 and should
be submitted on or before November 24,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.38
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–18481 Filed 11–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54653; File No. SR–NYSE–
2006–94]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Rule 122 (Orders With More Than One
Broker) Until the Availability of Full
d-Quote Functionality in a Particular
Security or February 5, 2007,
Whichever Comes First
October 26, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
25, 2006, the New York Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. NYSE
filed the proposed rule change pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3) of the Act 3 and Rule
38 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders
the proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NYSE seeks to amend Exchange Rule
122 (Orders with More than One Broker)
for a period of time commencing from
the operative date of this proposed rule
change until the availability of full
d-Quoting 5 functionality in a particular
security or February 5, 2007, whichever
comes first. The proposed rule change
would permit Floor brokers to maintain
discretionary e-Quotes (‘‘d-Quotes’’) and
CAP–DI orders 6 in a security on the
same side of the market for the same
order that are capable of trading at the
same price. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.nyse.com), at the Exchange’s
Office of the Secretary, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to permit
Floor brokers to enter discretionary
e-Quotes and CAP–DI orders in a
security on the same side of the market
for the same order that are capable of
trading at the same price for a limited
4 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54577
(October 5, 2006), 71 FR 60208 (October 12, 2006).
6 See Exchange Rules 13 and 123A.30(a).
Exchange Rule 123A.30(a) describes a CAP–DI
order as: ‘‘The elected or converted portion of a
‘percentage order that is convertible on a
destabilizing tick and designated immediate
execution or cancel election’ (‘‘CAP–DI order’’) may
be automatically executed and may participate in a
sweep.’’
5 See
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 212 (Thursday, November 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64590-64594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-18481]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54657; File No. SR-CHX-2006-29]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to Participant Fees and Credits
October 26, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 29, 2006, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the CHX. On October
20, 2006, the CHX filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\
The CHX has designated this
[[Page 64591]]
proposal as one establishing or changing a member due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the CHX under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\4\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\5\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as
amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 1 made technical changes to correct the
marking of the proposed rule text and made clarifying changes to the
discussion in the purpose section. Amendment No. 1 made no changes
to the proposed fees as set forth in the original filing.
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The CHX proposes to revise its Schedule of Participant Fees and
Credits (``Fee Schedule'') to provide for fees, charges and credits
contemplated by the Exchange's new trading model being implemented by
the CHX this fall. The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the CHX's Web site (https://www.chx.com/rules/proposed_rules.htm), at
the principal office of the CHX, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Throughout 2006, the Exchange has been working on the design and
development of a new trading model centered around a core matching
system that will provide for fully automated electronic matching of
orders (``Matching System''), as well as corresponding rules and
regulatory initiatives. On September 29, 2006, the Exchange's proposed
rules relating to the new trading model were approved by the
Commission.\6\ The Exchange anticipates making the transition to its
new trading model commencing the week of October 23, 2006. As further
detailed in SR-CHX-2006-05, the Exchange's new trading model differs
from the current CHX structure in several notable ways. First, the CHX
will no longer operate from a traditional physical exchange floor, but
rather will operate an entirely electronic facility. Second, the CHX
will no longer maintain a specialist program, in which specialists
maintain books of orders in designated issues.\7\ Finally, as noted
above, orders will be matched by a fully automated Matching System.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54550 (September 29,
2006); 71 FR 59563 (October 10, 2006) (SR-CHX-2006-05) (referred to
as the ``NTM Approval Order'').
\7\ In the new trading model, Participants may register as
either market makers or institutional brokers (formerly known as
floor brokers), or may simply operate as unregistered order-sending
firms that route orders to the CHX for execution.
\8\ The CHX new trading model does contemplate special handling
of orders by CHX institutional brokers, but all such orders must be
entered by institutional brokers into an electronic functionality
known as Brokerplex. Brokered orders must clear the Matching System
prior to execution and must otherwise be executed in accordance with
the rules set forth in new CHX Article 17, which governs
institutional brokers, as well as applicable law, including
Regulation NMS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This fundamental shift in the Exchange's trading model necessitates
certain changes in the Exchange's business model, including the fees,
charges and credits that it assesses its participants
(``Participants''). After significant deliberation, including a
comprehensive review of other self-regulatory organizations and their
respective billing structures, the Exchange has formulated a revised
Fee Schedule that the Exchange believes more closely resembles the fee
structures that have been implemented in connection with other
electronic trading facilities.
Summarized below are the provisions of the Fee Schedule that will
change from the previous version. To facilitate an orderly transition
to the new trading model, the Fee Schedule contemplates charging
Participants under current rates, with new Fee Schedule provisions to
become applicable as issues are transitioned to the new trading model
and become eligible for trading in the Matching System. The Fee
Schedule delineates which fees will be ``phased out'' during and after
the transition to the new trading model.
Participant Access & Registration (Sections A-D)
Permit Fees: In connection with the Exchange's
demutualization on February 9, 2005, the Exchange's rules were amended
to require that each Participant hold at least one Trading Permit in
order to access the CHX.\9\ The Exchange's Fee Schedule was amended to
provide for annual Trading Permit fees in lieu of annual member dues;
the amount of the Trading Permit Annual Fee ($6,000) was identical to
the amount of member dues immediately prior to demutualization. Trading
Permit fees have not increased for nearly two years, since the
demutualization transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51149 (February 8,
2005), 70 FR 7531 (February 14, 2005) (SR-CHX-2004-26). Prior to
demutualization, the Exchange's rules provided for access by
``members'' who owned or leased CHX ``seats.'' The demutualization
rule changes provide for access by ``Participants'' who hold
``trading permits.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to a recent proposed rule change (the ``Trading Permit
Rule Changes''), each Participant Firm will be required to hold only
one Trading Permit per firm, regardless of the number of its registered
representatives.\10\ These rule changes reflect the Exchange's
transition from a floor-based exchange (where it was appropriate to
require multiple Trading Permits if a Participant Firm had multiple
representatives on the CHX floor) to an electronic facility (where all
Participant Firms have equivalent electronic access to the Exchange's
facilities).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54494 (September
25, 2006); 71 FR 58023 (October 2, 2006) (SR-CHX-2006-23). The
Exchange believes that the Trading Permit Rule Changes will provide
for an even more equitable allocation of fees among Exchange
Participants, because no firm will be required to bear a
disproportionate share of total Trading Permit fees by holding
multiple Trading Permits. Instead, each Participant's Trading Permit
fee will be identical, because each Participant will only hold one
Trading Permit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The revised proposed Fee Schedule provides that the annual fee for
each Trading Permit will increase from $6,000 to $7,200 for each
Trading Permit purchased or renewed after October 1, 2006. The Trading
Permit cancellation fee will increase to the lesser of $2,400 or $600
per month for the remainder of the one-year term of the permit,
effective with the renewal of each Trading Permit after October 1,
2006.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Section A of the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CHX believes that these changes to the Trading Permit fee
structure are reasonable under the circumstances. The Trading Permit
Annual Fee has not increased for some time, warranting a modest
increase. Moreover, the Trading Permit Rule Changes will result in
aggregate savings to CHX Participants.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Although not all CHX Participant firms will realize savings
due to a reduction in the number of Trading Permits, total Trading
Permit fees will be reduced substantially. In order to offset a
portion of this aggregate reduction, the Exchange believes that the
proposed modest increase in annual Trading Permit fees is
appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the Trading Permit cancellation fee, as set forth
in previous proposed rule changes relating to charges for cancellation
of Trading
[[Page 64592]]
Permits,\13\ the CHX believes that it is reasonable to provide for some
fee relief for Participants whose trading permits are cancelled
intrayear. The Exchange also believes, however, that it is necessary
for the Exchange to have an adequate basis on which to budget and
project annual revenues. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that a
Trading Permit cancellation fee, including a modest increase thereof,
remains appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52815 (November 21,
2005), 70 FR 71572 (November 29, 2005) (SR-CHX 2005-31); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 54495 (September 25, 2006), 71 FR 58025
(October 2, 2006) (SR-CHX-2006-27) (providing for a cancellation fee
in the event a Trading Permit is cancelled intrayear).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SRO Fee: This fee will increase from $100/month to $250/
month. This fee will be assessed per Trading Permit.\14\ As set forth
above with respect to Trading Permit fees, this slight increase in the
per permit fee is offset by the aggregate savings that will be achieved
by CHX Participants due to the new ``one firm, one permit'' rule made
effective by the Trading Permit Rule Changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Section B of the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registration Fees: The CHX will continue to assess a $500
annual fee for each trader who is engaged in proprietary securities
trading for an off-Exchange Participant Firm that is solely a CHX
Participant and for which the CHX is the Designated Examining Authority
(``DEA'').\15\ This fee will be pro-rated in the first year of a
trader's registration, based on the quarter in which that registration
occurs.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Section C of the Fee Schedule.
\16\ This provision formerly provided for a $500 initial
registration fee and $500 annual fee (with no proration for partial
years) for each off-floor trader who was engaged in proprietary
securities trading for a Participant Firm for which the CHX is the
DEA. Given the elimination of the $500 initial registration fee and
the addition of the proration language, the changes to this
provision will result in net savings by affected Participant Firms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other changes to Section C of the Fee Schedule reflect the
transition away from a floor-based trading environment, with references
to the floor modified to reflect access to the Exchange's facilities.
The fee for floor clerks has also been eliminated.
Matching System Port Charges: The revised proposed Fee
Schedule provides for a port charge of $400 per month for each
Participant connection to the Matching System, other than connections
through the Brokerplex functionality that is used by CHX institutional
brokers.\17\ This fee is a new addition to the Fee Schedule and
reflects the Exchange's transition to a fully-electronic trading
platform instead of a floor-based market. The Exchange believes that,
in the new trading model, the port charge provides a reasonable means
of allocating a portion of Matching System expenses to those
Participant Firms that maintain connectivity to the Matching
System.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Section D of the Fee Schedule. Section D formerly
contained provisions relating to assignment of issues to CHX
specialists. This process will no longer occur because all
specialist issues are being migrated to the new trading model.
Accordingly, all former text of Section D has been deleted in its
entirety.
\18\ The former Fee Schedule allocated a portion of these costs
by means of various MAX-related connectivity charges, which will be
eliminated for issues as they migrate from MAX (the Exchange's
current semi-automated execution platform) to the new trading model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transaction and Order Routing Fees (Section E)
Transaction fees will be modified in several ways as the Exchange
transitions to its new trading model.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Section E of the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Matching System: Section E of the Fee Schedule sets forth
the transaction fees that will be charged for executions in the
Matching System once it is operative, including Matching System routing
fees. This section also contains an odd-lot Matching System transaction
fee, which is charged to the Participant that submits the odd-lot order
to the Matching System. The Exchange believes that the new transaction
fees for the Matching System are fair and reasonable, particularly in
light of the fee structures implemented in connection with other
electronic facilities. The Exchange believes that the ``take/provide''
model has become a widely-recognized industry model, and the Exchange's
rates are in line with other similarly-situated market centers.
To facilitate an orderly transition, Section E.7 of the Fee
Schedule preserves the pre- new trading model fee structure, which will
continue to provide the basis for transaction and order processing fees
if an issue is not yet traded in the Matching System, but will no
longer be applicable once an issue transitions to the new trading model
and is available for trading in the Matching System. Section E.7 of the
Fee Schedule also contains a new provision establishing a charge for
outbound ITS or NMS Linkage Plan orders.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ This provision is necessary in order to implement the CHX's
participation in the exchange-to-exchange billing arrangement
associated with the ``Plan for the Purpose of Creating and Operating
an Intermarket Communications Linkage Pursuant to Section
11A(a)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934'' (``Linkage
Plan''), which took effect on October 1, 2006. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 54548 (September 29, 2008), 71 FR 59159
(October 6, 2006) (SR-CHX-2006-28) (approving Linkage Plan exchange-
to-exchange billing procedures); Securities Exchange Act Release No.
54551 (September, 2006), 71 FR 59148 (October 6, 2006) (approving
Linkage Plan). When an outbound Linkage Plan commitment is executed
on another Linkage Participant market, such market will directly
invoice the CHX for a transaction fee equal to the transaction fee
that it would charge its own member for such an execution. The CHX
is then responsible for payment of such invoice. The new CHX Fee
Schedule provision permits the CHX to collect a corresponding fee
from the Participant who generated the outbound Linkage Plan
commitment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Institutional Broker Agency Fees: Section E.3 of the Fee
Schedule outlines the fees that will be charged to the Participant Firm
that executes an order through an institutional broker, if the broker
facilitates the execution of the order on the Exchange or in another
market over ITS or any later linkage plan. These fees have not changed
from the fees set forth in Section F.4(e) and (f) of the previous Fee
Schedule; only their location within the Fee Schedule has changed.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Reference to ``floor'' broker also has changed to
``institutional'' broker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Credits (Section F)
The Exchange's credit structure has been revised to adjust for the
new trading model as well as Regulation NMS, which impacts allocation
and payment of market data fees.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Section F of the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Institutional Brokers: In lieu of the previous formula
used for floor broker credits, which incorporated significant variables
including market data fees, each institutional broker will be eligible
for a monthly transaction fee credit equal to 18% of the transaction
fees received by the Exchange each month for agency trades executed
through the institutional broker.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ This new institutional broker credit replaces the former
floor broker credit provision set forth in Section M.2 of the
previous Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specialist Credits: These credits will continue to be
available to specialists in issues that they trade as specialist during
the transition to the new trading model.\24\ As an issue moves into the
Matching System for trading, specialist credits will be pro-rated or
eliminated for that issue, based on the date that the issue becomes
eligible for trading in the Matching System. Specialists (or other
eligible Participants) who elect to register as market makers in the
new trading model may then earn market data rebates for liquidity-
providing trades or crosses submitted to the Matching System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Formerly set forth in Section M.1, the specialist credit
provisions are unchanged and will remain in place until an issue
migrates to the new trading model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Data Rebates for Matching System Trades: Each
Participant Firm \25\
[[Page 64593]]
will be eligible for a tape credit, applied on a quarterly basis, equal
to 50% of monthly tape revenue from the Consolidated Tape Association
(less all direct CTA costs) generated by liquidity-providing trades or
crosses submitted to the Matching System by a Participant Firm in a
particular Tape A or Tape B security. By its terms, this credit is not
available unless an issue has migrated to the Matching System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ Institutional brokers are not eligible to receive tape
credits; they are instead eligible for the transaction fee credits
previously described.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The terms of this credit are identical to the terms of the
Specialist Credit discussed above. However, the CHX has added a
provision indicating that tape credits will be applied on a quarterly
basis, after the Exchange receives its payments from the reporting
plans.\26\ The identical nature of the credits is intentional. As set
forth above, the Specialist Credit is available until an issue migrates
to the CHX Matching System, at which point Specialist Credits will no
longer be available,\27\ but the former specialist (or another eligible
Participant) may receive a Market Data Rebate in lieu of the Specialist
Credit, on account of liquidity-providing trades or crosses submitted
to the Matching System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ The Exchange has also added a provision indicating that the
tape credit will be based on the tape revenue generated by
liquidity-providing trades or Crosses submitted to the Matching
System by the Participant Firm. (emphasis added). Telephone
conversation between Kathleen Boege, Vice President and Associate
General Counsel, CHX, Joseph Morra, Special Counsel, Division of
Market Regulation (``Division''), Commission, and Sara Gillis,
Attorney, Division, Commission, on October 24, 2006.
\27\ There will no longer be a specialist assigned to such
issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Credit Provisions: Section F.4 of the Fee Schedule,
relating to Two-Sided Quote Providers, remains unchanged but has been
relocated from former Section M.4. Section F.5 of the Fee Schedule,
governing unavailability of credits if a Participant's payment to the
Exchange is more than 60 days past due, also is unchanged from the
version that became effective shortly before this Fee Schedule was
submitted.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54522 (September
27, 2006), 71 FR 58456 (October 3, 2006) (SR-CHX-2006-26).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Co-Location Fees (Section G)
These provisions have not changed; they merely have been relocated
from former Section H to current Section G of the Fee Schedule.
Clearing Support Fees (Section H)
There are no changes to this section, which formerly was Section I
of the Fee Schedule, except that the Exchange is deleting provisions
relating to CUSIP fees.
Listing Fees (Section I)
There are no substantive changes to this section, which formerly
was Section J.
Market Regulation and Market Surveillance Fees (Section J)
There are no changes to this section, which formerly was Section K
of the Fee Schedule, except that the provision relating to DEA
Examination Fees has been modified to delete a footnote relating to
exemptions and to clarify that the charge is assessed per Participant
Firm.
Specialist Fixed Fees (Section K)
These provisions have not changed with respect to calculation of
the aggregate fixed fees; they merely have been relocated from former
Section E to current Section K of the Fee Schedule. This provision has
also been modified to reflect the transition to the new trading model
and to provide a basis for pro rating the fixed fees as issues migrate
to the new trading model over the next several months. Fixed fees will
continue to be charged for issues traded by CHX specialists; once an
issue migrates to the new trading model and is no longer traded by a
CHX specialist, the fixed fee due from the specialist for that month
will be prorated based on the transition date.
Space Charges (Section L)
The rule changes relating to the new trading model provide that the
Exchange will no longer be considered to have a physical trading floor
from a regulatory perspective, although the current trading floor space
will remain available for leasing by Participants (and ultimately
perhaps by non-Participants). During the transitional period this fall,
the existing billing structure for booth space, post space and
electrical or structural modifications to such space will remain in
place, through December 31, 2006. After that date, any applicable space
charges will be incorporated into separate lease agreements between the
Exchange and entities that lease space on the Exchange's former trading
floor.\29\ The Exchange is in the process of finalizing its
comprehensive space plan for the former trading floor, including the
terms under which it will offer space for lease to Participants. These
terms, and corresponding lease documentation, will be available for
consideration by Participants later this fall.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See Section L of the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equipment, Information Services & Technology Charges (Section M)
As with space charges, these fees will remain in place until
December 31, 2006. Except as set forth below, there are no substantive
changes to this section. Most changes are intended to delete obsolete
provisions relating to the Exchange's former OTC specialist program.
Broker Connectivity Charge/Credit: All network and
connectivity charges are rebilled monthly to institutional brokers that
access the network, based on the proportion of each firm's use of the
network during the month.\30\ Until completion of the new trading model
rollout, institutional brokers will be eligible for a monthly network/
connectivity fee credit, equal to a total monthly credit of $15,000,
allocated among institutional broker firms based on each firm's
respective percentage of total monthly transaction fee credits.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See Section M of the Fee Schedule.
\31\ See Section F.2 of the Fee Schedule for a description of
this credit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplies, Rulebooks and Reports (Section N)
This section includes two new charges:
Brokerplex Report Charge: There will be a charge of $50
per month to provide reports of Participant Firm activity, by
trader.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See Section N.3 of the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trade and order data: This charge is intended to help the
Exchange defray the expenses of responding to Participants' data
requests, which often require significant customization and other
accommodation of specific requests.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See Section N.4 of the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Late Fees (Section O)
These provisions have not changed; they merely have been relocated
from former Section N to current Section O of the Fee Schedule.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \34\ in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
its members and is in line with other self-regulatory organizations
that have implemented trading platforms similar to the CHX new trading
model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition.
[[Page 64594]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change establishes or changes a
member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \35\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) \36\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of
such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such
rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\36\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
\37\ For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which
the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change under
Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers the period
to commence on October 20, 2006, the date on which the CHX filed
Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-CHX-2006-29 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2006-29. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the CHX. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-CHX-2006-29 and should be submitted on or before
November 24, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\38\
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-18481 Filed 11-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P