Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to Amendment No. 2 to a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Disciplinary and Delisting Procedures; Correction, 62496-62497 [E6-17846]
Download as PDF
62496
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 25, 2006 / Notices
across all classes rather than only those
assigned to the Market Maker. The text
of the proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.bse.com), at the Exchange’s Office
of the Secretary and at the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
MAC which is contained in the Fee
Schedule for BOX. Currently, in order to
determine if a Market Maker has
reached its MAC, volume in their
assigned classes is charged a flat fee,
which is then compared to the MAC. In
addition, any activity outside a Market
Maker’s appointments is charged a flat
fee separately. Since trading in classes
outside of a Market Maker’s
appointment consumes a similar
amount of technological resources as
those in a Market Maker’s assigned
volume, the Exchange proposes to have
this unassigned activity included in the
volume accumulation that is used to
determine if a Market Marker has
reached its MAC. This proposed rule
change would aid BOX in its continuing
effort to reduce total fees incurred by
Participants.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of section 6(b) of the Act,5
in general, and section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,6 in particular, in that it provides for
the equitable allocation of dues, fees
and other charges among its members.
The Exchange believes that it is
appropriate to review the MAC across
all classes rather than only those
assigned to the Market Maker, in the
5 15
6 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:12 Oct 24, 2006
interest of fair pricing for all
Participants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change has become
effective upon filing pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 7 and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder 8 because it changes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form https://www.sec.gov/
rules.sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BSE–2006–43 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–BSE–2006–43. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
7 15
8 17
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules.sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing will also be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the BSE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to the file
number in the caption above and should
be submitted on or before November 15,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–17833 Filed 10–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54437A; File No. SR–CHX–
2005–06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change
and Amendment No. 1 and Notice of
Filing and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval to Amendment No. 2 to a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Disciplinary and Delisting Procedures;
Correction
October 18, 2006.
In FR Doc. No. E6–15588, beginning
on page 55037 for Wednesday,
September 20, 2006, the sentence in Part
V on page 55042 contained an error.
Release No. 34–54437 (the ‘‘Release’’)
approved a proposed rule change filed
by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., in
File No. SR–CHX–2005–06. Part V of the
Release identified the filing being
9 17
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
25OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 206 / Wednesday, October 25, 2006 / Notices
approved as SR–CBOE–2005–06, rather
than SR–CHX–2005–06. Accordingly,
Part V of the Release should be revised
to read as follows:
‘‘It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,1 that the
proposed rule change (SR–CHX–2005–
06), as amended, is approved.’’
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.2
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–17846 Filed 10–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54619; File No. SR–FICC–
2006–07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating To Providing Certain Reports
to its Members
October 18, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on
April 21, 2006, the Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) and on
June 2, 2006, amended the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared primarily by FICC. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would
clarify the frequency of certain reports
that FICC will provide to its members.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FICC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. FICC has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:12 Oct 24, 2006
Jkt 211001
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.2
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to further harmonize the rules
of The Depository Trust & Clearing
Corporation’s clearing agency
subsidiaries. In this filing, FICC
proposes to conform the rules of both its
divisions, the Government Securities
Division and the Mortgage Backed
Securities Division (‘‘MBSD’’), regarding
providing FICC’s financial reports to
members to the equivalent rule of The
Depository Trust Company (‘‘DTC’’).3
The revised rules would state that
quarterly unaudited financial statements
would only be provided to members for
the first three quarters of the calendar
year.4 In addition, although FICC would
delete the time frames for providing the
financial reports from its rules (in
conformity to DTC’s rule), FICC would
nevertheless continue to make its
annual audited financial statements
available to its members within 60 days
of the fiscal year end and would
continue to make its quarterly
unaudited financial statements available
within 30 days of the quarter end.5
FICC also proposes to change the time
frame in Article V, Rule 5, Section 3 of
MBSD’s Clearing Rulebook and EPN
Rulebook regarding its providing to its
members with the independent
auditors’ annual study and evaluation of
MBSD’s internal accounting controls.
While FICC proposes to delete these
rule provisions in their entirety, FICC
would make this study and evaluation
available to its members within a
reasonable time after it receives it from
its independent accountants, which is
exactly the practice for DTC.
FICC believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act 6
and the rules and regulations
thereunder because it is a change that
does not adversely affect the
safeguarding of securities or funds in
the custody or control of FICC or for
which it is responsible.
2 The Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by FICC.
3 DTC Rule 15.
4 An annual audited financial statement is
provided to members after the last calendar quarter
of each year.
5 FICC will post the information on its website
within the requisite time frames.
6 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62497
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
FICC does not believe that the
proposed rule change will have any
impact or impose any burden on
competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
FICC has not solicited or received
written comments relating to the
proposed rule change. FICC will notify
the Commission of any written
comments it receives.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within thirty-five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
ninety days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change; or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–FICC–2006–07 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–FICC–2006–07. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62496-62497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17846]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54437A; File No. SR-CHX-2005-06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 and Notice
of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to Amendment No. 2 to
a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Disciplinary and Delisting
Procedures; Correction
October 18, 2006.
In FR Doc. No. E6-15588, beginning on page 55037 for Wednesday,
September 20, 2006, the sentence in Part V on page 55042 contained an
error. Release No. 34-54437 (the ``Release'') approved a proposed rule
change filed by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., in File No. SR-CHX-
2005-06. Part V of the Release identified the filing being
[[Page 62497]]
approved as SR-CBOE-2005-06, rather than SR-CHX-2005-06. Accordingly,
Part V of the Release should be revised to read as follows:
``It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\1\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CHX-2005-06), as amended, is
approved.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-17846 Filed 10-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P