In the Matter of Certain Flash Memory Chips, Flash Memory Systems, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation, 62297-62298 [E6-17770]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 24, 2006 / Notices
natural resources management agency
where the corridor is located. The
USIBWC, in coordination with the
USFWS, is developing approximately 30
acres of new wetlands as mitigation for
levee improvements throughout the
LRGFCP.
Common Levee System Proposed
Action and Alternatives
No Action Alternative
The No Action Alternative was
evaluated as the single alternative action
to the Proposed Action. The No Action
Alternative will retain the current
configuration of the Common Levee
System, with no impacts to biological
and cultural resources, land use, and
soil, community resources, or
environmental health. In terms of flood
protection, however, current
containment capacity under the No
Action Alternative may be insufficient
to fully control Rio Grande flooding
under severe storm events, with
associated risks to personal safety and
property.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Proposed Action
Biological Resources. The Common
Levee System corridor runs primarily
through agricultural areas.
Approximately 1 mile of the total length
of the 5.2-mile levee system runs along
two units of the LRGV National Wildlife
Refuge. No thorn woodland will be
removed along the levee expansion,
while 3.9 acres of low density woodland
will be removed along Anzalduas Dike.
The 3.9 acres along the Anzalduas Dike
represent 10 percent of the total area of
thorn woodland within the Common
Levee System (including both the
Common Levee and the Anzalduas Dike
areas). A single wetlands/open water
area located within the Common Levee
ROW is located outside the 100-foot
buffer area for the proposed levee
expansion, and will not be affected by
construction activities. Removal of T&E
species habitat, including woodland
habitat suitable for the ocelot, would be
minimal along the Common Levee
System corridor. For other species
whose habitat is potentially present near
the levee corridor, construction
activities will be scheduled to minimize
impacts to those species and their
habitat.
Cultural Resources. No areas of high
probability for the occurrence of
unknown prehistoric archaeological
sites have been reported along the
Common Levee System, and none were
identified during the current archival
research conducted in preparation of the
EA. Preliminary investigations indicate
that two historic-age resources exist
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:25 Oct 23, 2006
Jkt 211001
within the current Mission Levee ROW
and are engineering elements of the
levee system. These resources will
undergo minor modifications at the
levee tie-ins, or may undergo a moderate
visual impact by the encroachment of
the expanded levee footprint.
Water Resources. The Common Levee
System was evaluated with the updated
hydraulic model to determine if changes
to water surface elevations will be
affected by the proposed improvements
to the levee system. As in the case of the
Mission Levee System, a minimum
change in floodwater surface elevation,
less than 1 inch, is anticipated as a
result of the levee height increase.
Land Use. The proposed expansion of
the Common Levee System will occur
entirely within the ROW. No urban
development is located near the
proposed levee expansion area. The
expansion will remove approximately
62 acres of herbaceous vegetation along
the Common Levee and approximately 6
acres of herbaceous vegetation along the
Anzalduas Dike. Alignment of the levee
expansion will be adjusted to minimize
removal of established wooded
vegetation along the Gabrielson and
Cottam Units of the LRGV National
Wildlife Refuge. Anzalduas Dam County
Park, where Anzalduas Dike is located,
will be temporarily affected during
project construction. No impacts to
agricultural lands are anticipated.
Community Resources. Improvements
to the Common Levee System,
individually or in combination with the
Mission Levee System, represent an
influx of federal funds into Hidalgo
County that will have a positive local
economic impact; however, the benefit
will be limited to the construction
period and represents less than 0.2
percent of the annual county
employment, income, and sales values.
No adverse impacts to
disproportionately high minority and
low-income populations were
identified. Minimum utilization of
public roads during construction is
anticipated; a temporary increase in use
of the access road will be required for
equipment mobilization to staging areas.
Environmental Health Issues.
Construction of the Common Levee
System represents less than 1 percent of
the Hidalgo County annual emissions
inventory for five air criteria pollutants.
Moderate increases in ambient noise
levels will result from excavation and
fill activities, with no transient or longterm exposures above threshold values
for adverse impacts. No waste storage or
disposal sites were identified within the
expanded levee footprint and its
vicinity.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62297
Best Management Practices and
Mitigation. Engineering design measures
will include optimization of the levee
expansion alignment to the extent
possible to avoid impact to sensitive
vegetation and natural resources
management areas within the LRGV
National Wildlife Area. Mitigation for
cultural resources, as required, will be
coordinated between the Texas Historic
Commission and the USIBWC. During
construction, BMPs include
development of a storm water pollution
prevention plan to minimize impacts of
receiving waters, including use of
sediment barriers and soil wetting to
minimize erosion. Following
construction, expanded levees and the
construction corridor will be promptly
revegetated using native herbaceous
indigenous species.
Availability
Single hard copies of the Draft
Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact may be
obtained by request at the above
address. Electronic copies may also be
obtained from the USIBWC Home Page
at www.ibwc.state.gov.
Dated: October 17, 2006.
Susan Daniel,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E6–17680 Filed 10–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7010–01–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–570]
In the Matter of Certain Flash Memory
Chips, Flash Memory Systems, and
Products Containing Same; Notice of a
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the above-captioned
investigation under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The
Commission has terminated the
investigation based on a settlement
agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Esq., telephone 202–708–
2310, Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
62298
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 24, 2006 / Notices
20436. Copies of all nonconfidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
the matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on May 16, 2006, based on a complaint
filed on April 11, 2006, by Lexar Media,
Inc. (‘‘Lexar’’) of Fremont, California. 71
FR 28387. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain flash memory chips, flash
memory systems, and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of claims 1 and 2 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,801,979; claims 1–7 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,397,314; and claims 1–13,
15, and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,978,342.
The complaint named three
respondents: Toshiba Corporation of
Japan; Toshiba America, Inc. of New
York, New York; and Toshiba America
Electronic Components, Inc. of Irvine,
California (collectively the
‘‘respondents’’). The complaint further
alleged that an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337. On August 31,
2006, Acclaim Innovations, LLC, which
had become the assignee of the asserted
patents, was permitted to intervene in
the investigation as a co-complainant.
On September 29, 2006, the cocomplainants and all respondents filed
a joint motion to terminate the
investigation on the basis of a settlement
agreement. The Commission
Investigative Attorney filed a response
in support of the motion on October 10,
2006.
The ALJ issued the subject ID on
October 11, 2006, granting the joint
motion for termination. No party
petitioned for review of the ID pursuant
to 19 CFR 210.43(a), and the
Commission found no basis for ordering
a review on its own initiative pursuant
to 19 CFR 210.44. The Commission has
determined not to review the ID.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:25 Oct 23, 2006
Jkt 211001
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.21(a)(2), (b) and
210.42(h)(3) of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 18, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–17770 Filed 10–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1103–NEW]
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services; Agency Information
Collection Activities: Proposed
Collection; Comments Requested
ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: COPS
Interoperable Communications
Technology Program (ICTP) Assessment.
The Department of Justice (DOJ)
Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services (COPS) has submitted the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The revision of
a currently approved information
collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
for 60 days for public comment until
December 26, 2006. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Rebekah Dorr,
Department of Justice Office of
Community Oriented Policing Services,
1100 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Proposed collection; comments
requested.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: COPS
Interoperable Communications
Technology Program (ICTP) Assessment.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
None. U.S. Department of Justice Office
of Community Oriented Policing
Services.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Law enforcement and
partner public safety agencies that are
recipients of COPS ICTP grants from
Fiscal Years 2003–2006.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply:
It is estimated that approximately 400
respondents across a three-year
assessment period can provide
responses within 90 minutes.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 600 total burden hours.
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: October 18, 2006.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA,
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E6–17754 Filed 10–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–AT–P
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62297-62298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17770]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-570]
In the Matter of Certain Flash Memory Chips, Flash Memory
Systems, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'')
terminating the above-captioned investigation under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337). The Commission has terminated the
investigation based on a settlement agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., telephone 202-
708-2310, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
[[Page 62298]]
20436. Copies of all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with
this investigation are or will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on the matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on May 16, 2006, based on a complaint filed on April 11, 2006, by Lexar
Media, Inc. (``Lexar'') of Fremont, California. 71 FR 28387. The
complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United
States after importation of certain flash memory chips, flash memory
systems, and products containing same by reason of infringement of
claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 6,801,979; claims 1-7 of U.S. Patent
No. 6,397,314; and claims 1-13, 15, and 16 of U.S. Patent No.
6,978,342. The complaint named three respondents: Toshiba Corporation
of Japan; Toshiba America, Inc. of New York, New York; and Toshiba
America Electronic Components, Inc. of Irvine, California (collectively
the ``respondents''). The complaint further alleged that an industry in
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337. On August 31, 2006, Acclaim Innovations, LLC, which had become the
assignee of the asserted patents, was permitted to intervene in the
investigation as a co-complainant.
On September 29, 2006, the co-complainants and all respondents
filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of a
settlement agreement. The Commission Investigative Attorney filed a
response in support of the motion on October 10, 2006.
The ALJ issued the subject ID on October 11, 2006, granting the
joint motion for termination. No party petitioned for review of the ID
pursuant to 19 CFR 210.43(a), and the Commission found no basis for
ordering a review on its own initiative pursuant to 19 CFR 210.44. The
Commission has determined not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in sections 210.21(a)(2), (b) and 210.42(h)(3) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 18, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-17770 Filed 10-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P