Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed-Circumstances Review: Stainless Steel Bar From Japan, 60691-60692 [E6-17149]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 199 / Monday, October 16, 2006 / Notices
Dated: October 6, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–17041 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–412–822]
Stainless Steel Bar From the United
Kingdom: Notice of Extension of Time
Limit for Preliminary Results of the
2005–2006 Administration Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482–
4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 28, 2006, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published in
the Federal Register a notice of
initiation of administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar from the United Kingdom,
covering the period March 1, 2005,
through February 28, 2006. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 71 FR 25145 (April 28, 2006).
The preliminary results for this
administrative review are currently due
no later than December 1, 2006.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Statutory Time Limits
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to issue the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order for
which a review is requested and a final
determination within 120 days after the
date on which the preliminary results
are published. If it is not practicable to
complete the review within the time
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act
allows the Department to extend these
deadlines to a maximum of 365 days
and 180 days, respectively.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Oct 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
The Department is in the process of
collecting additional information and
clarifications of submitted data from the
respondent. Furthermore, we require
additional time to conduct verifications.
Thus, it is not practicable to complete
this review within the original time
limit (i.e., 245 days). Therefore, the
Department is extending the time limit
for completion of the preliminary
results by 120 days, in accordance with
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The
preliminary results are now due not
later than March 30, 2007. The final
results continue to be due 120 days after
publication of the preliminary results.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 6, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–17129 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–588–833]
Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Changed-Circumstances Review:
Stainless Steel Bar From Japan
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and § 351.216(b) of
the Department of Commerce’s (the
Department’s) regulations, TRW Fuji
Valve, Inc. (TRW), a U.S. importer, filed
a request for a changed-circumstances
review of the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel bar from Japan. The
petitioners and domestic interested
parties have affirmatively expressed a
lack of interest in the continuation of
the order with respect to 21–2N
modified valve/stem stainless steel
round bar.1 In response to this request,
the Department is initiating a changedcircumstances review of the order on
stainless steel bar from Japan with
respect to this product as described
below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 16, 2006.
AGENCY:
1 The
petitioners and domestic interested parties
include Carpenter Technology Corp., Crucible
Specialty Metals Division of Crucible Materials
Corp., Electralloy Corp., North American Stainless,
Universal Stainless and Alloy Products, Inc., and
Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60691
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0665 or (202) 482–
1690.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 28, 2006, TRW 2 requested
that the Department conduct a changedcircumstances review of the order on
stainless steel bar from Japan and
exclude a product to which it referred
as 21–2N modified valve/stem stainless
steel round bar from the scope of the
order. See TRW’s letter to the Secretary,
dated August 28, 2006. Specifically,
TRW requested that the Department
exclude imports meeting the following
description from the order on stainless
steel bar from Japan: certain valve/stem
stainless steel round bar of 21–2N
modified grade, having a diameter of 5.7
millimeters (with a tolerance of 0.025
millimeters), in length no greater than
15 meters, having a chemical
composition consisting of a minimum of
0.50 percent and a maximum of 0.60
percent of carbon, a minimum of 7.50
percent and a maximum of 9.50 percent
of manganese, a maximum of 0.25
percent of silicon, a maximum of 0.04
percent of phosphorus, a maximum of
0.03 percent of sulfur, a minimum of
20.0 percent and a maximum of 22.00
percent of chromium, a minimum of
2.00 percent and a maximum of 3.00
percent of nickel, a minimum of 0.20
percent and a maximum of 0.40 percent
of nitrogen, a minimum of 0.85 percent
of the combined content of carbon and
nitrogen, and a balance minimum of
iron, having a maximum core hardness
of 385 HB and a maximum surface
hardness of 425 HB, with a minimum
hardness of 270 HB for annealed
material. See TRW’s letter to the
Secretary, dated August 28, 2006. TRW
requested that the Department revoke
the order in part retroactively to
February 1, 2006, the beginning of the
anniversary month of the order. TRW
stated that the steel product in question
is not produced in commercial
quantities in the United States.
On September 18, 2006, the
petitioners and domestic interested
parties provided a letter attesting to
2 In its August 28, 2006, request TRW did not
identify the sub-section of the term ‘‘interested
party,’’ as defined by section 771(9) of the Act,
which applies to TRW. In response to our
September 21, 2006, request for clarification, in its
September 25, 2006, response TRW identified itself
as a U.S. importer of the subject merchandise.
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
60692
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 199 / Monday, October 16, 2006 / Notices
their expressed lack of interest in having
this merchandise, as described above,
continue to be subject to the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar from Japan.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order covers
stainless steel bar (SSB). The term SSB
with respect to the order means articles
of stainless steel in straight lengths that
have been either hot-rolled, forged,
turned, cold-drawn, cold-rolled or
otherwise cold-finished, or ground,
having a uniform solid cross section
along their whole length in the shape of
circles, segments of circles, ovals,
rectangles (including squares), triangles,
hexagons, octagons or other convex
polygons. SSB includes cold-finished
SSBs that are turned or ground in
straight lengths, whether produced from
hot-rolled bar or from straightened and
cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars that
have indentations, ribs, grooves, or
other deformations produced during the
rolling process. Except as specified
above, the term does not include
stainless steel semi-finished products,
cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cutlength rolled products which if less than
4.75 mm in thickness have a width
measuring at least 10 times the
thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in
thickness having a width which exceeds
150 mm and measures at least twice the
thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed
products in coils, of any uniform solid
cross section along their whole length,
which do not conform to the definition
of flat-rolled products), and angles,
shapes and sections. The SSB subject to
this order is currently classifiable under
subheadings 7222.10.0005,
7222.10.0050, 7222.20.0005,
7222.20.0045, 7222.20.0075, and
7222.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.
Initiation of Changed-Circumstances
Review
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the
Act, the Department will conduct a
changed-circumstances review upon
receipt of information concerning, or a
request from an interested party for a
review of, an antidumping duty order
which shows changed circumstances
sufficient to warrant a review of the
order. As stated above, on August 28,
2006, TRW requested a determination
by the Department in accordance with
19 CFR 351.216(b) to exclude the
product described above from the scope
of the order. TRW also requested that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Oct 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
the Department make the revocation
effective February 1, 2006.
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.216(b), we are
initiating a changed-circumstances
review. Although the petitioners and
domestic interested parties have
expressed a lack of interest in the order
with respect to the product in question,
they did not claim that they represent
substantially all of the production of the
domestic like product nor has the
Department made such a determination.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this initiation or to
demonstrate that the petitioners and
domestic interested parties account for
substantially all of the production of the
domestic like product.
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit
comments which the Department will
take into account in the preliminary
results of this review. The due date for
filing any such comments is no later
than 15 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Responses to
those comments may be submitted not
later than 7 days following submission
of the comments. All written comments
must be submitted in accordance with
19 CFR 351.303. The Department will
publish in the Federal Register a notice
of preliminary results of changedcircumstances review in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4) and
351.221(c)(3)(i), which will set forth the
Department’s preliminary factual and
legal conclusions. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested parties will
have an opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results. The Department
will issue its final results of review in
accordance with the time limits set forth
in 19 CFR 351.216(e). This notice is
published in accordance with sections
751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and
§ 351.221(b) of the Department’s
regulations.
Dated: October 10, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–17149 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel
Reviews
NAFTA Secretariat, United
States Section, International Trade
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Decision of Panel.
SUMMARY: On October 6, 2006, the
binational panel issued its decision in
the full sunset review of the
antidumping and countervailing duty
determination made by the International
Trade Commission, respecting
Magnesium from Canada, Secretariat
File No. USA–CDA–2000–1904–09. The
binational panel affirmed the
International Trade Commission
determination with two dissenting
opinions. Copies of the panel decision
are available from the U.S. Section of
the NAFTA Secretariat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caratina L. Alston, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of the final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686). The panel review in this
matter has been conducted in
accordance with these Rules.
Panel Decision: The determination is
as follows:
The majority opinion stated that
‘‘While the Panel had some reasonable
concerns about the evidence supporting
the Commission’s price underselling
finding, the totality of the Commission’s
determination, including its alternative
price depression finding, is reasonable,
made in accordance with law, and
supported by substantial evidence on
the record as a whole. Therefore, the
second determination on remand is
hereby AFFIRMED’’.
The minority opinion stated ‘‘Having
reviewed the Commission Second
Remand Determination, the briefs,
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 199 (Monday, October 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60691-60692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17149]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-833]
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed-Circumstances Review:
Stainless Steel Bar From Japan
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), and Sec. 351.216(b) of the Department of
Commerce's (the Department's) regulations, TRW Fuji Valve, Inc. (TRW),
a U.S. importer, filed a request for a changed-circumstances review of
the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from Japan. The
petitioners and domestic interested parties have affirmatively
expressed a lack of interest in the continuation of the order with
respect to 21-2N modified valve/stem stainless steel round bar.\1\ In
response to this request, the Department is initiating a changed-
circumstances review of the order on stainless steel bar from Japan
with respect to this product as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The petitioners and domestic interested parties include
Carpenter Technology Corp., Crucible Specialty Metals Division of
Crucible Materials Corp., Electralloy Corp., North American
Stainless, Universal Stainless and Alloy Products, Inc., and
Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0665 or (202)
482-1690.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 28, 2006, TRW \2\ requested that the Department conduct a
changed-circumstances review of the order on stainless steel bar from
Japan and exclude a product to which it referred as 21-2N modified
valve/stem stainless steel round bar from the scope of the order. See
TRW's letter to the Secretary, dated August 28, 2006. Specifically, TRW
requested that the Department exclude imports meeting the following
description from the order on stainless steel bar from Japan: certain
valve/stem stainless steel round bar of 21-2N modified grade, having a
diameter of 5.7 millimeters (with a tolerance of 0.025 millimeters), in
length no greater than 15 meters, having a chemical composition
consisting of a minimum of 0.50 percent and a maximum of 0.60 percent
of carbon, a minimum of 7.50 percent and a maximum of 9.50 percent of
manganese, a maximum of 0.25 percent of silicon, a maximum of 0.04
percent of phosphorus, a maximum of 0.03 percent of sulfur, a minimum
of 20.0 percent and a maximum of 22.00 percent of chromium, a minimum
of 2.00 percent and a maximum of 3.00 percent of nickel, a minimum of
0.20 percent and a maximum of 0.40 percent of nitrogen, a minimum of
0.85 percent of the combined content of carbon and nitrogen, and a
balance minimum of iron, having a maximum core hardness of 385 HB and a
maximum surface hardness of 425 HB, with a minimum hardness of 270 HB
for annealed material. See TRW's letter to the Secretary, dated August
28, 2006. TRW requested that the Department revoke the order in part
retroactively to February 1, 2006, the beginning of the anniversary
month of the order. TRW stated that the steel product in question is
not produced in commercial quantities in the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In its August 28, 2006, request TRW did not identify the
sub-section of the term ``interested party,'' as defined by section
771(9) of the Act, which applies to TRW. In response to our
September 21, 2006, request for clarification, in its September 25,
2006, response TRW identified itself as a U.S. importer of the
subject merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 18, 2006, the petitioners and domestic interested
parties provided a letter attesting to
[[Page 60692]]
their expressed lack of interest in having this merchandise, as
described above, continue to be subject to the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel bar from Japan.
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order covers stainless steel bar (SSB). The term
SSB with respect to the order means articles of stainless steel in
straight lengths that have been either hot-rolled, forged, turned,
cold-drawn, cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, or ground, having a
uniform solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of
circles, segments of circles, ovals, rectangles (including squares),
triangles, hexagons, octagons or other convex polygons. SSB includes
cold-finished SSBs that are turned or ground in straight lengths,
whether produced from hot-rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod
or wire, and reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or
other deformations produced during the rolling process. Except as
specified above, the term does not include stainless steel semi-
finished products, cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cut-length
rolled products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width
measuring at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in
thickness having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least
twice the thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed products in coils, of any
uniform solid cross section along their whole length, which do not
conform to the definition of flat-rolled products), and angles, shapes
and sections. The SSB subject to this order is currently classifiable
under subheadings 7222.10.0005, 7222.10.0050, 7222.20.0005,
7222.20.0045, 7222.20.0075, and 7222.30.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written
description of the scope of this order is dispositive.
Initiation of Changed-Circumstances Review
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Act, the Department will
conduct a changed-circumstances review upon receipt of information
concerning, or a request from an interested party for a review of, an
antidumping duty order which shows changed circumstances sufficient to
warrant a review of the order. As stated above, on August 28, 2006, TRW
requested a determination by the Department in accordance with 19 CFR
351.216(b) to exclude the product described above from the scope of the
order. TRW also requested that the Department make the revocation
effective February 1, 2006.
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(b), we
are initiating a changed-circumstances review. Although the petitioners
and domestic interested parties have expressed a lack of interest in
the order with respect to the product in question, they did not claim
that they represent substantially all of the production of the domestic
like product nor has the Department made such a determination.
Interested parties are invited to comment on this initiation or to
demonstrate that the petitioners and domestic interested parties
account for substantially all of the production of the domestic like
product.
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit comments which the Department will
take into account in the preliminary results of this review. The due
date for filing any such comments is no later than 15 days after the
date of publication of this notice. Responses to those comments may be
submitted not later than 7 days following submission of the comments.
All written comments must be submitted in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303. The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice
of preliminary results of changed-circumstances review in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4) and 351.221(c)(3)(i), which will set forth
the Department's preliminary factual and legal conclusions. Pursuant to
19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested parties will have an opportunity
to comment on the preliminary results. The Department will issue its
final results of review in accordance with the time limits set forth in
19 CFR 351.216(e). This notice is published in accordance with sections
751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and Sec. 351.221(b) of the
Department's regulations.
Dated: October 10, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-17149 Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P