Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (a/k/a New York Stock Exchange LLC); Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendments No. 1 & 2 Thereto Relating to the Treasury Share Exception in NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03, Section 312.04 and Section 703.01(A), 60786-60788 [E6-17067]
Download as PDF
60786
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 199 / Monday, October 16, 2006 / Notices
2. Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, which
requires, among other things, that NASD
rules must be designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities,
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest. NASD believes that
the proposed rule change is designed to
facilitate transactions in securities and
to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to transactions
in securities by giving members a
mechanism to allow certain customers
that utilize alternative sources of
information to keep track of their
trading to opt out of receiving unwanted
account statements. NASD also believes
that the conditions of the proposed
amended rule are designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest by requiring that
consents to the suspension of account
statements under the amended rule be
in writing, and by requiring members to
undertake to promptly provide any
particular account statement upon
request and to promptly reinstate
delivery of account statements upon
request.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
NASD does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
NASD neither solicited nor received
written comments on the proposed rule
change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Oct 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
(a) By order approve such proposed
rule change, or
(b) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
NASD will announce the effective
date of the proposed rule change in a
Notice to Members to be published no
later than 60 days following
Commission approval. The effective
date of the proposed rule change will be
30 days following publication of the
Notice to Members announcing
Commission approval.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to
rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR–NASD–2006–066 on
the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR-NASD–2006–066. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will
be available for inspection and copying
at the principal office of NASD. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2006–066 and
should be submitted on or before
November 6, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–17064 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54579; File No. SR–NYSE–
2006–30]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange, Inc. (a/k/a New
York Stock Exchange LLC); Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendments No. 1 & 2 Thereto
Relating to the Treasury Share
Exception in NYSE Listed Company
Manual Section 312.03, Section 312.04
and Section 703.01(A)
October 5, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 5,
2006, the New York Stock Exchange,
LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
items I, II, and III below, which items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
On August 11, 2006, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.3 On September 25, 2006, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change.4 The Commission
9 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The substance of Amendment No. 1 was
changed in Amendment No. 2. See infra note 4. In
Amendment No. 1, the Exchange had (1) modified
the proposed rule change to state that if a company
has executed a binding contract prior to August 15,
2006 with respect to the issuance of common stock,
the existing treasury share exception will continue
to be available for the transaction; and (2) revised
the definition of ‘‘market value.’’
4 In Amendment No. 2, which replaced and
superseded Amendment No. 1 in its entirety, the
Exchange (1) revised the example provided with
respect to the proposed definition of ‘‘market
value’’ to make it clearer; and (2) amended the
transition period proposed so that the existing
treasury share exception would continue to be
available for companies that have entered into a
binding contract with respect to the issuance of
common stock prior to the date that is five business
days after the Commission publishes notice of the
proposed rule change in the Federal Register.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 199 / Monday, October 16, 2006 / Notices
is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule filing reflects
amendments to the current NYSE Listed
Company Manual shareholder approval
requirements for certain transactions.
The text of this proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site at
https://apps.nyse.com/commdata/
pub19b4.nsf/docs/89637D57B
29A9E63852571F40076E765/$FILE/
NYSE-2006-30%20A-2pdf, at the
Exchange’s principal office, and in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
NYSE included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The Exchange has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
1. Purpose
Section 312.03 of the Listed Company
Manual has for many years required that
companies obtain shareholder approval
before issuing stock in certain situations
or in significantly large amounts.5 The
precise terms have changed somewhat
over the years, but the rule has
historically not been applied to any
issuance by a company of shares from
the treasury, that is, a reissuance of
5 The section provides that shareholder approval
is a ‘‘prerequisite to listing’’ additional shares by a
listed company in several situations. To paraphrase,
they are an issuance of more than 1% of the current
outstanding common stock to an insider (an officer
or director, or an entity affiliated with an officer or
director), more than 5% of the current outstanding
to a 5% or greater shareholder or an affiliate thereof,
or more than 20% of the current outstanding in any
transaction other than a public offering or ‘‘bona
fide private financing’’ (as defined in Section
312.04(f)). Approval is also required when an
issuance will result in a ‘‘change of control of the
issuer.’’ These provisions apply in the same way to
offerings of securities that are convertible into
common stock, and the percentages in each case
apply either to outstanding common equity or
common voting power. The Commission notes that
shareholder approval is also required for equity
compensation plans. See NYSE Listed Company
Manual Sections 312.03(a) and 303A.08.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Oct 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
shares once issued but then reacquired
by the company.
The ‘‘treasury shares exception’’
results from the way the rule is written,
making shareholder approval a
‘‘prerequisite to listing.’’ The Exchange
takes the view that once listed, shares
remain listed even if they are
repurchased by the company and taken
back into ‘‘treasury.’’ 6 Accordingly,
when treasury shares are re-issued, we
do not require that they be ‘‘re-listed.’’
Since no listing application is required,
Section 312.03 is not triggered.
Note that prior to 2003, the
Exchange’s rule requiring shareholder
approval of stock option plans resided
in Section 312.03 as well, and the
treasury share exception was also
applied in that context. The rule
regarding such plans was significantly
revised in 2003, and codified in a
different section of the Listed Company
Manual, Section 303A.08. At this time,
the ‘‘treasury share exception’’ was
specifically made unavailable for equity
compensation plans, so that shareholder
approval would be required regardless
of whether a plan was funded in whole
or in part through the use of treasury
shares.7
The treasury share exception has been
criticized because it potentially allows
companies to store up large reserves of
stock against a future issuance of shares
in transactions that could significantly
dilute existing shareholders without
their approval. In light of this criticism,
on December 30, 2005, the Exchange
solicited comment from listed
companies and investors on whether or
not the treasury stock exception should
be eliminated. We received 19 comment
letters or e-mails in response. Fourteen
of the commenters, primarily
institutional investors, supported the
elimination of the exception. These
commenters generally criticized the
current exception as detrimental to
shareholders, providing the potential for
significant dilution without shareholder
approval. Several noted that the historic
rationale for the exception was outdated
and that the need for shareholder
approval should be governed by the
substance of the transaction, not the
technical status of the shares used. Five
commenters, primarily listed
companies, advocated maintenance of
the status quo. Several of these
6 This approach is also reflected by the fact that,
pursuant to Section 902.02 of the NYSE Listed
Company Manual, listed companies are charged
annual fees calculated for each class of security
listed based on the number of shares issued and
outstanding, including treasury stock and restricted
stock.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48108
(June 30, 2003), 68 FR 39995, 40002 (July 3, 2003).
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60787
commenters expressed the view that the
exception provides companies with
important flexibility in structuring and
negotiating transactions in a manner
consistent with shareholders’ interests.
The Exchange agrees that there is a
legitimate concern that the exception
could result in an unacceptable level of
dilution without shareholder input.
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to
amend Section 312.03 to eliminate the
treasury stock exception.
The Exchange is also proposing to
provide companies a limited transition
period with respect to the proposed
elimination of the treasury stock
exception. The Exchange stated that it is
sensitive to companies’ need for
certainty when planning a transaction
involving the issuance of shares.
Accordingly, the Exchange has
proposed a limited transition period for
companies that execute a binding
contract with respect to the issuance of
common stock prior to the date that is
five business days after the date that the
Commission publishes notice of this
filing in the Federal Register, so that the
existing treasury share exception would
continue to be available for the
transaction even though the transaction
does not close until after the date of
Commission approval of this proposed
rule change.
The Exchange is also proposing
related amendments to Section 312.04,
a section that amplifies and interprets
the operative provisions of Section
312.03. As initially filed with the
Commission, one of these proposed
amendments codified the guidance the
Exchange historically provided to
issuers on the time frame allowed where
an issuer chose to establish the market
value of the securities to be issued based
on an averaged price. The Exchange
allowed issuers to define market value
in the context of Section 312.03 as
either the last reported sale price on the
trading date prior to the date that the
issuer enters into a definitive agreement
to issue the securities or with reference
to average price over a period of time
that can not exceed ten trading days
prior to the date of issuance. In this
amendment, the Exchange is revising its
original proposal so that the term
‘‘market value’’ means the official
closing price on the Exchange as
reported to the Consolidated Tape
immediately preceding the entering into
of a binding agreement to issue the
securities. For example, if the
transaction is entered into on a Tuesday
after the close of the regular session at
4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, then
Tuesday’s official closing price is used.
If the transaction is entered into at any
time between the close of the regular
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
60788
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 199 / Monday, October 16, 2006 / Notices
session on Monday and the close of the
regular session on Tuesday, then
Monday’s official closing price is used.
This change will result in issuers no
longer having the ability to establish
market value based on an averaged
price. It will also bring this aspect of the
rule in line with the similar Nasdaq
Stock Market rule.
The Exchange is also proposing to
amend Section 312.03(b) to specify that
it covers issuances that are part of a
‘‘series of related transactions’’. This
proposed change parallels the language
used in Section 312.03(c) relating to the
issuance of 20% or more of a company’s
voting common securities.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to
amend Section 703.01(A) to require that
companies issuing shares from treasury
in a transaction or series of related
transactions notify the Exchange in
writing in advance of the issuance,
indicating whether shareholder
approval is required pursuant to Section
312.03 and, if required, the date such
shareholder approval was obtained. The
Exchange also proposes to amend
Sections 703.01(A) and 903.02 to
require that companies indicate in the
Subsequent Listing Application whether
shareholder approval is required with
respect to the issuance being listed
pursuant to Sections 303A.08 or 312.03
and, if required, the date such
shareholder approval was obtained.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 8
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 9 in particular,
in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange requested comment
from listed companies and investors on
8 15
9 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Oct 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
whether or not the treasury stock
exception should be eliminated and
received 19 comments in response.
These comments are described in more
detail above.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding, or
(ii) as to which the NYSE consents, the
Commission will:
A. By order approve such proposed
rule change; or
B. Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2006–30 on the
subject line.
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing will also be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the NYSE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File number
SR–NYSE–2006–30 and should be
submitted by November 6, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–17067 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA 2006–0081]
Privacy Act of 1974 as Amended;
Computer Matching Program (SSA/
States, SDX–BENDEX–SVES Files—
Matches 6001, 6002 and 6004)
AGENCY:
Social Security Administration
(SSA).
Notice of an amended computer
matching program.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
provisions of the Privacy Act, as
amended, this notice announces
amendments to an existing computer
matching program that SSA conducts
Paper Comments
with the States.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
DATES: SSA will file a report of the
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
subject matching program with the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Committee on Homeland Security and
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC,
Governmental Affairs of the Senate; the
20549–1090.
Committee on Government Reform of
All submissions should refer to File
the House of Representatives; and the
Number SR–NYSE–2006–30. This file
Office of Information and Regulatory
number should be included on the
Affairs, Office of Management and
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Budget (OMB). The matching program
Commission process and review your
will be effective as indicated below.
comments more efficiently, please use
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s comment on this notice by either
telefaxing to (410) 965–8582 or writing
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
to the Associate Commissioner for
rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the
Income Security Programs, 245
submission, all subsequent
Altmeyer Building, 640l Security
amendments, all written statements
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401.
with respect to the proposed rule
All comments received will be available
change that are filed with the
for public inspection at this address.
Commission, and all written
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
communications relating to the
Associate Commissioner for Income
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than Security Programs as shown above.
those that may be withheld from the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
public in accordance with the
10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 199 (Monday, October 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60786-60788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17067]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54579; File No. SR-NYSE-2006-30]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (a/
k/a New York Stock Exchange LLC); Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change and Amendments No. 1 & 2 Thereto Relating to the Treasury Share
Exception in NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03, Section 312.04
and Section 703.01(A)
October 5, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, (the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby
given that on May 5, 2006, the New York Stock Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or ``NYSE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the
Exchange. On August 11, 2006, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.\3\ On September 25, 2006, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The Commission
[[Page 60787]]
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ The substance of Amendment No. 1 was changed in Amendment
No. 2. See infra note 4. In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange had (1)
modified the proposed rule change to state that if a company has
executed a binding contract prior to August 15, 2006 with respect to
the issuance of common stock, the existing treasury share exception
will continue to be available for the transaction; and (2) revised
the definition of ``market value.''
\4\ In Amendment No. 2, which replaced and superseded Amendment
No. 1 in its entirety, the Exchange (1) revised the example provided
with respect to the proposed definition of ``market value'' to make
it clearer; and (2) amended the transition period proposed so that
the existing treasury share exception would continue to be available
for companies that have entered into a binding contract with respect
to the issuance of common stock prior to the date that is five
business days after the Commission publishes notice of the proposed
rule change in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule filing reflects amendments to the current NYSE
Listed Company Manual shareholder approval requirements for certain
transactions. The text of this proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site at https://apps.nyse.com/commdata/
pub19b4.nsf/docs/89637D57B29A9E63852571F40076E765/
$FILE/NYSE-2006-30%20A-2pdf, at the Exchange's principal
office, and in the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the NYSE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Section 312.03 of the Listed Company Manual has for many years
required that companies obtain shareholder approval before issuing
stock in certain situations or in significantly large amounts.\5\ The
precise terms have changed somewhat over the years, but the rule has
historically not been applied to any issuance by a company of shares
from the treasury, that is, a reissuance of shares once issued but then
reacquired by the company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The section provides that shareholder approval is a
``prerequisite to listing'' additional shares by a listed company in
several situations. To paraphrase, they are an issuance of more than
1% of the current outstanding common stock to an insider (an officer
or director, or an entity affiliated with an officer or director),
more than 5% of the current outstanding to a 5% or greater
shareholder or an affiliate thereof, or more than 20% of the current
outstanding in any transaction other than a public offering or
``bona fide private financing'' (as defined in Section 312.04(f)).
Approval is also required when an issuance will result in a ``change
of control of the issuer.'' These provisions apply in the same way
to offerings of securities that are convertible into common stock,
and the percentages in each case apply either to outstanding common
equity or common voting power. The Commission notes that shareholder
approval is also required for equity compensation plans. See NYSE
Listed Company Manual Sections 312.03(a) and 303A.08.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ``treasury shares exception'' results from the way the rule is
written, making shareholder approval a ``prerequisite to listing.'' The
Exchange takes the view that once listed, shares remain listed even if
they are repurchased by the company and taken back into ``treasury.''
\6\ Accordingly, when treasury shares are re-issued, we do not require
that they be ``re-listed.'' Since no listing application is required,
Section 312.03 is not triggered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This approach is also reflected by the fact that, pursuant
to Section 902.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, listed
companies are charged annual fees calculated for each class of
security listed based on the number of shares issued and
outstanding, including treasury stock and restricted stock.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note that prior to 2003, the Exchange's rule requiring shareholder
approval of stock option plans resided in Section 312.03 as well, and
the treasury share exception was also applied in that context. The rule
regarding such plans was significantly revised in 2003, and codified in
a different section of the Listed Company Manual, Section 303A.08. At
this time, the ``treasury share exception'' was specifically made
unavailable for equity compensation plans, so that shareholder approval
would be required regardless of whether a plan was funded in whole or
in part through the use of treasury shares.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48108 (June 30,
2003), 68 FR 39995, 40002 (July 3, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The treasury share exception has been criticized because it
potentially allows companies to store up large reserves of stock
against a future issuance of shares in transactions that could
significantly dilute existing shareholders without their approval. In
light of this criticism, on December 30, 2005, the Exchange solicited
comment from listed companies and investors on whether or not the
treasury stock exception should be eliminated. We received 19 comment
letters or e-mails in response. Fourteen of the commenters, primarily
institutional investors, supported the elimination of the exception.
These commenters generally criticized the current exception as
detrimental to shareholders, providing the potential for significant
dilution without shareholder approval. Several noted that the historic
rationale for the exception was outdated and that the need for
shareholder approval should be governed by the substance of the
transaction, not the technical status of the shares used. Five
commenters, primarily listed companies, advocated maintenance of the
status quo. Several of these commenters expressed the view that the
exception provides companies with important flexibility in structuring
and negotiating transactions in a manner consistent with shareholders'
interests.
The Exchange agrees that there is a legitimate concern that the
exception could result in an unacceptable level of dilution without
shareholder input. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend Section
312.03 to eliminate the treasury stock exception.
The Exchange is also proposing to provide companies a limited
transition period with respect to the proposed elimination of the
treasury stock exception. The Exchange stated that it is sensitive to
companies' need for certainty when planning a transaction involving the
issuance of shares. Accordingly, the Exchange has proposed a limited
transition period for companies that execute a binding contract with
respect to the issuance of common stock prior to the date that is five
business days after the date that the Commission publishes notice of
this filing in the Federal Register, so that the existing treasury
share exception would continue to be available for the transaction even
though the transaction does not close until after the date of
Commission approval of this proposed rule change.
The Exchange is also proposing related amendments to Section
312.04, a section that amplifies and interprets the operative
provisions of Section 312.03. As initially filed with the Commission,
one of these proposed amendments codified the guidance the Exchange
historically provided to issuers on the time frame allowed where an
issuer chose to establish the market value of the securities to be
issued based on an averaged price. The Exchange allowed issuers to
define market value in the context of Section 312.03 as either the last
reported sale price on the trading date prior to the date that the
issuer enters into a definitive agreement to issue the securities or
with reference to average price over a period of time that can not
exceed ten trading days prior to the date of issuance. In this
amendment, the Exchange is revising its original proposal so that the
term ``market value'' means the official closing price on the Exchange
as reported to the Consolidated Tape immediately preceding the entering
into of a binding agreement to issue the securities. For example, if
the transaction is entered into on a Tuesday after the close of the
regular session at 4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, then Tuesday's
official closing price is used. If the transaction is entered into at
any time between the close of the regular
[[Page 60788]]
session on Monday and the close of the regular session on Tuesday, then
Monday's official closing price is used. This change will result in
issuers no longer having the ability to establish market value based on
an averaged price. It will also bring this aspect of the rule in line
with the similar Nasdaq Stock Market rule.
The Exchange is also proposing to amend Section 312.03(b) to
specify that it covers issuances that are part of a ``series of related
transactions''. This proposed change parallels the language used in
Section 312.03(c) relating to the issuance of 20% or more of a
company's voting common securities.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend Section 703.01(A) to
require that companies issuing shares from treasury in a transaction or
series of related transactions notify the Exchange in writing in
advance of the issuance, indicating whether shareholder approval is
required pursuant to Section 312.03 and, if required, the date such
shareholder approval was obtained. The Exchange also proposes to amend
Sections 703.01(A) and 903.02 to require that companies indicate in the
Subsequent Listing Application whether shareholder approval is required
with respect to the issuance being listed pursuant to Sections 303A.08
or 312.03 and, if required, the date such shareholder approval was
obtained.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \8\ in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \9\ in particular, in that
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange requested comment from listed companies and investors
on whether or not the treasury stock exception should be eliminated and
received 19 comments in response. These comments are described in more
detail above.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or (ii) as to
which the NYSE consents, the Commission will:
A. By order approve such proposed rule change; or
B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR-NYSE-2006-30 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC, 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2006-30. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the NYSE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File number SR-NYSE-2006-30 and should be submitted by November 6,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-17067 Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P