Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 60689-60691 [E6-17041]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 199 / Monday, October 16, 2006 / Notices
occurred and subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties.
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
rescissions in accordance with section
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: October 10, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–17148 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–580–837]
Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon Quality
Steel Plate from Korea; Notice of
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–8362.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to issue
preliminary results within 245 days
after the last day of the anniversary
month of an order or finding for which
a review is requested. Section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act further states that
if it is not practicable to complete the
review within the time period specified,
the administering authority may extend
the 245-day period to issue its
preliminary results by up to 120 days.
We have determined that it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
results of this review within the 245-day
period. Given the number and
complexity of issues in this case, and in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act, we are extending the time
period for issuing the preliminary
results of review by 120 days. Therefore,
the preliminary results are now due no
later than February 28, 2007. The final
results continue to be due 120 days after
publication of the preliminary results.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 6, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–17040 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background Information
On April 5, 2006, the U.S. Department
of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published a notice of initiation of the
administrative review on the
countervailing duty order on certain
cut–to-length carbon quality steel plate
from the Republic of Korea, covering the
period January 1, 2005, through
December 31, 2005. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 71 FR 17077 (April
5, 2006). The preliminary results of this
review are currently due no later than
October 31, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Oct 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–820]
Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products From India: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: After the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated a
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain hot–rolled carbon steel flat
products (HRS) from India covering the
period December 1, 2004, through
November 30, 2005 (the period of
review or POR), the sole respondent,
Essar Steel Ltd. (Essar), claimed it did
not ship subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR. The
Department is now rescinding this
review based on record evidence
consistent with Essar’s no shipments
claim.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 16, 2006.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60689
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Pedersen or Howard Smith, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–2769 or (202) 482–
5193, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2005, the Department
published, in the Federal Register, a
notice of the opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on HRS from
India, covering the period December 1,
2004, through November 30, 2005. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 70 FR 72109
(December 1, 2005). On December 30,
2005 and January 3, 2006, Nucor
Corporation and U.S. Steel Corporation
(collectively, petitioners), respectively,
requested an administrative review of
the above–referenced antidumping
order with respect to Essar. On February
1, 2006, the Department initiated the
requested administrative review. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 71 FR 5241 (February 1, 2006). On
February 10, 2006, Essar submitted a
letter to the Department in which it
certified that it made no shipments of
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR.
On July 14, 2006, the Department
published notification of its intent to
rescind the instant review in the
Federal Register. See Certain Hot–
Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From
India: Notice of Intent to Rescind
Administrative Review, 71 FR 40068
(July 14, 2006) (Intent to Rescind). The
Department stated in that notice that it
intended to rescind the instant
administrative review of Essar because
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) data supported the conclusion
that there were no entries, exports, or
sales of subject merchandise from Essar.
The Department provided interested
parties an opportunity to comment on
the rescission and received no
comments.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the
antidumping duty order are certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products of a
rectangular shape, of a width of 0.5 inch
or greater, neither clad, plated, nor
coated with metal and whether or not
painted, varnished, or coated with
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
60690
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 199 / Monday, October 16, 2006 / Notices
plastics or other non–metallic
substances, in coils (whether or not in
successively superimposed layers),
regardless of thickness, and in straight
lengths, of a thickness of less than 4.75
mm and of a width measuring at least
10 times the thickness. Universal mill
plate (i.e., flat–rolled products rolled on
four faces or in a closed box pass, of a
width exceeding 150 mm, but not
exceeding 1250 mm, and of a thickness
of not less than 4.0 mm, not in coils and
without patterns in relief) of a thickness
not less than 4.0 mm is not included
within the scope of the order.
Specifically included within the
scope of the order are vacuum degassed,
fully stabilized (commonly referred to as
interstitial–free (IF)) steels, high
strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, and
the substrate for motor lamination
steels. IF steels are recognized as low
carbon steels with micro–alloying levels
of elements such as titanium or niobium
(also commonly referred to as
columbium), or both, added to stabilize
carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA
steels are recognized as steels with
micro–alloying levels of elements such
as chromium, copper, niobium,
vanadium, and molybdenum. The
substrate for motor lamination steels
contains micro–alloying levels of
elements such as silicon and aluminum.
Steel products to be included in the
scope of the order, regardless of
definitions in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
are products in which: i) iron
predominates, by weight, over each of
the other contained elements; ii) the
carbon content is 2 percent or less, by
weight; and iii) none of the elements
listed below exceeds the quantity, by
weight, respectively indicated:
1.80 percent of manganese, or
2.25 percent of silicon, or
1.00 percent of copper, or
0.50 percent of aluminum, or
1.25 percent of chromium, or
0.30 percent of cobalt, or
0.40 percent of lead, or
1.25 percent of nickel, or
0.30 percent of tungsten, or
0.10 percent of molybdenum, or
0.10 percent of niobium, or
0.15 percent of vanadium, or
0.15 percent of zirconium.
All products that meet the physical
and chemical description provided
above are within the scope of the order
unless otherwise excluded. The
following products, by way of example,
are outside or specifically excluded
from the scope of the order:
• Alloy HRS products in which at
least one of the chemical elements
exceeds those listed above
(including, e.g., American Society
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Oct 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
specifications A543, A387, A514,
A517, A506).
• Society of Automotive Engineers
(SAE)/American Iron & Steel
Institute (AISI) grades of series 2300
and higher.
• Ball bearing steels, as defined in the
HTSUS.
• Tool steels, as defined in the
HTSUS.
• Silico–manganese (as defined in the
HTSUS) or silicon electrical steel
with a silicon level exceeding 2.25
percent.
• ASTM specifications A710 and
A736.
• USS abrasion–resistant steels (USS
AR 400, USS AR 500).
• All products (proprietary or
otherwise) based on an alloy ASTM
specification (sample specifications:
ASTM A506, A507).
• Non–rectangular shapes, not in
coils, which are the result of having
been processed by cutting or
stamping and which have assumed
the character of articles or products
classified outside chapter 72 of the
HTSUS.
The merchandise subject to the order
is classified in the HTSUS at
subheadings: 7208.10.15.00,
7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00,
7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00,
7208.26.00.30, 7208.26.00.60,
7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60,
7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60,
7208.37.00.30, 7208.37.00.60,
7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30,
7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15,
7208.39.00.30, 7208.39.00.90,
7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60,
7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00,
7208.90.00.00, 7211.14.00.90,
7211.19.15.00, 7211.19.20.00,
7211.19.30.00, 7211.19.45.00,
7211.19.60.00, 7211.19.75.30,
7211.19.75.60, and 7211.19.75.90.
Certain hot–rolled carbon steel flat
products covered by the order,
including: vacuum degassed fully
stabilized; high strength low alloy; and
the substrate for motor lamination steel
may also enter under the following tariff
numbers: 7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00,
7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00,
7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90,
7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30,
7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00,
7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00,
7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and
7226.99.00.00. Subject merchandise
may also enter under 7210.70.30.00,
7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30,
7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, and
7212.50.00.00. Although the HTSUS
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
under review is dispositive.
Rescission of Administrative Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
§ 351.213(d)(3), the Department may
rescind an administrative review, in
whole or with respect to a particular
exporter or producer, if the Department
concludes that, during the period
covered by the review, there were no
entries, exports, or sales of the subject
merchandise. Because Essar was the
only company for which a review was
requested and it did not have any sales
or exports of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR, we are
rescinding this review pursuant to 19
CFR § 351.213(d)(3). See, e.g., Certain
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From
Turkey; Final Results, Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review in Part, and Determination not
to Revoke in Part, 68 FR 53127
(September 9, 2003) (after finding no
evidence of entries of subject
merchandise from two companies that
made ‘‘no shipments’’ claims, the
Department stated that ‘‘consistent with
our practice, we are rescinding our
review for Diler and Ekinciler’’).
Although Essar did not have any sales
or exports of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR, its
subject merchandise may have entered
the United States during the POR under
CBP’s antidumping case number for
Essar by way of intermediaries (without
Essar’s knowledge). Within 15 days of
publication of this notice, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the ‘‘all–
others’’ rate in effect on the date of the
entry. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APOs) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR § 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 199 / Monday, October 16, 2006 / Notices
Dated: October 6, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–17041 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–412–822]
Stainless Steel Bar From the United
Kingdom: Notice of Extension of Time
Limit for Preliminary Results of the
2005–2006 Administration Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482–
4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 28, 2006, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published in
the Federal Register a notice of
initiation of administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar from the United Kingdom,
covering the period March 1, 2005,
through February 28, 2006. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 71 FR 25145 (April 28, 2006).
The preliminary results for this
administrative review are currently due
no later than December 1, 2006.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Statutory Time Limits
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to issue the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order for
which a review is requested and a final
determination within 120 days after the
date on which the preliminary results
are published. If it is not practicable to
complete the review within the time
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act
allows the Department to extend these
deadlines to a maximum of 365 days
and 180 days, respectively.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Oct 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
The Department is in the process of
collecting additional information and
clarifications of submitted data from the
respondent. Furthermore, we require
additional time to conduct verifications.
Thus, it is not practicable to complete
this review within the original time
limit (i.e., 245 days). Therefore, the
Department is extending the time limit
for completion of the preliminary
results by 120 days, in accordance with
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The
preliminary results are now due not
later than March 30, 2007. The final
results continue to be due 120 days after
publication of the preliminary results.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 6, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–17129 Filed 10–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–588–833]
Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Changed-Circumstances Review:
Stainless Steel Bar From Japan
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and § 351.216(b) of
the Department of Commerce’s (the
Department’s) regulations, TRW Fuji
Valve, Inc. (TRW), a U.S. importer, filed
a request for a changed-circumstances
review of the antidumping duty order
on stainless steel bar from Japan. The
petitioners and domestic interested
parties have affirmatively expressed a
lack of interest in the continuation of
the order with respect to 21–2N
modified valve/stem stainless steel
round bar.1 In response to this request,
the Department is initiating a changedcircumstances review of the order on
stainless steel bar from Japan with
respect to this product as described
below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 16, 2006.
AGENCY:
1 The
petitioners and domestic interested parties
include Carpenter Technology Corp., Crucible
Specialty Metals Division of Crucible Materials
Corp., Electralloy Corp., North American Stainless,
Universal Stainless and Alloy Products, Inc., and
Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60691
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0665 or (202) 482–
1690.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 28, 2006, TRW 2 requested
that the Department conduct a changedcircumstances review of the order on
stainless steel bar from Japan and
exclude a product to which it referred
as 21–2N modified valve/stem stainless
steel round bar from the scope of the
order. See TRW’s letter to the Secretary,
dated August 28, 2006. Specifically,
TRW requested that the Department
exclude imports meeting the following
description from the order on stainless
steel bar from Japan: certain valve/stem
stainless steel round bar of 21–2N
modified grade, having a diameter of 5.7
millimeters (with a tolerance of 0.025
millimeters), in length no greater than
15 meters, having a chemical
composition consisting of a minimum of
0.50 percent and a maximum of 0.60
percent of carbon, a minimum of 7.50
percent and a maximum of 9.50 percent
of manganese, a maximum of 0.25
percent of silicon, a maximum of 0.04
percent of phosphorus, a maximum of
0.03 percent of sulfur, a minimum of
20.0 percent and a maximum of 22.00
percent of chromium, a minimum of
2.00 percent and a maximum of 3.00
percent of nickel, a minimum of 0.20
percent and a maximum of 0.40 percent
of nitrogen, a minimum of 0.85 percent
of the combined content of carbon and
nitrogen, and a balance minimum of
iron, having a maximum core hardness
of 385 HB and a maximum surface
hardness of 425 HB, with a minimum
hardness of 270 HB for annealed
material. See TRW’s letter to the
Secretary, dated August 28, 2006. TRW
requested that the Department revoke
the order in part retroactively to
February 1, 2006, the beginning of the
anniversary month of the order. TRW
stated that the steel product in question
is not produced in commercial
quantities in the United States.
On September 18, 2006, the
petitioners and domestic interested
parties provided a letter attesting to
2 In its August 28, 2006, request TRW did not
identify the sub-section of the term ‘‘interested
party,’’ as defined by section 771(9) of the Act,
which applies to TRW. In response to our
September 21, 2006, request for clarification, in its
September 25, 2006, response TRW identified itself
as a U.S. importer of the subject merchandise.
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 199 (Monday, October 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60689-60691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-17041]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-820]
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Notice
of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: After the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated a
review of the antidumping duty order on certain hot-rolled carbon steel
flat products (HRS) from India covering the period December 1, 2004,
through November 30, 2005 (the period of review or POR), the sole
respondent, Essar Steel Ltd. (Essar), claimed it did not ship subject
merchandise to the United States during the POR. The Department is now
rescinding this review based on record evidence consistent with Essar's
no shipments claim.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Pedersen or Howard Smith, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
2769 or (202) 482-5193, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2005, the Department published, in the Federal
Register, a notice of the opportunity to request an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on HRS from India, covering the
period December 1, 2004, through November 30, 2005. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation;
Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 70 FR 72109 (December 1,
2005). On December 30, 2005 and January 3, 2006, Nucor Corporation and
U.S. Steel Corporation (collectively, petitioners), respectively,
requested an administrative review of the above-referenced antidumping
order with respect to Essar. On February 1, 2006, the Department
initiated the requested administrative review. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request
for Revocation in Part, 71 FR 5241 (February 1, 2006). On February 10,
2006, Essar submitted a letter to the Department in which it certified
that it made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States
during the POR.
On July 14, 2006, the Department published notification of its
intent to rescind the instant review in the Federal Register. See
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From India: Notice of
Intent to Rescind Administrative Review, 71 FR 40068 (July 14, 2006)
(Intent to Rescind). The Department stated in that notice that it
intended to rescind the instant administrative review of Essar because
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data supported the conclusion
that there were no entries, exports, or sales of subject merchandise
from Essar. The Department provided interested parties an opportunity
to comment on the rescission and received no comments.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the antidumping duty order are certain hot-
rolled carbon steel flat products of a rectangular shape, of a width of
0.5 inch or greater, neither clad, plated, nor coated with metal and
whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with
[[Page 60690]]
plastics or other non-metallic substances, in coils (whether or not in
successively superimposed layers), regardless of thickness, and in
straight lengths, of a thickness of less than 4.75 mm and of a width
measuring at least 10 times the thickness. Universal mill plate (i.e.,
flat-rolled products rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a
width exceeding 150 mm, but not exceeding 1250 mm, and of a thickness
of not less than 4.0 mm, not in coils and without patterns in relief)
of a thickness not less than 4.0 mm is not included within the scope of
the order.
Specifically included within the scope of the order are vacuum
degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as interstitial-free
(IF)) steels, high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, and the substrate
for motor lamination steels. IF steels are recognized as low carbon
steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as titanium or
niobium (also commonly referred to as columbium), or both, added to
stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized as
steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper,
niobium, vanadium, and molybdenum. The substrate for motor lamination
steels contains micro-alloying levels of elements such as silicon and
aluminum.
Steel products to be included in the scope of the order, regardless
of definitions in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS), are products in which: i) iron predominates, by weight, over
each of the other contained elements; ii) the carbon content is 2
percent or less, by weight; and iii) none of the elements listed below
exceeds the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated:
1.80 percent of manganese, or
2.25 percent of silicon, or
1.00 percent of copper, or
0.50 percent of aluminum, or
1.25 percent of chromium, or
0.30 percent of cobalt, or
0.40 percent of lead, or
1.25 percent of nickel, or
0.30 percent of tungsten, or
0.10 percent of molybdenum, or
0.10 percent of niobium, or
0.15 percent of vanadium, or
0.15 percent of zirconium.
All products that meet the physical and chemical description
provided above are within the scope of the order unless otherwise
excluded. The following products, by way of example, are outside or
specifically excluded from the scope of the order:
Alloy HRS products in which at least one of the chemical
elements exceeds those listed above (including, e.g., American Society
for Testing and Materials (ASTM) specifications A543, A387, A514, A517,
A506).
Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)/American Iron &
Steel Institute (AISI) grades of series 2300 and higher.
Ball bearing steels, as defined in the HTSUS.
Tool steels, as defined in the HTSUS.
Silico-manganese (as defined in the HTSUS) or silicon
electrical steel with a silicon level exceeding 2.25 percent.
ASTM specifications A710 and A736.
USS abrasion-resistant steels (USS AR 400, USS AR 500).
All products (proprietary or otherwise) based on an alloy
ASTM specification (sample specifications: ASTM A506, A507).
Non-rectangular shapes, not in coils, which are the result
of having been processed by cutting or stamping and which have assumed
the character of articles or products classified outside chapter 72 of
the HTSUS.
The merchandise subject to the order is classified in the HTSUS at
subheadings: 7208.10.15.00, 7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00,
7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00, 7208.26.00.30, 7208.26.00.60,
7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60, 7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60,
7208.37.00.30, 7208.37.00.60, 7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30,
7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15, 7208.39.00.30, 7208.39.00.90,
7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60, 7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00,
7208.90.00.00, 7211.14.00.90, 7211.19.15.00, 7211.19.20.00,
7211.19.30.00, 7211.19.45.00, 7211.19.60.00, 7211.19.75.30,
7211.19.75.60, and 7211.19.75.90. Certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat
products covered by the order, including: vacuum degassed fully
stabilized; high strength low alloy; and the substrate for motor
lamination steel may also enter under the following tariff numbers:
7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00, 7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00,
7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90, 7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30,
7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00, 7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00,
7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and 7226.99.00.00. Subject merchandise
may also enter under 7210.70.30.00, 7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30,
7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, and 7212.50.00.00. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise under review is dispositive.
Rescission of Administrative Review
In accordance with 19 CFR Sec. 351.213(d)(3), the Department may
rescind an administrative review, in whole or with respect to a
particular exporter or producer, if the Department concludes that,
during the period covered by the review, there were no entries,
exports, or sales of the subject merchandise. Because Essar was the
only company for which a review was requested and it did not have any
sales or exports of subject merchandise to the United States during the
POR, we are rescinding this review pursuant to 19 CFR Sec.
351.213(d)(3). See, e.g., Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From
Turkey; Final Results, Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review in Part, and Determination not to Revoke in Part, 68 FR 53127
(September 9, 2003) (after finding no evidence of entries of subject
merchandise from two companies that made ``no shipments'' claims, the
Department stated that ``consistent with our practice, we are
rescinding our review for Diler and Ekinciler''). Although Essar did
not have any sales or exports of subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR, its subject merchandise may have entered the
United States during the POR under CBP's antidumping case number for
Essar by way of intermediaries (without Essar's knowledge). Within 15
days of publication of this notice, the Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the ``all-others'' rate in effect on the date
of the entry. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR Sec. 351.305(a)(3).
Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials
or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
[[Page 60691]]
Dated: October 6, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-17041 Filed 10-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S