In the Matter of Certain Portable Digital Media Players and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination of the Administrative Law Judge Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Binding Term Sheet, 59816 [E6-16808]

Download as PDF 59816 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 11, 2006 / Notices Conservation Plans. The above districts have developed Plans, which Reclamation has evaluated and preliminarily determined to meet the requirements of these Criteria. Reclamation is publishing this notice in order to allow the public to review the Plans and comment on the preliminary determinations. Public comment on Reclamation’s preliminary (i.e., draft) determination is invited at this time. All public comments must be received by November 13, 2006. ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to Laurie Sharp, Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way , MP–410, Sacramento, California 95825, or contact at 916–978–5232 (TDD 978–5608), or e-mail lsharp@mp.usbr.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To be placed on a mailing list for any subsequent information, please contact Ms. Sharp at the e-mail address or telephone number above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are inviting the public to comment on our preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of Plan adequacy. Section 3405(e) of the CVPIA (Title 34 Public Law 102–575) requires the Secretary of the Interior to establish and administer an office on Central Valley Project water conservation best management practices (BMPs) that shall ‘‘* * * develop criteria for evaluating the adequacy of all water conservation plans developed by project contractors, including those plans required by Section 210 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.’’ Also, according to Section 3405(e)(1), these Criteria must be developed. ‘‘* * * with the purpose of promoting the highest level of water use efficiency reasonably achievable by project contractors using best available cost-effective technology and best management practices.’’ These Criteria state that all parties (Contractors) that contract with Reclamation for water supplies (municipal and industrial contracts over 2,000 acre-feet and agricultural contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) must prepare Plans that contain the following information: 1. Description of the District. 2. Inventory of Water Resources. 3. BMPs for Agricultural Contractors. 4. BMPs for Urban Contractors. 5. BMP Plan Implementation. 6. BMP Exemption Justification. Reclamation will evaluate Plans based on these Criteria. A copy of these Plans will be available for review at Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific (MP) Regional Office located in Sacramento, California, and the local area office. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES DATES: VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:53 Oct 10, 2006 Jkt 211001 review. Individual respondents may request that Reclamation withhold their home address from public disclosure, and we will honor such requests to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which Reclamation would elect to withhold a respondent’s identity from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses available for public disclosure in their entirety. If you wish to review a copy of these Plans, please contact Ms. Sharp to find the office nearest you. Dated: September 5, 2006. Michael Heaton, Acting Regional Resources Manager, MidPacific Region. [FR Doc. 06–8573 Filed 10–10–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–576] In the Matter of Certain Portable Digital Media Players and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination of the Administrative Law Judge Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Binding Term Sheet U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 3) terminating the above-captioned investigation on the basis of a binding term sheet. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3152. Copies of the ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing- PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. On July 6, 2006, the Commission instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint, as supplemented and amended, filed by Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, California (‘‘Apple’’), alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain portable digital media players and components thereof by reason of infringement of claim 25 of U.S. Patent No. 7,046,230; claims 25 and 33 of U.S. Patent No. 5,341,293; claims 36–39, 48, 65, 72–73, and 77–78 of U.S. Patent No. 5,898,434; and claims 1, 24, and 32 of U.S. Patent No. 6,282,646. 71 FR 38421 (July 6, 2006). The complainant named Creative Labs, Inc. of Milpitas, California, and Creative Technology Ltd. of Singapore (collectively, ‘‘Creative’’) as respondents. On September 13, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 3) granting a joint motion filed by Apple and Creative seeking termination of this investigation on the basis of a binding term sheet. No party petitioned for review of Order No. 3. The Commission has determined not to review Order No. 3. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in § 210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42(h)). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By order of the Commission. Issued: October 4, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–16808 Filed 10–10–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM 11OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 59816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16808]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-576]


In the Matter of Certain Portable Digital Media Players and 
Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an 
Initial Determination of the Administrative Law Judge Terminating the 
Investigation on the Basis of a Binding Term Sheet

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 3) 
terminating the above-captioned investigation on the basis of a binding 
term sheet.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3152. Copies of the ID and all 
other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this 
investigation are or will be available for inspection during official 
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, 
U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons are advised 
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this 
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6, 2006, the Commission instituted 
this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint, as supplemented and amended, filed 
by Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, California (``Apple''), alleging 
a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, 
and sale within the United States after importation of certain portable 
digital media players and components thereof by reason of infringement 
of claim 25 of U.S. Patent No. 7,046,230; claims 25 and 33 of U.S. 
Patent No. 5,341,293; claims 36-39, 48, 65, 72-73, and 77-78 of U.S. 
Patent No. 5,898,434; and claims 1, 24, and 32 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,282,646. 71 FR 38421 (July 6, 2006). The complainant named Creative 
Labs, Inc. of Milpitas, California, and Creative Technology Ltd. of 
Singapore (collectively, ``Creative'') as respondents.
    On September 13, 2006, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 3) granting 
a joint motion filed by Apple and Creative seeking termination of this 
investigation on the basis of a binding term sheet. No party petitioned 
for review of Order No. 3.
    The Commission has determined not to review Order No. 3.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Sec.  210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42(h)).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 4, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E6-16808 Filed 10-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P