Self Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Amending the Citation to Section 19 of the Securities Exchange Act in NASD Rule 9559, 59845-59847 [E6-16717]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 11, 2006 / Notices
Exchange proposes an annual regulatory
fee of $6,000.6
The Exchange also proposes to amend
(1) the Notes for the cancellation fee to
clarify that the fee is applicable to
options orders only; and (2) language to
the EAM / Trade Review Terminal fee
and the Order Routing Service
Connection Fee to clarify that these fees
are options fees and are applicable to
EAMs that trade options.7 The Exchange
states that both these fees currently
appear as Session/API Fee in the current
fee schedule.
Finally, the Exchange also proposes to
charge EAMs that trade equity securities
certain administrative fees. These would
include fees related to the registration of
Form U4 as well as a CRD fee. The
Exchange states that these
administrative fees currently appear
under the Legal & Regulatory section of
the current fee schedule.
Act 10 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 11
thereunder, because it establishes or
changes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the Exchange. Accordingly,
the proposal will take effect upon filing
with the Commission. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission
may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for
the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.
2. Statutory Basis
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–ISE–2006–54 on the subject
line.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 8 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 9
in particular, in that it provides for an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among ISE
members.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited nor
received any written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change
has been designated as a fee change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
6 The
Exchange represents that there exists
overlap in the costs associated with the regulatory
fee for trading options and for trading equities.
Therefore, if an EAM trades both, the EAM is only
charged $6,000 instead of $10,000. Id.
7 The Exchange represents that the Trade Review
Terminal and the related Order Routing Service are
used exclusively for the trading of options.
Therefore, the Trade Review Terminal fee and the
associated Order Routing Service Connection Fee
would only be charged to EAMs trading options. Id.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Oct 10, 2006
Jkt 211001
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2006–54. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the ISE. All
10 15
11 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59845
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2006–54 and should be
submitted on or before November 1,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–16729 Filed 10–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54562; File No. SR–NASD–
2006–111]
Self Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Amending the
Citation to Section 19 of the Securities
Exchange Act in NASD Rule 9559
October 3, 2006.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 25, 2006, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by NASD. NASD has designated the
proposed rule change as constituting a
‘‘non-controversial’’ rule change under
section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders
the proposal effective upon receipt of
this filing by the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NASD is proposing to amend NASD
Rule 9559(s), to amend the citation to
section 19 of the Act. Below is the text
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
59846
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 11, 2006 / Notices
of the proposed rule change. Proposed
deletions are in [brackets].
*
*
*
*
*
9559. Hearing Procedures for
Expedited Proceedings Under the Rule
9550 Series
(a) through (r) No Change.
(s) Application to Commission for
Review
The right to have any action pursuant
to this Rule reviewed by the Securities
and Exchange Commission is governed
by Section 19[(f)] of the Securities
Exchange Act. The filing of an
application for review by the Securities
and Exchange Commission shall not
stay the effectiveness of final NASD
action, unless the Securities and
Exchange Commission otherwise orders.
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
NASD included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. NASD has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Rule 9550 Series of NASD’s
procedural rules establishes the
procedures for expedited proceedings
brought against NASD members or
associated persons for certain types of
actions. These actions include
proceedings initiated for failure to pay
NASD dues, fees, and other charges;5
failure to comply with an arbitration
award or related settlement;6 and failure
to comply with temporary cease and
desist orders.7 The hearing procedures
for all expedited proceedings initiated
under the NASD Rule 9550 Series are
set forth in NASD Rule 9559. Although
most of the provisions in NASD Rule
9559 relate to the procedural
requirements of the hearing and NASD’s
written decisions, paragraph (s) notes
that respondents have the right to
appeal any decision issued after an
expedited proceeding to the
Commission and cites section 19(f) of
the Act. Other provisions of NASD’s
procedural rules refer more broadly to
the Commission’s review of NASD
decisions under section 19 of the Act
without specifying a particular
paragraph of the section.8 The proposed
rule change would amend the reference
to the Commission’s review of NASD
decisions in expedited proceedings
pursuant to section 19 of the Act by
deleting the specific reference to
paragraph (f) of section 19 and replacing
it with a broad reference to section 19.
NASD has filed the proposed rule
change for immediate effectiveness. The
effective date and the implementation
date will be the date of filing, September
25, 2006.
2. Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of section 15A of the Act,9 in general,
and with section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,10
in particular, which requires, among
other things, that NASD rules must be
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest and
with section 15A(b)(8) of the Act,11
which requires, among other things, that
NASD rules must provide a fair
procedure for the disciplining of
members and persons associated with
members. NASD believes that the
proposed rule change will clarify the
citation to the Act with respect to the
appeal of expedited proceedings to the
Commission.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
NASD does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not:
(i) Significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest;
8 See
e.g. NASD Rule 9870.
U.S.C. 78o–3.
10 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
11 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(8).
5 See
NASD Rule 9553.
6 See NASD Rule 9554.
7 See NASD Rule 9556.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Oct 10, 2006
9 15
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(ii) Impose any significant burden on
competition; and
(iii) Become operative for 30 days
from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission
may designate if consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest, it has become effective
pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act–12 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.13 As required under Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii),14 NASD provided the
Commission with written notice of
NASD’s intent to file the proposed rule
change along with a brief description
and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the
filing date of the proposed rule change.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally may not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of its filing.15 However, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) 16 permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. NASD
has requested that the Commission
waive the 30-day operative delay based
upon a representation that the proposed
rule change merely clarifies a citation to
section 19 of the Act. In light of the
foregoing, the Commission believes
such waiver is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. Accordingly, the Commission
designated the proposal to be effective
and operative upon filing with the
Commission.17
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
14 17 CFR 240.19.6–4(P)(6)(iii).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
17 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay of this proposal, the Commission
has considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
13 17
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 11, 2006 / Notices
pwalker on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
18 17
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5577]
Determination on the Use of FY 2005
Supplemental Peacekeeping
Operations Funds To Support the
Global War on Terrorism
The Secretary of State, pursuant to the
Emergency Supplemental
Appropriations Act for Defense, the
Global War on Terror, and Tsunami
Relief (P.L. 109–13) and the President’s
delegation of his authority to make the
necessary determination on the use of
these funds, determined on September
9th that the use of the $30 million in FY
2005 supplemental peacekeeping
operations funds in Lebanon and Kyrgyz
Republic will support the global war on
terrorism.
Dated: September 29, 2006.
Michael W. Coulter,
Deputy Assistant Secretary , Bureau of
Political-Military Affairs, Department of
State.
BILLING CODE 4710–27–P
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:22 Oct 10, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
EN11OC06.000</GPH>
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
• Use the Commission’s Internet
proposed rule change between the
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
Commission and any person, other than
rules/sro.shtml); or
those that may be withheld from the
• Send an e-mail to rulepublic in accordance with the
comments@sec.gov. Please include File
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Number SR–NASD–2006–111 on the
available for inspection and copying in
subject line.
the Commission’s Public Reference
Paper Comments
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
• Send paper comments in triplicate
the principal office of NASD.
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
All comments received will be posted
Securities and Exchange Commission,
without change; the Commission does
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
not edit personal identifying
20549–1090.
information from submissions. You
All submissions should refer to File
should submit only information that
Number SR-NASD–2006–111. This file
you wish to make available publicly. All
number should be included on the
submissions should refer to File
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Number SR–NASD–2006–111 and
Commission process and review your
should be submitted on or before
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will November 1, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
post all comments on the Commission’s
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
authority.18
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
Nancy M. Morris,
submission, all subsequent
Secretary.
amendments, all written statements
[FR Doc. E6–16717 Filed 10–10–06; 8:45 am]
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
59847
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59845-59847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16717]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54562; File No. SR-NASD-2006-111]
Self Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Amending the Citation to Section 19 of the
Securities Exchange Act in NASD Rule 9559
October 3, 2006.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 25, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by NASD. NASD has
designated the proposed rule change as constituting a ``non-
controversial'' rule change under section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon receipt of this filing by the Commission. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
NASD is proposing to amend NASD Rule 9559(s), to amend the citation
to section 19 of the Act. Below is the text
[[Page 59846]]
of the proposed rule change. Proposed deletions are in [brackets].
* * * * *
9559. Hearing Procedures for Expedited Proceedings Under the Rule
9550 Series
(a) through (r) No Change.
(s) Application to Commission for Review
The right to have any action pursuant to this Rule reviewed by the
Securities and Exchange Commission is governed by Section 19[(f)] of
the Securities Exchange Act. The filing of an application for review by
the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not stay the effectiveness
of final NASD action, unless the Securities and Exchange Commission
otherwise orders.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Rule 9550 Series of NASD's procedural rules establishes the
procedures for expedited proceedings brought against NASD members or
associated persons for certain types of actions. These actions include
proceedings initiated for failure to pay NASD dues, fees, and other
charges;\5\ failure to comply with an arbitration award or related
settlement;\6\ and failure to comply with temporary cease and desist
orders.\7\ The hearing procedures for all expedited proceedings
initiated under the NASD Rule 9550 Series are set forth in NASD Rule
9559. Although most of the provisions in NASD Rule 9559 relate to the
procedural requirements of the hearing and NASD's written decisions,
paragraph (s) notes that respondents have the right to appeal any
decision issued after an expedited proceeding to the Commission and
cites section 19(f) of the Act. Other provisions of NASD's procedural
rules refer more broadly to the Commission's review of NASD decisions
under section 19 of the Act without specifying a particular paragraph
of the section.\8\ The proposed rule change would amend the reference
to the Commission's review of NASD decisions in expedited proceedings
pursuant to section 19 of the Act by deleting the specific reference to
paragraph (f) of section 19 and replacing it with a broad reference to
section 19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See NASD Rule 9553.
\6\ See NASD Rule 9554.
\7\ See NASD Rule 9556.
\8\ See e.g. NASD Rule 9870.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASD has filed the proposed rule change for immediate
effectiveness. The effective date and the implementation date will be
the date of filing, September 25, 2006.
2. Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of section 15A of the Act,\9\ in general, and with section
15A(b)(6) of the Act,\10\ in particular, which requires, among other
things, that NASD rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest and with section 15A(b)(8) of the Act,\11\ which
requires, among other things, that NASD rules must provide a fair
procedure for the disciplining of members and persons associated with
members. NASD believes that the proposed rule change will clarify the
citation to the Act with respect to the appeal of expedited proceedings
to the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
(i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
(ii) Impose any significant burden on competition; and
(iii) Become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, it
has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act-\12\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\13\ As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii),\14\ NASD provided the Commission with written notice of
NASD's intent to file the proposed rule change along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the filing date of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19.6-4(P)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally may
not become operative for 30 days after the date of its filing.\15\
However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \16\ permits the Commission to designate
a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. NASD has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay based upon a representation
that the proposed rule change merely clarifies a citation to section 19
of the Act. In light of the foregoing, the Commission believes such
waiver is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. Accordingly, the Commission designated the proposal to be
effective and operative upon filing with the Commission.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\17\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay of
this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[[Page 59847]]
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NASD-2006-111 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-111. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of NASD.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-111
and should be submitted on or before November 1, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-16717 Filed 10-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
