Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 58011-58012 [E6-16097]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 190 / Monday, October 2, 2006 / Notices Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of September 2006. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6–16099 Filed 9–29–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1 Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the period of September 18 through September 22, 2006. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:07 Sep 29, 2006 Jkt 211001 C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss or business by the workers’ firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met. 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers’ firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers’ firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 58011 3. The competitive conditions within the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–59,853; Janna Ugone Associates, Easthampton, MA: August 4, 2005. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been met. None. Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–59,958; Stanley Fastening Systems, L.P., A Division of Stanley Works, East Greenwich, RI: August 24, 2005. TA–W–59,961; Agilent Technologies, Global Infrastructure Organization, Santa Rosa, CA: August 25, 2005. TA–W–59,986; Crane Valve North America, A Division of MCC Holdings, Inc., Washington, IA: August 30, 2005. TA–W–60,019; Artesyn Technologies, Framingham, MA: September 6, 2005. E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1 58012 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 190 / Monday, October 2, 2006 / Notices TA–W–60,028; WestPoint Home, BED Products Division, Lanett, AL: September 7, 2005. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W–59,899; Albany International, Seaming Department and Table #8 Unit, Menasha, WI: August 11, 2005. TA–W–59,916; Federal Mogul Corp., leased workers of Kelly Services and Aerotek, St. Johns, MI: April 17, 2006. TA–W–59,975; Outdoor Footwear Company, Division of The Timberland Co., Isabella, PR: August 29, 2005. TA–W–59,982; Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC, A Division of Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Oklahoma City, OK: August 29, 2005. TA–W–59,990; Honeywell International, Inc., Honeywell Security and Custom Electronics, Syosset, NY: August 30, 2005. TA–W–60,006; Bosch Sumter Plant, Automotive Technology Chassis Division, Sumter, SC: September 5, 2005. TA–W–60,008; BBA Nonwovens Washougal, leased workers of Reemay, Inc., Washougal, WA: September 1, 2005. TA–W–60,009; Joan Fabrics Corporation, Tyngsboro, MA: September 5, 2005. TA–W–60,035; Rawlings Sporting Goods Co., Washington, MO: September 7, 1995. TA–W–59,887; Llink Technologies, LLC, Romeo, MI: August 10, 2005. TA–W–59,937; Stronglite, Inc., Cottage Grove, OR: August 21, 2005. TA–W–59,969; Burke E. Porter Machinery, Grand Rapids, MI: August 22, 2005. TA–W–60,076; Medibeg USA, Inc., Mayodan, NC: September 11, 2008. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. None. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:07 Sep 29, 2006 Jkt 211001 None. Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified. The Department as determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older. None. The Department as determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily transferable. TA–W–59,853; Janna Ugone Associates, Easthampton, MA. The Department as determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been met. Competition conditions within the workers’ industry are not adverse. None. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. Since the workers of the firm are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met. None. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–60,053; Quality Concepts Manufacturing, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO. The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met. TA–W–59,732; Fibermark, Durable Specialties Division, Quakertown, PA. TA–W–59,867; Johnson Controls, Interior Experience Division, Mt. Clemens, MI. TA–W–59,917; Meridian Automotive Systems, Canton, MI. TA–W–59,497; Unisys Corporation, Roseville, MN. TA–W–59,817; Synthron, Inc., Morganton, NC. PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 TA–W–59,696; Metrobility Optical Systems, A Division of Telco Systems, Inc., Merrimack, NH. The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C.) (shift in production to a foreign country under a free trade agreement or a beneficiary country under a preferential trade agreement, or there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports). TA–W–59,756; Volex, Inc., Power Cord Products Div., Clinton, AR. The workers’ firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. TA–W–59,859; International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), Integrated Technology Delivery (ITD), Lexington, KY. TA–W–59,927; Toshiba America Business Solutions, A Subsidiary of Toshiba America, Document Solutions Engineering Division, Irvine, CA. TA–W–60,016; Wachovia Bank, Adjustment Department, Philadelphia, PA. TA–W–60,066; Source Corp, Manchester Location, Manchester, KY. TA–W–59,790; Premier Turbines, Div. of Dallas Airmotive, Inc., Neosho, MO. The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for TAA. None. I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued from September 18 through September 22, 2006. Copies of these determinations are available for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address. Dated: September 26, 2006. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6–16097 Filed 9–29–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 190 (Monday, October 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58011-58012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment 
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of 
September 18 through September 22, 2006.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision 
have decreased absolutely; and
    C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with 
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed 
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to 
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
    II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
    A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or 
partially separated;
    B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or 
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly 
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or 
subdivision; and
    C. One of the following must be satisfied:
    1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United 
States;
    2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of 
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference 
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin 
Economic Recovery Act; or
    3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of 
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are 
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
    Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for 
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' 
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or 
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially 
separated;
    (2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream 
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers 
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade 
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related 
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) 
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the 
workers' firm; or
    (B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or 
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued 
a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
    1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 
50 years of age or older.
    2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are 
not easily transferable.
    3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., 
conditions within the industry are adverse).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

None.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

TA-W-59,853; Janna Ugone Associates, Easthampton, MA: August 4, 2005.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

None.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

None.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-59,958; Stanley Fastening Systems, L.P., A Division of Stanley 
Works, East Greenwich, RI: August 24, 2005.
TA-W-59,961; Agilent Technologies, Global Infrastructure Organization, 
Santa Rosa, CA: August 25, 2005.
TA-W-59,986; Crane Valve North America, A Division of MCC Holdings, 
Inc., Washington, IA: August 30, 2005.
TA-W-60,019; Artesyn Technologies, Framingham, MA: September 6, 2005.

[[Page 58012]]

TA-W-60,028; WestPoint Home, BED Products Division, Lanett, AL: 
September 7, 2005.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W-59,899; Albany International, Seaming Department and Table #8 
Unit, Menasha, WI: August 11, 2005.
TA-W-59,916; Federal Mogul Corp., leased workers of Kelly Services and 
Aerotek, St. Johns, MI: April 17, 2006.
TA-W-59,975; Outdoor Footwear Company, Division of The Timberland Co., 
Isabella, PR: August 29, 2005.
TA-W-59,982; Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC, A Division 
of Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Oklahoma City, OK: August 29, 2005.
TA-W-59,990; Honeywell International, Inc., Honeywell Security and 
Custom Electronics, Syosset, NY: August 30, 2005.
TA-W-60,006; Bosch Sumter Plant, Automotive Technology Chassis 
Division, Sumter, SC: September 5, 2005.
TA-W-60,008; BBA Nonwovens Washougal, leased workers of Reemay, Inc., 
Washougal, WA: September 1, 2005.
TA-W-60,009; Joan Fabrics Corporation, Tyngsboro, MA: September 5, 
2005.
TA-W-60,035; Rawlings Sporting Goods Co., Washington, MO: September 7, 
1995.
TA-W-59,887; Llink Technologies, LLC, Romeo, MI: August 10, 2005.
TA-W-59,937; Stronglite, Inc., Cottage Grove, OR: August 21, 2005.
TA-W-59,969; Burke E. Porter Machinery, Grand Rapids, MI: August 22, 
2005.
TA-W-60,076; Medibeg USA, Inc., Mayodan, NC: September 11, 2008.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 
been met.

None.

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or 
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) 
of the Trade Act have been met.

None.

Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, it has been determined that the 
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons 
specified.
    The Department as determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.

None.

    The Department as determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily 
transferable.

TA-W-59,853; Janna Ugone Associates, Easthampton, MA.

    The Department as determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has 
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are 
not adverse.

None.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    Since the workers of the firm are denied eligibility to apply for 
TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and 
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.

None.

    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 
production to a foreign country) have not been met.

TA-W-60,053; Quality Concepts Manufacturing, Inc., Colorado Springs, 
CO.

    The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign 
country) have not been met.

TA-W-59,732; Fibermark, Durable Specialties Division, Quakertown, PA.
TA-W-59,867; Johnson Controls, Interior Experience Division, Mt. 
Clemens, MI.
TA-W-59,917; Meridian Automotive Systems, Canton, MI.
TA-W-59,497; Unisys Corporation, Roseville, MN.
TA-W-59,817; Synthron, Inc., Morganton, NC.
TA-W-59,696; Metrobility Optical Systems, A Division of Telco Systems, 
Inc., Merrimack, NH.

    The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker 
separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C.) (shift in production to a foreign country 
under a free trade agreement or a beneficiary country under a 
preferential trade agreement, or there has been or is likely to be an 
increase in imports).

TA-W-59,756; Volex, Inc., Power Cord Products Div., Clinton, AR.

    The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for 
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA-W-59,859; International Business Machines Corp. (IBM), Integrated 
Technology Delivery (ITD), Lexington, KY.
TA-W-59,927; Toshiba America Business Solutions, A Subsidiary of 
Toshiba America, Document Solutions Engineering Division, Irvine, CA.
TA-W-60,016; Wachovia Bank, Adjustment Department, Philadelphia, PA.
TA-W-60,066; Source Corp, Manchester Location, Manchester, KY.
TA-W-59,790; Premier Turbines, Div. of Dallas Airmotive, Inc., Neosho, 
MO.

    The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has 
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to 
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified 
eligible to apply for TAA.

None.

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
from September 18 through September 22, 2006. Copies of these 
determinations are available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. 
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 
during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to 
the above address.

    Dated: September 26, 2006.
 Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E6-16097 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.