In the Matter of Certain Laminated Floor Panels; Notice of Commission Determination to Review Portions of a Final Initial Determination; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding; Extension of Target Date, 57564-57566 [E6-16078]

Download as PDF 57564 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 189 / Friday, September 29, 2006 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Minerals Management Service National Park Service Coastal Impact Assistance Program Guidelines National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending Nominations and Related Actions AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior. Notice of Availability of Guidelines. ACTION: SUMMARY: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) is issuing this notice to advise the public of the availability of guidelines for the Coastal Impact Assistance Program (CIAP). The guidelines are an important step in the formulation of CIAP. Ms. Colleen Benner, Minerals Management Service, 381 Elden Street, Mail Stop 4040, Herndon, Virginia 20170. You may also contact Ms. Benner by telephone at (703) 787–1710. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) has created CIAP by amending Section 31 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1356a). Under the provisions of the EPAct, the authority and responsibility for the management of CIAP is vested in the Secretary of the Department of the Interior (Secretary). The Secretary has delegated this authority and responsibility to MMS. Under Section 384 of the EPAct, MMS shall disburse $250 million for each Fiscal Year 2007 through 2010 to eligible producing States (State) and coastal political subdivisions (CPS’s). The funds allocated to each State are based on the proportion of qualified outer continental shelf (OCS) revenues offshore the individual State to total qualified OCS revenues from all States. In order to receive CIAP’s funds, States are required to submit a coastal impact assistance plan (Plan) that MMS must approve prior to disbursing any funds. All funds shall be disbursed through a grant process. This guidance has been developed by MMS to provide the information necessary for States to develop a Plan and submit it to MMS. Digital copies of these guidelines may be found on the MMS Web site at https://www.mms.gov/offshore/ CIAPmain.htm. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: September 6, 2006. R.M. ‘‘Johnnie’’ Burton, Director, Minerals Management Service. [FR Doc. E6–16090 Filed 9–28–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:43 Sep 28, 2006 Jkt 208001 Nominations for the following properties being considered for listing or related actions in the National Register were received by the National Park Service before September 16, 2006. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR Part 60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service,1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by October 16, 2006. John W. Roberts, Acting Chief, National Register/National Historic Landmarks Program. CALIFORNIA Lake County Tallman Hotel, 9550 Main St., Upper Lake, 06000947 Orange County Fox Fullerton Theatre Complex, 500–512 N. Harbor Blvd., Fullerton, 06000948 COLORADO Las Animas County Zion’s German Lutheran Church, 510 Pine St., Trinidad, 06000950 Weld County Alger, Amanda K., Memorial Methodist Episcopal Church, 303 Maple Ave., Eaton, 06000949 CONNECTICUT Fairfield County Perry Avenue Bridge, Perry Avenue over Silvermine River, Norwalk, 06000951 New Haven County Westville Village Historic District (Boundary Increase), 827 Whalley Ave., New Haven, 06000954 FLORIDA Miami-Dade County Lummus Park Historic District, Generally bounded by NW 4th ST., NW 3rd Court, NW 2nd St. and NW North River Dr., Miami, 06000952 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 IOWA Linn County Terrace Park Historic District, Roughly bounded by 10th Ave., 9th Ave., 11th St. and E side of 12th St., Marion, 06000953 TEXAS Cameron County Morris—Browne House, 204 E. Levee St., Brownsville, 06000955 [FR Doc. E6–16071 Filed 9–28–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–70–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–545] In the Matter of Certain Laminated Floor Panels; Notice of Commission Determination to Review Portions of a Final Initial Determination; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding; Extension of Target Date U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review portions of the final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on July 3, 2006, in the abovecaptioned investigation. The Commission has also determined to extend the target date for completion of the investigation until November 21, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Haldenstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3041. Copies of the ALJ’s ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 189 / Friday, September 29, 2006 / Notices Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on July 29, 2005, based on a complaint filed by Unilin Beheer B.V., Flooring Industries Ltd., and Unilin Flooring N.C. LLC (collectively ‘‘Unilin’’). 70 FR 44694 (August 3, 2005). The complaint (as amended) alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘section 337’’) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain laminated floor panels by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 37, 52, 65, and 66 of U.S. Patent No. 6,006,486 (‘‘the ‘486 patent’’), claims 1, 2, 10, 13, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,490,836 (‘‘the ’836 patent’’), claims 1–6 of U.S. Patent No. 6,874,292 (‘‘the ‘292 patent’’), and claims 1, 5, 13, 17, 27, and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 6,928,779 (‘‘the ‘779 patent’’). The investigation was subsequently terminated with respect to the ‘486 patent. The Commission named as respondents 32 companies located in Canada, China, South Korea, Malaysia, and the United States. Id. Two respondents have been terminated from the investigation as a result of settlement agreements. The administrative law judge set October 3, 2006, as the target date for completion of the investigation. On July 3, 2006, the ALJ issued his final ID, including his recommended determination on remedy and bonding. The complainants, the Commission investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’), and several respondents have petitioned for review of various portions of the ID. Having considered the ID, the petitions for review, the responses thereto, and other relevant portions of the record, the Commission has determined to review those portions of the ALJ’s final ID concerning: (1) Construction of claim 1 of the ’836 patent and claim 4 of the ‘292 patent, (2) infringement of claims 1 and 2 of the ‘836 patent and claims 3 and 4 of the ‘292 patent; (3) infringement by the defaulting respondents; (4) invalidity of the asserted claims of the ‘779 patent; and (5) the validity of the asserted claims of the ‘836 and ‘292 patents to the extent implicated by the Commission’s review described in item (1). On review, the Commission requests briefing based on the evidentiary record. In particular, the Commission is interested in briefing on the following issues: In connection with issue (1), whether the location of the ‘‘elastically bendable portion’’ of the lower lip is VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:43 Sep 28, 2006 Jkt 208001 limited to a particular portion of the lip (as discussed by the IA in his Petition for Review at p. 14, n.11); in connection with issue (2), the reliability of Dr. Loferski’s bent lower lip test and the results of other experts’ tests for a bent lower lip in the accused products; in connection with issue (2), whether the bent lower lip should be analyzed as a cantilevered beam; in connection with issue (2), whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that the lower lip remains in the bent position during lateral shifting of the coupled panels; in connection with issue (3), the legal and policy issues the Commission should consider with respect to infringement by defaulting respondents. In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2) issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in respondents being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and provide information establishing that activities involving other types of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For background, see In the Matter of Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994) (Commission Opinion). If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in the context of this investigation. If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the President has 60 days to approve or disapprove the Commission’s action. During this period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under bond, in an amount determined by the PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57565 Commission and prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be imposed. The Commission also requests that complainants provide the expiration dates of the asserted patents and the HTSUS numbers of the allegedly infringing goods. Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation are requested to file written submissions on the issues under review. The submissions should be concise and thoroughly referenced to the record in this investigation. Parties to the investigation, interested government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Such submissions should address the July 3, 2006, recommended determination by the ALJ on remedy and bonding. Complainants and the Commission investigative attorney are also requested to submit proposed remedial orders for the Commission’s consideration. The written submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than close of business on October 10, 2006. Reply submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on October 17, 2006. No further submissions on these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with the Office of the Secretary. Any person desiring to submit a document (or portion thereof) to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment unless the information has already been granted such treatment during the proceedings. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary of the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See section 201.6 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is sought will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.42–.46 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–.46). By order of the Commission. E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1 57566 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 189 / Friday, September 29, 2006 / Notices Issued: September 25, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E6–16078 Filed 9–28–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–364 and 731– TA–711 and 713–716 (Second Review)] Oil Country Tubular Goods From Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and Mexico United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year reviews concerning the countervailing duty order on oil country tubular goods from Italy and the antidumping duty orders on oil country tubular goods from Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and Mexico. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on oil country tubular goods from Italy and the antidumping duty orders on oil country tubular goods from Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATE: September 22, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Ruggles (202–205–3187), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:43 Sep 28, 2006 Jkt 208001 these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—On September 5, 2006, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act should proceed (71 FR 54520, September 15, 2006). A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Participation in the reviews and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report.—The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on March 22, 2007, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing.—The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on April PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12, 2007, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before April 3, 2007. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 a.m. on April 5, 2007, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions.—Each party to the reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is April 2, 2007. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission’s rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the Commission’s rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is April 23, 2007; witness testimony must be filed no later than three days before the hearing. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or before April 23, 2007. On May 22, 2007, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before May 24, 2007, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.68 of the Commission’s rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 189 (Friday, September 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57564-57566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16078]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-545]


In the Matter of Certain Laminated Floor Panels; Notice of 
Commission Determination to Review Portions of a Final Initial 
Determination; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues 
Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding; Extension 
of Target Date

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to review portions of the final initial 
determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') on July 3, 2006, in the above-captioned investigation. The 
Commission has also determined to extend the target date for completion 
of the investigation until November 21, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Haldenstein, Esq., Office of 
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3041. Copies of the 
ALJ's ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection 
with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during 
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this 
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised 
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the

[[Page 57565]]

Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
The Commission instituted this investigation on July 29, 2005, based on 
a complaint filed by Unilin Beheer B.V., Flooring Industries Ltd., and 
Unilin Flooring N.C. LLC (collectively ``Unilin''). 70 FR 44694 (August 
3, 2005). The complaint (as amended) alleged violations of section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (``section 337'') in the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain laminated floor panels by reason of 
infringement of one or more of claims 1, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 37, 52, 
65, and 66 of U.S. Patent No. 6,006,486 (``the `486 patent''), claims 
1, 2, 10, 13, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,490,836 
(``the '836 patent''), claims 1-6 of U.S. Patent No. 6,874,292 (``the 
`292 patent''), and claims 1, 5, 13, 17, 27, and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,928,779 (``the `779 patent''). The investigation was subsequently 
terminated with respect to the `486 patent. The Commission named as 
respondents 32 companies located in Canada, China, South Korea, 
Malaysia, and the United States. Id. Two respondents have been 
terminated from the investigation as a result of settlement agreements. 
The administrative law judge set October 3, 2006, as the target date 
for completion of the investigation.
    On July 3, 2006, the ALJ issued his final ID, including his 
recommended determination on remedy and bonding. The complainants, the 
Commission investigative attorney (``IA''), and several respondents 
have petitioned for review of various portions of the ID.
    Having considered the ID, the petitions for review, the responses 
thereto, and other relevant portions of the record, the Commission has 
determined to review those portions of the ALJ's final ID concerning: 
(1) Construction of claim 1 of the '836 patent and claim 4 of the `292 
patent, (2) infringement of claims 1 and 2 of the `836 patent and 
claims 3 and 4 of the `292 patent; (3) infringement by the defaulting 
respondents; (4) invalidity of the asserted claims of the `779 patent; 
and (5) the validity of the asserted claims of the `836 and `292 
patents to the extent implicated by the Commission's review described 
in item (1).
    On review, the Commission requests briefing based on the 
evidentiary record. In particular, the Commission is interested in 
briefing on the following issues: In connection with issue (1), whether 
the location of the ``elastically bendable portion'' of the lower lip 
is limited to a particular portion of the lip (as discussed by the IA 
in his Petition for Review at p. 14, n.11); in connection with issue 
(2), the reliability of Dr. Loferski's bent lower lip test and the 
results of other experts' tests for a bent lower lip in the accused 
products; in connection with issue (2), whether the bent lower lip 
should be analyzed as a cantilevered beam; in connection with issue 
(2), whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that the lower lip 
remains in the bent position during lateral shifting of the coupled 
panels; in connection with issue (3), the legal and policy issues the 
Commission should consider with respect to infringement by defaulting 
respondents.
    In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the 
Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of 
the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2) 
issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in 
respondents being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair 
acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the 
Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address 
the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks 
exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes 
other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and 
provide information establishing that activities involving other types 
of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For 
background, see In the Matter of Certain Devices for Connecting 
Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 
(December 1994) (Commission Opinion).
    If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must 
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The 
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an 
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the 
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. 
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly 
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. 
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written 
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in 
the context of this investigation.
    If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the President has 60 
days to approve or disapprove the Commission's action. During this 
period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United 
States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and 
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is 
therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of 
the bond that should be imposed. The Commission also requests that 
complainants provide the expiration dates of the asserted patents and 
the HTSUS numbers of the allegedly infringing goods.
    Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation are requested 
to file written submissions on the issues under review. The submissions 
should be concise and thoroughly referenced to the record in this 
investigation. Parties to the investigation, interested government 
agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to file 
written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and 
bonding. Such submissions should address the July 3, 2006, recommended 
determination by the ALJ on remedy and bonding. Complainants and the 
Commission investigative attorney are also requested to submit proposed 
remedial orders for the Commission's consideration. The written 
submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than 
close of business on October 10, 2006. Reply submissions must be filed 
no later than the close of business on October 17, 2006. No further 
submissions on these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered 
by the Commission.
    Persons filing written submissions must file the original document 
and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with 
the Office of the Secretary. Any person desiring to submit a document 
(or portion thereof) to the Commission in confidence must request 
confidential treatment unless the information has already been granted 
such treatment during the proceedings. All such requests should be 
directed to the Secretary of the Commission and must include a full 
statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such 
treatment. See section 201.6 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by 
the Commission is sought will be treated accordingly. All 
nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public 
inspection at the Office of the Secretary.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.42-.46 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42-.46).

By order of the Commission.

[[Page 57566]]

    Issued: September 25, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-16078 Filed 9-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.