In the Matter of Certain Laminated Floor Panels; Notice of Commission Determination to Review Portions of a Final Initial Determination; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding; Extension of Target Date, 57564-57566 [E6-16078]
Download as PDF
57564
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 189 / Friday, September 29, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service
National Park Service
Coastal Impact Assistance Program
Guidelines
National Register of Historic Places;
Notification of Pending Nominations
and Related Actions
AGENCY:
Minerals Management Service,
Interior.
Notice of Availability of
Guidelines.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Minerals Management
Service (MMS) is issuing this notice to
advise the public of the availability of
guidelines for the Coastal Impact
Assistance Program (CIAP). The
guidelines are an important step in the
formulation of CIAP.
Ms.
Colleen Benner, Minerals Management
Service, 381 Elden Street, Mail Stop
4040, Herndon, Virginia 20170. You
may also contact Ms. Benner by
telephone at (703) 787–1710.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) has
created CIAP by amending Section 31 of
the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act
(43 U.S.C. 1356a). Under the provisions
of the EPAct, the authority and
responsibility for the management of
CIAP is vested in the Secretary of the
Department of the Interior (Secretary).
The Secretary has delegated this
authority and responsibility to MMS.
Under Section 384 of the EPAct, MMS
shall disburse $250 million for each
Fiscal Year 2007 through 2010 to
eligible producing States (State) and
coastal political subdivisions (CPS’s).
The funds allocated to each State are
based on the proportion of qualified
outer continental shelf (OCS) revenues
offshore the individual State to total
qualified OCS revenues from all States.
In order to receive CIAP’s funds, States
are required to submit a coastal impact
assistance plan (Plan) that MMS must
approve prior to disbursing any funds.
All funds shall be disbursed through a
grant process. This guidance has been
developed by MMS to provide the
information necessary for States to
develop a Plan and submit it to MMS.
Digital copies of these guidelines may
be found on the MMS Web site at
https://www.mms.gov/offshore/
CIAPmain.htm.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: September 6, 2006.
R.M. ‘‘Johnnie’’ Burton,
Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. E6–16090 Filed 9–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:43 Sep 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
Nominations for the following
properties being considered for listing
or related actions in the National
Register were received by the National
Park Service before September 16, 2006.
Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR Part
60 written comments concerning the
significance of these properties under
the National Register criteria for
evaluation may be forwarded by United
States Postal Service, to the National
Register of Historic Places, National
Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., 2280,
Washington, DC 20240; by all other
carriers, National Register of Historic
Places, National Park Service,1201 Eye
St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC
20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written
or faxed comments should be submitted
by October 16, 2006.
John W. Roberts,
Acting Chief, National Register/National
Historic Landmarks Program.
CALIFORNIA
Lake County
Tallman Hotel, 9550 Main St., Upper Lake,
06000947
Orange County
Fox Fullerton Theatre Complex, 500–512 N.
Harbor Blvd., Fullerton, 06000948
COLORADO
Las Animas County
Zion’s German Lutheran Church, 510 Pine
St., Trinidad, 06000950
Weld County
Alger, Amanda K., Memorial Methodist
Episcopal Church, 303 Maple Ave., Eaton,
06000949
CONNECTICUT
Fairfield County
Perry Avenue Bridge, Perry Avenue over
Silvermine River, Norwalk, 06000951
New Haven County
Westville Village Historic District (Boundary
Increase), 827 Whalley Ave., New Haven,
06000954
FLORIDA
Miami-Dade County
Lummus Park Historic District, Generally
bounded by NW 4th ST., NW 3rd Court,
NW 2nd St. and NW North River Dr.,
Miami, 06000952
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IOWA
Linn County
Terrace Park Historic District, Roughly
bounded by 10th Ave., 9th Ave., 11th St.
and E side of 12th St., Marion, 06000953
TEXAS
Cameron County
Morris—Browne House, 204 E. Levee St.,
Brownsville, 06000955
[FR Doc. E6–16071 Filed 9–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–70–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–545]
In the Matter of Certain Laminated
Floor Panels; Notice of Commission
Determination to Review Portions of a
Final Initial Determination; Schedule
for Filing Written Submissions on the
Issues Under Review and on Remedy,
the Public Interest, and Bonding;
Extension of Target Date
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review
portions of the final initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the
presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) on July 3, 2006, in the abovecaptioned investigation. The
Commission has also determined to
extend the target date for completion of
the investigation until November 21,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Haldenstein, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3041. Copies of the ALJ’s ID and all
other nonconfidential documents filed
in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
205–2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 189 / Friday, September 29, 2006 / Notices
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION: The Commission
instituted this investigation on July 29,
2005, based on a complaint filed by
Unilin Beheer B.V., Flooring Industries
Ltd., and Unilin Flooring N.C. LLC
(collectively ‘‘Unilin’’). 70 FR 44694
(August 3, 2005). The complaint (as
amended) alleged violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘section
337’’) in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain laminated floor
panels by reason of infringement of one
or more of claims 1, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21,
37, 52, 65, and 66 of U.S. Patent No.
6,006,486 (‘‘the ‘486 patent’’), claims 1,
2, 10, 13, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, and 27 of
U.S. Patent No. 6,490,836 (‘‘the ’836
patent’’), claims 1–6 of U.S. Patent No.
6,874,292 (‘‘the ‘292 patent’’), and
claims 1, 5, 13, 17, 27, and 28 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,928,779 (‘‘the ‘779 patent’’).
The investigation was subsequently
terminated with respect to the ‘486
patent. The Commission named as
respondents 32 companies located in
Canada, China, South Korea, Malaysia,
and the United States. Id. Two
respondents have been terminated from
the investigation as a result of
settlement agreements. The
administrative law judge set October 3,
2006, as the target date for completion
of the investigation.
On July 3, 2006, the ALJ issued his
final ID, including his recommended
determination on remedy and bonding.
The complainants, the Commission
investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’), and
several respondents have petitioned for
review of various portions of the ID.
Having considered the ID, the
petitions for review, the responses
thereto, and other relevant portions of
the record, the Commission has
determined to review those portions of
the ALJ’s final ID concerning: (1)
Construction of claim 1 of the ’836
patent and claim 4 of the ‘292 patent, (2)
infringement of claims 1 and 2 of the
‘836 patent and claims 3 and 4 of the
‘292 patent; (3) infringement by the
defaulting respondents; (4) invalidity of
the asserted claims of the ‘779 patent;
and (5) the validity of the asserted
claims of the ‘836 and ‘292 patents to
the extent implicated by the
Commission’s review described in item
(1).
On review, the Commission requests
briefing based on the evidentiary record.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in briefing on the following
issues: In connection with issue (1),
whether the location of the ‘‘elastically
bendable portion’’ of the lower lip is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:43 Sep 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
limited to a particular portion of the lip
(as discussed by the IA in his Petition
for Review at p. 14, n.11); in connection
with issue (2), the reliability of Dr.
Loferski’s bent lower lip test and the
results of other experts’ tests for a bent
lower lip in the accused products; in
connection with issue (2), whether the
bent lower lip should be analyzed as a
cantilevered beam; in connection with
issue (2), whether the evidence was
sufficient to prove that the lower lip
remains in the bent position during
lateral shifting of the coupled panels; in
connection with issue (3), the legal and
policy issues the Commission should
consider with respect to infringement by
defaulting respondents.
In connection with the final
disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that
could result in the exclusion of the
subject articles from entry into the
United States, and/or (2) issue one or
more cease and desist orders that could
result in respondents being required to
cease and desist from engaging in unfair
acts in the importation and sale of such
articles. Accordingly, the Commission is
interested in receiving written
submissions that address the form of
remedy, if any, that should be ordered.
If a party seeks exclusion of an article
from entry into the United States for
purposes other than entry for
consumption, the party should so
indicate and provide information
establishing that activities involving
other types of entry either are adversely
affecting it or likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain
Devices for Connecting Computers via
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360,
USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994)
(Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some
form of remedy, it must consider the
effects of that remedy upon the public
interest. The factors the Commission
will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist
orders would have on (1) the public
health and welfare, (2) competitive
conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.
production of articles that are like or
directly competitive with those that are
subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the
aforementioned public interest factors
in the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form
of remedy, the President has 60 days to
approve or disapprove the
Commission’s action. During this
period, the subject articles would be
entitled to enter the United States under
bond, in an amount determined by the
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57565
Commission and prescribed by the
Secretary of the Treasury. The
Commission is therefore interested in
receiving submissions concerning the
amount of the bond that should be
imposed. The Commission also requests
that complainants provide the
expiration dates of the asserted patents
and the HTSUS numbers of the
allegedly infringing goods.
Written Submissions: The parties to
the investigation are requested to file
written submissions on the issues under
review. The submissions should be
concise and thoroughly referenced to
the record in this investigation. Parties
to the investigation, interested
government agencies, and any other
interested parties are encouraged to file
written submissions on the issues of
remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. Such submissions should
address the July 3, 2006, recommended
determination by the ALJ on remedy
and bonding. Complainants and the
Commission investigative attorney are
also requested to submit proposed
remedial orders for the Commission’s
consideration. The written submissions
and proposed remedial orders must be
filed no later than close of business on
October 10, 2006. Reply submissions
must be filed no later than the close of
business on October 17, 2006. No
further submissions on these issues will
be permitted unless otherwise ordered
by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document and 12
true copies thereof on or before the
deadlines stated above with the Office
of the Secretary. Any person desiring to
submit a document (or portion thereof)
to the Commission in confidence must
request confidential treatment unless
the information has already been
granted such treatment during the
proceedings. All such requests should
be directed to the Secretary of the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See section 201.6 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for
which confidential treatment by the
Commission is sought will be treated
accordingly. All nonconfidential written
submissions will be available for public
inspection at the Office of the Secretary.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.42–.46 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.42–.46).
By order of the Commission.
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
57566
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 189 / Friday, September 29, 2006 / Notices
Issued: September 25, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–16078 Filed 9–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–364 and 731–
TA–711 and 713–716 (Second Review)]
Oil Country Tubular Goods From
Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and
Mexico
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year
reviews concerning the countervailing
duty order on oil country tubular goods
from Italy and the antidumping duty
orders on oil country tubular goods from
Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and
Mexico.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of full reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5))
(the Act) to determine whether
revocation of the countervailing duty
order on oil country tubular goods from
Italy and the antidumping duty orders
on oil country tubular goods from
Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and
Mexico would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time. The Commission has determined
to exercise its authority to extend the
review period by up to 90 days pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). For further
information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 22, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Ruggles (202–205–3187), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:43 Sep 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On September 5, 2006,
the Commission determined that
responses to its notice of institution of
the subject five-year reviews were such
that full reviews pursuant to section
751(c)(5) of the Act should proceed (71
FR 54520, September 15, 2006). A
record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements are available from the Office
of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Participation in the reviews and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the subject
merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in these reviews as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11 of the
Commission’s rules, by 45 days after
publication of this notice. A party that
filed a notice of appearance following
publication of the Commission’s notice
of institution of the reviews need not
file an additional notice of appearance.
The Secretary will maintain a public
service list containing the names and
addresses of all persons, or their
representatives, who are parties to the
reviews.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and BPI service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
gathered in these reviews available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the reviews, provided that the
application is made by 45 days after
publication of this notice. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the reviews. A party
granted access to BPI following
publication of the Commission’s notice
of institution of the reviews need not
reapply for such access. A separate
service list will be maintained by the
Secretary for those parties authorized to
receive BPI under the APO.
Staff report.—The prehearing staff
report in the reviews will be placed in
the nonpublic record on March 22,
2007, and a public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section
207.64 of the Commission’s rules.
Hearing.—The Commission will hold
a hearing in connection with the
reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on April
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12, 2007, at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building. Requests to
appear at the hearing should be filed in
writing with the Secretary to the
Commission on or before April 3, 2007.
A nonparty who has testimony that may
aid the Commission’s deliberations may
request permission to present a short
statement at the hearing. All parties and
nonparties desiring to appear at the
hearing and make oral presentations
should attend a prehearing conference
to be held at 9:30 a.m. on April 5, 2007,
at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building. Oral testimony
and written materials to be submitted at
the public hearing are governed by
sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24,
and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules.
Parties must submit any request to
present a portion of their hearing
testimony in camera no later than 7
business days prior to the date of the
hearing.
Written submissions.—Each party to
the reviews may submit a prehearing
brief to the Commission. Prehearing
briefs must conform with the provisions
of section 207.65 of the Commission’s
rules; the deadline for filing is April 2,
2007. Parties may also file written
testimony in connection with their
presentation at the hearing, as provided
in section 207.24 of the Commission’s
rules, and posthearing briefs, which
must conform with the provisions of
section 207.67 of the Commission’s
rules. The deadline for filing
posthearing briefs is April 23, 2007;
witness testimony must be filed no later
than three days before the hearing. In
addition, any person who has not
entered an appearance as a party to the
reviews may submit a written statement
of information pertinent to the subject of
the reviews on or before April 23, 2007.
On May 22, 2007, the Commission will
make available to parties all information
on which they have not had an
opportunity to comment. Parties may
submit final comments on this
information on or before May 24, 2007,
but such final comments must not
contain new factual information and
must otherwise comply with section
207.68 of the Commission’s rules. All
written submissions must conform with
the provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s rules; any submissions
that contain BPI must also conform with
the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8,
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 189 (Friday, September 29, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57564-57566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-16078]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-545]
In the Matter of Certain Laminated Floor Panels; Notice of
Commission Determination to Review Portions of a Final Initial
Determination; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues
Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding; Extension
of Target Date
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review portions of the final initial
determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') on July 3, 2006, in the above-captioned investigation. The
Commission has also determined to extend the target date for completion
of the investigation until November 21, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Haldenstein, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3041. Copies of the
ALJ's ID and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection
with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the
[[Page 57565]]
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Commission instituted this investigation on July 29, 2005, based on
a complaint filed by Unilin Beheer B.V., Flooring Industries Ltd., and
Unilin Flooring N.C. LLC (collectively ``Unilin''). 70 FR 44694 (August
3, 2005). The complaint (as amended) alleged violations of section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (``section 337'') in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United
States after importation of certain laminated floor panels by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 37, 52,
65, and 66 of U.S. Patent No. 6,006,486 (``the `486 patent''), claims
1, 2, 10, 13, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, and 27 of U.S. Patent No. 6,490,836
(``the '836 patent''), claims 1-6 of U.S. Patent No. 6,874,292 (``the
`292 patent''), and claims 1, 5, 13, 17, 27, and 28 of U.S. Patent No.
6,928,779 (``the `779 patent''). The investigation was subsequently
terminated with respect to the `486 patent. The Commission named as
respondents 32 companies located in Canada, China, South Korea,
Malaysia, and the United States. Id. Two respondents have been
terminated from the investigation as a result of settlement agreements.
The administrative law judge set October 3, 2006, as the target date
for completion of the investigation.
On July 3, 2006, the ALJ issued his final ID, including his
recommended determination on remedy and bonding. The complainants, the
Commission investigative attorney (``IA''), and several respondents
have petitioned for review of various portions of the ID.
Having considered the ID, the petitions for review, the responses
thereto, and other relevant portions of the record, the Commission has
determined to review those portions of the ALJ's final ID concerning:
(1) Construction of claim 1 of the '836 patent and claim 4 of the `292
patent, (2) infringement of claims 1 and 2 of the `836 patent and
claims 3 and 4 of the `292 patent; (3) infringement by the defaulting
respondents; (4) invalidity of the asserted claims of the `779 patent;
and (5) the validity of the asserted claims of the `836 and `292
patents to the extent implicated by the Commission's review described
in item (1).
On review, the Commission requests briefing based on the
evidentiary record. In particular, the Commission is interested in
briefing on the following issues: In connection with issue (1), whether
the location of the ``elastically bendable portion'' of the lower lip
is limited to a particular portion of the lip (as discussed by the IA
in his Petition for Review at p. 14, n.11); in connection with issue
(2), the reliability of Dr. Loferski's bent lower lip test and the
results of other experts' tests for a bent lower lip in the accused
products; in connection with issue (2), whether the bent lower lip
should be analyzed as a cantilevered beam; in connection with issue
(2), whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that the lower lip
remains in the bent position during lateral shifting of the coupled
panels; in connection with issue (3), the legal and policy issues the
Commission should consider with respect to infringement by defaulting
respondents.
In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of
the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2)
issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in
respondents being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair
acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the
Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address
the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks
exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes
other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and
provide information establishing that activities involving other types
of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain Devices for Connecting
Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843
(December 1994) (Commission Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in
the context of this investigation.
If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the President has 60
days to approve or disapprove the Commission's action. During this
period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United
States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is
therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of
the bond that should be imposed. The Commission also requests that
complainants provide the expiration dates of the asserted patents and
the HTSUS numbers of the allegedly infringing goods.
Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation are requested
to file written submissions on the issues under review. The submissions
should be concise and thoroughly referenced to the record in this
investigation. Parties to the investigation, interested government
agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to file
written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. Such submissions should address the July 3, 2006, recommended
determination by the ALJ on remedy and bonding. Complainants and the
Commission investigative attorney are also requested to submit proposed
remedial orders for the Commission's consideration. The written
submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than
close of business on October 10, 2006. Reply submissions must be filed
no later than the close of business on October 17, 2006. No further
submissions on these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered
by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with
the Office of the Secretary. Any person desiring to submit a document
(or portion thereof) to the Commission in confidence must request
confidential treatment unless the information has already been granted
such treatment during the proceedings. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary of the Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See section 201.6 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by
the Commission is sought will be treated accordingly. All
nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public
inspection at the Office of the Secretary.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in sections 210.42-.46 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.42-.46).
By order of the Commission.
[[Page 57566]]
Issued: September 25, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-16078 Filed 9-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P