Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico; Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary and Final Results of Full Five-year (“Sunset”) Review of Antidumping Duty Order, 55774-55775 [06-8181]
Download as PDF
55774
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 185
Monday, September 25, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
send their names and proposals to Bill
Pell, DFO, P.O. Box 1270, Hot Springs,
AR 71902
Dated: September 12, 2006.
Caroline Mitchell,
Committee Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 06–8129 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–52–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Forest Service
International Trade Administration
Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory
Committee
[A–201–817]
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Meeting notice for the OuachitaOzark Resource Advisory Committee
under Section 205 of the Secure Rural
Schools and Community Self
Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
393).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice is published in
accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act.
Meeting notice is hereby given for the
Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory
Committee pursuant to section 205 of
the Secure Rural Schools and
Community Self Determination Act of
2000, Public Law 106–393. Topics to be
discussed include: General information,
proposed new Title II projects, updates
on current or completed Title II projects,
renewal of committee member terms
and committee member recruitment
needs and, if appropriate, next meeting
date and agenda.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
September 28, 2006, beginning at 6 p.m.
and ending at approximately 9 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Scott County Courthouse, 100 W.
First Street, Waldron, AR 71958.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caroline Mitchell, Committee
Coordinator, USDA, Ouachita National
Forest, P.O. Box 1270, Hot Springs, AR
71902 (501–321–5318).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public Committee
discussion is limited to Forest Service
Staff, Committee members, and elected
officials. However, persons who wish to
bring matters to the attention of the
Committee may file written statements
with the Committee staff before or after
the meeting. Individuals wishing to
speak or propose agenda items must
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:46 Sep 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Mexico; Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary and Final Results of Full
Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of
Antidumping Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 25, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury or Abdelali Elouaradia, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–
1374, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On June 1, 2006, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published in the Federal Register the
notice of initiation of its sunset reviews
of the antidumping duty orders on oil
country tubular goods (‘‘OCTG’’) from
Argentina, Italy, Japan, South Korea,
and Mexico. See Initiation of Five-year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 71 FR 31153 (June
1, 2006). On June 14, 2006, domestic
interested party United States Steel
Corporation (‘‘U.S. Steel’’) submitted a
letter indicating its intent to participate
in the sunset review on OCTG from
Mexico. On June 15, 2006, the domestic
interested parties IPSCO Tubulars Inc.,
Lone Star Steel Company, Koppel Steel
(NS Group), Maverick Tube
Corporation, Newport Steel (NS Group),
and V&M Star LP, submitted a letter
indicating their intent to participate in
the sunset reviews. On June 29, 2006,
June 30, 2006, and July 3, 2006,
domestic and respondent interested
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
parties provided substantive responses
as required under section 351.218 (d)(3)
of the Department’s regulations.
Respondent interested parties Hylsa,
S.A. de C.V. (‘‘Hylsa’’) and Tubos de
Acero de Mexico, S.A. (‘‘TAMSA’’),
included, in their substantive responses,
arguments regarding ‘‘other factors’’
under section 752(c)(2) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’) and
their effect on the Department’s
determination whether dumping is
likely to continue or recur. Domestic
interested parties filed rebuttal
comments on July 5, 2006, and July 14,
2006.
On July 21, 2006, the Department
determined that the participation of the
respondent interested parties was
adequate, and that it was appropriate to
conduct full sunset reviews. See
Memorandum to Steven J. Claeys:
Adequacy Determination; Sunset
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Oil Country Tubular Goods from
Mexico, dated July 21, 2006, and on file
in the Central Records Unit, Room B–
099 of the Department of Commerce
building.
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary and Final Results of
Reviews
The Act provides for the completion
of a full sunset review within 240 days
of the publication of the initiation
notice. See section 751(c)(5)(A) of the
Act. In accordance with section
751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department
may extend the period of time for
making its determination by not more
than 90 days, if it determines that the
review is extraordinarily complicated.
We determine that this review is
extraordinarily complicated, pursuant to
sections 751(c)(5)(C) (i) and (ii) of the
Act, because there are a large number of
issues and the issues to be considered
are complex. Therefore, the Department
requires additional time to complete its
analysis. The Department’s preliminary
results of the sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on OCTG are
scheduled for September 19, 2006.
However, the Department will extend
the deadline in this proceeding for the
above–stated reasons. As a result, the
Department intends to issue the
preliminary results of the full sunset
review by December 18, 2006, and the
final results of that review by April 27,
2007. These dates are 90 days from the
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 185 / Monday, September 25, 2006 / Notices
original scheduled dates of the
preliminary and final results of the
sunset review.
This notice is issued in accordance
with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and (C) of the
Act.
Dated: September 19, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 06–8181 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
COMMITTEE FOR THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE
AGREEMENTS
Adjustment of Import Limits for Certain
Cotton and Man-Made Fiber Textile
Products Produced or Manufactured in
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
September 18, 2006.
Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements
(CITA).
ACTION: Issuing a directive to the
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
AGENCY:
September 25, 2006
Ross
Arnold, International Trade Specialist,
Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S.
Department of Commerce, (202) 482–
4212. For information on the quota
status of these limits, refer to the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection website
(https://www.cbp.gov), or call (202) 3442650. For information on embargoes and
quota re-openings, refer to the Office of
Textiles and Apparel website at https://
otexa.ita.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Authority: Section 204 of the Agricultural
Act of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1854);
Executive Order 11651 of March 3, 1972, as
amended.
The Bilateral Textile Agreement of
July 17, 2003, as amended, between the
Governments of the United States and
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,
establishes limits for certain cotton,
wool and man-made fiber textiles and
textile products, produced or
manufactured in the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam. The current limits for
certain categories are being adjusted for
carryover.
A description of the textile and
apparel categories in terms of HTS
numbers is available in the
CORRELATION: Textile and Apparel
Categories with the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (refer to
the Office of Textiles and Apparel
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:46 Sep 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
website at https://otexa.ita.doc.gov). See
70 FR 75156 (December 19, 2005).
55775
human environment as a result of the
proposed installation of hydropower
generation facilities at Bluestone Dam,
Philip J. Martello,
Hinton, Summers County, WV
Acting Chairman, Committee for the
(Hydropower Project). The proposed
Implementation of Textile Agreements.
hydropower project would utilize three
Committee for the Implementation of Textile of the six existing penstocks which were
Agreements
part of the original construction of the
dam. The proposed project would also
September 18, 2006.
involve the discharge of dredged and fill
Commissioner,
material into waters of the United States
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
(U.S.) and would involve work in the
Washington, DC 20229
Dear Commissioner: This directive
New River, a navigable water of the U.S.
amends, but does not cancel, the directive
Therefore, the subject proposal would
issued to you on December 13, 2005, by the
require a Department of the Army (DA)
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation permit pursuant to section 404 of the
of Textile Agreements. That directive
Clean Water Act (Section 404) and
concerns imports of certain cotton, wool, and
man–made fiber textiles and textile products, Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
of 1899 (Section 10). This EIS will
produced or manufactured in Vietnam and
document the agency’s evaluation of all
exported during the twelve-month period
reasonable alternatives as they affect
which began on January 1, 2006 and extends
through December 31, 2006.
stability of the dam and control the
Effective on September 25, 2006, you are
release of water from Bluestone Dam,
directed to increase the limits for the
and will document analysis of impacts
following categories, as provided for under
to Waters of the U.S. sufficient to
the terms of the current bilateral textile
accommodate the NEPA process for
agreement between the Governments of the
permitting under section 10 and section
United States and Vietnam:
404.
DATES: A public scoping meeting is
Category
Restraint limi
announced for October 2, 2006, from 11
342/642 .................... 752,777 dozen.
a.m.–8 p.m. at Hinton Technology
347/348 .................... 9,502,903 dozen.
Center, 301 Summers Street, Hinton,
1 The limits have not been adjusted to acSummers County, WV.
count for any imports exported after December ADDRESSES: Send written comments and
31, 2005.
suggestions concerning this proposed
The Committee for the Implementation of
project to John Preston, PM–PD–R, U.S.
Textile Agreements has determined that
Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington
these actions fall within the foreign affairs
District, 502 Eighth Street, Huntington,
exception to the rulemaking provisions of 5
WV, 25701–2070. Telephone: (304) 399–
U.S.C. 553(a)(1).
5870. Electronic mail:
Sincerely,
John.S.Preston@usace.army.mil.
Philip J. Martello,
Requests to be placed on the mailing list
Acting Chairman, Committee for the
should also be sent to this address.
Implementation of Textile Agreements.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
[FR Doc. 06–8178 Filed 9–22–06; 8:45 am]
obtain additional information about the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS
proposed project, contact Kenneth
Halstead EC–WH, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Huntington District, 502
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Eighth Street, Huntington, WV, 25701–
2070. Telephone: (304) 399–5811.
Department of the Army; Corps of
Electronic mail:
Engineers
Kenneth.C.Halstead@usace.army.mil.
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. Public
Environmental Impact Statement and
Participation: a. The Corps of Engineers
Conduct a Public Scoping Meeting for
will conduct a public scoping meeting
the Bluestone Hydropower Project,
(open house format) to gain input from
Hinton, Summers County, WV
interested agencies, organizations, and
the general public concerning the
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S.
content of the EIS, issues and impacts
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
to be addressed in the EIS, and
ACTION: Notice of intent.
alternatives that should be analyzed.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
The meeting is scheduled for (see
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
DATES).
(NEPA), the U.S. Army Corps of
b. The Corps invites full public
Engineers, DoD, Huntington District will participation to promote open
prepare an Environmental Impact
communication and better decisionStatement (EIS) to evaluate potential
making. All persons and organizations
impacts to the natural, physical, and
that have an interest in potential effects
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 185 (Monday, September 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55774-55775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8181]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-201-817]
Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico; Extension of Time Limits
for Preliminary and Final Results of Full Five-year (``Sunset'') Review
of Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 25, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Abdelali Elouaradia, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0195 or
(202) 482-1374, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 1, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'')
published in the Federal Register the notice of initiation of its
sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on oil country tubular
goods (``OCTG'') from Argentina, Italy, Japan, South Korea, and Mexico.
See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 71 FR 31153 (June 1,
2006). On June 14, 2006, domestic interested party United States Steel
Corporation (``U.S. Steel'') submitted a letter indicating its intent
to participate in the sunset review on OCTG from Mexico. On June 15,
2006, the domestic interested parties IPSCO Tubulars Inc., Lone Star
Steel Company, Koppel Steel (NS Group), Maverick Tube Corporation,
Newport Steel (NS Group), and V&M Star LP, submitted a letter
indicating their intent to participate in the sunset reviews. On June
29, 2006, June 30, 2006, and July 3, 2006, domestic and respondent
interested parties provided substantive responses as required under
section 351.218 (d)(3) of the Department's regulations. Respondent
interested parties Hylsa, S.A. de C.V. (``Hylsa'') and Tubos de Acero
de Mexico, S.A. (``TAMSA''), included, in their substantive responses,
arguments regarding ``other factors'' under section 752(c)(2) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'') and their effect on the
Department's determination whether dumping is likely to continue or
recur. Domestic interested parties filed rebuttal comments on July 5,
2006, and July 14, 2006.
On July 21, 2006, the Department determined that the participation
of the respondent interested parties was adequate, and that it was
appropriate to conduct full sunset reviews. See Memorandum to Steven J.
Claeys: Adequacy Determination; Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Mexico, dated July 21, 2006,
and on file in the Central Records Unit, Room B-099 of the Department
of Commerce building.
Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary and Final Results of Reviews
The Act provides for the completion of a full sunset review within
240 days of the publication of the initiation notice. See section
751(c)(5)(A) of the Act. In accordance with section 751(c)(5)(B) of the
Act, the Department may extend the period of time for making its
determination by not more than 90 days, if it determines that the
review is extraordinarily complicated. We determine that this review is
extraordinarily complicated, pursuant to sections 751(c)(5)(C) (i) and
(ii) of the Act, because there are a large number of issues and the
issues to be considered are complex. Therefore, the Department requires
additional time to complete its analysis. The Department's preliminary
results of the sunset review of the antidumping duty order on OCTG are
scheduled for September 19, 2006. However, the Department will extend
the deadline in this proceeding for the above-stated reasons. As a
result, the Department intends to issue the preliminary results of the
full sunset review by December 18, 2006, and the final results of that
review by April 27, 2007. These dates are 90 days from the
[[Page 55775]]
original scheduled dates of the preliminary and final results of the
sunset review.
This notice is issued in accordance with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and
(C) of the Act.
Dated: September 19, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 06-8181 Filed 9-22-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S