Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Allow for the Digital Recording of Arbitration Hearings, 55536-55537 [06-8001]

Download as PDF 55536 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Notices SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–54455; File No. SR–NASD– 2006–102] Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Allow for the Digital Recording of Arbitration Hearings September 15, 2006. Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on August 23, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD. NASD has designated this proposal as concerned solely with the administration of a self-regulatory organization pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(3) thereunder,4 which renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change NASD is proposing to amend Rule 10326 of the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure (‘‘Code’’) to allow for the digital or other recording of arbitration hearings. Below is the text of the proposed rule change.5 Proposed new language is in italics. * * * * * 10326. Record of Proceedings (a) A verbatim record by stenographic reporter or a tape, digital, or other recording of all arbitration hearings shall be kept. If a party or parties to a dispute elect to have the record 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(3). 5 The rules proposed in this filing will be renumbered as appropriate following Commission approval of the pending revisions to the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes; see Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51856 (June 15, 2005), 70 FR 36442 (June 23, 2005) (SR–NASD–2003–158); and the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes; see Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51857 (June 15, 2005), 70 FR 36430 (June 23, 2005) (SR–NASD– 2004–011). sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 2 17 VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:37 Sep 21, 2006 Jkt 208001 transcribed, the cost of such transcription shall be borne by the party or parties making the request unless the arbitrators direct otherwise. The arbitrators may also direct that the record be transcribed. If the record is transcribed at the request of any party, a copy shall be provided to the arbitrators. (b) No change * * * * * II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 10326 of the Code to allow for the digital or other recording of arbitration hearings. Rule 10326 of the Code currently requires arbitration hearings to be recorded either by a stenographic reporter or through the use of a tape recorder. Since its inception in 1968, NASD Dispute Resolution has used tape recorders to fulfill this obligation. In response to constituent suggestions that NASD consider upgrading its recording technology, NASD intends to formally evaluate the digital recording of its arbitration hearings.6 The evaluation will help to ascertain how well arbitrators adapt to using digital recording equipment, the quality of the recordings, the appropriate file storage format(s), and the best means for disseminating and storing audio files. Since Rule 10326 currently does not allow for the use of digital recording equipment, NASD is proposing to revise the rule to expand the permissible methods of recording arbitration hearings to allow for the use of ‘‘digital or other’’ recording devices. This change will allow NASD to use digital 6 Digital recording is the recording and storing of audio data through use of one of several computer file formats, such as MP3, AVI, WAV, etc., rather than using tape. These files can be stored electronically, and sent via e-mail. PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 recording technology, or another recording method, should such technology prove to be superior to the tape recording system that is currently in use. 2. Statutory Basis NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, 7 which requires, among other things, that NASD’s rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provision of the Act noted above because it will provide additional options for the recording of arbitration hearings, which may be better than the current alternatives available under the Code. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 8 and subparagraph (f)(3) of Rule 19b–4 thereunder 9 as it is concerned solely with the administration of a selfregulatory organization. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.10 IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 7 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6). U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii). 9 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(3). 10 See section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). 8 15 E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM 22SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Notices change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–NASD–2006–102 on the subject line. [Release No. 34–54319A; File No. SR– NASD–2006–060] Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Require Members To File Regulatory Notices With NASD Electronically change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by NYSE Arca. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION September 18, 2006. Correction: In FR Document No. E6–13812, beginning on page 48959 for Tuesday • Send paper comments in triplicate August 22, 2006, the first sentence to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, under ‘‘Statutory Basis’’ in column 1 Securities and Exchange Commission, should read as follows: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC NASD believes that the proposed rule 20549–1090. change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,1 which All submissions should refer to File requires, among other things, that NASD Number SR–NASD–2006–102. This file rules must be designed to prevent number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable Commission process and review your principles of trade, and, in general, to comments more efficiently, please use protect investors and the public interest, only one method. The Commission will in that the proposed rule change will post all comments on the Commission’s permit the expeditious filing of Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ specified required regulatory notices rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the and other required submissions by submission, all subsequent requiring firms to file such reports and amendments, all written statements documents with NASD electronically. with respect to the proposed rule For the Commission, by the Division of change that are filed with the Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated Commission, and all written authority.2 communications relating to the Jill M. Peterson, proposed rule change between the Assistant Secretary. Commission and any person, other than [FR Doc. 06–8040 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am] those that may be withheld from the BILLING CODE 8010–01–M public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE the Commission’s Public Reference COMMISSION Room. Copies of such filing also will be [Release No. 34–54466; File No. SR– available for inspection and copying at NYSEArca–2006–48] the principal office of NASD. All comments received will be posted Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE without change; the Commission does Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed not edit personal identifying Rule Change To Amend NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.’s Clearly Erroneous information from submissions. You Executions Rule To Include an Appeal should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All Fee for the Archipelago Exchange submissions should refer to File September 18, 2006. Number SR–NASD–2006–102 and Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the should be submitted on or before Securities Exchange Act of 1934 October 13, 2006. (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Paper Comments For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.11 Jill M. Peterson, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 06–8001 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 11 17 VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:37 Sep 21, 2006 notice is hereby given that on August 11, 2006, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 1 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6). CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 2 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Jkt 208001 55537 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 NYSE Arca proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.10 governing clearly erroneous executions (‘‘CEE’’) on the Archipelago Exchange, the equities trading facility of NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’). Specifically, the Exchange proposes to assess a fee associated with the appellate mechanism of NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.10. The text of the proposed rule change is available on NYSE Arca’s Web site (https://www.nysearca.com), at NYSE Arca’s principal office, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, NYSE Arca included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. NYSE Arca has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange amended NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.10 (Clearly Erroneous Executions) to include subsections (c)(2)–(4), which amendment became effective May 16, 2005. NYSE Arca Equities Rules 7.10(c)(2)–(4) provide for an appeals panel that includes the Exchange’s Chief Regulatory Officer (‘‘CRO’’), or a designee of the CRO, and two representatives from Equity Trading Permit (‘‘ETP’’) Holders (together with the CRO, the ‘‘CEE Panel’’) to review the determination of clearly erroneous executions that are made by an NYSE Arca Equities officer under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.10(c)(1). As part of its continuing efforts to enhance the appeal process, the Exchange proposes to add NYSE Arca E:\FR\FM\22SEN1.SGM 22SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55536-55537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8001]



[[Page 55536]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54455; File No. SR-NASD-2006-102]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities 
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 
Rule Change To Allow for the Digital Recording of Arbitration Hearings

September 15, 2006.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on August 23, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
Inc. (``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD. NASD has 
designated this proposal as concerned solely with the administration of 
a self-regulatory organization pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of 
the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(3) thereunder,\4\ which renders the 
proposed rule change effective upon filing with the Commission. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASD is proposing to amend Rule 10326 of the NASD Code of 
Arbitration Procedure (``Code'') to allow for the digital or other 
recording of arbitration hearings.
    Below is the text of the proposed rule change.\5\ Proposed new 
language is in italics.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The rules proposed in this filing will be renumbered as 
appropriate following Commission approval of the pending revisions 
to the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes; see 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51856 (June 15, 2005), 70 FR 
36442 (June 23, 2005) (SR-NASD-2003-158); and the NASD Code of 
Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes; see Securities Exchange 
Act Release No. 51857 (June 15, 2005), 70 FR 36430 (June 23, 2005) 
(SR-NASD-2004-011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

10326. Record of Proceedings

    (a) A verbatim record by stenographic reporter or a tape, digital, 
or other recording of all arbitration hearings shall be kept. If a 
party or parties to a dispute elect to have the record transcribed, the 
cost of such transcription shall be borne by the party or parties 
making the request unless the arbitrators direct otherwise. The 
arbitrators may also direct that the record be transcribed. If the 
record is transcribed at the request of any party, a copy shall be 
provided to the arbitrators.
    (b) No change
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, 
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 10326 of 
the Code to allow for the digital or other recording of arbitration 
hearings.
    Rule 10326 of the Code currently requires arbitration hearings to 
be recorded either by a stenographic reporter or through the use of a 
tape recorder. Since its inception in 1968, NASD Dispute Resolution has 
used tape recorders to fulfill this obligation.
    In response to constituent suggestions that NASD consider upgrading 
its recording technology, NASD intends to formally evaluate the digital 
recording of its arbitration hearings.\6\ The evaluation will help to 
ascertain how well arbitrators adapt to using digital recording 
equipment, the quality of the recordings, the appropriate file storage 
format(s), and the best means for disseminating and storing audio 
files.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Digital recording is the recording and storing of audio data 
through use of one of several computer file formats, such as MP3, 
AVI, WAV, etc., rather than using tape. These files can be stored 
electronically, and sent via e-mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since Rule 10326 currently does not allow for the use of digital 
recording equipment, NASD is proposing to revise the rule to expand the 
permissible methods of recording arbitration hearings to allow for the 
use of ``digital or other'' recording devices. This change will allow 
NASD to use digital recording technology, or another recording method, 
should such technology prove to be superior to the tape recording 
system that is currently in use.
2. Statutory Basis
    NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
provisions of section 15A(b)(6) of the Act, \7\ which requires, among 
other things, that NASD's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest. NASD believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the provision of the Act noted above because it will 
provide additional options for the recording of arbitration hearings, 
which may be better than the current alternatives available under the 
Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in 
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section 
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \8\ and subparagraph (f)(3) of Rule 19b-4 
thereunder \9\ as it is concerned solely with the administration of a 
self-regulatory organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it 
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate 
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule

[[Page 55537]]

change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NASD-2006-102 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-102. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. 
To help the Commission process and review your comments more 
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all 
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, 
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that 
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating 
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, 
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance 
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection 
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such 
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of NASD. All comments received will be posted without 
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information 
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to 
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number 
SR-NASD-2006-102 and should be submitted on or before October 13, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-8001 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.