Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 54266-54268 [E6-15271]

Download as PDF rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES 54266 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 178 / Thursday, September 14, 2006 / Notices the full amount of the civil penalty and interest, a penalty charge and an administrative charge, as more fully described in the attached Notice. Third, that the timely payment of the civil penalty set forth above is hereby made a condition to the granting, restoration, or continuing validity of any export license, License Exception, permission, or privilege granted, or to be granted, to Butler. Accordingly, if Butler should fail to pay the civil penalty in a timely manner, the undersigned may enter an Order denying all of Butler’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of one year from the date of entry of this Order. Fourth, that for a period of 10 years from the date of entry of this Order, Thomas Campbell Butler, 4611 10th Street, Lubbock, Texas 79416, and, when acting on his behalf, his representatives, agents, or employees (‘‘Denied Person’’) may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software, or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to: A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License Exception, or export control document; B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations; or C. Benefiting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations. Fifth, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item subject to the Regulations; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:23 Sep 13, 2006 Jkt 208001 C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any item, or whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. Sixth, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to Butler by affiliation, worship, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of the Order. Seventh, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced direct product of U.S.origin technology. Eighth, that the proposed charging letter, the Settlement Agreement, and this Order shall be made available to the public. Ninth, that this Order shall be served on the Denied Person and on BIS, and shall be published in Federal Register. This Order, which constitutes the final agency action in this matter, is effective immediately. Entered this 1st day of September 2006. Darryl W. Jackson, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement. [FR Doc. 06–7622 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A–549–502) Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 7, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand in the Federal Register. See Circular Welded Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 17810 (April 7, 2006) (Preliminary Results). The review covers one producer of the subject merchandise. The period of review is March 1, 2004 through February 28, 2005. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made changes to the preliminary results, which are discussed in the ‘‘Changes Since the Preliminary Results’’ section below. For the final dumping margins, see the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section below. EFFECTIVE DATE: September 14, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith or Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255 or (202) 482–1391, respectively. AGENCY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 7, 2006, the Department published the Preliminary Results. In the Preliminary Results, we stated our intention to request further information from Saha Thai to allow Saha Thai the opportunity to demonstrate that there are two distinct levels of trade in the home market. On April 21, 2006, we issued a supplemental questionnaire for this purpose to Saha Thai and its affiliated resellers. Saha Thai submitted its response on May 8, 2006. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On May 18, 2006, we provided specific deadlines. On June 1, 2006, we received a case brief from the sole respondent, Saha Thai Steel Pipe Company, Ltd. (Saha Thai) and E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM 14SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 178 / Thursday, September 14, 2006 / Notices from Allied Tube and Conduit Corporation and Wheatland Tube Company (collectively, petitioners); respondent and petitioners each submitted a rebuttal brief on June 6, 2006. On August 3, 2006, the Department published in the Federal Register a notice extending the final results from August 5, 2006 to September 7, 2006. See Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 71 FR 44016 (August 3, 2006). Scope of the Order The products covered by this antidumping order are certain welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand. The subject merchandise has an outside diameter of 0.375 inches or more, but not exceeding 16 inches. These products, which are commonly referred to in the industry as ‘‘standard pipe’’ or ‘‘structural tubing,’’ are hereinafter designated as ‘‘pipes and tubes.’’ The merchandise is classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and purposes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES The issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration (Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice and which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues addressed in the Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Decision Memorandum is on file in the central records unit (CRU), and can be accessed directly on the Web at http:// ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of comments received, we have made adjustments to our margin calculations. The adjustments are discussed in detail in the Decision Memorandum. VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:23 Sep 13, 2006 Jkt 208001 Final Results of Review As a result of our review, we determine that the following weighted– average margin exists for the period of March 1, 2004 through February 28, 2005: 54267 destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the ‘‘all others’’ rate from the investigation if there is no rate for the intermediate company involved in the transaction. See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes Manufacturer/Exporter Margin (percent) and Tubes from Thailand; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Saha Thai Steel Pipe Fair Value, 51 FR 3384 (January 27, Company, Ltd. ........... 2.26 1986). For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Assessment Countervailing Duty Proceedings: The Department shall determine, and Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). all appropriate entries. Pursuant to 19 Cash Deposits CFR 351.212(b)(1), the Department calculates an assessment rate for each The following deposit requirements importer of the subject merchandise for will be effective upon publication of the each respondent. Upon issuance of the final results of this administrative final results of this administrative review for all shipments of subject review, if any importer–specific rates merchandise entered, or withdrawn calculated in the final results are above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), from warehouse, for consumption on or the Department will issue appraisement after the publication date of these final results, as provided by section instructions directly to CBP to assess 751(a)(2)(c) of the Act: (1) For antidumping duties on appropriate companies covered by this review, the entries. To determine whether the duty cash deposit rate will be the rate listed assessment rates covering the period above; (2) for merchandise exported by were de minimis, in accordance with producers or exporters not covered in the requirement set forth in 19 CFR this review but covered in a previous 351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we segment of this proceeding, the cash calculated importer (or customer)deposit rate will continue to be the specific ad valorem rates by aggregating company–specific rate published in the the dumping margins calculated for all most recent final results in which that U.S. sales to that importer or customer producer or exporter participated; (3) if and dividing this amount by the total the exporter is not a firm covered in this value of the sales to that importer (or review or in any previous segment of customer). Where an importer (or this proceeding, but the producer is, the customer)-specific ad valorem rate is cash deposit rate will be that established greater than de minimis, and the respondent has reported reliable entered for the producer of the merchandise in these final results of review or in the values, we apply the assessment rate to most recent final results in which that the entered value of the importer’s/ producer participated; and, (4) if neither customer’s entries during the review the exporter nor the producer is a firm period. Where an importer (or covered in this review or in any customer)-specific ad valorem rate is previous segment of this proceeding, the greater than de minimis and we do not cash deposit rate will be 15.67 percent, have reliable entered values, we the ‘‘all others’’ rate established in the calculate a per–unit assessment rate by less–than-fair–value investigation. aggregating the dumping duties for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) Notification to Importers and dividing this amount by the total quantity sold to that importer (or This notice also serves as a final customer). The Department will issue reminder to importers of their appropriate assessment instructions responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) directly to CBP within 15 days of the to file a certificate regarding the final results of this review. reimbursement of antidumping duties The Department clarified its prior to liquidation of the relevant ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on entries during this review period. May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This Failure to comply with this requirement clarification will apply to entries of could result in the Secretary’s subject merchandise during the period presumption that reimbursement of of review produced by the company included in these final results of review antidumping duties occurred, and in the subsequent assessment of double for which the reviewed company did antidumping duties. not know their merchandise was PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM 14SEN1 54268 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 178 / Thursday, September 14, 2006 / Notices Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: September 7, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix I Issues in Decision Memorandum Comment 2: Antidumping Duty Exemptions Comment 3: Duty Drawback Comment 4: Product Matching for Fence Tube Comment 5: Level of Trade in the Home Market Comment 6: Zeroing of Saha Thai’s Sales [FR Doc. E6–15271 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Corrected Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES 21:22 Sep 13, 2006 Jkt 208001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood or Jill Pollack, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230; telephone (202) 482–3874 and (202) 482–4593, respectively. On July 20, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register its notice of partial rescission of the antidumping duty administrative review of certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Thailand for the period August 4, 2004, through January 31, 2006. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 41200 (July 20, 2006) (Partial Rescission). In the Partial Rescission, the Department noted that it was rescinding the administrative review with respect to Thai Union Frozen Products Co., Ltd., based on a timely request for withdrawal. See Partial Rescission, 71 FR at 41201. However, the correct name for this company is Thai Union Frozen Products Public Co., Ltd. As noted above, the name for Thai Union Frozen Products Public Co., Ltd. was incorrectly stated in the Partial Rescission. We now correct the partial rescission of the 2004–2006 antidumping duty administrative review of certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Thailand as noted above. As a result of this correction, we are rescinding the 2004–2006 administrative review for Thai Union Frozen Products Public Co., Ltd. This corrected partial rescission is issued and published in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: September 14, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irina Itkin or Alice Gibbons, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230; telephone (202) 482–0656 and (202) 482–0498, respectively. VerDate Aug<31>2005 Background Dated: September 11, 2006. Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–15269 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am] [A–549–822] AGENCY: EFFECTIVE DATE: Corrected Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Comment 1: Saha Thai’s Revocation Request September 14, 2006. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–840] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 21, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register its notice of partial rescission of the antidumping duty administrative review of certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India for the period August 4, 2004, through January 31, 2006. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India; Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 41419 (July 21, 2006) (Partial Rescission). In Partial Rescission, the Department noted that it was rescinding the administrative review with respect to Sagar Samrat Foods, based on a timely request for withdrawal. See Partial Rescission, 71 FR at 41420. However, the correct name for this company is Sagar Samrat Seafoods. Corrected Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review As noted above, the name for Sagar Samrat Seafoods was incorrectly stated in the Partial Rescission. We now correct the partial rescission of the 2004–2006 antidumping duty administrative review of certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India as noted above. As a result of this correction, we are rescinding the 2004–2006 administrative review for Sagar Samrat Seafoods. This corrected partial rescission is issued and published in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: September 11, 2006. Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India; Corrected Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Stephen J. Claeys, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–15279 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am] E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM 14SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 178 (Thursday, September 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54266-54268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-549-502)


Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: 
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 7, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes 
from Thailand in the Federal Register. See Circular Welded Steel Pipes 
and Tubes from Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 71 FR 17810 (April 7, 2006) (Preliminary 
Results). The review covers one producer of the subject merchandise. 
The period of review is March 1, 2004 through February 28, 2005. Based 
on our analysis of the comments received, we have made changes to the 
preliminary results, which are discussed in the ``Changes Since the 
Preliminary Results'' section below. For the final dumping margins, see 
the ``Final Results of Review'' section below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 14, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith or Dana 
Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-5255 or (202) 482-1391, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 7, 2006, the Department published the Preliminary Results. 
In the Preliminary Results, we stated our intention to request further 
information from Saha Thai to allow Saha Thai the opportunity to 
demonstrate that there are two distinct levels of trade in the home 
market. On April 21, 2006, we issued a supplemental questionnaire for 
this purpose to Saha Thai and its affiliated resellers. Saha Thai 
submitted its response on May 8, 2006.
    We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On May 
18, 2006, we provided specific deadlines. On June 1, 2006, we received 
a case brief from the sole respondent, Saha Thai Steel Pipe Company, 
Ltd. (Saha Thai) and

[[Page 54267]]

from Allied Tube and Conduit Corporation and Wheatland Tube Company 
(collectively, petitioners); respondent and petitioners each submitted 
a rebuttal brief on June 6, 2006. On August 3, 2006, the Department 
published in the Federal Register a notice extending the final results 
from August 5, 2006 to September 7, 2006. See Extension of Time Limit 
for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Circular 
Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 71 FR 44016 (August 
3, 2006).

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this antidumping order are certain welded 
carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand. The subject merchandise has 
an outside diameter of 0.375 inches or more, but not exceeding 16 
inches. These products, which are commonly referred to in the industry 
as ``standard pipe'' or ``structural tubing,'' are hereinafter 
designated as ``pipes and tubes.'' The merchandise is classifiable 
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item 
numbers 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 
7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and purposes of U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection (CBP), our written description of the scope of 
the order is dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    The issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import 
Administration, from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Import Administration (Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with 
this notice and which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the 
issues addressed in the Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. 
The Decision Memorandum is on file in the central records unit (CRU), 
and can be accessed directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. 
The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of comments received, we have made 
adjustments to our margin calculations. The adjustments are discussed 
in detail in the Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of Review

    As a result of our review, we determine that the following 
weighted-average margin exists for the period of March 1, 2004 through 
February 28, 2005:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Manufacturer/Exporter                  Margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saha Thai Steel Pipe Company, Ltd...................                2.26
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 
the Department calculates an assessment rate for each importer of the 
subject merchandise for each respondent. Upon issuance of the final 
results of this administrative review, if any importer-specific rates 
calculated in the final results are above de minimis (i.e., at or above 
0.5 percent), the Department will issue appraisement instructions 
directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries.
    To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period 
were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we calculated importer (or 
customer)-specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins 
calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and dividing 
this amount by the total value of the sales to that importer (or 
customer). Where an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is 
greater than de minimis, and the respondent has reported reliable 
entered values, we apply the assessment rate to the entered value of 
the importer's/customer's entries during the review period. Where an 
importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is greater than de 
minimis and we do not have reliable entered values, we calculate a per-
unit assessment rate by aggregating the dumping duties for all U.S. 
sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the 
total quantity sold to that importer (or customer). The Department will 
issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP within 15 
days of the final results of this review.
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This clarification will apply to entries of 
subject merchandise during the period of review produced by the company 
included in these final results of review for which the reviewed 
company did not know their merchandise was destined for the United 
States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 
entries at the ``all others'' rate from the investigation if there is 
no rate for the intermediate company involved in the transaction. See 
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand; Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 51 FR 3384 (January 27, 
1986). For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).

Cash Deposits

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date of these final 
results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(c) of the Act: (1) For 
companies covered by this review, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate listed above; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or 
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a previous segment 
of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 
company-specific rate published in the most recent final results in 
which that producer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is 
not a firm covered in this review or in any previous segment of this 
proceeding, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be that 
established for the producer of the merchandise in these final results 
of review or in the most recent final results in which that producer 
participated; and, (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a 
firm covered in this review or in any previous segment of this 
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will be 15.67 percent, the ``all 
others'' rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred, and in the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

[[Page 54268]]

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: September 7, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix I Issues in Decision Memorandum

Comment 1: Saha Thai's Revocation Request
Comment 2: Antidumping Duty Exemptions
Comment 3: Duty Drawback
Comment 4: Product Matching for Fence Tube
Comment 5: Level of Trade in the Home Market
Comment 6: Zeroing of Saha Thai's Sales
[FR Doc. E6-15271 Filed 9-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S