Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 54266-54268 [E6-15271]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
54266
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 178 / Thursday, September 14, 2006 / Notices
the full amount of the civil penalty and
interest, a penalty charge and an
administrative charge, as more fully
described in the attached Notice.
Third, that the timely payment of the
civil penalty set forth above is hereby
made a condition to the granting,
restoration, or continuing validity of any
export license, License Exception,
permission, or privilege granted, or to be
granted, to Butler. Accordingly, if Butler
should fail to pay the civil penalty in a
timely manner, the undersigned may
enter an Order denying all of Butler’s
export privileges under the Regulations
for a period of one year from the date
of entry of this Order.
Fourth, that for a period of 10 years
from the date of entry of this Order,
Thomas Campbell Butler, 4611 10th
Street, Lubbock, Texas 79416, and,
when acting on his behalf, his
representatives, agents, or employees
(‘‘Denied Person’’) may not, directly or
indirectly, participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software, or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefiting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Fifth, that no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:23 Sep 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, or whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Sixth, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Butler by
affiliation, worship, control, or position
of responsibility in the conduct of trade
or related services may also be made
subject to the provisions of the Order.
Seventh, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations
where the only items involved that are
subject to the Regulations are the
foreign-produced direct product of U.S.origin technology.
Eighth, that the proposed charging
letter, the Settlement Agreement, and
this Order shall be made available to the
public.
Ninth, that this Order shall be served
on the Denied Person and on BIS, and
shall be published in Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the
final agency action in this matter, is
effective immediately.
Entered this 1st day of September 2006.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 06–7622 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–549–502)
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes
and Tubes from Thailand: Notice of
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 7, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on circular
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes
from Thailand in the Federal Register.
See Circular Welded Steel Pipes and
Tubes from Thailand: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 71 FR 17810
(April 7, 2006) (Preliminary Results).
The review covers one producer of the
subject merchandise. The period of
review is March 1, 2004 through
February 28, 2005. Based on our
analysis of the comments received, we
have made changes to the preliminary
results, which are discussed in the
‘‘Changes Since the Preliminary
Results’’ section below. For the final
dumping margins, see the ‘‘Final Results
of Review’’ section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 14, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Arrowsmith or Dana
Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–5255 or (202) 482–1391,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 7, 2006, the Department
published the Preliminary Results. In
the Preliminary Results, we stated our
intention to request further information
from Saha Thai to allow Saha Thai the
opportunity to demonstrate that there
are two distinct levels of trade in the
home market. On April 21, 2006, we
issued a supplemental questionnaire for
this purpose to Saha Thai and its
affiliated resellers. Saha Thai submitted
its response on May 8, 2006.
We invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. On May 18, 2006,
we provided specific deadlines. On June
1, 2006, we received a case brief from
the sole respondent, Saha Thai Steel
Pipe Company, Ltd. (Saha Thai) and
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 178 / Thursday, September 14, 2006 / Notices
from Allied Tube and Conduit
Corporation and Wheatland Tube
Company (collectively, petitioners);
respondent and petitioners each
submitted a rebuttal brief on June 6,
2006. On August 3, 2006, the
Department published in the Federal
Register a notice extending the final
results from August 5, 2006 to
September 7, 2006. See Extension of
Time Limit for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Circular Welded Carbon Steel
Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 71 FR
44016 (August 3, 2006).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this
antidumping order are certain welded
carbon steel pipes and tubes from
Thailand. The subject merchandise has
an outside diameter of 0.375 inches or
more, but not exceeding 16 inches.
These products, which are commonly
referred to in the industry as ‘‘standard
pipe’’ or ‘‘structural tubing,’’ are
hereinafter designated as ‘‘pipes and
tubes.’’ The merchandise is classifiable
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS) item
numbers 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025,
7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040,
7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and
7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and purposes of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP),
our written description of the scope of
the order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
The issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
to David M. Spooner, Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration (Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with
this notice and which is hereby adopted
by this notice. A list of the issues
addressed in the Decision Memorandum
is appended to this notice. The Decision
Memorandum is on file in the central
records unit (CRU), and can be accessed
directly on the Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments
received, we have made adjustments to
our margin calculations. The
adjustments are discussed in detail in
the Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:23 Sep 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we
determine that the following weighted–
average margin exists for the period of
March 1, 2004 through February 28,
2005:
54267
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the ‘‘all
others’’ rate from the investigation if
there is no rate for the intermediate
company involved in the transaction.
See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margin (percent)
and Tubes from Thailand; Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Saha Thai Steel Pipe
Fair Value, 51 FR 3384 (January 27,
Company, Ltd. ...........
2.26
1986). For a full discussion of this
clarification, see Antidumping and
Assessment
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
The Department shall determine, and
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
all appropriate entries. Pursuant to 19
Cash Deposits
CFR 351.212(b)(1), the Department
calculates an assessment rate for each
The following deposit requirements
importer of the subject merchandise for
will be effective upon publication of the
each respondent. Upon issuance of the
final results of this administrative
final results of this administrative
review for all shipments of subject
review, if any importer–specific rates
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
calculated in the final results are above
de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), from warehouse, for consumption on or
the Department will issue appraisement after the publication date of these final
results, as provided by section
instructions directly to CBP to assess
751(a)(2)(c) of the Act: (1) For
antidumping duties on appropriate
companies covered by this review, the
entries.
To determine whether the duty
cash deposit rate will be the rate listed
assessment rates covering the period
above; (2) for merchandise exported by
were de minimis, in accordance with
producers or exporters not covered in
the requirement set forth in 19 CFR
this review but covered in a previous
351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we
segment of this proceeding, the cash
calculated importer (or customer)deposit rate will continue to be the
specific ad valorem rates by aggregating company–specific rate published in the
the dumping margins calculated for all
most recent final results in which that
U.S. sales to that importer or customer
producer or exporter participated; (3) if
and dividing this amount by the total
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
value of the sales to that importer (or
review or in any previous segment of
customer). Where an importer (or
this proceeding, but the producer is, the
customer)-specific ad valorem rate is
cash deposit rate will be that established
greater than de minimis, and the
respondent has reported reliable entered for the producer of the merchandise in
these final results of review or in the
values, we apply the assessment rate to
most recent final results in which that
the entered value of the importer’s/
producer participated; and, (4) if neither
customer’s entries during the review
the exporter nor the producer is a firm
period. Where an importer (or
covered in this review or in any
customer)-specific ad valorem rate is
previous segment of this proceeding, the
greater than de minimis and we do not
cash deposit rate will be 15.67 percent,
have reliable entered values, we
the ‘‘all others’’ rate established in the
calculate a per–unit assessment rate by
less–than-fair–value investigation.
aggregating the dumping duties for all
U.S. sales to each importer (or customer)
Notification to Importers
and dividing this amount by the total
quantity sold to that importer (or
This notice also serves as a final
customer). The Department will issue
reminder to importers of their
appropriate assessment instructions
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
directly to CBP within 15 days of the
to file a certificate regarding the
final results of this review.
reimbursement of antidumping duties
The Department clarified its
prior to liquidation of the relevant
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
entries during this review period.
May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This
Failure to comply with this requirement
clarification will apply to entries of
could result in the Secretary’s
subject merchandise during the period
presumption that reimbursement of
of review produced by the company
included in these final results of review antidumping duties occurred, and in the
subsequent assessment of double
for which the reviewed company did
antidumping duties.
not know their merchandise was
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
54268
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 178 / Thursday, September 14, 2006 / Notices
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice is the only reminder to
parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 7, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I Issues in Decision
Memorandum
Comment 2: Antidumping Duty
Exemptions
Comment 3: Duty Drawback
Comment 4: Product Matching for Fence
Tube
Comment 5: Level of Trade in the Home
Market
Comment 6: Zeroing of Saha Thai’s
Sales
[FR Doc. E6–15271 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from Thailand; Corrected Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
21:22 Sep 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Eastwood or Jill Pollack, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone (202) 482–3874 and (202)
482–4593, respectively.
On July 20, 2006, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published
in the Federal Register its notice of
partial rescission of the antidumping
duty administrative review of certain
frozen warmwater shrimp from
Thailand for the period August 4, 2004,
through January 31, 2006. See Certain
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from
Thailand; Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 71 FR 41200 (July 20, 2006)
(Partial Rescission). In the Partial
Rescission, the Department noted that it
was rescinding the administrative
review with respect to Thai Union
Frozen Products Co., Ltd., based on a
timely request for withdrawal. See
Partial Rescission, 71 FR at 41201.
However, the correct name for this
company is Thai Union Frozen Products
Public Co., Ltd.
As noted above, the name for Thai
Union Frozen Products Public Co., Ltd.
was incorrectly stated in the Partial
Rescission. We now correct the partial
rescission of the 2004–2006
antidumping duty administrative review
of certain frozen warmwater shrimp
from Thailand as noted above. As a
result of this correction, we are
rescinding the 2004–2006
administrative review for Thai Union
Frozen Products Public Co., Ltd.
This corrected partial rescission is
issued and published in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 14, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irina
Itkin or Alice Gibbons, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone (202) 482–0656 and (202)
482–0498, respectively.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Background
Dated: September 11, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–15269 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am]
[A–549–822]
AGENCY:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Corrected Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Comment 1: Saha Thai’s Revocation
Request
September 14, 2006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–840]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 21, 2006, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published
in the Federal Register its notice of
partial rescission of the antidumping
duty administrative review of certain
frozen warmwater shrimp from India for
the period August 4, 2004, through
January 31, 2006. See Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp from India; Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 71 FR 41419
(July 21, 2006) (Partial Rescission). In
Partial Rescission, the Department
noted that it was rescinding the
administrative review with respect to
Sagar Samrat Foods, based on a timely
request for withdrawal. See Partial
Rescission, 71 FR at 41420. However,
the correct name for this company is
Sagar Samrat Seafoods.
Corrected Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
As noted above, the name for Sagar
Samrat Seafoods was incorrectly stated
in the Partial Rescission. We now
correct the partial rescission of the
2004–2006 antidumping duty
administrative review of certain frozen
warmwater shrimp from India as noted
above. As a result of this correction, we
are rescinding the 2004–2006
administrative review for Sagar Samrat
Seafoods.
This corrected partial rescission is
issued and published in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: September 11, 2006.
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from India; Corrected Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Stephen J. Claeys,
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–15279 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am]
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 178 (Thursday, September 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54266-54268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15271]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-549-502)
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand:
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 7, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes
from Thailand in the Federal Register. See Circular Welded Steel Pipes
and Tubes from Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 71 FR 17810 (April 7, 2006) (Preliminary
Results). The review covers one producer of the subject merchandise.
The period of review is March 1, 2004 through February 28, 2005. Based
on our analysis of the comments received, we have made changes to the
preliminary results, which are discussed in the ``Changes Since the
Preliminary Results'' section below. For the final dumping margins, see
the ``Final Results of Review'' section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 14, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith or Dana
Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-5255 or (202) 482-1391, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 7, 2006, the Department published the Preliminary Results.
In the Preliminary Results, we stated our intention to request further
information from Saha Thai to allow Saha Thai the opportunity to
demonstrate that there are two distinct levels of trade in the home
market. On April 21, 2006, we issued a supplemental questionnaire for
this purpose to Saha Thai and its affiliated resellers. Saha Thai
submitted its response on May 8, 2006.
We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On May
18, 2006, we provided specific deadlines. On June 1, 2006, we received
a case brief from the sole respondent, Saha Thai Steel Pipe Company,
Ltd. (Saha Thai) and
[[Page 54267]]
from Allied Tube and Conduit Corporation and Wheatland Tube Company
(collectively, petitioners); respondent and petitioners each submitted
a rebuttal brief on June 6, 2006. On August 3, 2006, the Department
published in the Federal Register a notice extending the final results
from August 5, 2006 to September 7, 2006. See Extension of Time Limit
for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Circular
Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 71 FR 44016 (August
3, 2006).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this antidumping order are certain welded
carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand. The subject merchandise has
an outside diameter of 0.375 inches or more, but not exceeding 16
inches. These products, which are commonly referred to in the industry
as ``standard pipe'' or ``structural tubing,'' are hereinafter
designated as ``pipes and tubes.'' The merchandise is classifiable
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item
numbers 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040,
7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and purposes of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP), our written description of the scope of
the order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
The issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration (Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with
this notice and which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the
issues addressed in the Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice.
The Decision Memorandum is on file in the central records unit (CRU),
and can be accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments received, we have made
adjustments to our margin calculations. The adjustments are discussed
in detail in the Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we determine that the following
weighted-average margin exists for the period of March 1, 2004 through
February 28, 2005:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer/Exporter Margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saha Thai Steel Pipe Company, Ltd................... 2.26
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
the Department calculates an assessment rate for each importer of the
subject merchandise for each respondent. Upon issuance of the final
results of this administrative review, if any importer-specific rates
calculated in the final results are above de minimis (i.e., at or above
0.5 percent), the Department will issue appraisement instructions
directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries.
To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period
were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we calculated importer (or
customer)-specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins
calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and dividing
this amount by the total value of the sales to that importer (or
customer). Where an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is
greater than de minimis, and the respondent has reported reliable
entered values, we apply the assessment rate to the entered value of
the importer's/customer's entries during the review period. Where an
importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is greater than de
minimis and we do not have reliable entered values, we calculate a per-
unit assessment rate by aggregating the dumping duties for all U.S.
sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the
total quantity sold to that importer (or customer). The Department will
issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP within 15
days of the final results of this review.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This clarification will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the period of review produced by the company
included in these final results of review for which the reviewed
company did not know their merchandise was destined for the United
States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the ``all others'' rate from the investigation if there is
no rate for the intermediate company involved in the transaction. See
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand; Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 51 FR 3384 (January 27,
1986). For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Cash Deposits
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of these final
results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(c) of the Act: (1) For
companies covered by this review, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate listed above; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a previous segment
of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published in the most recent final results in
which that producer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review or in any previous segment of this
proceeding, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be that
established for the producer of the merchandise in these final results
of review or in the most recent final results in which that producer
participated; and, (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a
firm covered in this review or in any previous segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will be 15.67 percent, the ``all
others'' rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred, and in the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
[[Page 54268]]
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 7, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I Issues in Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Saha Thai's Revocation Request
Comment 2: Antidumping Duty Exemptions
Comment 3: Duty Drawback
Comment 4: Product Matching for Fence Tube
Comment 5: Level of Trade in the Home Market
Comment 6: Zeroing of Saha Thai's Sales
[FR Doc. E6-15271 Filed 9-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
