Delaware Investments Dividend and Income Fund, Inc., et al., Notice of Intention To Rescind an Order, 53140-53141 [E6-14879]
Download as PDF
53140
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 174 / Friday, September 8, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
1(b)(2)(iv), and 31a–1(b)(9); 8 and (v)
preserves permanently, the first two
years in an easily accessible place, all
books and records required to be made
under these rules.
Rule 2a–7 contains certain collection
of information requirements. An
unregistered money market fund that
complies with rule 2a–7 would be
subject to these collection of
information requirements. In addition,
the recordkeeping requirements under
rule 31 with which the acquiring fund
reasonably believes the unregistered
money market fund complies are
collections of information for the
unregistered money market fund. By
allowing funds to invest in registered
and unregistered money market funds,
rule 12d1–1 is intended to provide
funds greater options for cash
management. In order for a registered
fund to rely on the exemption to invest
in an unregistered money market fund,
the unregistered money market fund
must comply with certain collection of
information requirements for registered
money market funds. These
requirements are intended to ensure that
the unregistered money market fund has
established procedures for collecting the
information necessary to make adequate
credit reviews of securities in its
portfolio, as well as other recordkeeping
requirements that will assist the
acquiring fund in overseeing the
unregistered money market fund (and
Commission staff in its examination of
the unregistered money market fund’s
adviser).
Commission staff estimates that
registered funds currently invest in 40
unregistered money market funds in
excess of the statutory limits under an
exemptive order issued by the
Commission, and will invest in
approximately 6 new unregistered
money market funds each year.9 Staff
estimates that each of these unregistered
money market funds spends 1220 hours
to perform the record of credit risk
analysis and other determinations
annually, and in the first year after the
rule’s adoption, each will spend 21
hours to implement the board
procedures.10 Finally, Commission staff
8 See 17 CFR 270.31a–1(b)(2)(ii), 17 CFR 270.31a–
1(b)(2)(iv), 17 CFR 270.31a–1(b)(9).
9 This estimate is based on the number of
applications filed with the Commission in 2005.
This estimate may be understated because
applicants generally do not identify the name or
number of unregistered money market funds in
which registered funds intend to invest, and each
application also applies to unregistered money
market funds to be organized in the future.
10 The Commission adopted rule 12d1–1 on June
20, 2006. See Fund of Funds Investments,
Investment Company Act Release No. 27399 (June
20, 2006).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:38 Sep 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
estimates that 10 unregistered money
market funds spends 4.5 hours to review
and amend procedures annually. The
estimated total of annual responses
under rule 12d1–1 is 57,131.11
Commission staff estimates that in
addition to the costs described in
section 12, unregistered money market
funds will incur costs to preserve
records, as required under rule 2a–7.
These costs will vary significantly for
individual funds, depending on the
amount of assets under fund
management and whether the fund
preserves its records in a storage facility
in hard copy or has developed and
maintains a computer system to create
and preserve compliance records. In its
Rule 2a–7 submission, Commission staff
estimated that the amount an individual
money market fund may spend ranged
from $100 per year to $300,000. We
have no reason to believe the range
would be different for unregistered
money market funds. As noted before,
we have no information on the amount
of assets managed by unregistered
money market funds. Accordingly,
Commission staff has estimated that an
unregistered money market fund in
which registered funds would invest in
reliance on rule 12d1–1 would have, on
average, $376.4 million in assets under
management.12 Based on a cost of
$0.0000005 per dollar of assets under
management for medium-sized funds,
the staff estimates compliance with rule
2–7 would cost these types of
unregistered money market funds $8000
annually.13 Commission staff estimates
that unregistered money market funds
will not incur any capital costs to create
computer programs for maintaining and
preserving compliance records for rule
2a–7.14
The collections of information
required for unregistered money market
funds by rule 12d1–1 are necessary in
order for acquiring funds to able to
obtain the benefits described above.
11 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: (40 × 1220) + (6 × 1220) + (40 × 21)
+ (6 × 21) + (10 × 4.5) = 57,131.
12 This estimate is based on the average of assets
under management of medium-sized registered
money market funds ($50 million to $999 million).
13 This estimate was based on the following
calculation: 46 unregistered money market funds x
$357.7 million in assets under management ×
$0.0000005 = $8227. The estimate of cost per dollar
of assets is the same as that used for medium-sized
funds in the Rule 2a–7 submission.
14 This estimate is based on information
Commission staff obtained in its survey for the Rule
2a–7 submission. Of the funds surveyed, no
medium-sized funds incurred this type of capital
cost. The funds either maintained record systems
using a program the fund would be likely to have
in the ordinary course of business (such as Excel)
or the records were maintained by the fund’s
custodian.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notices to the Commission will not be
kept confidential. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
General comments regarding the
above information should be directed to
the following persons: (i) Desk Officer
for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102,
New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503 or e-mail to:
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) R.
Corey Booth, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, c/o Shirley Martinson,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria,
Virginia 22312, or send an e-mail to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
Dated: August 30, 2006.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–14854 Filed 9–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–27475; 812–12420]
Delaware Investments Dividend and
Income Fund, Inc., et al., Notice of
Intention To Rescind an Order
September 1, 2006.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of the Commission’s
intention to rescind an order pursuant
to section 38(a) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On April 15, 2002, the
Commission issued an order on an
application filed by Delaware
Investments Dividend and Income
Fund, Inc. and Delaware Investments
Global Dividend and Income Fund
(together, the ‘‘Applicants’’) under
section 6(c) of the Act granting an
exemption from section 19(b) of the Act
and rule 19b–1 under the Act (the
‘‘Application’’).1 On August 31, 2006,
the Commission issued an order finding,
among other things, that Delaware
Service Company, Inc. (‘‘DSC’’) caused
and aided and abetted the Applicants’
violations of section 19(a) of the Act and
rule 19a–1 under the Act and violated
1 Delaware Investments Dividend and Income
Fund, Inc., et al., Investment Company Act Release
Nos. 25465 (Mar. 18, 2002) (notice) and 25524 (Apr.
15, 2002) (‘‘Exemptive Order’’).
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 174 / Friday, September 8, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
section 34(b) of the Act by making a
material misrepresentation to the
Commission in the Application (‘‘Order
Finding Violations’’).2 The Commission
is issuing this notice of the
Commission’s intention to rescind the
Exemptive Order on the basis of the
Order Finding Violations.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order rescinding the Exemptive Order
will be issued unless the Commission
orders a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary. Hearing
requests should be received by the
Commission by 5:30 p.m. on September
25, 2006. Hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, the
reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Commission, 100
F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–
1090.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nadya B. Roytblat, Assistant Director, at
202–551–6821 (Division of Investment
Management, Office of Investment
Company Regulation).
Background
1. Each Applicant is a closed-end
investment company registered under
the Act. The Exemptive Order granted
each Applicant relief from section 19(b)
of the Act and rule 19b–1 under the Act
so that the Applicant may make up to
twelve distributions of long-term capital
gains in any one taxable year in
accordance with the Applicants’
distribution policy with respect to its
common stock. Section 19(b) and rule
19b–1 generally limit to one the number
of distributions of long-term capital
gains that a registered investment
company may make each year. The
Exemptive Order was issued pursuant to
the Commission’s authority set forth in
section 6(c) of the Act which provides,
in relevant part, that the Commission,
by order upon application, may exempt
any person from any provision of the
Act or any rule under the Act, if and to
the extent that the exemption is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
2. DSC, a Delaware corporation,
provides accounting and administrative
services to the Applicants. According to
the Order Finding Violations, DSC was
2 In the Matter of Delaware Service Company Inc.,
Release No. IC–27473, Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3–12403 (August 31, 2006).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:38 Sep 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
responsible for determining the amount
and composition of the Applicants’
distributions to shareholders; providing
the Applicants’ transfer agent, dividend
disbursing agent, and custodian with
information necessary to effect payment
of dividends and distributions; and
preparing and filing all reports and
notices required by the Federal
securities laws and regulations,
including any notices required by
section 19(a) of the Act.
3. Section 19(a) of the Act and rule
19a–1 under the Act make it unlawful
for a registered investment company to
pay any dividend or make any
distribution in the nature of a dividend
payment, wholly or partly, from any
source other than net income unless
such payment is accompanied by a
written statement which adequately
discloses the source of such payment
(‘‘section 19(a) notice’’). According to
the Order Finding Violations, from
January 2000 through March 2004, the
Applicants, among others, made
distributions to their common
shareholders that, in large part, were a
return of the shareholders’ capital, and
none of the distributions was
accompanied by the required section
19(a) notice. Thus, during the relevant
time period, the Applicants failed to
provide the section 19(a) notices
required by the Act. The Order Finding
Violations found that DSC caused and
aided and abetted the Applicants’
violations of section 19(a) and rule 19a–
1.
4. The Order Finding Violations also
found that the Exemptive Order was
granted, in part, on the basis of a
representation in the Application that
the Applicants were providing the
required 19(a) notices to their
shareholders, but that the representation
was an untrue statement of a material
fact. The Application was prepared by
DSC on behalf of the Applicants. The
Order Finding Violations thus found
that DSC violated section 34(b) of the
Act. Section 34(b) of the Act, in relevant
part, makes it unlawful for any person
to make any untrue statement of a
material fact in any application filed
pursuant to the Act.
Legal Analysis
Section 38(a) of the Act states, in
relevant part, that the Commission shall
have authority to rescind an order as is
necessary or appropriate to the exercise
of the powers conferred upon the
Commission elsewhere in the Act. The
Commission issues orders under section
6(c) of the Act, such as the Exemptive
Order, based on the representations, and
subject to the terms and conditions,
contained in the applications seeking
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53141
the orders. If an application contains an
untrue statement of a material fact, the
Commission cannot properly exercise
its power to make the findings required
by section 6(c) of the Act.3 The
Commission therefore believes that it is
necessary and appropriate to the
exercise of the powers conferred upon
the Commission in section 6(c) of the
Act to rescind the Exemptive Order on
the basis of the Order Finding
Violations.
By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–14879 Filed 9–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54396]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Declaration of Effectiveness of the
Philadelphia Stock Exchange
Fingerprinting Plan
August 31, 2006.
On July 17, 2006, the Philadelphia
Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Phlx’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
fingerprint plan (‘‘Plan’’) pursuant to
Rule 17f–2(c) 1 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).2 A copy
of the Plan is attached as Exhibit A.
The Phlx believes that the Plan will
facilitate compliance by Exchange
members with Section 17(f)(2) of the Act
and Rule 17f–2 thereunder by providing
a facility for the fingerprints of
directors, partners, officers and
employees of Exchange members to be
submitted to the Attorney General of the
United States and processed
electronically.
Under the Plan, all persons who are
seeking registration with the Phlx or are
currently registered with the Phlx
submit fingerprint cards or fingerprint
results to the NASD, which then
forwards the fingerprints to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (‘‘FBI’’) (the
fingerprint processing arm of the
Attorney General). The FBI identifies
submitted fingerprints, retrieves
relevant criminal history information,
and returns fingerprint reports to the
NASD. Phlx members will be able to
3 The Commission also reiterates that any
exemption provided by an order issued under the
Act is available only to a person that complies with
the terms and conditions set forth in the application
based on which the exemption was granted.
1 17 CFR 240.17f–2(c).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 174 (Friday, September 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53140-53141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-14879]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. IC-27475; 812-12420]
Delaware Investments Dividend and Income Fund, Inc., et al.,
Notice of Intention To Rescind an Order
September 1, 2006.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of the Commission's intention to rescind an order
pursuant to section 38(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940
(``Act'').
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On April 15, 2002, the Commission issued an order on an
application filed by Delaware Investments Dividend and Income Fund,
Inc. and Delaware Investments Global Dividend and Income Fund
(together, the ``Applicants'') under section 6(c) of the Act granting
an exemption from section 19(b) of the Act and rule 19b-1 under the Act
(the ``Application'').\1\ On August 31, 2006, the Commission issued an
order finding, among other things, that Delaware Service Company, Inc.
(``DSC'') caused and aided and abetted the Applicants' violations of
section 19(a) of the Act and rule 19a-1 under the Act and violated
[[Page 53141]]
section 34(b) of the Act by making a material misrepresentation to the
Commission in the Application (``Order Finding Violations'').\2\ The
Commission is issuing this notice of the Commission's intention to
rescind the Exemptive Order on the basis of the Order Finding
Violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Delaware Investments Dividend and Income Fund, Inc., et al.,
Investment Company Act Release Nos. 25465 (Mar. 18, 2002) (notice)
and 25524 (Apr. 15, 2002) (``Exemptive Order'').
\2\ In the Matter of Delaware Service Company Inc., Release No.
IC-27473, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-12403 (August 31,
2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order rescinding the
Exemptive Order will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on September 25, 2006. Hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the
issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may
request notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549-1090.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadya B. Roytblat, Assistant Director,
at 202-551-6821 (Division of Investment Management, Office of
Investment Company Regulation).
Background
1. Each Applicant is a closed-end investment company registered
under the Act. The Exemptive Order granted each Applicant relief from
section 19(b) of the Act and rule 19b-1 under the Act so that the
Applicant may make up to twelve distributions of long-term capital
gains in any one taxable year in accordance with the Applicants'
distribution policy with respect to its common stock. Section 19(b) and
rule 19b-1 generally limit to one the number of distributions of long-
term capital gains that a registered investment company may make each
year. The Exemptive Order was issued pursuant to the Commission's
authority set forth in section 6(c) of the Act which provides, in
relevant part, that the Commission, by order upon application, may
exempt any person from any provision of the Act or any rule under the
Act, if and to the extent that the exemption is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection
of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
2. DSC, a Delaware corporation, provides accounting and
administrative services to the Applicants. According to the Order
Finding Violations, DSC was responsible for determining the amount and
composition of the Applicants' distributions to shareholders; providing
the Applicants' transfer agent, dividend disbursing agent, and
custodian with information necessary to effect payment of dividends and
distributions; and preparing and filing all reports and notices
required by the Federal securities laws and regulations, including any
notices required by section 19(a) of the Act.
3. Section 19(a) of the Act and rule 19a-1 under the Act make it
unlawful for a registered investment company to pay any dividend or
make any distribution in the nature of a dividend payment, wholly or
partly, from any source other than net income unless such payment is
accompanied by a written statement which adequately discloses the
source of such payment (``section 19(a) notice''). According to the
Order Finding Violations, from January 2000 through March 2004, the
Applicants, among others, made distributions to their common
shareholders that, in large part, were a return of the shareholders'
capital, and none of the distributions was accompanied by the required
section 19(a) notice. Thus, during the relevant time period, the
Applicants failed to provide the section 19(a) notices required by the
Act. The Order Finding Violations found that DSC caused and aided and
abetted the Applicants' violations of section 19(a) and rule 19a-1.
4. The Order Finding Violations also found that the Exemptive Order
was granted, in part, on the basis of a representation in the
Application that the Applicants were providing the required 19(a)
notices to their shareholders, but that the representation was an
untrue statement of a material fact. The Application was prepared by
DSC on behalf of the Applicants. The Order Finding Violations thus
found that DSC violated section 34(b) of the Act. Section 34(b) of the
Act, in relevant part, makes it unlawful for any person to make any
untrue statement of a material fact in any application filed pursuant
to the Act.
Legal Analysis
Section 38(a) of the Act states, in relevant part, that the
Commission shall have authority to rescind an order as is necessary or
appropriate to the exercise of the powers conferred upon the Commission
elsewhere in the Act. The Commission issues orders under section 6(c)
of the Act, such as the Exemptive Order, based on the representations,
and subject to the terms and conditions, contained in the applications
seeking the orders. If an application contains an untrue statement of a
material fact, the Commission cannot properly exercise its power to
make the findings required by section 6(c) of the Act.\3\ The
Commission therefore believes that it is necessary and appropriate to
the exercise of the powers conferred upon the Commission in section
6(c) of the Act to rescind the Exemptive Order on the basis of the
Order Finding Violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Commission also reiterates that any exemption provided
by an order issued under the Act is available only to a person that
complies with the terms and conditions set forth in the application
based on which the exemption was granted.
By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-14879 Filed 9-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P