Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Thereto and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to Amendment No. 5 Thereto To Implement the Boston Equities Exchange (“BeX”) Trading System, 52192-52198 [E6-14564]
Download as PDF
52192
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Notices
F. Accelerated Approval of Amendment
No. 5
The Commission finds good cause for
approving Amendment No. 5 to the
proposed rule change prior to the
thirtieth day after publishing notice of
Amendment No. 5 in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of
the Act.49
In Amendment No. 5, the BSE made
changes to the proposed rule change to
clarify its discussion of the BSX
Operating Agreement and correct
several inconsistencies between the
description of the BSX Operating
Agreement and the Agreement’s text. In
addition, Amendment No. 5 amended
proposed Section 6 of Chapter XVIII of
the BSE Rules to align the cure period
for a violation of the Ownership
Concentration Limit with that contained
in Section 8.5(b) of the BSX Operating
Agreement. Amendment No. 5 also
updated Schedule 2 of the BSX
Operating Agreement to provide current
information on the ownership interests
of the BSX Members.
The BSE also made other technical,
non-substantive changes to the
proposed rule change, which raise no
new or novel issues. The Commission
believes that Amendment No. 5 serves
to clarify and enhance the proposal and
that publication of its provisions would
needlessly delay the implementation of
the proposal. The Commission therefore
finds good cause exists to accelerate
approval of Amendment No. 5, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act.50
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning Amendment No.
5, including whether Amendment No. 5
is consistent with the Act. Comments
may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
Electronic Comments
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BSE–2006–20 on the
subject line.
requirements of Section 6(b)(3) of the Act, and
reviews each SRO proposal on its own terms to
determine if it is consistent with the Act.
49 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)
of the Act, the Commission may not approve any
proposed rule change, or amendment thereto, prior
to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of
the notice thereof, unless the Commission finds
good cause for so doing.
50 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Aug 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54365; File No. SR–BSE–
2006–22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston
Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting
Approval of Proposed Rule Change
All submissions should refer to File
and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, and 3
Number SR–BSE–2006–20. This file
Thereto and Notice of Filing and Order
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Granting Accelerated Approval to
Amendment No. 5 Thereto To
Commission process and review your
Implement the Boston Equities
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will Exchange (‘‘BeX’’) Trading System
post all comments on the Commission’s August 25, 2006.
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
I. Introduction
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
On May 10, 2006, the Boston Stock
amendments, all written statements
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
with respect to the proposed rule
submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
change that are filed with the
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Commission, and all written
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
communications relating to the
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than proposed rule change to implement a
new trading system, the Boston Equities
those that may be withheld from the
Exchange (‘‘BeX’’). BSE filed
public in accordance with the
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
change on June 2, 2006.3 BSE filed
available for inspection and copying in
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
the Commission’s Public Reference
4
Room. Copies of such filing also will be change on June 9, 2006. BSE filed
Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule
available for inspection and copying at
change on June 15, 2006.5 The proposed
the principal office of the Exchange. All
rule change, as amended, was published
comments received will be posted
for comment in the Federal Register on
without change; the Commission does
June 29, 2006.6 The Commission
not edit personal identifying
received no comments regarding the
information from submissions. You
proposal, as amended. On August 22,
should submit only information that
2006, BSE filed Amendment No. 5 to the
you wish to make available publicly. All proposed rule change.7 This order
submissions should refer to Amendment
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
No. 5 of File Number SR–BSE–2006–20
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
and should be submitted on or before
3 Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the
September 22, 2006.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,51 that the
proposed rule change (SR–BSE–2006–
20), as amended, and Amendment No.
3 thereto, is approved and Amendment
No. 5 is approved on an accelerated
basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.52
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–14531 Filed 8–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
5115
5217
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
original filing in its entirety.
4 Amendment No. 2 replaced and superseded the
original filing and Amendment No. 1 in their
entirety.
5 Amendment No. 3 replaced and superseded the
original filing, Amendment No. 1, and Amendment
No. 2 in their entirety.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54034
(June 22, 2006), 71 FR 37140.
7 Amendment No. 4 was filed on July 26, 2006.
Amendment No. 4 was withdrawn on August 22,
2006. Amendment No. 5 was filed on August 22,
2006. In Amendment No. 5, the Exchange amended
BSE Rules Chapter II, Section 41—Minimum Price
Variation to state that the Exchange shall not
display, rank, or accept any bids, offers, or orders
in a security priced in an increment smaller than
$0.01 if that bid, offer, or order is priced equal to
or greater than $1.00, but that the Exchange may
execute and report Mid-point Cross Orders in
increments as small as one-half the Minimum Price
Variation for the security. In addition, BSE
amended the rule text of BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII
to clarify that if an At the Close order is not fully
executed at the close, the part of the order not
executed will be cancelled; to clarify opening
procedures; to indicate more clearly when orders
would be routed at the instruction of the Member
entering the order; and to clarify how cross orders
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Notices
approves the proposed rule change, as
amended, grants accelerated approval to
Amendment No. 5 to the proposed rule
change, and solicits comments from
interested persons on Amendment No.
5.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
In a separate filing that is being
approved today, BSE proposes to
establish a new communications and
electronic trading facility,8 to be known
as ‘‘BeX.’’ 9 The BeX facility is a fullyautomated electronic book for the
display and execution of orders in
securities intended for the use of BSE
Members, including Electronic Access
Members, and their customers.
In the instant filing, the Exchange
proposes rules to implement the initial
phase of BeX.10 In this initial phase,
BeX would be BSE’s trading facility for
any security, other than securities listed
on The Nasdaq Stock Market
(‘‘Nasdaq’’),11 for which BSE obtains
unlisted trading privileges (‘‘UTP’’) after
June 30, 2006. All securities displayed
and executed on BeX would be
securities that are not assigned to a BSE
specialist. BeX would allow Exchange
Members, whether or not they are on the
Exchange’s floor, to enter orders in these
would be executed in the Post-Primary Trading
Session. Further, the Exchange corrected several
technical errors contained in the rule text.
8 Pursuant to Section 3(a)(2) of the Act, the term
‘‘facility’’ when used with respect to an exchange,
includes ‘‘its premises, tangible or intangible
property whether on the premises or not, any right
to the use of such premises or property or any
service thereof for the purpose of effecting or
reporting a transaction on an exchange (including,
among other things, any system of communication
to or from the exchange, by ticker or otherwise,
maintained by or with the consent of the exchange),
and any right of the exchange to the use of any
property or service.’’ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(2).
9 BeX is owned and will be operated by BSX
Group, LLC (‘‘BSX’’), of which BSE is currently a
majority owner. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 54364 (August 25, 2006) (order
approving SR–BSE–2006–20), which adopts the
proposed governance structure of BSX as reflected
in its operating agreement, and proposed changes
to the BSE Constitution with respect to the creation
of Electronic Access Members and to BSE rules
regarding transfer of ownership of BSX units.
10 The Commission notes that the BSE recently
filed a proposed rule change setting forth proposed
rules to implement the second phase of BeX and to
comply with the Commission’s Regulation NMS
under the Act, which the Commission has
published for comment. See Securities Exchange
Release Act No. 54291 (August 8, 2006), 71 FR
47264 (August 16, 2006) (File No. SR–BSE–2006–
30)(‘‘BeX Phase II Notice’’).
11 The BSE rules governing trading in Nasdaq
stocks (BSE Rules, Chapter XXXV) and the BSE
rules governing trading in listed securities assigned
to a specialist (BSE Rules, Chapters I, II, III, XV,
XVI, XVII, XIX, and XXXIII) remain unchanged. The
Exchange advised that it intends to apply for UTP
in securities listed otherwise than on Nasdaq for
which it currently does not trade UTP.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Aug 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
52193
securities into the BeX facility for
possible execution.
The rules governing BeX would be
located in Chapter XXXVII of the BSE’s
Rules. The bylaws and all other BSE
Rules and policies would continue to be
applicable to BeX trading except where
the context requires otherwise.12
Eligible securities. In the initial phase
of BeX, all securities eligible for trading
on the Exchange that are listed
otherwise than on Nasdaq for which the
BSE has obtained UTP after June 30,
2006 would be eligible to be traded in
the BeX.13 However, any specialist
request to remove a security from BeX
would be considered by the appropriate
committee of the BSE’s Board of
Directors (‘‘Board’’).14
Receipt of orders. Orders could be
routed to BeX through the Exchange’s
systems or through other
communications lines approved by the
Exchange for the delivery of orders by
Exchange Members.15 BeX would also
accept and automatically execute
commitments sent by market centers
that participate in ITS.
Ranking, display, and automated
matching of orders. Except for Cross,
Cross with Size, Mid-point Cross orders
and Post Primary Cross orders,16 all
orders sent to BeX would be ranked
according to their price and time of
receipt and would be displayed to the
public when they constitute the Best
Bid or Offer in BeX for a security.
Orders would automatically match
against each other, in price/time
priority. Specifically, an incoming order
would be matched against one or more
orders in the BeX, in the order of their
ranking, at the price of each order, for
the full amount of shares available at
that price, or for the size of the
incoming order, if smaller.17 If an
incoming order could not be matched
when it is received, and it is not
designated as an order that should be
immediately cancelled, the order would
be placed in the BeX.18
Under the proposed rules, orders
could be entered by a BSE Member on
its own behalf, for the account of
another Member (collectively,
‘‘professional orders’’) or for the account
of a customer (an ‘‘agency order’’).
However, agency orders would be
subject to the same display and
execution processes as professional
orders, and agency orders would not
receive any priority in order execution
or handling.19
Eligible order types. Orders sent to
BeX would be required to be specifically
designated in the manner specified by
the Exchange for trading in BeX. BeX
would accept only round-lot market and
limit orders for regular-way
settlement.20
Orders eligible for execution in BeX
could be designated as one of the
following existing BSE order types: 21
‘‘At the Close,’’ ‘‘At the Opening or At
the Opening Only,’’ ‘‘Day,’’ ‘‘Do Not
Increase (DNI),’’ ‘‘Do not Reduce
(DNR),’’ ‘‘Fill or Kill,’’ ‘‘Good ‘til
Cancel,’’ ‘‘Immediate or Cancel,’’
‘‘Limit, Limited or Limited Price,’’
‘‘Market,’’ ‘‘Stop Limit,’’ or ‘‘Stop’’
orders. Orders could also be designated
one of the following new order types in
BeX: ‘‘Cross,’’ ‘‘Cross with Size,’’ ‘‘Good
‘Till Date (GTD),’’ Good ‘‘Till Time
(GTT),’’ ‘‘Limit or Close,’’ ‘‘Mid-point
Cross’’ or ‘‘Post Primary Cross.’’
Descriptions of the new BeX-eligible
order types are as follows: 22
Cross: An order to buy and sell the
same security at a specific price better
than the best bid and offer displayed in
BeX and equal to or better than the
National Best Bid and Offer. A Cross
order could represent interest of one or
more BSE Members.
Cross with Size: A Cross order to buy
and sell at least 5,000 shares of the same
security with a market value of at least
$100,000 at a price equal to or better
than the best bid or offer displayed in
BeX and the National Best Bid or Offer,
where the size of the order is larger than
the aggregate size of all interest
12 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 7.
13 This includes securities that are not listed on
Nasdaq and securities listed on other exchanges
that did not begin trading on BSE prior to June 30,
2006.
14 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 1, Paragraph (a).
15 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 3, Paragraph (h)(i).
16 See Section on eligible order types for a
discussion of BeX-eligible cross orders. Cross, Cross
with Size, Mid-point Cross and Post Primary Cross
orders would be executed in accordance with BSE
Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 3, Paragraph (k).
17 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 3, Paragraph (j).
18 See discussion of compliance with the
Intermarket Trading System (‘‘ITS’’) Plan infra.
19 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 2, Paragraph (d). The Exchange has
represented that current BSE Rule, Chapter II,
Section 11, Trading While Acting as a Broker as to
Market Orders, would apply to participants’
activities on BeX. The rule generally provides that
a member may not trade ahead of a customer order
it is representing. Telephone call between Brian
Donnelly, Assistant Vice President, Regulation and
Compliance, BSE, and Jennifer Colihan, Special
Counsel, and David Michehl, Special Counsel,
Division of Market Regulation, Commission, on
August 8, 2006.
20 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 2, Paragraph (a)–(b).
21 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 1, Paragraph (c)(i).
22 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 1, Paragraph (c)(ii).
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
52194
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
displayed in BeX at that price. Neither
side of a Cross with Size order may be
for the account of the BSE Member
sending the order to BeX.23
Good ’Till Date (GTD): An order to
buy or sell that, if not executed, expires
at the end of the date specified in the
order.
Good ’Till Time (GTT): An order to
buy or sell that, if not executed, expires
at the time specified in the order.
Limit or Close: A Limit Order to buy
or sell that if not executed prior to the
Market on Close cutoff time of 3:40
p.m., pursuant to BSE Rule, Chapter II,
Section 22, will automatically convert to
an At the Close Order for inclusion in
the closing process, and if not so
executed at the close, will be cancelled.
Mid-Point Cross: A two-sided order
with both a buy and sell component
combined that would be executed at the
midpoint of the National Best Bid or
Offer. A Mid-Point Cross order would be
rejected when a locked or crossed
market exists in the relevant security at
the time the order is received. Mid-Point
Cross orders would be permitted to be
executed and reported in increments as
small as one-half of the Minimum Price
Variation.24
Post Primary Cross: A single priced
cross order entered during the Post
Primary Trading Session.
Cross, Cross with Size, Mid-point
Cross, and Post Primary Cross orders
would be executed automatically if they
meet the requirements for those types of
orders. If they do not meet applicable
requirements, they would be
immediately cancelled.25
With the exception of Fill or Kill and
Immediate or Cancel orders, a customer
would be able to append to an order an
instruction that the order be routed to
the market(s) displaying the National
Best Bid or Offer if the order would
trade through the National Best Bid or
Offer if executed on the BeX. Absent
such an instruction, the order would be
cancelled.
Compliance with ITS Plan.26 The
proposed rules provide that if an order
23 The Commission notes that the in the BeX
Phase II Notice, supra note 10, BSE has proposed,
among other things, to amend the Cross with Size
provision.
24 BSE Rules, Chapter II, Section 41 generally sets
forth the ‘‘Minimum Price Variation’’ as $.01. See
supra note 7 regarding an amendment the Exchange
has made to this proposal with respect to the
definition of Minimum Price Variation.
25 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 3, Paragraph (k).
26 The Commission notes that in the BeX Phase
II Notice, supra note 10, the BSE proposed further
rule changes, among others, to ensure that its rules
comply with Rules 610 and 611 of Regulation NMS
under the Act. The Commission notes that once
Regulation NMS has been fully implemented, the
ITS Plan and its requirements will no longer be in
effect.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Aug 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
in an ITS-eligible security crosses or
locks the National Best Bid or Offer at
the time that it is received, the order
would be immediately cancelled or, at
the instruction of the member entering
the order, routed to the market(s)
displaying the National Best Bid or
Offer to ensure compliance with the ITS
Plan’s rules relating to locked markets.27
If an incoming Limit Order would trade
through (as defined in the ITS Plan)
through the National Best Bid or Offer
if executed on the BeX at the time of
receipt, it would be either cancelled or,
at the instruction of the member
entering the order, routed to the
market(s) showing the National Best Bid
or Offer.28 If an incoming Market Order
would trade through the National Best
Bid or Offer if executed on the BeX at
the time of receipt, it would either be
cancelled or, at the instruction of the
member entering the order, routed to the
market(s) displaying the National Best
Bid or Offer.29
Inbound ITS commitments, if priced
at or better than the current Best Bid or
Offer in BeX, would be automatically
executed against the order(s) reflected in
the Best Bid or Offer for the full amount
of shares at that price, and any
remaining portion of the ITS
commitment would be automatically
cancelled.30
Operating hours and trading sessions.
BeX would operate from 7:30 a.m. until
4:30 p.m. during Pre-Opening, Opening,
Primary, and Post-Primary Trading
Sessions.31 Specifically, the PreOpening would extend from 7:30 a.m.
until 9:30 a.m., during which orders
could be placed on the BeX but would
not be matched and would not generate
trade executions. Market participants
would be able to add, modify or cancel
orders during this period.
The BeX facility would open for
trading once the primary market for a
security opens on either a displayed
quote or trade (the ‘‘Opening’’).32 Where
27 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 3, Paragraph (i), subparagraph (ii).
Similarly, if an order in a listed security locks or
crosses the Best Bid or Offer in BeX at the time it
is received, the order would be executed on BeX
according to BeX’s matching algorithm with any
remaining portion either immediately cancelled, at
the instruction of the member entering the order,
routed to an away market center(s).
28 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 3, Paragraph (j)(ii).
29 Id. at Paragraph (j)(iii).
30 Id. at Paragraph (j)(iv).
31 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 3, Paragraphs (a)–(g).
32 The proposed rules define the primary market
for purposes of BeX as the listing market for a
security, unless otherwise designated by the
appropriate BSE Board committee; provided,
however, that if a security is traded by the New
York Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’), then the
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Opening is based on a trade print in
the primary market, it would match the
primary market opening price for each
individual security opened. Once the
BeX opening price was determined, all
eligible orders priced equal to or better
than the BeX opening price would be
paired for execution at that price
following applicable BeX priority rules.
Where the Opening is based on a
quote in the primary market, the BeX
would open in one of the following
ways: (1) Where there were orders in the
BeX that could not be matched, the BeX
would open on a quote; (2) where there
were orders in the BeX that could be
matched, the BeX opening price would
be the Theoretical Opening Price
(‘‘TOP’’),33 provided the TOP is at or
within the National Best Bid and Offer.
If the only orders in BeX at the opening
are Market Orders, the TOP will be the
prior day’s closing price and the orders
would be executed at that price. If that
price is not within the National Best Bid
or Offer, the order would be routed, at
the instruction of the Member entering
the order, to the market center(s)
displaying the National Best Bid or
Offer. If the Member has not provided
the instruction to route, the order will
be cancelled; (3) where there were
orders in the BeX that could be
matched, and the TOP is not at or
within the National Best Bid and Offer,
the BeX opening trade price would be
at the National Best Bid or Offer closest
to the TOP as long as orders could be
matched at that price. If orders could
not be matched at that price, the BeX
would open on a quote.
Following the opening execution
process in an individual security all
orders remaining that are executable
against the National Best Bid and Offer
primary market for such security would be the
NYSE, and if a security is not traded by the NYSE
and is traded by the Amex, then the primary market
for such security would be the Amex. If a security
is traded on both the NYSE and the Amex,
whichever of the two is the listing market would
be considered the primary market. If a security is
solely listed on any other exchange, then the
primary security for that market would be that
exchange. See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 3, Paragraph (a)(i). Nasdaq securities and
BSE-solely listed issues, which currently are
assigned to a specialist, would continue to trade
under the BSE’s existing rules, and not on BeX.
33 The TOP would be the price that maximizes the
quantity of orders traded on the BeX at the opening.
If there are multiple prices that maximize the
quantity of orders traded on the BeX at the opening,
then the TOP would be the price that minimizes the
quantity of orders not traded. If there are multiple
prices that minimize the quantity of orders not
traded, then the price that minimizes any order
imbalance is the TOP. If there are multiple prices
that minimize the quantity of orders not traded and
there is no order imbalance, the TOP is the price
closest to the previous day’s closing price. See
proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section
3(c)(iii).
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Notices
would be cancelled, or routed in
accordance with the customer’s
instruction. All other orders would be
booked on the BeX. Immediately
following the Opening for individual
securities, BeX will commence the
Primary Trading Session. All orders
would be matched automatically
following price and time priority as
soon as they are entered in the BeX
book. Incoming orders would be
executed at or within the National Best
Bid and Offer.
BeX would close the Primary Trading
Session in the following manner:
Beginning at 3:40 p.m., BeX would
broadcast the imbalance between the Atthe-Close and Limit-or-Close orders on
the bid side, and At-the-Close and
Limit-or-Close orders on the offer side.
During this ‘‘Market on Close Period,’’
At-the-Close and Limit-or-Close orders
could not be cancelled. At 4 p.m., BeX
would put all eligible orders in such
securities received by 4 p.m. into an
Authorized Reserve State. When BeX
received the closing price message from
the primary market, the BeX trading
engine would complete the closing
process for each individual security.
During this process, all paired At the
Close and Limit or Close orders would
be executed at the primary market
closing price.
The Post-Primary Trading Session
would operate from the time when the
primary market disseminates its closing
price until 4:30. During the Post Primary
Trading Session only Post Primary Cross
orders at a specific price could be
submitted.
Cancellations of transactions and
handling of clearly erroneous
transactions. Under the proposed rules,
Members that make a transaction in
demonstrable error could agree to cancel
and unwind the transaction, subject to
the approval of the Exchange.34 For
purposes of the BeX facility, the
Exchange also proposes to adopt
procedures for review of clearly
erroneous transactions when such
review is requested.35 The Chief
Regulatory Officer (‘‘CRO’’) or another
officer designated by the CRO would
review the transaction and potentially
modify or cancel executions where one
party believes that the terms of the
transaction were clearly erroneous when
submitted. The CRO or another officer
designated by the CRO would also be
able to modify or cancel executions that
result from a disruption or malfunction
in the use or operation of BeX, or any
34 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 4, Paragraph (a).
35 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 5, Paragraph (a).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Aug 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
communications system associated with
the BeX.
The proposed rules set out procedures
for each of these reviews, including
specific means for Members to appeal
the Exchange’s decisions.
Adjustment of orders on ex-dates. The
Exchange also proposes to adopt a
process for adjusting orders in securities
quoted ex-dividend, ex-distribution, exrights, or ex-interest.
III. Discussion
After careful review of the proposal,
the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, which would
establish trading rules for the BeX
facility, is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities exchange.36 In
particular, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change, as amended,
is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,37 which requires that the rules of
a national securities exchange be
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system; and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
According to BSE, it currently has no
provisions for the trading of securities
that are not assigned to a specialist.
Under the proposed rule change, BSE
would inaugurate a new, fullyelectronic facility for the trading of
equity securities, which would permit
orders in eligible securities to match
against each other automatically,
without the participation of a BSE
specialist. The Commission finds that
the proposed rules governing the BeX
facility are designed to perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market by
providing for the automatic handling of
orders in BeX-eligible securities in a fair
and reasonable manner. In the
Commission’s view, this new automatic
execution facility should help provide
investors with a more efficient
mechanism by which to immediately
access and trade securities on the
Exchange.38
36 In approving this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
37 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
38 The Commission notes that the Exchange
recently filed a proposed rule change, that, among
other things, would add enhancements to the BeX
facility to ensure the Exchange’s compliance with
Regulation NMS under the Act, and to qualify as
an ‘‘automated trading center’’ under that
regulation. While the Commission believes that the
instant proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with the requirements of the Act, the
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52195
Various facets of the proposed rule
change are discussed below.
1. Eligible Securities
Under the proposed rule change,
securities eligible for trading on BeX
would include all securities eligible for
trading on the Exchange that are not
listed on the Nasdaq for which the BSE
obtains UTP after June 30, 2006.
Although, under the proposal, a
specialist could request to remove a
security from BeX, the Commission
notes that a security would not be
eligible for trading on BeX if that same
security is traded by a BSE specialist.
The Commission further notes that,
since filing the instant proposal, the
Exchange has filed a proposed rule
change that is intended to eliminate, as
of January 1, 2007, specialist
participation in any transactions on the
BSE.39 The Commission believes that
the Exchange’s retention on a short-term
basis of its existing specialist system for
securities that have traded pursuant to
UTP on the BSE prior to June 1, 2006,
at the same time BeX is introduced for
other securities, is a reasonable
approach by which the Exchange can
phase-in its fully-automated trading
system.
2. Receipt, Ranking, Display, and
Automated Matching of Orders
Orders could be routed to BeX
through the Exchange’s systems or
through other communications lines
approved by the Exchange for the
delivery of orders by Exchange
Members.40 BeX would also accept and
automatically execute commitments
sent by market centers that participate
in ITS.
Under the proposed rule change, all
orders sent to BeX (excluding the order
types discussed below) would be ranked
according to their price and time of
receipt and would be displayed to the
public when they constitute the Best
Bid or Offer in BeX for a security. No
distinction is made to this priority with
regard to agency orders and professional
or proprietary orders. The Commission
believes that the use of price/time
priority in the ranking, display, and
matching of orders, and the equal
treatment of agency and professional
orders, is consistent with the Act. The
Commission notes that it previously has
Commission is not making a determination in this
Order that the Exchange’s automatic execution
capabilities would satisfy the ‘‘automated trading
center’’ definition in Rule 600(b)(4) of Regulation
NMS.
39 See BeX Phase II Notice, supra note10.
40 See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII,
Section 3, Paragraph (h)(i).
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
52196
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Notices
approved similar rules for other
exchanges.41
3. Eligible Order Types
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
In addition to accepting specific order
types set forth in BSE’s existing rules,
the Exchange proposes to add several
new order types for use exclusively on
BeX. These order types include Cross,
Cross with Size, Good ‘Till Date, Good
‘Till Time, Limit or Close, Mid-Point
Cross, and Post Primary Cross orders
types. The Commission believes that
these new order types are appropriate in
the context of the BeX facility. In
addition, they should help provide
market participants with greater
flexibility in fulfilling their trading
objectives.
With respect to the Cross, Cross with
Size, and Mid-point Cross orders that
would be implemented in BeX, the
Commission notes that similar order
types have been approved for electronic
trading systems at other exchanges.42
The Commission notes that the
proposed rule regarding Cross with Size,
in consonance with the criteria for
larger-sized crosses contained in the
existing BSE rules, would require this
order type to be for at least 5,000 shares
and larger than the aggregate size of all
interest displayed in BeX at the price of
the cross. It would further require that
neither side of the order be for the
account of the BSE member sending the
order to the Exchange. The Exchange
has added another condition for BeX,
stipulating that the order must have a
market value of at least $100,000.43
If an incoming Limit Order or Market
Order in an ITS-eligible security would
trade through (as defined in the ITS
Plan) the NBBO if executed on the BeX
at the time of receipt, it would either be
cancelled, or routed to the market(s)
displaying the NBBO if it contains such
instruction from the Exchange member
entering the order. Inbound ITS
commitments, if priced at or better than
the current best bid or offer in BeX
(‘‘BBO’’), would be automatically
executed against the order(s) reflected in
the BBO for the full amount of shares at
that price, and any remaining portion of
the ITS commitment would be
automatically cancelled.
5. Trading Sessions and Opening and
Closing Procedures
The BeX will open its Primary
Session for trading each day, and begin
processing orders that have been
submitted during the 7:30 to 9:30 a.m.
Pre-Opening Session, once the primary
market for the relevant security opens.
When the primary market opens on a
trade print, the opening price on BeX
will match the price of that transaction.
When the primary market opens on a
displayed quote, and there are no orders
in BeX that can be matched, BeX also
will open on a quote. When there are
orders that can be matched, the opening
price will be either the TOP, or—when
the TOP is inferior to the National Best
Bid or National Best Offer—at the closer
of the National Best Bid or National Best
Offer to the TOP, if there are orders on
the BeX that can be matched at that
price. Otherwise, BeX will open on a
4. Compliance With Intermarket
quote. Following the opening in an
Trading System Plan
individual security—where there were
orders that were matched—any
The Commission believes that the
remaining orders that could be executed
proposed rule change includes
at the NBBO are either canceled, or
provisions serving to ensure that the
routed in accordance with the
BeX complies with the ITS Plan and
customer’s instructions. Remaining
thereby promote the fair and orderly
orders that could set a new NBBO
operation of the national market
would be displayed. All other orders
system.44 In this regard, the Commission
would be placed on the BeX book.
notes that the rules provide that if an
To close the Primary Trading Session,
order in an ITS-eligible security crosses
at 3:40 p.m., BeX would broadcast the
or locks the NBBO at the time that it is
imbalance between the orders on the bid
received, the order would be cancelled
and ask side, respectively, that have
or, at the instruction of the member
been designated to be executed at the
entering the order, routed to the market
closing price (i.e., At-the-Close and any
center(s) displaying the National Best
Limit-or-Close orders that have not been
Bid or Offer.
executed by this time, and have
therefore been converted to At the Close
41 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
orders). At 4 p.m., BeX would put all
52094 (July 21, 2005), 70 FR 43913 (July 29, 2005)
eligible orders in such securities
(Order approving the electronic book for the
received by 4:00 p.m. into an
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.).
42 See Chicago Stock Exchange Rules Chapter
Authorized Reserve State. When BeX
XXA, Rule 2(c)(3)–(4); NYSE Arca Rule 7.31(y).
receives the closing price message from
43 The Commission notes that the BSE has
the primary market, BeX would
proposed to amend the Cross with Size provision
complete the closing process for each
as part of the second phase of BeX. See BeX Phase
individual security by pairing these
II Notice.
44 See also supra note 26.
orders and executing them at the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Aug 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
primary market closing price. From this
time until 4:30 p.m., the BeX will
operate a Post-Primary Trading Session
during which only Post Primary cross
orders could be submitted. The
Commission believes that the proposed
BeX opening and closing procedures are
reasonable and consistent with the Act.
6. Cancellations, Clearly Erroneous
Transactions, and Adjustment of Orders
The Exchange’s proposal would allow
participants making a demonstrable
error to agree to cancel and unwind the
transaction, subject to the Exchange’s
approval. The proposed rule change also
sets forth formal procedures regarding
the Exchange’s review of clearly
erroneous transactions, and the specific
means for market participants to appeal
decisions made by Exchange officials.
The Commission believes that these
proposed rules are consistent with the
Act and should provide for a fair,
transparent, and reasonable process in
which BeX participants can correct
erroneous transactions. The
Commission notes that it has approved
similar rules at other exchanges.45
The proposal also sets forth the rules
governing how and when it would
adjust certain orders to buy or sell a
security when a security is quoted exdividend, ex-distribution, or ex-interest.
These procedures should help ensure
that such orders will continue to be
handled according to the sellers’ or
buyers’ original intentions and to
preserve the ability of these orders to
obtain the best price available. These
proposed rules, too, are substantially
similar to rules of another exchange that
were previously approved by the
Commission.46
7. Application of ‘‘Effect v. Execute’’
Exemption From Section 11(a) of the
Act
Section 11(a) of the Act 47 prohibits a
member of a national securities
exchange from effecting transactions on
that exchange for its own account, the
account of an associated person, or an
account over which it or its associated
person exercises discretion (collectively,
‘‘covered accounts’’) unless an
exception applies. Rule 11a2–2(T) 48
under the Act, known as the ‘‘effect
versus execute’’ rule, provides exchange
members with an exemption from the
Section 11(a) prohibition. Rule 11a2–
2(T) permits an exchange member,
subject to certain conditions, to effect
45 See, e.g., CHX Rules, Article XXA, Rules 5 and
7; NYSE Arca Rule 7.10.
46 See NYSE Rule 118.
47 15 U.S.C. 78k(a).
48 17 CFR 240.11a2–2(T).
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
transactions for covered accounts by
arranging for an unaffiliated member to
execute the transactions on the
exchange. To comply with Rule 11a2–
2(T)’s conditions, a member (i) must
transmit the order from off the exchange
floor; (ii) may not participate in the
execution of the transaction once it has
been transmitted to the member
performing the execution; (iii) may not
be affiliated with the executing member;
and (iv) with respect to an account over
which the member has investment
discretion, neither the member nor its
associated person may retain any
compensation in the connection with
effecting the transaction except as
provided in the Rule.
In letters to the Commission,49 the
Exchange represented that transactions
effected in the BeX trading system meet
the requirements of Rule 11a2–2(T).
Based on these representations, the
Commission finds that the BeX trading
system satisfies the four conditions of
Rule 11a2–2(T).
First, orders would be sent, by
electronic means, to the physically
separate trading platform of BeX. In the
context of other automated trading
systems, the Commission has found that
the off-floor transmission requirement is
met if a covered account order is
transmitted from a remote location
directly to an exchange’s floor by
electronic means.50 The Exchange stated
49 See Letter from Letter from William C. Meehan,
General Counsel, BSE, to Kelly M. Riley, Assistant
Director, Division of Market Regulation,
Commission, dated June 2, 2006; see also Letter
from William C. Meehan, General Counsel, BSE, to
Kelly M. Riley, Assistant Director, Division,
Commission, dated August 8, 2006.
50 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
49066 (January 13, 2004), 69 FR 2773 (January 20,
2004) (order approving the Boston Options
Exchange as an options trading facility of the
Boston Stock Exchange); 29237 (May 24, 1991), 56
FR 24853 (May 31, 1991) (regarding New York
Stock Exchange’s (‘‘NYSE’’) Off-Hours Trading
Facility); 15533 (January 29, 1979), 44 FR 6084
(January 31, 1979) (regarding the American Stock
Exchange (‘‘Amex’’) Post Execution Reporting
System, the Amex Switching System, the
Intermarket Trading System, the Multiple Dealer
Trading Facility of the Cincinnati Stock Exchange,
the Pacific Exchange’s (‘‘PCX’’) Communications
and Execution System, and the Philadelphia Stock
Exchange’s (‘‘Phlx’’) Automated Communications
and Execution System (‘‘1979 Release’’)); and 14563
(March 14, 1978), 43 FR 11542 (March 17, 1978)
(regarding the NYSE’s Designated Order
Turnaround System). See also Letter from Paula R.
Jensen, Deputy Chief Counsel, Division,
Commission, to Angelo Evangelou, Senior Attorney,
Chicago Board Options Exchange (‘‘CBOE’’), dated
March 31, 2003 (regarding CBOE’s CBOEdirect
system (‘‘CBOEdirect Letter’’)); Letter from Paula R.
Jenson, Deputy Chief Counsel, Division,
Commission, to Jeffrey P. Burns, Assistant General
Counsel, Amex, dated July 9, 2002 (regarding
Amex’s Auto-Ex system for options); Letter from
Paula R. Jenson, Deputy Chief Counsel, Division,
Commission, to Richard S. Rudolph, Counsel, Phlx,
dated April 15, 2002 (regarding Phlx’s AUTOM
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Aug 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
in its letter that it proposes that its
members, whether they are located on
the Exchange’s physical trading floor or
off of the floor, be able to use automated
means to transmit orders for their own
account into the BeX trading system.
The Commission has stated that the offfloor transmission requirement may be
met when an order is sent from one
trading floor of an exchange to another,
separate trading floor of the same
exchange.51 On the basis of the
Exchange’s representations, the
Commission believes that orders sent,
by electronic means, from the
Exchange’s physical trading floor may
be considered to be sent from ‘‘off-floor’’
for purposes of the BeX trading system.
Specifically, the Commission believes
that because the securities traded on the
BeX trading system are not traded on
the Exchange’s physical floor, the BeX
trading system is essentially a different,
separate ‘‘trading floor.’’ The
Commission notes that Exchange floor
members will not have a time/place
advantage with regard to the securities
traded in the BeX trading system.
Specifically, orders transmitted from the
Exchange’s trading floor will not be
processed any more quickly by the BeX
trading system than those orders
received from off the physical floor. In
addition, floor members will see
information about orders that are at the
top of the BeX trading system only after
that information has been sent to the
securities information processor for
dissemination to the public. Thus, based
on these facts, the Commission believes
the off-floor transmission requirement is
satisfied in this case.
Second, the rule requires that the
member not participate in the execution
of its order. The Exchange represented
that its members relinquish control of
orders after they are submitted to BeX
and noted that the members do not
receive any special or unique trading
advantages in BeX.52 Third, although
System and its automatic execution feature AUTOX); Letter from Paula R. Jensen, Deputy Chief
Counsel, Division, Commission, to Kathryn L. Beck,
Senior Vice President, Special Counsel and
Antitrust Compliance Officer, PCX, dated October
25, 2001 (regarding Archipelago Exchange
(‘‘ArcaEx’’) (‘‘ArcaEx Letter’’)); Letter from Brandon
Becker, Director, Division, Commission, to George
T. Simon, Foley & Lardner, dated November 30,
1994 (regarding Chicago Match (‘‘Chicago Match
Letter’’)).
51 See Letter from Richard A. Steinwurtzel,
Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel, Division,
Commission, to Philip J. Lo Bue, Senior Vice
President, PCX, dated December 22, 1978); see also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52094 (July 21,
2005), 70 FR 43913 (July 29, 2005) (order approving
the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. Ebook).
52 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44983
(October 25, 2001), 66 FR 55225 (November 1, 2001)
(Order approving ArcaEx as the equities trading
facility of PCX Equities Inc.); 1979 Release, supra
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52197
Rule 11a2–2(T) contemplates having an
order executed by an exchange member
who is unaffiliated with the member
initiating the order, the Commission
recognizes that the requirement may be
satisfied when automated exchange
facilities are used.53 Finally, the BSE
represents that members that rely on
Rule 11a2–2(T) for a managed account
transaction must comply with the
limitations on compensation set forth in
the rule.
Accelerated Approval of Amendment
No. 5
The Commission finds good cause for
approving Amendment No. 5 to the
proposed rule change prior to the
thirtieth day after publishing notice of
Amendment No. 5 in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of
the Act.54
In Amendment No. 5, the BSE
amended Chapter II, Section 41—
Minimum Price Variation to state that
the Exchange shall not display, rank, or
accept any bids, offers, or orders in a
security priced in an increment smaller
than $0.01 if that bid, offer, or order is
priced equal to or greater than $1.00, but
that the Exchange may execute and
report Mid-point Cross Orders in
increments as small as one-half the
Minimum Price Variation for the
security. In addition, BSE amended the
rules text of BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII
to clarify that if an At the Close order
is not fully executed at the close, the
part of the order not executed will be
cancelled; to clarify opening
procedures; to indicate more clearly
when orders would be routed at the
instruction of the member entering the
order, to the market center(s) displaying
the National Best Bid or Offer; and to
note 50. See also CBOEdirect Letter, supra note 50;
Letter from Larry E. Bergmann, Senior Associate
Director, Division, Commission, to Edith Hallahan,
Associate General Counsel, Phlx, dated March 24,
1999 (regarding Phlx’s VWAP Trading System);
Letter from Catherine McGuire, Chief Counsel,
Division, Commission, to David E. Rosedahl, PCX,
dated November 30, 1998 (regarding Optimark); and
Chicago Match Letter, supra note 50.
53 In considering the operation of automated
execution systems operated by an exchange, the
Commission noted that while there is no
independent executing exchange member, the
execution of an order is automatic once it has been
transmitted into the systems. Because the design of
these systems ensures that members do not possess
any special or unique trading advantages in
handling their orders after transmitting them to the
exchange, the Commission has stated that
executions obtained through these systems satisfy
the independent execution requirement of Rule
11a2–2(T). See 1979 Release, supra note 50.
54 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)
of the Act, the Commission may not approve any
proposed rule change, or amendment thereto, prior
to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of
the notice thereof, unless the Commission finds
good cause for so doing.
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
52198
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Notices
clarify how cross orders would be
executed in the Post-Primary Trading
Session. The Exchange also corrected
several technical errors contained in the
rule text.
The Commission believes that these
clarifying and technical changes to the
proposed rule change improve the
proposal and raise no new or novel
issues of regulatory concern, and
therefore should not delay its
implementation. Accordingly, the
Commission finds good cause to
accelerate approval of Amendment No.
5, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act.55
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning Amendment No.
5, including whether Amendment No. 5
is consistent with the Act. Comments
may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BSE–2006–22 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BSE–2006–22. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Exchange. All
55 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Aug 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to Amendment
No. 5 of File Number SR–BSE–2006–22
and should be submitted on or before
September 22, 2006.
V. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange, and, in
particular, with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act.56
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,57 that the
proposed rule change (SR-BSE–2006–
22), as amended, and Amendment No.
3 thereto, is approved and Amendment
No. 5 is approved on an accelerated
basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.58
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–14564 Filed 8–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54367; File No. SR–DTC–
2006–09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Depository Trust Company; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule To Revise the DTC
Custody Service Guide To Incorporate
the Terms of Certain Participant
Agreements
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on
May 19, 2006, The Depository Trust
Company (‘‘DTC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
and on June 23, 2006, amended the
proposed rule change described in Items
I, II, and III below, which items have
been prepared primarily by DTC. DTC
filed the proposed rule change pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 2
56 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
58 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
57 15
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would
incorporate the terms and conditions of
certain participant agreements related to
DTC’s custody service into the DTC
Custody Service Guide.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
DTC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. DTC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.4
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
DTC is filing the proposed rule
change to incorporate the terms and
conditions of various participant
agreements relating to DTC’s custody
service into the DTC Custody Service
Guide (‘‘Guide’’).5 Specifically, DTC is
incorporating the terms of three custody
service participant agreements into the
Guide: (i) The High Value Letter,6 (ii)
New York Window Service Agreement,7
and (iii) Medallion Signature Guarantee/
Stamp Letter.8 The terms proposed to be
3 17
August 25, 2006.
PO 00000
and Rule 19b–4(f)(4) thereunder 3 so that
the proposal was effective upon filing
with the Commission. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested parties.
Sfmt 4703
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4).
Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by DTC.
5 For background information on the Custody
Service Guide, which replaced applicable
participant operating procedures relating to the
custody service, see Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 34–44719 (August 17, 2001), 66 FR
44656 (August 24, 2001) [File No. SR–DTC–2001–
01].
6 The High Value Letter defines the extent of loss
that DTC would incur in connection with the
processing of certain ‘‘high value’’ certificates as
being limited by the extent of the DTC insurance
coverage at the time of an incident of loss.
7 The New York Window Service Agreement sets
forth the terms and conditions for a participant’s
use of the New York Window Service, a service
offered under the umbrella of DTC’s custody
service.
8 The Medallion Signature Guarantee/Stamp
Letter sets forth the terms and conditions for DTC’s
use of certain participant stamps and medallions in
connection with the New York Window Service.
4 The
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 170 (Friday, September 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52192-52198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-14564]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54365; File No. SR-BSE-2006-22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, and
3 Thereto and Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval
to Amendment No. 5 Thereto To Implement the Boston Equities Exchange
(``BeX'') Trading System
August 25, 2006.
I. Introduction
On May 10, 2006, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'' or
``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to implement a new trading system, the Boston
Equities Exchange (``BeX''). BSE filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change on June 2, 2006.\3\ BSE filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change on June 9, 2006.\4\ BSE filed Amendment No. 3 to
the proposed rule change on June 15, 2006.\5\ The proposed rule change,
as amended, was published for comment in the Federal Register on June
29, 2006.\6\ The Commission received no comments regarding the
proposal, as amended. On August 22, 2006, BSE filed Amendment No. 5 to
the proposed rule change.\7\ This order
[[Page 52193]]
approves the proposed rule change, as amended, grants accelerated
approval to Amendment No. 5 to the proposed rule change, and solicits
comments from interested persons on Amendment No. 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the original filing
in its entirety.
\4\ Amendment No. 2 replaced and superseded the original filing
and Amendment No. 1 in their entirety.
\5\ Amendment No. 3 replaced and superseded the original filing,
Amendment No. 1, and Amendment No. 2 in their entirety.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54034 (June 22,
2006), 71 FR 37140.
\7\ Amendment No. 4 was filed on July 26, 2006. Amendment No. 4
was withdrawn on August 22, 2006. Amendment No. 5 was filed on
August 22, 2006. In Amendment No. 5, the Exchange amended BSE Rules
Chapter II, Section 41--Minimum Price Variation to state that the
Exchange shall not display, rank, or accept any bids, offers, or
orders in a security priced in an increment smaller than $0.01 if
that bid, offer, or order is priced equal to or greater than $1.00,
but that the Exchange may execute and report Mid-point Cross Orders
in increments as small as one-half the Minimum Price Variation for
the security. In addition, BSE amended the rule text of BSE Rule,
Chapter XXXVII to clarify that if an At the Close order is not fully
executed at the close, the part of the order not executed will be
cancelled; to clarify opening procedures; to indicate more clearly
when orders would be routed at the instruction of the Member
entering the order; and to clarify how cross orders would be
executed in the Post-Primary Trading Session. Further, the Exchange
corrected several technical errors contained in the rule text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
In a separate filing that is being approved today, BSE proposes to
establish a new communications and electronic trading facility,\8\ to
be known as ``BeX.'' \9\ The BeX facility is a fully-automated
electronic book for the display and execution of orders in securities
intended for the use of BSE Members, including Electronic Access
Members, and their customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Pursuant to Section 3(a)(2) of the Act, the term
``facility'' when used with respect to an exchange, includes ``its
premises, tangible or intangible property whether on the premises or
not, any right to the use of such premises or property or any
service thereof for the purpose of effecting or reporting a
transaction on an exchange (including, among other things, any
system of communication to or from the exchange, by ticker or
otherwise, maintained by or with the consent of the exchange), and
any right of the exchange to the use of any property or service.''
15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(2).
\9\ BeX is owned and will be operated by BSX Group, LLC
(``BSX''), of which BSE is currently a majority owner. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54364 (August 25, 2006) (order
approving SR-BSE-2006-20), which adopts the proposed governance
structure of BSX as reflected in its operating agreement, and
proposed changes to the BSE Constitution with respect to the
creation of Electronic Access Members and to BSE rules regarding
transfer of ownership of BSX units.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the instant filing, the Exchange proposes rules to implement the
initial phase of BeX.\10\ In this initial phase, BeX would be BSE's
trading facility for any security, other than securities listed on The
Nasdaq Stock Market (``Nasdaq''),\11\ for which BSE obtains unlisted
trading privileges (``UTP'') after June 30, 2006. All securities
displayed and executed on BeX would be securities that are not assigned
to a BSE specialist. BeX would allow Exchange Members, whether or not
they are on the Exchange's floor, to enter orders in these securities
into the BeX facility for possible execution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The Commission notes that the BSE recently filed a proposed
rule change setting forth proposed rules to implement the second
phase of BeX and to comply with the Commission's Regulation NMS
under the Act, which the Commission has published for comment. See
Securities Exchange Release Act No. 54291 (August 8, 2006), 71 FR
47264 (August 16, 2006) (File No. SR-BSE-2006-30)(``BeX Phase II
Notice'').
\11\ The BSE rules governing trading in Nasdaq stocks (BSE
Rules, Chapter XXXV) and the BSE rules governing trading in listed
securities assigned to a specialist (BSE Rules, Chapters I, II, III,
XV, XVI, XVII, XIX, and XXXIII) remain unchanged. The Exchange
advised that it intends to apply for UTP in securities listed
otherwise than on Nasdaq for which it currently does not trade UTP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The rules governing BeX would be located in Chapter XXXVII of the
BSE's Rules. The bylaws and all other BSE Rules and policies would
continue to be applicable to BeX trading except where the context
requires otherwise.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eligible securities. In the initial phase of BeX, all securities
eligible for trading on the Exchange that are listed otherwise than on
Nasdaq for which the BSE has obtained UTP after June 30, 2006 would be
eligible to be traded in the BeX.\13\ However, any specialist request
to remove a security from BeX would be considered by the appropriate
committee of the BSE's Board of Directors (``Board'').\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ This includes securities that are not listed on Nasdaq and
securities listed on other exchanges that did not begin trading on
BSE prior to June 30, 2006.
\14\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 1, Paragraph
(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Receipt of orders. Orders could be routed to BeX through the
Exchange's systems or through other communications lines approved by
the Exchange for the delivery of orders by Exchange Members.\15\ BeX
would also accept and automatically execute commitments sent by market
centers that participate in ITS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 3, Paragraph
(h)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ranking, display, and automated matching of orders. Except for
Cross, Cross with Size, Mid-point Cross orders and Post Primary Cross
orders,\16\ all orders sent to BeX would be ranked according to their
price and time of receipt and would be displayed to the public when
they constitute the Best Bid or Offer in BeX for a security. Orders
would automatically match against each other, in price/time priority.
Specifically, an incoming order would be matched against one or more
orders in the BeX, in the order of their ranking, at the price of each
order, for the full amount of shares available at that price, or for
the size of the incoming order, if smaller.\17\ If an incoming order
could not be matched when it is received, and it is not designated as
an order that should be immediately cancelled, the order would be
placed in the BeX.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Section on eligible order types for a discussion of
BeX-eligible cross orders. Cross, Cross with Size, Mid-point Cross
and Post Primary Cross orders would be executed in accordance with
BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 3, Paragraph (k).
\17\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 3, Paragraph
(j).
\18\ See discussion of compliance with the Intermarket Trading
System (``ITS'') Plan infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposed rules, orders could be entered by a BSE Member
on its own behalf, for the account of another Member (collectively,
``professional orders'') or for the account of a customer (an ``agency
order''). However, agency orders would be subject to the same display
and execution processes as professional orders, and agency orders would
not receive any priority in order execution or handling.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 2, Paragraph
(d). The Exchange has represented that current BSE Rule, Chapter II,
Section 11, Trading While Acting as a Broker as to Market Orders,
would apply to participants' activities on BeX. The rule generally
provides that a member may not trade ahead of a customer order it is
representing. Telephone call between Brian Donnelly, Assistant Vice
President, Regulation and Compliance, BSE, and Jennifer Colihan,
Special Counsel, and David Michehl, Special Counsel, Division of
Market Regulation, Commission, on August 8, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eligible order types. Orders sent to BeX would be required to be
specifically designated in the manner specified by the Exchange for
trading in BeX. BeX would accept only round-lot market and limit orders
for regular-way settlement.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 2, Paragraph
(a)-(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Orders eligible for execution in BeX could be designated as one of
the following existing BSE order types: \21\ ``At the Close,'' ``At the
Opening or At the Opening Only,'' ``Day,'' ``Do Not Increase (DNI),''
``Do not Reduce (DNR),'' ``Fill or Kill,'' ``Good `til Cancel,''
``Immediate or Cancel,'' ``Limit, Limited or Limited Price,''
``Market,'' ``Stop Limit,'' or ``Stop'' orders. Orders could also be
designated one of the following new order types in BeX: ``Cross,''
``Cross with Size,'' ``Good `Till Date (GTD),'' Good ``Till Time
(GTT),'' ``Limit or Close,'' ``Mid-point Cross'' or ``Post Primary
Cross.'' Descriptions of the new BeX-eligible order types are as
follows: \22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 1, Paragraph
(c)(i).
\22\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 1, Paragraph
(c)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross: An order to buy and sell the same security at a specific
price better than the best bid and offer displayed in BeX and equal to
or better than the National Best Bid and Offer. A Cross order could
represent interest of one or more BSE Members.
Cross with Size: A Cross order to buy and sell at least 5,000
shares of the same security with a market value of at least $100,000 at
a price equal to or better than the best bid or offer displayed in BeX
and the National Best Bid or Offer, where the size of the order is
larger than the aggregate size of all interest
[[Page 52194]]
displayed in BeX at that price. Neither side of a Cross with Size order
may be for the account of the BSE Member sending the order to BeX.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ The Commission notes that the in the BeX Phase II Notice,
supra note 10, BSE has proposed, among other things, to amend the
Cross with Size provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good 'Till Date (GTD): An order to buy or sell that, if not
executed, expires at the end of the date specified in the order.
Good 'Till Time (GTT): An order to buy or sell that, if not
executed, expires at the time specified in the order.
Limit or Close: A Limit Order to buy or sell that if not executed
prior to the Market on Close cutoff time of 3:40 p.m., pursuant to BSE
Rule, Chapter II, Section 22, will automatically convert to an At the
Close Order for inclusion in the closing process, and if not so
executed at the close, will be cancelled.
Mid-Point Cross: A two-sided order with both a buy and sell
component combined that would be executed at the midpoint of the
National Best Bid or Offer. A Mid-Point Cross order would be rejected
when a locked or crossed market exists in the relevant security at the
time the order is received. Mid-Point Cross orders would be permitted
to be executed and reported in increments as small as one-half of the
Minimum Price Variation.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ BSE Rules, Chapter II, Section 41 generally sets forth the
``Minimum Price Variation'' as $.01. See supra note 7 regarding an
amendment the Exchange has made to this proposal with respect to the
definition of Minimum Price Variation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post Primary Cross: A single priced cross order entered during the
Post Primary Trading Session.
Cross, Cross with Size, Mid-point Cross, and Post Primary Cross
orders would be executed automatically if they meet the requirements
for those types of orders. If they do not meet applicable requirements,
they would be immediately cancelled.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 3, Paragraph
(k).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of Fill or Kill and Immediate or Cancel orders,
a customer would be able to append to an order an instruction that the
order be routed to the market(s) displaying the National Best Bid or
Offer if the order would trade through the National Best Bid or Offer
if executed on the BeX. Absent such an instruction, the order would be
cancelled.
Compliance with ITS Plan.\26\ The proposed rules provide that if an
order in an ITS-eligible security crosses or locks the National Best
Bid or Offer at the time that it is received, the order would be
immediately cancelled or, at the instruction of the member entering the
order, routed to the market(s) displaying the National Best Bid or
Offer to ensure compliance with the ITS Plan's rules relating to locked
markets.\27\ If an incoming Limit Order would trade through (as defined
in the ITS Plan) through the National Best Bid or Offer if executed on
the BeX at the time of receipt, it would be either cancelled or, at the
instruction of the member entering the order, routed to the market(s)
showing the National Best Bid or Offer.\28\ If an incoming Market Order
would trade through the National Best Bid or Offer if executed on the
BeX at the time of receipt, it would either be cancelled or, at the
instruction of the member entering the order, routed to the market(s)
displaying the National Best Bid or Offer.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ The Commission notes that in the BeX Phase II Notice, supra
note 10, the BSE proposed further rule changes, among others, to
ensure that its rules comply with Rules 610 and 611 of Regulation
NMS under the Act. The Commission notes that once Regulation NMS has
been fully implemented, the ITS Plan and its requirements will no
longer be in effect.
\27\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 3, Paragraph
(i), subparagraph (ii). Similarly, if an order in a listed security
locks or crosses the Best Bid or Offer in BeX at the time it is
received, the order would be executed on BeX according to BeX's
matching algorithm with any remaining portion either immediately
cancelled, at the instruction of the member entering the order,
routed to an away market center(s).
\28\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 3, Paragraph
(j)(ii).
\29\ Id. at Paragraph (j)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inbound ITS commitments, if priced at or better than the current
Best Bid or Offer in BeX, would be automatically executed against the
order(s) reflected in the Best Bid or Offer for the full amount of
shares at that price, and any remaining portion of the ITS commitment
would be automatically cancelled.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Id. at Paragraph (j)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating hours and trading sessions. BeX would operate from 7:30
a.m. until 4:30 p.m. during Pre-Opening, Opening, Primary, and Post-
Primary Trading Sessions.\31\ Specifically, the Pre-Opening would
extend from 7:30 a.m. until 9:30 a.m., during which orders could be
placed on the BeX but would not be matched and would not generate trade
executions. Market participants would be able to add, modify or cancel
orders during this period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 3,
Paragraphs (a)-(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The BeX facility would open for trading once the primary market for
a security opens on either a displayed quote or trade (the
``Opening'').\32\ Where the Opening is based on a trade print in the
primary market, it would match the primary market opening price for
each individual security opened. Once the BeX opening price was
determined, all eligible orders priced equal to or better than the BeX
opening price would be paired for execution at that price following
applicable BeX priority rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ The proposed rules define the primary market for purposes
of BeX as the listing market for a security, unless otherwise
designated by the appropriate BSE Board committee; provided,
however, that if a security is traded by the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''), then the primary market for such security
would be the NYSE, and if a security is not traded by the NYSE and
is traded by the Amex, then the primary market for such security
would be the Amex. If a security is traded on both the NYSE and the
Amex, whichever of the two is the listing market would be considered
the primary market. If a security is solely listed on any other
exchange, then the primary security for that market would be that
exchange. See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 3,
Paragraph (a)(i). Nasdaq securities and BSE-solely listed issues,
which currently are assigned to a specialist, would continue to
trade under the BSE's existing rules, and not on BeX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where the Opening is based on a quote in the primary market, the
BeX would open in one of the following ways: (1) Where there were
orders in the BeX that could not be matched, the BeX would open on a
quote; (2) where there were orders in the BeX that could be matched,
the BeX opening price would be the Theoretical Opening Price
(``TOP''),\33\ provided the TOP is at or within the National Best Bid
and Offer. If the only orders in BeX at the opening are Market Orders,
the TOP will be the prior day's closing price and the orders would be
executed at that price. If that price is not within the National Best
Bid or Offer, the order would be routed, at the instruction of the
Member entering the order, to the market center(s) displaying the
National Best Bid or Offer. If the Member has not provided the
instruction to route, the order will be cancelled; (3) where there were
orders in the BeX that could be matched, and the TOP is not at or
within the National Best Bid and Offer, the BeX opening trade price
would be at the National Best Bid or Offer closest to the TOP as long
as orders could be matched at that price. If orders could not be
matched at that price, the BeX would open on a quote.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ The TOP would be the price that maximizes the quantity of
orders traded on the BeX at the opening. If there are multiple
prices that maximize the quantity of orders traded on the BeX at the
opening, then the TOP would be the price that minimizes the quantity
of orders not traded. If there are multiple prices that minimize the
quantity of orders not traded, then the price that minimizes any
order imbalance is the TOP. If there are multiple prices that
minimize the quantity of orders not traded and there is no order
imbalance, the TOP is the price closest to the previous day's
closing price. See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section
3(c)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Following the opening execution process in an individual security
all orders remaining that are executable against the National Best Bid
and Offer
[[Page 52195]]
would be cancelled, or routed in accordance with the customer's
instruction. All other orders would be booked on the BeX. Immediately
following the Opening for individual securities, BeX will commence the
Primary Trading Session. All orders would be matched automatically
following price and time priority as soon as they are entered in the
BeX book. Incoming orders would be executed at or within the National
Best Bid and Offer.
BeX would close the Primary Trading Session in the following
manner: Beginning at 3:40 p.m., BeX would broadcast the imbalance
between the At-the-Close and Limit-or-Close orders on the bid side, and
At-the-Close and Limit-or-Close orders on the offer side. During this
``Market on Close Period,'' At-the-Close and Limit-or-Close orders
could not be cancelled. At 4 p.m., BeX would put all eligible orders in
such securities received by 4 p.m. into an Authorized Reserve State.
When BeX received the closing price message from the primary market,
the BeX trading engine would complete the closing process for each
individual security. During this process, all paired At the Close and
Limit or Close orders would be executed at the primary market closing
price.
The Post-Primary Trading Session would operate from the time when
the primary market disseminates its closing price until 4:30. During
the Post Primary Trading Session only Post Primary Cross orders at a
specific price could be submitted.
Cancellations of transactions and handling of clearly erroneous
transactions. Under the proposed rules, Members that make a transaction
in demonstrable error could agree to cancel and unwind the transaction,
subject to the approval of the Exchange.\34\ For purposes of the BeX
facility, the Exchange also proposes to adopt procedures for review of
clearly erroneous transactions when such review is requested.\35\ The
Chief Regulatory Officer (``CRO'') or another officer designated by the
CRO would review the transaction and potentially modify or cancel
executions where one party believes that the terms of the transaction
were clearly erroneous when submitted. The CRO or another officer
designated by the CRO would also be able to modify or cancel executions
that result from a disruption or malfunction in the use or operation of
BeX, or any communications system associated with the BeX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 4, Paragraph
(a).
\35\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 5, Paragraph
(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rules set out procedures for each of these reviews,
including specific means for Members to appeal the Exchange's
decisions.
Adjustment of orders on ex-dates. The Exchange also proposes to
adopt a process for adjusting orders in securities quoted ex-dividend,
ex-distribution, ex-rights, or ex-interest.
III. Discussion
After careful review of the proposal, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change, as amended, which would establish trading rules
for the BeX facility, is consistent with the requirements of the Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.\36\ In particular, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,\37\ which requires that the rules of a national securities
exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system; and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\37\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to BSE, it currently has no provisions for the trading of
securities that are not assigned to a specialist. Under the proposed
rule change, BSE would inaugurate a new, fully-electronic facility for
the trading of equity securities, which would permit orders in eligible
securities to match against each other automatically, without the
participation of a BSE specialist. The Commission finds that the
proposed rules governing the BeX facility are designed to perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market by providing for the automatic
handling of orders in BeX-eligible securities in a fair and reasonable
manner. In the Commission's view, this new automatic execution facility
should help provide investors with a more efficient mechanism by which
to immediately access and trade securities on the Exchange.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ The Commission notes that the Exchange recently filed a
proposed rule change, that, among other things, would add
enhancements to the BeX facility to ensure the Exchange's compliance
with Regulation NMS under the Act, and to qualify as an ``automated
trading center'' under that regulation. While the Commission
believes that the instant proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with the requirements of the Act, the Commission is not
making a determination in this Order that the Exchange's automatic
execution capabilities would satisfy the ``automated trading
center'' definition in Rule 600(b)(4) of Regulation NMS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Various facets of the proposed rule change are discussed below.
1. Eligible Securities
Under the proposed rule change, securities eligible for trading on
BeX would include all securities eligible for trading on the Exchange
that are not listed on the Nasdaq for which the BSE obtains UTP after
June 30, 2006. Although, under the proposal, a specialist could request
to remove a security from BeX, the Commission notes that a security
would not be eligible for trading on BeX if that same security is
traded by a BSE specialist. The Commission further notes that, since
filing the instant proposal, the Exchange has filed a proposed rule
change that is intended to eliminate, as of January 1, 2007, specialist
participation in any transactions on the BSE.\39\ The Commission
believes that the Exchange's retention on a short-term basis of its
existing specialist system for securities that have traded pursuant to
UTP on the BSE prior to June 1, 2006, at the same time BeX is
introduced for other securities, is a reasonable approach by which the
Exchange can phase-in its fully-automated trading system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ See BeX Phase II Notice, supra note10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Receipt, Ranking, Display, and Automated Matching of Orders
Orders could be routed to BeX through the Exchange's systems or
through other communications lines approved by the Exchange for the
delivery of orders by Exchange Members.\40\ BeX would also accept and
automatically execute commitments sent by market centers that
participate in ITS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ See proposed BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII, Section 3, Paragraph
(h)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposed rule change, all orders sent to BeX (excluding
the order types discussed below) would be ranked according to their
price and time of receipt and would be displayed to the public when
they constitute the Best Bid or Offer in BeX for a security. No
distinction is made to this priority with regard to agency orders and
professional or proprietary orders. The Commission believes that the
use of price/time priority in the ranking, display, and matching of
orders, and the equal treatment of agency and professional orders, is
consistent with the Act. The Commission notes that it previously has
[[Page 52196]]
approved similar rules for other exchanges.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52094 (July
21, 2005), 70 FR 43913 (July 29, 2005) (Order approving the
electronic book for the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Eligible Order Types
In addition to accepting specific order types set forth in BSE's
existing rules, the Exchange proposes to add several new order types
for use exclusively on BeX. These order types include Cross, Cross with
Size, Good `Till Date, Good `Till Time, Limit or Close, Mid-Point
Cross, and Post Primary Cross orders types. The Commission believes
that these new order types are appropriate in the context of the BeX
facility. In addition, they should help provide market participants
with greater flexibility in fulfilling their trading objectives.
With respect to the Cross, Cross with Size, and Mid-point Cross
orders that would be implemented in BeX, the Commission notes that
similar order types have been approved for electronic trading systems
at other exchanges.\42\ The Commission notes that the proposed rule
regarding Cross with Size, in consonance with the criteria for larger-
sized crosses contained in the existing BSE rules, would require this
order type to be for at least 5,000 shares and larger than the
aggregate size of all interest displayed in BeX at the price of the
cross. It would further require that neither side of the order be for
the account of the BSE member sending the order to the Exchange. The
Exchange has added another condition for BeX, stipulating that the
order must have a market value of at least $100,000.\43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See Chicago Stock Exchange Rules Chapter XXA, Rule 2(c)(3)-
(4); NYSE Arca Rule 7.31(y).
\43\ The Commission notes that the BSE has proposed to amend the
Cross with Size provision as part of the second phase of BeX. See
BeX Phase II Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Compliance With Intermarket Trading System Plan
The Commission believes that the proposed rule change includes
provisions serving to ensure that the BeX complies with the ITS Plan
and thereby promote the fair and orderly operation of the national
market system.\44\ In this regard, the Commission notes that the rules
provide that if an order in an ITS-eligible security crosses or locks
the NBBO at the time that it is received, the order would be cancelled
or, at the instruction of the member entering the order, routed to the
market center(s) displaying the National Best Bid or Offer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ See also supra note 26.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If an incoming Limit Order or Market Order in an ITS-eligible
security would trade through (as defined in the ITS Plan) the NBBO if
executed on the BeX at the time of receipt, it would either be
cancelled, or routed to the market(s) displaying the NBBO if it
contains such instruction from the Exchange member entering the order.
Inbound ITS commitments, if priced at or better than the current best
bid or offer in BeX (``BBO''), would be automatically executed against
the order(s) reflected in the BBO for the full amount of shares at that
price, and any remaining portion of the ITS commitment would be
automatically cancelled.
5. Trading Sessions and Opening and Closing Procedures
The BeX will open its Primary Session for trading each day, and
begin processing orders that have been submitted during the 7:30 to
9:30 a.m. Pre-Opening Session, once the primary market for the relevant
security opens. When the primary market opens on a trade print, the
opening price on BeX will match the price of that transaction. When the
primary market opens on a displayed quote, and there are no orders in
BeX that can be matched, BeX also will open on a quote. When there are
orders that can be matched, the opening price will be either the TOP,
or--when the TOP is inferior to the National Best Bid or National Best
Offer--at the closer of the National Best Bid or National Best Offer to
the TOP, if there are orders on the BeX that can be matched at that
price. Otherwise, BeX will open on a quote. Following the opening in an
individual security--where there were orders that were matched--any
remaining orders that could be executed at the NBBO are either
canceled, or routed in accordance with the customer's instructions.
Remaining orders that could set a new NBBO would be displayed. All
other orders would be placed on the BeX book.
To close the Primary Trading Session, at 3:40 p.m., BeX would
broadcast the imbalance between the orders on the bid and ask side,
respectively, that have been designated to be executed at the closing
price (i.e., At-the-Close and any Limit-or-Close orders that have not
been executed by this time, and have therefore been converted to At the
Close orders). At 4 p.m., BeX would put all eligible orders in such
securities received by 4:00 p.m. into an Authorized Reserve State. When
BeX receives the closing price message from the primary market, BeX
would complete the closing process for each individual security by
pairing these orders and executing them at the primary market closing
price. From this time until 4:30 p.m., the BeX will operate a Post-
Primary Trading Session during which only Post Primary cross orders
could be submitted. The Commission believes that the proposed BeX
opening and closing procedures are reasonable and consistent with the
Act.
6. Cancellations, Clearly Erroneous Transactions, and Adjustment of
Orders
The Exchange's proposal would allow participants making a
demonstrable error to agree to cancel and unwind the transaction,
subject to the Exchange's approval. The proposed rule change also sets
forth formal procedures regarding the Exchange's review of clearly
erroneous transactions, and the specific means for market participants
to appeal decisions made by Exchange officials. The Commission believes
that these proposed rules are consistent with the Act and should
provide for a fair, transparent, and reasonable process in which BeX
participants can correct erroneous transactions. The Commission notes
that it has approved similar rules at other exchanges.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ See, e.g., CHX Rules, Article XXA, Rules 5 and 7; NYSE Arca
Rule 7.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal also sets forth the rules governing how and when it
would adjust certain orders to buy or sell a security when a security
is quoted ex-dividend, ex-distribution, or ex-interest. These
procedures should help ensure that such orders will continue to be
handled according to the sellers' or buyers' original intentions and to
preserve the ability of these orders to obtain the best price
available. These proposed rules, too, are substantially similar to
rules of another exchange that were previously approved by the
Commission.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ See NYSE Rule 118.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Application of ``Effect v. Execute'' Exemption From Section 11(a) of
the Act
Section 11(a) of the Act \47\ prohibits a member of a national
securities exchange from effecting transactions on that exchange for
its own account, the account of an associated person, or an account
over which it or its associated person exercises discretion
(collectively, ``covered accounts'') unless an exception applies. Rule
11a2-2(T) \48\ under the Act, known as the ``effect versus execute''
rule, provides exchange members with an exemption from the Section
11(a) prohibition. Rule 11a2-2(T) permits an exchange member, subject
to certain conditions, to effect
[[Page 52197]]
transactions for covered accounts by arranging for an unaffiliated
member to execute the transactions on the exchange. To comply with Rule
11a2-2(T)'s conditions, a member (i) must transmit the order from off
the exchange floor; (ii) may not participate in the execution of the
transaction once it has been transmitted to the member performing the
execution; (iii) may not be affiliated with the executing member; and
(iv) with respect to an account over which the member has investment
discretion, neither the member nor its associated person may retain any
compensation in the connection with effecting the transaction except as
provided in the Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ 15 U.S.C. 78k(a).
\48\ 17 CFR 240.11a2-2(T).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In letters to the Commission,\49\ the Exchange represented that
transactions effected in the BeX trading system meet the requirements
of Rule 11a2-2(T). Based on these representations, the Commission finds
that the BeX trading system satisfies the four conditions of Rule 11a2-
2(T).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ See Letter from Letter from William C. Meehan, General
Counsel, BSE, to Kelly M. Riley, Assistant Director, Division of
Market Regulation, Commission, dated June 2, 2006; see also Letter
from William C. Meehan, General Counsel, BSE, to Kelly M. Riley,
Assistant Director, Division, Commission, dated August 8, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, orders would be sent, by electronic means, to the physically
separate trading platform of BeX. In the context of other automated
trading systems, the Commission has found that the off-floor
transmission requirement is met if a covered account order is
transmitted from a remote location directly to an exchange's floor by
electronic means.\50\ The Exchange stated in its letter that it
proposes that its members, whether they are located on the Exchange's
physical trading floor or off of the floor, be able to use automated
means to transmit orders for their own account into the BeX trading
system. The Commission has stated that the off-floor transmission
requirement may be met when an order is sent from one trading floor of
an exchange to another, separate trading floor of the same
exchange.\51\ On the basis of the Exchange's representations, the
Commission believes that orders sent, by electronic means, from the
Exchange's physical trading floor may be considered to be sent from
``off-floor'' for purposes of the BeX trading system. Specifically, the
Commission believes that because the securities traded on the BeX
trading system are not traded on the Exchange's physical floor, the BeX
trading system is essentially a different, separate ``trading floor.''
The Commission notes that Exchange floor members will not have a time/
place advantage with regard to the securities traded in the BeX trading
system. Specifically, orders transmitted from the Exchange's trading
floor will not be processed any more quickly by the BeX trading system
than those orders received from off the physical floor. In addition,
floor members will see information about orders that are at the top of
the BeX trading system only after that information has been sent to the
securities information processor for dissemination to the public. Thus,
based on these facts, the Commission believes the off-floor
transmission requirement is satisfied in this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 49066
(January 13, 2004), 69 FR 2773 (January 20, 2004) (order approving
the Boston Options Exchange as an options trading facility of the
Boston Stock Exchange); 29237 (May 24, 1991), 56 FR 24853 (May 31,
1991) (regarding New York Stock Exchange's (``NYSE'') Off-Hours
Trading Facility); 15533 (January 29, 1979), 44 FR 6084 (January 31,
1979) (regarding the American Stock Exchange (``Amex'') Post
Execution Reporting System, the Amex Switching System, the
Intermarket Trading System, the Multiple Dealer Trading Facility of
the Cincinnati Stock Exchange, the Pacific Exchange's (``PCX'')
Communications and Execution System, and the Philadelphia Stock
Exchange's (``Phlx'') Automated Communications and Execution System
(``1979 Release'')); and 14563 (March 14, 1978), 43 FR 11542 (March
17, 1978) (regarding the NYSE's Designated Order Turnaround System).
See also Letter from Paula R. Jensen, Deputy Chief Counsel,
Division, Commission, to Angelo Evangelou, Senior Attorney, Chicago
Board Options Exchange (``CBOE''), dated March 31, 2003 (regarding
CBOE's CBOEdirect system (``CBOEdirect Letter'')); Letter from Paula
R. Jenson, Deputy Chief Counsel, Division, Commission, to Jeffrey P.
Burns, Assistant General Counsel, Amex, dated July 9, 2002
(regarding Amex's Auto-Ex system for options); Letter from Paula R.
Jenson, Deputy Chief Counsel, Division, Commission, to Richard S.
Rudolph, Counsel, Phlx, dated April 15, 2002 (regarding Phlx's AUTOM
System and its automatic execution feature AUTO-X); Letter from
Paula R. Jensen, Deputy Chief Counsel, Division, Commission, to
Kathryn L. Beck, Senior Vice President, Special Counsel and
Antitrust Compliance Officer, PCX, dated October 25, 2001 (regarding
Archipelago Exchange (``ArcaEx'') (``ArcaEx Letter'')); Letter from
Brandon Becker, Director, Division, Commission, to George T. Simon,
Foley & Lardner, dated November 30, 1994 (regarding Chicago Match
(``Chicago Match Letter'')).
\51\ See Letter from Richard A. Steinwurtzel, Attorney, Office
of Chief Counsel, Division, Commission, to Philip J. Lo Bue, Senior
Vice President, PCX, dated December 22, 1978); see also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 52094 (July 21, 2005), 70 FR 43913 (July
29, 2005) (order approving the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. Ebook).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the rule requires that the member not participate in the
execution of its order. The Exchange represented that its members
relinquish control of orders after they are submitted to BeX and noted
that the members do not receive any special or unique trading
advantages in BeX.\52\ Third, although Rule 11a2-2(T) contemplates
having an order executed by an exchange member who is unaffiliated with
the member initiating the order, the Commission recognizes that the
requirement may be satisfied when automated exchange facilities are
used.\53\ Finally, the BSE represents that members that rely on Rule
11a2-2(T) for a managed account transaction must comply with the
limitations on compensation set forth in the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44983 (October 25,
2001), 66 FR 55225 (November 1, 2001) (Order approving ArcaEx as the
equities trading facility of PCX Equities Inc.); 1979 Release, supra
note 50. See also CBOEdirect Letter, supra note 50; Letter from
Larry E. Bergmann, Senior Associate Director, Division, Commission,
to Edith Hallahan, Associate General Counsel, Phlx, dated March 24,
1999 (regarding Phlx's VWAP Trading System); Letter from Catherine
McGuire, Chief Counsel, Division, Commission, to David E. Rosedahl,
PCX, dated November 30, 1998 (regarding Optimark); and Chicago Match
Letter, supra note 50.
\53\ In considering the operation of automated execution systems
operated by an exchange, the Commission noted that while there is no
independent executing exchange member, the execution of an order is
automatic once it has been transmitted into the systems. Because the
design of these systems ensures that members do not possess any
special or unique trading advantages in handling their orders after
transmitting them to the exchange, the Commission has stated that
executions obtained through these systems satisfy the independent
execution requirement of Rule 11a2-2(T). See 1979 Release, supra
note 50.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accelerated Approval of Amendment No. 5
The Commission finds good cause for approving Amendment No. 5 to
the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after publishing
notice of Amendment No. 5 in the Federal Register pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\54\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act, the Commission may not approve any proposed rule change, or
amendment thereto, prior to the thirtieth day after the date of
publication of the notice thereof, unless the Commission finds good
cause for so doing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Amendment No. 5, the BSE amended Chapter II, Section 41--Minimum
Price Variation to state that the Exchange shall not display, rank, or
accept any bids, offers, or orders in a security priced in an increment
smaller than $0.01 if that bid, offer, or order is priced equal to or
greater than $1.00, but that the Exchange may execute and report Mid-
point Cross Orders in increments as small as one-half the Minimum Price
Variation for the security. In addition, BSE amended the rules text of
BSE Rule, Chapter XXXVII to clarify that if an At the Close order is
not fully executed at the close, the part of the order not executed
will be cancelled; to clarify opening procedures; to indicate more
clearly when orders would be routed at the instruction of the member
entering the order, to the market center(s) displaying the National
Best Bid or Offer; and to
[[Page 52198]]
clarify how cross orders would be executed in the Post-Primary Trading
Session. The Exchange also corrected several technical errors contained
in the rule text.
The Commission believes that these clarifying and technical changes
to the proposed rule change improve the proposal and raise no new or
novel issues of regulatory concern, and therefore should not delay its
implementation. Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause to
accelerate approval of Amendment No. 5, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of
the Act.\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\55\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning Amendment No. 5, including whether Amendment No. 5
is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BSE-2006-22 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2006-22. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
Amendment No. 5 of File Number SR-BSE-2006-22 and should be submitted
on or before September 22, 2006.
V. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange,
and, in particular, with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\57\ that the proposed rule change (SR-BSE-2006-22), as amended,
and Amendment No. 3 thereto, is approved and Amendment No. 5 is
approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\57\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\58\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\58\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-14564 Filed 8-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P