Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Expiration Date Exercise Procedures, 47853-47854 [E6-13616]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 160 / Friday, August 18, 2006 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54306; File No. SR–OCC–
2006–05]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Notice
of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Expiration Date Exercise
Procedures
August 11, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on
April 26, 2006, The Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which items have been
prepared primarily by OCC. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would
amend Rule 805, which describes
expiration date exercise procedures
including exercise by exception
processing.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
OCC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. OCC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.2
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
The proposed rule change would
amend Rule 805, Expiration Date
Exercise Procedure, to reduce the
threshold amounts used to determine
the equity options that are in the money
for purposes of exercise by exception
processing. A conforming change would
also be made to Rule 1106, Open
Positions, which concerns the treatment
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Commission has modified parts of these
statements.
2 The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Aug 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
of open positions following the
suspension of a clearing member.
OCC has for years maintained an
‘‘exercise by exception’’ procedure.
Under that procedure, options that are
in the money at expiration by more than
a specified threshold amount are
exercised automatically unless the
clearing member carrying the position
instructs otherwise. Equity options are
determined to be in the money or not
based on the difference between the
exercise price and the closing price of
the underlying equity interest on the
last trading day before expiration. In
September 2004, in order to streamline
expiration processing, OCC reduced the
threshold amounts for equity options
from $.75 to $.25 in a clearing member’s
customers’ account and from $.25 to
$.15 in any other account (i.e., firm and
market makers’ accounts).3 This change,
which was implemented at the request
of the OCC Roundtable,4 immediately
yielded significant benefits to both OCC
and clearing members as the time for
submitting exercise instructions was
reduced by one to three hours on an
average expiration weekend.
Increasing options volumes in 2004
and 2005 prompted the OCC Roundtable
to review the thresholds applied to
equity options in an effort to further
reduce operational risks and improve
expiration processing. Initially, the
Roundtable proposed that the threshold
for all account types be set at $.01, but
an OCC survey of clearing members
found that while 65% of responding
clearing members supported this
change, 35% were against it. A second
OCC survey determined that 75% of
responding clearing members were in
favor of a threshold change to $.05 for
all account types and 25% were
opposed to it. The Roundtable then
requested that OCC establish $.05 as the
threshold applicable to equity options
exercises for all account types.
In response to this request, OCC
analyzed equity options exercise
information from the June 2004 through
December 2005 expirations. OCC’s
analysis determined that 70% of equity
option contracts carried in clearing
members’ customers’ accounts that were
in the money by the amount of $.05 to
$.24 (i.e., the change in the ‘‘in-themoney’’ amount represented by the
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50178
(August 10, 2004), 69 FR 51343 (August 18, 2004)
[File No. SR–OCC–2004–04].
4 The OCC Roundtable is an OCC sponsored
advisory group comprised of representatives from
OCC’s participant exchanges, OCC, a cross-section
of OCC clearing members, and industry service
bureaus. The Roundtable considers operational
improvements that may be made to increase
efficiencies and lower costs in the options industry.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47853
proposed threshold) were exercised.
OCC’s analysis also determined that
exercise activity in other account ranges
supported the proposed threshold
change.
OCC surveyed all clearing members to
obtain their views and comments on the
proposed change to $.05 as the
threshold amount for equity options for
all account types. Survey results
demonstrated strong support across the
membership for the change. Eightyseven clearing members 5 responded to
the survey with sixty-five clearing
members (75 percent) in favor of the
threshold change and 22 clearing
members (25 percent) opposed. Clearing
members supporting the change
confirmed the Roundtable’s view that it
would significantly reduce the number
of instructions they are required to
input on expiration thereby shortening
the timeframe for completing
instructions to OCC.
OCC contacted each firm that opposed
the threshold change. These firms are
generally mid-size to small retail
clearing members. Their opposition to
the change reflected their principal
concern about having to input more ‘‘do
not exercise’’ instructions. Some
indicated concerns about the need to
educate customers and the possibility
that commission costs could make an
exercise unprofitable.6 However, all of
these firms agreed that they could adapt
to the change if supported by the
majority of clearing members. OCC
further reviewed the positions carried
by these firms and determined that, on
average, they carry positions in fewer
than 10 expiring series per expiration
that are below the current threshold of
$.25. This review led OCC to conclude
that the threshold change would result
in only a slight increase in processing
time for these firms and that they would
not be unduly burdened by its
implementation.
OCC’s survey of clearing members
also asked firms to provide an estimate
of the time needed to accommodate the
threshold change based upon supplied
time frames (e.g., 0–3 months or 4–6
months). The majority of firms indicated
that they could complete the necessary
systems development and customer
notifications within six months. OCC
contacted every firm that commented on
the proposed time frames, and all
expressed the view that their efforts
would be completed in the six month
time period.
5 OCC contacted clearing members that did not
respond to its survey. These firms expressed no
opinion on the matter.
6 As noted, clearing members are able to instruct
OCC not to exercise an expiring equity option.
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
47854
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 160 / Friday, August 18, 2006 / Notices
The Roundtable has recommended
that this change be implemented for the
October 2006 expiration. OCC therefore
requests that the Commission approve
the proposed rule change with an
effective date of October 1, 2006, and
that the Commission authorize OCC to
implement the threshold change
thereafter based upon its assessment of
clearing member readiness. OCC would
provide at least ten days advance notice
to clearing members of the effective date
for the new threshold amounts by
information memoranda and other
forms of electronic notice such as email. Additionally, OCC would allow
clearing members additional time to
complete preparations for the threshold
change if necessary.
OCC believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 17A of
the Act because it facilitates the prompt
and accurate processing of exercise
information on expiration.
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
OCC does not believe that the
proposed rule change would impose any
burden on competition.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were not and are
not intended to be solicited with respect
to the proposed rule change, and none
have been received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding, or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve the proposed
rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Aug 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml) or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–OCC–2006–05 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–OCC–2006–05. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will
be available for inspection and copying
at the principal office of OCC and on
OCC’s Web site at
www.optionsclearing.com. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–OCC–2006–05 and should
be submitted on or before September 8,
2006.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–13616 Filed 8–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54305; File No. SR–OCC–
2006–11]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Quarterly Options
August 11, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on
June 23, 2006, The Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which items have been
prepared primarily by OCC. OCC filed
the proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 2 whereby
the proposal was effective upon filing
with the Commission. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would
amend OCC’s By-Laws and Rules to
accommodate ‘‘quarterly options’’ (i.e., a
series of options or index options that
expires on the last business day of the
calendar quarter) which have been
proposed for trading by the
International Securities Exchange
(‘‘ISE’’).
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
OCC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. OCC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.3
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
Quarterly options in general have the
same terms as conventional options
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
3 The Commission has modified parts of these
statements.
2 15
7 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 160 (Friday, August 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47853-47854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13616]
[[Page 47853]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54306; File No. SR-OCC-2006-05]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Expiration Date
Exercise Procedures
August 11, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on April 26, 2006, The
Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared
primarily by OCC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would amend Rule 805, which describes
expiration date exercise procedures including exercise by exception
processing.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, OCC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. OCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A),
(B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has modified parts of these statements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would amend Rule 805, Expiration Date
Exercise Procedure, to reduce the threshold amounts used to determine
the equity options that are in the money for purposes of exercise by
exception processing. A conforming change would also be made to Rule
1106, Open Positions, which concerns the treatment of open positions
following the suspension of a clearing member.
OCC has for years maintained an ``exercise by exception''
procedure. Under that procedure, options that are in the money at
expiration by more than a specified threshold amount are exercised
automatically unless the clearing member carrying the position
instructs otherwise. Equity options are determined to be in the money
or not based on the difference between the exercise price and the
closing price of the underlying equity interest on the last trading day
before expiration. In September 2004, in order to streamline expiration
processing, OCC reduced the threshold amounts for equity options from
$.75 to $.25 in a clearing member's customers' account and from $.25 to
$.15 in any other account (i.e., firm and market makers' accounts).\3\
This change, which was implemented at the request of the OCC
Roundtable,\4\ immediately yielded significant benefits to both OCC and
clearing members as the time for submitting exercise instructions was
reduced by one to three hours on an average expiration weekend.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50178 (August 10, 2004),
69 FR 51343 (August 18, 2004) [File No. SR-OCC-2004-04].
\4\ The OCC Roundtable is an OCC sponsored advisory group
comprised of representatives from OCC's participant exchanges, OCC,
a cross-section of OCC clearing members, and industry service
bureaus. The Roundtable considers operational improvements that may
be made to increase efficiencies and lower costs in the options
industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increasing options volumes in 2004 and 2005 prompted the OCC
Roundtable to review the thresholds applied to equity options in an
effort to further reduce operational risks and improve expiration
processing. Initially, the Roundtable proposed that the threshold for
all account types be set at $.01, but an OCC survey of clearing members
found that while 65% of responding clearing members supported this
change, 35% were against it. A second OCC survey determined that 75% of
responding clearing members were in favor of a threshold change to $.05
for all account types and 25% were opposed to it. The Roundtable then
requested that OCC establish $.05 as the threshold applicable to equity
options exercises for all account types.
In response to this request, OCC analyzed equity options exercise
information from the June 2004 through December 2005 expirations. OCC's
analysis determined that 70% of equity option contracts carried in
clearing members' customers' accounts that were in the money by the
amount of $.05 to $.24 (i.e., the change in the ``in-the-money'' amount
represented by the proposed threshold) were exercised. OCC's analysis
also determined that exercise activity in other account ranges
supported the proposed threshold change.
OCC surveyed all clearing members to obtain their views and
comments on the proposed change to $.05 as the threshold amount for
equity options for all account types. Survey results demonstrated
strong support across the membership for the change. Eighty-seven
clearing members \5\ responded to the survey with sixty-five clearing
members (75 percent) in favor of the threshold change and 22 clearing
members (25 percent) opposed. Clearing members supporting the change
confirmed the Roundtable's view that it would significantly reduce the
number of instructions they are required to input on expiration thereby
shortening the timeframe for completing instructions to OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ OCC contacted clearing members that did not respond to its
survey. These firms expressed no opinion on the matter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC contacted each firm that opposed the threshold change. These
firms are generally mid-size to small retail clearing members. Their
opposition to the change reflected their principal concern about having
to input more ``do not exercise'' instructions. Some indicated concerns
about the need to educate customers and the possibility that commission
costs could make an exercise unprofitable.\6\ However, all of these
firms agreed that they could adapt to the change if supported by the
majority of clearing members. OCC further reviewed the positions
carried by these firms and determined that, on average, they carry
positions in fewer than 10 expiring series per expiration that are
below the current threshold of $.25. This review led OCC to conclude
that the threshold change would result in only a slight increase in
processing time for these firms and that they would not be unduly
burdened by its implementation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ As noted, clearing members are able to instruct OCC not to
exercise an expiring equity option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC's survey of clearing members also asked firms to provide an
estimate of the time needed to accommodate the threshold change based
upon supplied time frames (e.g., 0-3 months or 4-6 months). The
majority of firms indicated that they could complete the necessary
systems development and customer notifications within six months. OCC
contacted every firm that commented on the proposed time frames, and
all expressed the view that their efforts would be completed in the six
month time period.
[[Page 47854]]
The Roundtable has recommended that this change be implemented for
the October 2006 expiration. OCC therefore requests that the Commission
approve the proposed rule change with an effective date of October 1,
2006, and that the Commission authorize OCC to implement the threshold
change thereafter based upon its assessment of clearing member
readiness. OCC would provide at least ten days advance notice to
clearing members of the effective date for the new threshold amounts by
information memoranda and other forms of electronic notice such as e-
mail. Additionally, OCC would allow clearing members additional time to
complete preparations for the threshold change if necessary.
OCC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 17A of the Act because it facilitates the prompt and accurate
processing of exercise information on expiration.
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
OCC does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any
burden on competition.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were not and are not intended to be solicited with
respect to the proposed rule change, and none have been received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml) or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-OCC-2006-05 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2006-05. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of OCC and on OCC's
Web site at www.optionsclearing.com. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2006-05 and should be submitted on
or before September 8, 2006.
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-13616 Filed 8-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
