Investigation No. 731-TA-702 (Second Review); Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium From Russia, 47523-47524 [E6-13596]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
Anthropology, University of Colorado
Museum, Henderson Building, Campus
Box 218, Boulder, CO 80309–0218,
telephone (303) 492–6671, before
September 18, 2006. Repatriation of the
human remains and associated funerary
objects to the Hopi Tribe of Arizona;
Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico; Pueblo
of Cochiti, New Mexico; Pueblo of
Isleta, New Mexico; Pueblo of Jemez,
New Mexico; Pueblo of Laguna, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico;
Pueblo of Picuris, New Mexico; Pueblo
of Pojoaque, New Mexico; Pueblo of San
Felipe, New Mexico; Pueblo of San
Ildefonso, New Mexico; Pueblo of San
Juan, New Mexico; Pueblo of Sandia,
New Mexico; Pueblo of Santa Ana, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Santa Clara, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Santo Domingo, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico;
Pueblo of Tesuque, New Mexico; Pueblo
of Zia, New Mexico; Ysleta Del Sur
Pueblo of Texas; and Zuni Tribe of the
Zuni Reservation, New Mexico may
proceed after that date if no additional
claimants come forward.
The University of Colorado Museum
is responsible for notifying the Hopi
Tribe of Arizona; Navajo Nation,
Arizona, New Mexico & Utah; Pueblo of
Acoma, New Mexico; Pueblo of Cochiti,
New Mexico; Pueblo of Isleta, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico;
Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico; Pueblo
of Nambe, New Mexico; Pueblo of
Picuris, New Mexico; Pueblo of
Pojoaque, New Mexico; Pueblo of San
Felipe, New Mexico; Pueblo of San
Ildefonso, New Mexico; Pueblo of San
Juan, New Mexico; Pueblo of Sandia,
New Mexico; Pueblo of Santa Ana, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Santa Clara, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Santo Domingo, New
Mexico; Pueblo of Taos, New Mexico;
Pueblo of Tesuque, New Mexico; Pueblo
of Zia, New Mexico; Southern Ute
Indian Tribe of the Southern Ute
Reservation, Colorado; Ute Mountain
Tribe of the Ute Mountain Reservation,
Colorado, New Mexico & Utah; Ysleta
Del Sur Pueblo of Texas; and Zuni Tribe
of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico.
Dated: July 24, 2006
Sherry Hutt
Manager, National NAGPRA Program
[FR Doc. 06–13602 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–706 (Second
Review)]
Canned Pineapple Fruit From Thailand
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Commission
determination to conduct a full five-year
review concerning the antidumping
duty order on canned pineapple fruit
from Thailand.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it will proceed with a full
review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on canned pineapple fruit from
Thailand would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time. A schedule for the review will be
established and announced at a later
date. For further information concerning
the conduct of this review and rules of
general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 7, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7,
2006, the Commission determined that
it should proceed to a full review in the
subject five-year review pursuant to
section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The
Commission found that both the
domestic and respondent interested
party group responses to its notice of
institution (71 FR 16585, April 3, 2006)
were adequate. A record of the
Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47523
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements will be available from the
Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
Issued: August 14, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–13598 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Investigation No. 731–TA–702 (Second
Review); Ferrovanadium and Nitrided
Vanadium From Russia
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping
duty order on ferrovanadium and
nitrided vanadium from Russia.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on ferrovanadium and
nitrided vanadium from Russia would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury within a
reasonably foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of
this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: August 4, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Russell Duncan (202–708–4727), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
47524
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: On August 4, 2006, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (71
FR 25609, May 1, 2006) of the subject
five-year review was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.2
Staff report: A staff report containing
information concerning the subject
matter of the review will be placed in
the nonpublic record on August 30,
2006, and made available to persons on
the Administrative Protective Order
service list for this review. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions: As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,3 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before
September 5, 2006, and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
review nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to the review by
September 5, 2006. However, should the
Department of Commerce extend the
time limit for its completion of the final
results of its review, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce’s
final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules,
as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8,
2002). Even where electronic filing of a
document is permitted, certain
documents must also be filed in paper
form, as specified in II (C) of the
Commission’s Handbook on Electronic
Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173
(November 8, 2002).
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
Issued: August 14, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–13596 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Membership of the Senior Executive
Service Standing Performance Review
Boards
Department of Justice.
Notice of Department of
Justice’s standing members of the Senior
Executive Service Performance Review
Boards.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the requirements
of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the Department of
Justice announces the membership of its
2006 Senior Executive service (SES)
Standing Performance Review Boards
(PRBs). The purpose of the PRBs is to
provide fair and impartial review of SES
performance appraisals, bonus
recommendations and pay adjustments.
The PRBs will make recommendations
regarding the final performance ratings
to be assigned, SES bonuses and/or pay
adjustments to be awarded.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rod
Markham, Deputy Director, Personnel
Staff, Justice Management Division,
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20530; (202) 514–4350.
Lee J. Lofthus,
Acting Assistant Attorney General for
Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES
BAILEY, GREGG D ...............................
BARAN, VIVIAN A .................................
BARRERA, HUGO .................................
BELL, WILLIAM L ..................................
BOUCHARD, MICHAEL R ....................
CARROLL, CARSON W ........................
CARTER, DONNIE A ............................
CARTER, RONNIE A ............................
CAVANAUGH, JAMES M ......................
CHASE, RICHARD E ............................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
DOMENECH, EDGAR AXEL .................
ETHRIDGE, MICHAEL W ......................
FORD, WILFRED L ...............................
HARRIS, GREGORY PAUL ..................
HOOVER, WILLIAM ..............................
KOETT, IMELDA M ...............................
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY/CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER).
DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT).
DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION).
DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY).
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (FIELD OPERATIONS).
DEPUTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (FIELD OPERATIONS CENTRAL).
SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (HOUSTON FIELD DIVISION).
SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (DALLAS FIELD DIVISION).
DIVISION DIRECTOR/SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (NASHVILLE FIELD DIVISION).
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SECURITY OPERATIONS).
DEPUTY DIRECTOR.
DIRECTOR (LABORATORY SERVICES).
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS).
CHIEF OF STAFF.
SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE (WASHINGTON FIELD DIVISION DIRECTOR).
DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL.
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner
Deanna Tanner Okun concluded that the domestic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
group response for this review was adequate and
the respondent group response was inadequate, but
that circumstances warranted a full review.
3 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by Bear Metallurgical Co., Gulf Chemical
& Metallurgical Corp., Metallurg Vanadium Corp.,
and The Vanadium Producers and Reclaimers
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Association to be individually adequate. Comments
from other interested parties will not be accepted
(see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 159 (Thursday, August 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47523-47524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13596]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Investigation No. 731-TA-702 (Second Review); Ferrovanadium and
Nitrided Vanadium From Russia
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited five-year review concerning the
antidumping duty order on ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium from
Russia.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an
expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation
of the antidumping duty order on ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium
from Russia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,
part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: August 4, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russell Duncan (202-708-4727), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this
review may be viewed on the
[[Page 47524]]
Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: On August 4, 2006, the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution
(71 FR 25609, May 1, 2006) of the subject five-year review was adequate
and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate.
The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission determined
that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3)
of the Act.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's Web site.
\2\ Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner Deanna Tanner
Okun concluded that the domestic group response for this review was
adequate and the respondent group response was inadequate, but that
circumstances warranted a full review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff report: A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on
August 30, 2006, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's
rules.
Written submissions: As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the review
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\3\ and any party other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are
due on or before September 5, 2006, and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review
nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review
by September 5, 2006. However, should the Department of Commerce extend
the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review,
the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce's final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments contain business
proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements
of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The
Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent
permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR
68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is
permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as
specified in II (C) of the Commission's Handbook on Electronic Filing
Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Commission has found the responses submitted by Bear
Metallurgical Co., Gulf Chemical & Metallurgical Corp., Metallurg
Vanadium Corp., and The Vanadium Producers and Reclaimers
Association to be individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
Issued: August 14, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-13596 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P