Self-Regulatory Organizations: National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Additional Market Participant Identifier Functionality on the Alternative Display Facility, 47551-47554 [E6-13568]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
proposal effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The CBOE is proposing to amend its
Fees Schedule to increase the equity
options Designated Primary Market
Maker (‘‘DPM’’) transaction fee. The text
of the proposed rule change is on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.cboe.com), at the Exchange’s
Office of the Secretary, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
CBOE included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The Exchange has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to increase
the equity options DPM transaction fee
from the current $.14 per contract to
$.16 per contract, effective August 1,
2006. The Exchange believes that this
fee increase is appropriate given that
DPM costs are expected to decrease as
the result of recently implemented
enhanced DPM Linkage transaction fee
credits.5
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),6 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) 7 of the Act
in particular, in that it is designed to
5 See Section 21 of the CBOE Fees Schedule. See
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53866
(May 25, 2006), 71 FR 31237 (June 1, 2006). Linkage
order fees (except for Satisfaction Orders) and
related transaction fee credits are in effect on a pilot
basis until July 31, 2007. See Footnote 8 and
Section 21 of the CBOE Fees Schedule dated August
3, 2006.
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among CBOE members.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule change
establishes or changes a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by the Exchange,
it has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 8 and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 9
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.10
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
47551
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–CBOE–2006–67 and should be
submitted on or before September 7,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–13567 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54307; File No. SR–NASD–
2006–096]
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2006–67 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–CBOE–2006–67. This file number
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
10 Id.
Self-Regulatory Organizations:
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Additional
Market Participant Identifier
Functionality on the Alternative
Display Facility
August 11, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August 8,
2006, the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
8 15
11 17
9 17
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
47552
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by NASD. NASD
has filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders
the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission.5 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
NASD is proposing to amend NASD
Rule 4613A and adopt IM–4613A–1 to
enable electronic communications
network (‘‘ECN’’) members that post
quotations through the Alternative
Display Facility (‘‘ADF’’) (i.e.,
Registered Reporting ADF ECNs), to
request and receive multiple market
participant identifiers (‘‘MPIDs’’) with
which to enter multiple quotes/orders in
the ADF and report trades through the
ADF trade reporting facility, the Trade
Reporting and Comparison Service
(‘‘TRACS’’), pursuant to the NASD Rule
4000A Series. Below is the text of the
proposed rule change. Proposed new
language is in italics.
4613A. Character of Quotations
(a) No Change.
(b) Primary and Additional MPIDs
(1) The first Market Participant
Identifier (‘‘MPID’’) issued to an NASD
Market Participant shall be referred to
as the NASD Market Participant’s
‘‘Primary MPID.’’ For a pilot period
ending January 26, 2007, a Registered
Reporting ADF ECN may request the use
of Additional MPIDs for displaying
quotes/orders and reporting trades
through TRACS for any ADF-Eligible
Security (as defined in NASD Rule
4100A). A Registered Reporting ADF
ECN that ceases to meet the obligations
appurtenant to its Primary MPID in any
security shall not be permitted to use
Additional MPIDs for any purpose in
that security.
(b) through (e) renumbered as (c)
through (f).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
IM–4613A–1 Procedures For Allocation
of Multiple MPIDs
NASD considers the issuance of, the
display of, and the trade reporting with
Additional MPIDs to be a privilege and
3 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
5 NASD has requested the Commission to waive
the 30-day pre-operative delay required by Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii), 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). See
discussion infra Section III.
4 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
not a right. NASD has developed the
following method for allocating the
privilege of receiving, displaying, and
trade reporting with Additional MPIDs
in an orderly, predictable, and fair
manner. While NASD does not intend to
place a numerical limit on the number
of Additional MPIDs it may grant to
Registered Reporting ADF ECNs, given
the agent business model of ECNs,
NASD does not anticipate the granting
of many additional MPIDs to Registered
Reporting ADF ECNs.
As described in Rule 4613A, NASD
will automatically designate a
Registered Reporting ADF ECN’s first
MPID as a ‘‘Primary MPID.’’ Additional
MPIDs will be designated as such.
Registered Reporting ADF ECNs are
required to use their Primary MPID in
accordance with the requirements of
NASD Rule 4613A as well as all existing
requirements for the use of MPIDs in
NASD systems and under NASD rules.
Each of an ECN’s MPID will be subject
to the requirements of NASD Rule
4623A.
If it is determined that one or more
Additional MPIDs are being used
improperly, NASD staff retains full
discretion to limit or withdraw its grant
of the Additional MPID(s) for all
purposes for all securities. In addition,
if a Registered Reporting ADF ECN no
longer fulfills the conditions
appurtenant to its Primary MPID (e.g.,
by being placed into an unexcused
withdrawal), it may not use an
Additional MPID for any purpose in that
security.
The first priority of NASD’s method
for allocating the privilege of displaying
and trade reporting with Additional
MPIDs is that each Registered Reporting
ADF ECN should be permitted to
display quotations and report trades
under a Primary MPID before any is
permitted to display additional
quotations under and report trades with
Additional MPIDs. If all requests for
Primary MPIDs have been satisfied,
NASD will then register Additional
MPIDs on a first-come-first-served basis,
consistent with the procedures listed
below.
A Registered Reporting ADF ECN
shall contact NASD in writing setting
forth the bona fide business and/or
regulatory reasons for requesting an
Additional MPID. NASD will consider
the business and/or regulatory reasons
demonstrated by the Registered
Reporting ADF ECN and promptly
respond to the Registered Reporting
ADF ECN. If an Additional MPID is
granted, it will be subject to the same
requirements applicable to a Primary
MPID. NASD staff retains full discretion
to limit or withdraw the Additional
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
MPID privileges of a Registered
Reporting ADF ECN.
A Registered Reporting ADF ECN that
posts a quotation through either a
Primary MPID or Additional MPID and
reports a trade to TRACS as a result of
such a posted quotation must utilize the
corresponding Primary MPID or
Additional MPID for reporting purposes
through which the quotation was
originally posted (i.e., Registered
Reporting ADF ECNs must use the same
MPID for TRACS trade reporting as was
used for ADF quotation posting).
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
NASD included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. NASD has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
An NASD member that registers as a
market maker or ECN is currently
permitted to enter one two-sided
quotation per security in the ADF and
is assigned a unique MPID with which
to enter such quotations. The NASD
4600A Rule Series governs the character
of such quotations and the rights and
obligations of members that display
quotations in the ADF via their MPIDs.
NASD proposes to amend NASD Rule
4613A and adopt IM–4613A–1 to permit
NASD Registered Reporting ADF ECNs
to request the use of additional MPIDs
for a pilot period ending January 26,
2007.6 At this time only ECNs have been
certified for posting quotations through
the ADF and at no time has a registered
market maker been certified for the
ADF. Accordingly, NASD believes it
appropriate to limit the scope of this
proposed rule to Registered Reporting
ADF ECNs.7 An ECN would be entitled
6 This date coincides with the expiration of the
current ADF pilot period. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 53699 (April 21, 2006), 71 FR
25271 (April 28, 2006). Accordingly, the provisions
set forth in Rule 4613A and IM–4613A–1 will be
extended with any extension of an ADF pilot
period.
7 In support of the requirement under the Act that
NASD rules not result in unfair discrimination
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
to request additional MPIDs for
displaying quotes/orders and reporting
trades through the ADF trade reporting
facility, TRACS, pursuant to the NASD
Rule 4000A Series.
Registered Reporting ADF ECNs that
are permitted the use of additional
MPIDs for displaying quotes/orders
would be subject to the same rules
applicable to the members’ first
quotation. In other words, ECNs that
display one or more additional quotes/
orders would be required to comply
with all rules applicable to ECNs in
their display of quotes/orders.
NASD believes that the ability to enter
quotes and orders and to display
quotations under an additional MPID
would potentially carry with it similar
benefits that have resulted from the
supplemental MPID Program of the
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’).8
Specifically, the introduction of
additional MPIDs on the ADF may
enable Registered Reporting ADF ECNs
to contribute more liquidity to the
market, add to the transparency of
trading interest, and better serve the
needs of investors and the needs of
Registered Reporting ADF ECNs
themselves.9 As noted above, Registered
Reporting ADF ECNs that use an
additional MPID would be required to
comply with all NASD and Commission
rules applicable to their current use of
a single MPID. Registered Reporting
ADF ECNs would be prohibited from
using an additional MPID to accomplish
indirectly what they are prohibited from
doing directly through their Primary
MPID. To the extent that the allocation
of additional MPIDs were to create
regulatory confusion or ambiguity or
would diminish the quality or rigor of
the regulation of the over-the-counter
(‘‘OTC’’) market, every inference would
be drawn against the use of additional
MPIDs. Moreover, pursuant to the
proposed rule and interpretive material,
NASD staff retains full discretion to
determine whether a bona fide
regulatory and/or business need exists
for being granted the additional MPID
privilege and to limit or withdraw the
between members (see 15 U.S.C. 78o–(b)(6)), NASD
commits to expand additional MPID privilege
functionality to Registered Reporting ADF Market
Makers at such time that at least one broker-dealer
NASD member becomes certified for posting
quotations through the ADF and demonstrates a
bona fide business and/or regulatory need for
additional MPID functionality.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47954
(May 30, 2003), 68 FR 34017 (June 6, 2003). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53192 (January
30, 2006), 71 FR 6302 (February 4, 2006).
9 NASD will assess no fees for the issuance or use
of an additional MPID, other than the Commissionapproved fees set forth in NASD Rule 7010.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
additional MPID display privilege at any
time.
2. Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,10 which
requires, among other things, that NASD
rules be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. NASD
believes that the proposed rule change
is consistent with these requirements
because it will provide a process by
which ECNs can request, and NASD can
properly allocate, the use of additional
MPIDs for displaying quotes and orders
through the ADF.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
NASD does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (1) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (3) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposal has become effective pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.11
Pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),12 a
proposed ‘‘non-controversial’’ rule
change does not become operative prior
to 30 days after the date of filing, or
such shorter time as the Commission
may designate if consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. NASD has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay. The Commission
believes that waiving the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
10 15
U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
11 17
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47553
interest.13 The proposal will extend for
ECN participants on the ADF a
functionality that has been widely
available to ECNs on Nasdaq through a
pilot program. Allowing this proposal to
become operative immediately is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because the benefits of the pilot and the
use of multiple MPIDs can continue
without undue disruption. For this
reason, the Commission designates the
proposed rule change to be effective and
operative upon filing with the
Commission.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASD–2006–096 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2006–096. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
13 For purposes only of accelerating the operative
date of this proposal, the Commission has
considered the rule’s impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
47554
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of NASD. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–2006–096 and should be
submitted on or before September 7,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–13568 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5506]
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs:
Revocation of Defense Export
Licenses to Venezuela
Department of State.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the United States will no longer
authorize the export of defense articles
and defense services to Venezuela.
Furthermore, all licenses and approvals
to export or otherwise transfer defense
articles and defense services to
Venezuela pursuant to section 38 of the
Arms Export Control Act (AECA) are
revoked. The use of exemptions from
licensing as provided for in the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) also are revoked
with regard to Venezuela with the
exception of the license exemptions at
section 123.17 for use in connection
with certain temporary exports of
firearms and ammunition for personal
use.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
August 17, 2006.
Mr.
Stephen J. Tomchik, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Policy, Department of
State, Telephone (202) 663–2799 or FAX
(202) 261–8199.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
It is the
policy of the U.S. Government to deny
all applications for licenses and other
approvals to export or otherwise transfer
defense articles and services to
Venezuela until further notice. In
addition, U.S. manufacturers and
exporters, and any other affected parties
(e.g., brokers) are hereby notified that
the Department of State has revoked all
licenses and approvals authorizing the
export of or other transfers of defense
articles or services to Venezuela.
Revocation extends to the deletion of
Venezuela from any manufacturing
license or technical assistance
agreement involving Venezuela,
including any agreement that has
Venezuela as a sales territory. This
action also precludes the use in
connection with Venezuela of any
exemptions from licensing or other
approval requirements included in the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120–
130), with the exception of the license
exemptions at section 123.17 of the
ITAR for exports of firearms and
ammunition to Venezuela when for
personal use by individuals (not for
resale or retransfer, including to the
Government of Venezuela) and the
firearms will be returned to the United
States.
This action has been taken pursuant
to Section 38 of the AECA (22 U.S.C.
2778) and relevant provisions of the
ITAR in furtherance of the foreign
policy of the United States.
No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875],
I hereby determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘A Bronze
Menagerie: Mat Weight of Early China,’’
imported from abroad for temporary
exhibition within the United States, are
of cultural significance. The objects are
imported pursuant to loan agreements
with the foreign owners or custodians.
I also determine that the exhibition or
display of the exhibit objects at the
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum,
Boston, Massachusetts, from on or about
October 5, 2006, until on or about
January 14, 2007, and at possible
additional venues yet to be determined,
is in the national interest. Public Notice
of these Determinations is ordered to be
published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr
Sulznsky, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: 202/453–8050). The
address is U.S. Department of State, SA–
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700,
Washington, DC 20547–0001.
Dated: August 2, 2006.
Robert G. Joseph,
Under Secretary of State for Arms Control
and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E6–13583 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
[Public Notice 5500]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5502]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘A
Bronze Menagerie: Mat Weight of Early
China’’
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as
amended, and Delegation of Authority
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: August 10, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E6–13576 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations:
‘‘Constable’s Great Landscapes: The
Six-Foot Paintings’’
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as
amended, and Delegation of Authority
No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875],
I hereby determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘Constable’s
Great Landscapes: The Six-Foot
Paintings,’’ imported from abroad for
temporary exhibition within the United
States, are of cultural significance. The
objects are imported pursuant to loan
agreements with the foreign owners or
custodians. I also determine that the
exhibition or display of the exhibit
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 159 (Thursday, August 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47551-47554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13568]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54307; File No. SR-NASD-2006-096]
Self-Regulatory Organizations: National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Additional Market Participant Identifier
Functionality on the Alternative Display Facility
August 11, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 8, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
[[Page 47552]]
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD.
NASD has filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission.\5\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\5\ NASD has requested the Commission to waive the 30-day pre-
operative delay required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii), 17 CFR 240.19b-
4(f)(6)(iii). See discussion infra Section III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
NASD is proposing to amend NASD Rule 4613A and adopt IM-4613A-1 to
enable electronic communications network (``ECN'') members that post
quotations through the Alternative Display Facility (``ADF'') (i.e.,
Registered Reporting ADF ECNs), to request and receive multiple market
participant identifiers (``MPIDs'') with which to enter multiple
quotes/orders in the ADF and report trades through the ADF trade
reporting facility, the Trade Reporting and Comparison Service
(``TRACS''), pursuant to the NASD Rule 4000A Series. Below is the text
of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is in italics.
4613A. Character of Quotations
(a) No Change.
(b) Primary and Additional MPIDs
(1) The first Market Participant Identifier (``MPID'') issued to an
NASD Market Participant shall be referred to as the NASD Market
Participant's ``Primary MPID.'' For a pilot period ending January 26,
2007, a Registered Reporting ADF ECN may request the use of Additional
MPIDs for displaying quotes/orders and reporting trades through TRACS
for any ADF-Eligible Security (as defined in NASD Rule 4100A). A
Registered Reporting ADF ECN that ceases to meet the obligations
appurtenant to its Primary MPID in any security shall not be permitted
to use Additional MPIDs for any purpose in that security.
(b) through (e) renumbered as (c) through (f).
IM-4613A-1 Procedures For Allocation of Multiple MPIDs
NASD considers the issuance of, the display of, and the trade
reporting with Additional MPIDs to be a privilege and not a right. NASD
has developed the following method for allocating the privilege of
receiving, displaying, and trade reporting with Additional MPIDs in an
orderly, predictable, and fair manner. While NASD does not intend to
place a numerical limit on the number of Additional MPIDs it may grant
to Registered Reporting ADF ECNs, given the agent business model of
ECNs, NASD does not anticipate the granting of many additional MPIDs to
Registered Reporting ADF ECNs.
As described in Rule 4613A, NASD will automatically designate a
Registered Reporting ADF ECN's first MPID as a ``Primary MPID.''
Additional MPIDs will be designated as such. Registered Reporting ADF
ECNs are required to use their Primary MPID in accordance with the
requirements of NASD Rule 4613A as well as all existing requirements
for the use of MPIDs in NASD systems and under NASD rules. Each of an
ECN's MPID will be subject to the requirements of NASD Rule 4623A.
If it is determined that one or more Additional MPIDs are being
used improperly, NASD staff retains full discretion to limit or
withdraw its grant of the Additional MPID(s) for all purposes for all
securities. In addition, if a Registered Reporting ADF ECN no longer
fulfills the conditions appurtenant to its Primary MPID (e.g., by being
placed into an unexcused withdrawal), it may not use an Additional MPID
for any purpose in that security.
The first priority of NASD's method for allocating the privilege of
displaying and trade reporting with Additional MPIDs is that each
Registered Reporting ADF ECN should be permitted to display quotations
and report trades under a Primary MPID before any is permitted to
display additional quotations under and report trades with Additional
MPIDs. If all requests for Primary MPIDs have been satisfied, NASD will
then register Additional MPIDs on a first-come-first-served basis,
consistent with the procedures listed below.
A Registered Reporting ADF ECN shall contact NASD in writing
setting forth the bona fide business and/or regulatory reasons for
requesting an Additional MPID. NASD will consider the business and/or
regulatory reasons demonstrated by the Registered Reporting ADF ECN and
promptly respond to the Registered Reporting ADF ECN. If an Additional
MPID is granted, it will be subject to the same requirements applicable
to a Primary MPID. NASD staff retains full discretion to limit or
withdraw the Additional MPID privileges of a Registered Reporting ADF
ECN.
A Registered Reporting ADF ECN that posts a quotation through
either a Primary MPID or Additional MPID and reports a trade to TRACS
as a result of such a posted quotation must utilize the corresponding
Primary MPID or Additional MPID for reporting purposes through which
the quotation was originally posted (i.e., Registered Reporting ADF
ECNs must use the same MPID for TRACS trade reporting as was used for
ADF quotation posting).
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
An NASD member that registers as a market maker or ECN is currently
permitted to enter one two-sided quotation per security in the ADF and
is assigned a unique MPID with which to enter such quotations. The NASD
4600A Rule Series governs the character of such quotations and the
rights and obligations of members that display quotations in the ADF
via their MPIDs.
NASD proposes to amend NASD Rule 4613A and adopt IM-4613A-1 to
permit NASD Registered Reporting ADF ECNs to request the use of
additional MPIDs for a pilot period ending January 26, 2007.\6\ At this
time only ECNs have been certified for posting quotations through the
ADF and at no time has a registered market maker been certified for the
ADF. Accordingly, NASD believes it appropriate to limit the scope of
this proposed rule to Registered Reporting ADF ECNs.\7\ An ECN would be
entitled
[[Page 47553]]
to request additional MPIDs for displaying quotes/orders and reporting
trades through the ADF trade reporting facility, TRACS, pursuant to the
NASD Rule 4000A Series.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This date coincides with the expiration of the current ADF
pilot period. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53699 (April
21, 2006), 71 FR 25271 (April 28, 2006). Accordingly, the provisions
set forth in Rule 4613A and IM-4613A-1 will be extended with any
extension of an ADF pilot period.
\7\ In support of the requirement under the Act that NASD rules
not result in unfair discrimination between members (see 15 U.S.C.
78o-(b)(6)), NASD commits to expand additional MPID privilege
functionality to Registered Reporting ADF Market Makers at such time
that at least one broker-dealer NASD member becomes certified for
posting quotations through the ADF and demonstrates a bona fide
business and/or regulatory need for additional MPID functionality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registered Reporting ADF ECNs that are permitted the use of
additional MPIDs for displaying quotes/orders would be subject to the
same rules applicable to the members' first quotation. In other words,
ECNs that display one or more additional quotes/orders would be
required to comply with all rules applicable to ECNs in their display
of quotes/orders.
NASD believes that the ability to enter quotes and orders and to
display quotations under an additional MPID would potentially carry
with it similar benefits that have resulted from the supplemental MPID
Program of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'').\8\ Specifically,
the introduction of additional MPIDs on the ADF may enable Registered
Reporting ADF ECNs to contribute more liquidity to the market, add to
the transparency of trading interest, and better serve the needs of
investors and the needs of Registered Reporting ADF ECNs themselves.\9\
As noted above, Registered Reporting ADF ECNs that use an additional
MPID would be required to comply with all NASD and Commission rules
applicable to their current use of a single MPID. Registered Reporting
ADF ECNs would be prohibited from using an additional MPID to
accomplish indirectly what they are prohibited from doing directly
through their Primary MPID. To the extent that the allocation of
additional MPIDs were to create regulatory confusion or ambiguity or
would diminish the quality or rigor of the regulation of the over-the-
counter (``OTC'') market, every inference would be drawn against the
use of additional MPIDs. Moreover, pursuant to the proposed rule and
interpretive material, NASD staff retains full discretion to determine
whether a bona fide regulatory and/or business need exists for being
granted the additional MPID privilege and to limit or withdraw the
additional MPID display privilege at any time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47954 (May 30,
2003), 68 FR 34017 (June 6, 2003). See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 53192 (January 30, 2006), 71 FR 6302 (February 4, 2006).
\9\ NASD will assess no fees for the issuance or use of an
additional MPID, other than the Commission-approved fees set forth
in NASD Rule 7010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\10\ which requires, among
other things, that NASD rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. NASD believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with these requirements because it will provide a process by
which ECNs can request, and NASD can properly allocate, the use of
additional MPIDs for displaying quotes and orders through the ADF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (1)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant burden on competition; and (3)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposal has
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\12\ a proposed ``non-
controversial'' rule change does not become operative prior to 30 days
after the date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. NASD has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest.\13\ The proposal will extend for ECN participants on the ADF
a functionality that has been widely available to ECNs on Nasdaq
through a pilot program. Allowing this proposal to become operative
immediately is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest because the benefits of the pilot and the use of
multiple MPIDs can continue without undue disruption. For this reason,
the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be effective and
operative upon filing with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\13\ For purposes only of accelerating the operative date of
this proposal, the Commission has considered the rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NASD-2006-096 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-096. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written
[[Page 47554]]
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public
Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of NASD. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-2006-096 and should be
submitted on or before September 7, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-13568 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P