Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 47531-47532 [E6-13566]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
47531
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE—Continued
FARMER, MARC A ...............................
FINAN II, ROBERT J .............................
JONES, SYLVESTER E ........................
LITMAN, DIANE C .................................
MEAD, GARY E .....................................
PEARSON, MICHAEL A ........................
RODERICK JR, ARTHUR D .................
SMITH, SUZANNE D .............................
TRONO, ROBERT .................................
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
DEPUTY DIRECTOR.
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210,
(202) 693–3911 (this is not a toll-free
number); fax: 202–693–2766 (this is not
a toll-free number), or e-mail
Simonetta.Jonathan@dol.gov.
[FR Doc. 06–6977 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–AR–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Employment and Training
Administration
I. Background
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor
(DOL), as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden conducts a pre-clearance
consultation program to provide the
general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing collections
of information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to insure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format; reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized;
collection instruments are clearly
understood; and the impact of collection
on respondents can be properly
assessed. Currently, the Employment
and Training Administration (ETA) is
soliciting comments concerning the
proposed extension of the collection of
administrative and survey data on the
Growing America Through
Entrepreneurship project 1205–0444,
expires December 31, 2006). A copy of
the proposed information collection
request (ICR) can be obtained by
contacting the office listed below in the
address section of this notice or at this
Web site: https://www.doleta.gov/
Performance/guidance/
OMBControlNumber.cfm.
Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before
October 16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Jonathan Simonetta, Office
of Policy Development and Research,
Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5637, 200 Constitution
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 16, 2006
FOR JUDICIAL SECURITY.
FOR INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES.
FOR WITNESS SECURITY AND PRISONER OPERATIONS.
FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.
FOR BUSINESS SERVICES.
FOR EXECUTIVE SERVICES.
FOR OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
OF HUMAN RESOURCES.
Jkt 208001
Many individuals have the motivation
and skills to develop small businesses
but lack business expertise and/or
access to financing. Recognizing this
untapped potential, ETA is teaming
with the Small Business Administration
(SBA) to create a demonstration
program designed to assist individuals
interested in self-employment to
develop their businesses—Project GATE
(Growing America Through
Entrepreneurship). In helping people
develop businesses, Project GATE
promotes both workforce and economic
development. The effectiveness of the
program is being evaluated.
Entrepreneurial services provided by
Project GATE include an assessment, a
structured training course, and technical
assistance provided by a trained
counselor. As part of the technical
assistance, counselors assist individuals
in need of financing to apply for loans
from SBA’s Microloan program and
other funding sources. DOL’s One-Stop
Centers conduct Project GATE
orientations where interested
individuals will be informed about the
services available at the One-Stop
Center, the benefits and challenges of
self-employment and the services
offered through Project GATE. Small
Business Development Center (SBDC)
counselors conduct individual
assessments and identify the most
appropriate training course for each
Project GATE participant. Existing
entrepreneurial training providers in the
community provide training and
technical assistance.
DOL’s One-Stop Centers play a central
role in recruiting for the project.
Interested individuals register for an
orientation to Project GATE at One-Stop
Centers as well as via telephone, mail,
or a Web site. The orientations are held
at the One-Stop Centers.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Eligibility for Project GATE is broad—
it is designed to serve almost anyone
interested in starting a business. Special
attention is paid, however, to recruiting
immigrant populations.
Project GATE is being evaluated using
an experimental design. Individuals
who submit an application for Project
GATE in each site and who meet
minimal eligibility criteria are randomly
assigned to either a program group or a
control group. Members of the program
group are eligible to receive Project
GATE services, while members of the
control group are not eligible to receive
Project GATE services, although they
are not prohibited from receiving selfemployment services from other
sources.
GATE is implemented in seven sitesthree urban and four rural sites. The
three urban sites are in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
and Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota.
The rural sites are one in Minnesota
centered around Duluth, and three in
Maine centered around Portland,
Bangor, and Lewiston.
The evaluation addresses three key
questions:
1. Is Project GATE Viable? What are
the challenges in implementing the
program? Does an interagency model for
the program work? Who participates in
GATE? Is the outreach effective in
reaching immigrants? How does the
implementation of the program vary
across sites?
2. Does the Program Work? Does the
program increase self-employment,
increase employment and earnings, and
reduce the receipt of unemployment
insurance and public assistance? Does
the program promote employment and
other economic development? Is it
effective in both rural and urban areas?
Does the effectiveness of the program
vary by population subgroup?
Is the Program Cost-Effective? Do the
benefits of the program exceed its costs?
Addressing these questions involve
conducting process, impact, and benefitcost analyses. The process evaluation is
based on information collected during
three rounds of visits to each site,
during which detailed information is
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
47532
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
collected on the implementation of the
program from interviews with program
staff, observations of services, and focus
groups with program participants. Data
also is collected using a Participant
Tracking System developed specifically
for the study. The impact evaluation
involves comparing outcomes of
members of the program group with
outcomes of members of the control
group. Data on these outcomes is
collected from Unemployment
Insurance (UI) benefit records and
quarterly wage records, and two followup surveys that occur approximately 6
months and 18 months after random
assignment. The benefit-cost analysis
involves placing a dollar value on all
impacts of the program and comparing
them with the dollar value of the costs.
II. Review Focus
The Department of Labor is
particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of ETA, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
III. Current Actions
This is a notice to extend the
collection period that is currently
approved by OMB (1205–0444 expires
December 31, 2006).
The data for the impact analysis
comes from UI benefits and wage
records in the three states, a computerbased Participant Tracking System
developed for the demonstration and
used in the seven sites, and follow-up
surveys conducted twice with the
expected sample of 4,000 individuals
who apply for Project GATE. The
follow-up surveys, which are the subject
of this notice, are conducted by
Total
respondents
Frequency
telephone approximately 6 and 18
months following the GATE application.
These voluntary surveys collect data
unavailable from administrative records.
The first survey is designed to collect
detailed information about sample
members’ participation and experiences
in receiving self-employment services,
their experiences starting a business,
their experiences in jobs working for
someone else, their receipt of public
assistance, and some background data
on their socio-economic and
demographic characteristics. The
second survey is designed to collect
their experiences in self-employment
and developing small businesses, their
experiences in jobs working for
someone else, and their income and
receipt of public assistance.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Agency: Employment and Training
Administration.
Title: Partnership for Self-Sufficiency:
Growing America Through
Entrepreneurship (GATE).
OMB Number: 1205–0444.
Affected Public: Individuals of
households.
Total Respondents: 400.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 267.
Total
responses
Average time
per response
(minutes)
Burden (hours)
GATE 18-month follow-up survey (in 2007) ........................
400
Once ..............
400
40
267
Totals .............................................................................
400
Once ..............
400
40
267
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
$0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintaining): $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information
request; they will also become a matter
of public record.
Dated: August 11, 2006.
Maria K. Flynn,
Administrator, Office of Policy Development
and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–13566 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. NRTL1–88]
MET Laboratories, Inc., Application for
Expansion of Recognition
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
application of MET Laboratories, Inc.,
for expansion of its recognition to use
additional test standards, and presents
the Agency’s preliminary finding to
grant this request for expansion. This
preliminary finding does not constitute
an interim or temporary approval of this
application.
DATES: You must submit information or
comments, or any request for extension
of the time to comment, by the
following dates:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Hard copy: postmarked or sent by
September 1, 2006.
• Electronic transmission or
facsimile: sent by September 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit
information or comments to this
notice—identified by docket number
NRTL1–88—by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• OSHA Web site: https://
ecomments.osha.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on OSHA’s Web page.
• Fax: If your written comments are
10 pages or fewer, you may fax them to
the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–
1648.
• Regular mail, express delivery,
hand delivery and courier service:
Submit three copies to the OSHA
Docket Office, Docket No. NRTL1–88,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N–
2625, Washington, DC 20210; telephone
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 159 (Thursday, August 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47531-47532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13566]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL), as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden conducts a pre-
clearance consultation program to provide the general public and
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program
helps to insure that requested data can be provided in the desired
format; reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized;
collection instruments are clearly understood; and the impact of
collection on respondents can be properly assessed. Currently, the
Employment and Training Administration (ETA) is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed extension of the collection of administrative
and survey data on the Growing America Through Entrepreneurship project
1205-0444, expires December 31, 2006). A copy of the proposed
information collection request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the
office listed below in the address section of this notice or at this
Web site: https://www.doleta.gov/Performance/guidance/
OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before October 16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Jonathan Simonetta, Office of Policy Development and
Research, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N-5637, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210,
(202) 693-3911 (this is not a toll-free number); fax: 202-693-2766
(this is not a toll-free number), or e-mail Simonetta.Jonathan@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Many individuals have the motivation and skills to develop small
businesses but lack business expertise and/or access to financing.
Recognizing this untapped potential, ETA is teaming with the Small
Business Administration (SBA) to create a demonstration program
designed to assist individuals interested in self-employment to develop
their businesses--Project GATE (Growing America Through
Entrepreneurship). In helping people develop businesses, Project GATE
promotes both workforce and economic development. The effectiveness of
the program is being evaluated.
Entrepreneurial services provided by Project GATE include an
assessment, a structured training course, and technical assistance
provided by a trained counselor. As part of the technical assistance,
counselors assist individuals in need of financing to apply for loans
from SBA's Microloan program and other funding sources. DOL's One-Stop
Centers conduct Project GATE orientations where interested individuals
will be informed about the services available at the One-Stop Center,
the benefits and challenges of self-employment and the services offered
through Project GATE. Small Business Development Center (SBDC)
counselors conduct individual assessments and identify the most
appropriate training course for each Project GATE participant. Existing
entrepreneurial training providers in the community provide training
and technical assistance.
DOL's One-Stop Centers play a central role in recruiting for the
project. Interested individuals register for an orientation to Project
GATE at One-Stop Centers as well as via telephone, mail, or a Web site.
The orientations are held at the One-Stop Centers.
Eligibility for Project GATE is broad--it is designed to serve
almost anyone interested in starting a business. Special attention is
paid, however, to recruiting immigrant populations.
Project GATE is being evaluated using an experimental design.
Individuals who submit an application for Project GATE in each site and
who meet minimal eligibility criteria are randomly assigned to either a
program group or a control group. Members of the program group are
eligible to receive Project GATE services, while members of the control
group are not eligible to receive Project GATE services, although they
are not prohibited from receiving self-employment services from other
sources.
GATE is implemented in seven sites-three urban and four rural
sites. The three urban sites are in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. The
rural sites are one in Minnesota centered around Duluth, and three in
Maine centered around Portland, Bangor, and Lewiston.
The evaluation addresses three key questions:
1. Is Project GATE Viable? What are the challenges in implementing
the program? Does an interagency model for the program work? Who
participates in GATE? Is the outreach effective in reaching immigrants?
How does the implementation of the program vary across sites?
2. Does the Program Work? Does the program increase self-
employment, increase employment and earnings, and reduce the receipt of
unemployment insurance and public assistance? Does the program promote
employment and other economic development? Is it effective in both
rural and urban areas? Does the effectiveness of the program vary by
population subgroup?
Is the Program Cost-Effective? Do the benefits of the program
exceed its costs? Addressing these questions involve conducting
process, impact, and benefit-cost analyses. The process evaluation is
based on information collected during three rounds of visits to each
site, during which detailed information is collected on the
implementation of the program from interviews with program
[[Page 47532]]
staff, observations of services, and focus groups with program
participants. Data also is collected using a Participant Tracking
System developed specifically for the study. The impact evaluation
involves comparing outcomes of members of the program group with
outcomes of members of the control group. Data on these outcomes is
collected from Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefit records and
quarterly wage records, and two follow-up surveys that occur
approximately 6 months and 18 months after random assignment. The
benefit-cost analysis involves placing a dollar value on all impacts of
the program and comparing them with the dollar value of the costs.
II. Review Focus
The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments
which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of ETA, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions
This is a notice to extend the collection period that is currently
approved by OMB (1205-0444 expires December 31, 2006).
The data for the impact analysis comes from UI benefits and wage
records in the three states, a computer-based Participant Tracking
System developed for the demonstration and used in the seven sites, and
follow-up surveys conducted twice with the expected sample of 4,000
individuals who apply for Project GATE. The follow-up surveys, which
are the subject of this notice, are conducted by telephone
approximately 6 and 18 months following the GATE application. These
voluntary surveys collect data unavailable from administrative records.
The first survey is designed to collect detailed information about
sample members' participation and experiences in receiving self-
employment services, their experiences starting a business, their
experiences in jobs working for someone else, their receipt of public
assistance, and some background data on their socio-economic and
demographic characteristics. The second survey is designed to collect
their experiences in self-employment and developing small businesses,
their experiences in jobs working for someone else, and their income
and receipt of public assistance.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Agency: Employment and Training Administration.
Title: Partnership for Self-Sufficiency: Growing America Through
Entrepreneurship (GATE).
OMB Number: 1205-0444.
Affected Public: Individuals of households.
Total Respondents: 400.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 267.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average time
Total Frequency Total per response Burden (hours)
respondents responses (minutes)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GATE 18-month follow-up survey 400 Once............ 400 40 267
(in 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals.................... 400 Once............ 400 40 267
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): $0.
Total Burden Cost(operating/maintaining): $0.
Comments submitted in response to this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information request; they will also become a
matter of public record.
Dated: August 11, 2006.
Maria K. Flynn,
Administrator, Office of Policy Development and Research.
[FR Doc. E6-13566 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P