In the Matter of Certain Power Supply Controllers and Products Containing Same; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order; Termination of the Investigation, 47245-47246 [E6-13512]
Download as PDF
47245
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Notices
Citation 30 CFR Part 256
Reporting requirement
56 .............................................
57 .............................................
57(d)(3); 58 ..............................
59(c)(2) .....................................
Subpart J:
62; 64; 65; 67 ...........................
64(a)(7); ...................................
64(a)(8) ....................................
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Subpart K:
76 .............................................
77(c) .........................................
Provide plan/instructions to fund lease-specific abandonment account
and related information; request approval to withdraw funds.
Provide third-party guarantee, indemnity agreement, financial information, related notices, reports, and annual update; notify MMS if
guarantor becomes unqualified.
Notice of and request approval to terminate period of liability, cancel
bond, or other security.
Provide information to demonstrate lease will be brought into compliance.
20:24 Aug 15, 2006
12.
19.
⁄ .
12
16.
File application and required information for assignment or transfer
for approval/comment on filing fee (forms MMS–150 and MMS–
151).
File required instruments creating or transferring working interests,
etc., for record purposes.
Submit non-required documents, for record purposes, which respondents want MMS to file with the lease document.
1.
File written request for relinquishment (form MMS–152) ......................
Comment on lease cancellation (MMS expects 1 in 10 years) ............
1.
1.
Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’
Burden: The currently approved ‘‘nonhour cost’’ burden for this information
collection is a total of $537,000. This
cost burden is for filing fees associated
with submitting requests for approval of
instruments of transfer ($170 per
application) or to file non-required
documents for record purposes ($25 per
filing).
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Until OMB approves a
collection of information, you are not
obligated to respond.
Comments: Before submitting an ICR
to OMB, PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A)
requires each agency ‘‘* * * to provide
notice * * * and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information * * *’’.
Agencies must specifically solicit
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the agency to perform its
duties, including whether the
information is useful; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
minimize the burden on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Agencies must also estimate the ‘‘nonhour cost’’ burdens to respondents or
recordkeepers resulting from the
collection of information. Therefore, if
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Hour burden
Jkt 208001
you have costs to generate, maintain,
and disclose this information, you
should comment and provide your total
capital and startup cost components or
annual operation, maintenance, and
purchase of service components. You
should describe the methods you use to
estimate major cost factors, including
system and technology acquisition,
expected useful life of capital
equipment, discount rate(s), and the
period over which you incur costs.
Capital and startup costs include,
among other items, computers and
software you purchase to prepare for
collecting information, monitoring, and
record storage facilities. You should not
include estimates for equipment or
services purchased: (i) Before October 1,
1995; (ii) to comply with requirements
not associated with the information
collection; (iii) for reasons other than to
provide information or keep records for
the Government; or (iv) as part of
customary and usual business or private
practices.
We will summarize written responses
to this notice and address them in our
submission for OMB approval. As a
result of your comments, we will make
any necessary adjustments to the burden
in our submission to OMB.
Public Comment Procedures: MMS’s
practice is to make comments, including
names and addresses of respondents,
available for public review. If you wish
your name and/or address to be
withheld, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. MMS will honor this request
to the extent allowable by law; however,
anonymous comments will not be
considered. There may be circumstances
in which we would withhold from the
record a respondent’s identity, as
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1.
Accepted on behalf of lessees as
a service, MMS does not require
nor need the filings.
allowable by the law. If you wish us to
withhold your name and/or address,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comment. In addition,
you must present a rationale for
withholding this information. This
rationale must demonstrate that
disclosure ‘‘would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy.’’
Unsupported assertions will not meet
this burden. In the absence of
exceptional, documentable
circumstances, this information will be
released. All submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public inspection in
their entirety.
MMS Information Collection
Clearance Officer: Arlene Bajusz, (202)
208–7744.
Dated: August 8, 2006.
E.P. Danenberger,
Chief, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. E6–13383 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–541]
In the Matter of Certain Power Supply
Controllers and Products Containing
Same; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion
Order; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
47246
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Notices
Commission has issued a limited
exclusion order in the above-captioned
investigation directed against products
of respondent System General
Corporation (‘‘SG’’) of Taipei, Taiwan.
The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
13, 2005, the Commission instituted this
investigation, based on a complaint filed
by Power Integrations, Inc. (‘‘PI’’) of San
Jose, California. 70 FR 34149 (June 13,
2005). The complaint, as amended and
supplemented, alleged violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain power
supply controllers and products
containing the same. The Commission
determined that SG violated section 337
by reason of infringement of claims 1, 3,
5, and 6 of United States Patent No.
6,351,398 (‘‘the ’398 patent’’) and claims
26 and 27 of United States Patent No.
6,538,908 (‘‘the ’908 patent’’). The
Commission requested written
submissions from the parties relating to
the appropriate remedy, whether the
statutory public interest factors preclude
issuance of that remedy, and the amount
of bond to be imposed during the
Presidential review period. All parties
filed written submissions.
Having reviewed the record in this
investigation, including the written
submissions of the parties, the
Commission has made its determination
on the issues of remedy, the public
interest, and bonding. The Commission
has determined that the appropriate
form of relief is a limited exclusion
order prohibiting the unlicensed entry
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:24 Aug 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
of power supply controllers that infringe
one or more of claims 1, 3, 5, and 6 of
the ’398 patent or claims 26 and 27 of
the ’908 patent and that are
manufactured by or on behalf of SG, its
affiliated companies, parents,
subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, or
other related business entities, or
successors or assigns. The Commission
has also determined to prohibit the
unlicensed entry of LCD computer
monitors, AC printer adapters, and
sample/demonstration boards
containing such infringing power
supply controllers.
The Commission further determined
that the public interest factors
enumerated in section 337(d)(1) (19
U.S.C. 1337(d)(1)) do not preclude
issuance of the limited exclusion order.
Finally, the Commission determined
that the amount of bond to permit
temporary importation during the
Presidential review period (19 U.S.C.
1337(j)) shall be in the amount of thirtyeight (38) cents per power supply
controller circuit or LCD computer
monitor, AC printer adapter, or sample/
demonstration board containing the
same that are subject to the order. The
Commission’s order was delivered to
the President and the United States
Trade Representative on the day of its
issuance.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.50 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 11, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–13512 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
International Transportation
Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02545;
United States v. Cummins Engine
Company, Case No. 1:98CV02546;
United States v. Detroit Diesel
Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02548;
United States v. Volvo Truck
Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02547;
United States v. Mack Trucks, Inc., Case
No. 1:98CV01495; and United States v.
Renault Vehicles Industries, S.A., Case
No. 1:98CV02543). In supporting entry
by the court of the decrees, the United
States committed to meet periodically
with states, industry groups,
environmental groups, and concerned
citizens to discuss consent decree
implementation issues. Future meetings
will be announced here and on EPA’s
Diesel Engine Settlement Web site at:
https://www.epa.gov/compliance/
resources/cases/civil/caa/diesel/
index.html.
Interested parties should contact the
Environmental Protection Agency at the
address listed below prior to the
meeting to reserve a telephone line and
receive instructions for the call.
Agenda
1. Panel Remarks—10 a.m.
Remarks by DOJ and EPA regarding
implementation of the provisions of the
diesel engine consent decrees.
2. Public comments and questions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anne Wick, EPA Diesel Engine Consent
Decree Coordinator, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (Mail Code 2242A),
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; e-mail:
wick.anne@epa.gov.
Karen S. Dworkin,
Assistant Chief, Environment & Natural
Resources Division, Environmental
Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 06–6943 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Public Meeting by
Teleconference Concerning Heavy
Duty Diesel Engine Consent Decrees
Notice of Lodging of Second
Amendment to Consent Decree
Involving Point Ruston, LLC and
Asarco LLC Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response
Compensation, and Liability Act
The Department of Justice and the
Environmental Protection Agency will
hold a public meeting on September 13,
2006 at 10 a.m. by teleconference. The
subject of the meeting will be
implementation of the provisions of the
seven consent decrees signed by the
United States and diesel engine
manufacturers and entered by the
United States District Court for the
District of Columbia on July 1, 1999
(United States v. Caterpillar, Case No.
1:98CV02544; United States v. Navistar
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice is hereby given that on July 27,
2006, a proposed amendment to the
existing consent decree (the ‘‘Second
Amendment’’) in United States v.
Asarco Inc., Civil Action No. C91–
5528B was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Western
District of Washington.
This Second Amendment involves the
potential sales of property owned by
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47245-47246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13512]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-541]
In the Matter of Certain Power Supply Controllers and Products
Containing Same; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order; Termination of
the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
[[Page 47246]]
Commission has issued a limited exclusion order in the above-captioned
investigation directed against products of respondent System General
Corporation (``SG'') of Taipei, Taiwan. The investigation is
terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 13, 2005, the Commission instituted
this investigation, based on a complaint filed by Power Integrations,
Inc. (``PI'') of San Jose, California. 70 FR 34149 (June 13, 2005). The
complaint, as amended and supplemented, alleged violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into
the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of certain power supply controllers and
products containing the same. The Commission determined that SG
violated section 337 by reason of infringement of claims 1, 3, 5, and 6
of United States Patent No. 6,351,398 (``the '398 patent'') and claims
26 and 27 of United States Patent No. 6,538,908 (``the '908 patent'').
The Commission requested written submissions from the parties relating
to the appropriate remedy, whether the statutory public interest
factors preclude issuance of that remedy, and the amount of bond to be
imposed during the Presidential review period. All parties filed
written submissions.
Having reviewed the record in this investigation, including the
written submissions of the parties, the Commission has made its
determination on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. The Commission has determined that the appropriate form of
relief is a limited exclusion order prohibiting the unlicensed entry of
power supply controllers that infringe one or more of claims 1, 3, 5,
and 6 of the '398 patent or claims 26 and 27 of the '908 patent and
that are manufactured by or on behalf of SG, its affiliated companies,
parents, subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, or other related
business entities, or successors or assigns. The Commission has also
determined to prohibit the unlicensed entry of LCD computer monitors,
AC printer adapters, and sample/demonstration boards containing such
infringing power supply controllers.
The Commission further determined that the public interest factors
enumerated in section 337(d)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1)) do not preclude
issuance of the limited exclusion order. Finally, the Commission
determined that the amount of bond to permit temporary importation
during the Presidential review period (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) shall be in
the amount of thirty-eight (38) cents per power supply controller
circuit or LCD computer monitor, AC printer adapter, or sample/
demonstration board containing the same that are subject to the order.
The Commission's order was delivered to the President and the United
States Trade Representative on the day of its issuance.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in section 210.50 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
(19 CFR 210.50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 11, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6-13512 Filed 8-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P