Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 46517-46519 [E6-13262]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 156 / Monday, August 14, 2006 / Notices
Adjustment Assistance and confirms
eligibility to apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance as identified on
page 35952 in the first column, the tenth
TA–W-number listed.
The Department appropriately
published in the Federal Register June
22, 2006, page 35953, under the notice
of Negative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance, the denial of eligibility
applicable to workers of TA–W–59,244.
The notice appears on page 35953 in the
first column, the fifteenth TA–Wnumber listed.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
August 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–13261 Filed 8–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,326]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Dura Art Stone, Inc., Fontana, CA;
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance;
Correction
This notice rescinds the notice of
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance applicable to TA–W–59,326,
which was published in the Federal
Register on June 22, 2006 (71 FR 35949–
35950) in FR Document E6–9906,
Billing Code 4510–30–P.
This rescinds the certification of
eligibility for workers of TA–W–59,326,
to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance and confirms
eligibility to apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance as identified on
page 35952 in the first column, the
thirtheen TA–W–number listed.
The Department appropriately
published in the Federal Register June
22, 2006, page 35953, under the notice
of Negative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance, the denial of eligibility
applicable to workers of TA–W–59,326.
The notice appears on page 35953 in the
first column, the sixteenth TA–W–
number listed.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:58 Aug 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
August 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–13254 Filed 8–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,184]
Georgia-Pacific Corporation Consumer
Products Division Day Street Facility,
Green Bay, WI; Amended Certification
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on November 21, 2005,
applicable to workers of Georgia-Pacific
Corporation, Consumer Products
Division, Green Bay, Wisconsin. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on December 15, 2005 (70 FR
74368). The certification was amended
on July 11, 2006 to avoid an overlap in
worker group coverage. The notice will
be published soon in the Federal
Register.
The Department, on its own motion,
reviewed the certification for workers of
the subject firm. The workers are
engaged in the production of napkins,
towels and tissue and are not separately
identifiable by product line.
New findings show that the correct
name of the subject firm is identified as
the Day Street Facility of the Consumer
Products Division of Georgia-Pacific
Corporation, Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Accordingly, the Department is again
amending this certification to correctly
identify the name of the subject firm to
read Georgia-Pacific Corporation,
Consumer Products Division, Day Street
Facility, Green Bay, Wisconsin and to
correctly return the impact date to
October 12, 2004 as originally stated in
the certification determination dated
November 21, 2005.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
subject firm located in Green Bay,
Wisconsin who were adversely affect by
a shift in production to Mexico.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–58,184 is hereby issued as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46517
All workers of Georgia-Pacific Corporation,
Consumer Products Division, Day Street
Facility, Green Bay, Wisconsin, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after October 12, 2004,
through November 21, 2007, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 and are
also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC this 26th day of
July 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–13260 Filed 8–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of July 2006.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
46518
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 156 / Monday, August 14, 2006 / Notices
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issued a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:58 Aug 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–59,701; Pilgrim Home and
Hearth LLC, Fairfield, CA: July 11,
2005.
TA–W–59,649; Rowe Furniture, Inc.,
Elliston, VA: June 28, 2006.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of
Section222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–59,594; C and D Technologies,
Inc., Power Electronics Division,
Product Development Department,
Tucson, AZ: June 20, 2005.
TA–W–59,706; Eaton Filtration LLC,
Elizabeth, NJ: July 12, 2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TA–W–59,685; Laidlaw Corporation,
Metropolis Division, Metropolis, IL:
July 7, 2005.
TA–W–59,549; Manufacturers Products
Co., Warren, MI: June 5, 2005.
TA–W–59,593; Rauch Industries, Inc.,
Gastonia, NC: June 20, 2005.
TA–W–59,631; Moosehead
Manufacturing Co., Monson, ME:
May 14, 2006.
TA–W–59,631A; Moosehead
Manufacturing Co., Dover-Foxcroft,
ME: May 14, 2006.
TA–W–59,651; Superior Industries Int’l
Inc., Chrome Plating Operation
Div., Fayetteville, AR: June 28,
2005.
TA–W–58,608; Rug Barn (The),
Abbeville, SC: January 10, 2005.
TA–W–59,598; Waste Management of
Missouri, Inc., Working on Site at
Ford Motor Co. St. Louis Assembly
Plant, Hazelwood, MO: June 19,
2005.
TA–W–59,730; Tutee Corp., Vernon, CA:
July 6, 2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–59,678; Dna Corporation,
Coupled Products, Inc. Division,
Andrews, IN: June 18, 2006.
TA–W–59,684; Whirlpool Corp., Fort
Smith, AR: July 7, 2005.
TA–W–59,718; Monroe Staffing, Leased
Wkrs On-Site at C-Cor, Inc., Access
and Transport Division,
Wallingford, CT: July 13, 2005.
TA–W–59,718A; Universal Staffing,
Leased Wkrs On-Site at C-Cor, Inc.,
Access and Transport Division,
Wallingford, CT: July 13, 2005.
TA–W–59,718B; Manpower, Leased
Wkrs On-Site at C-Cor, Inc., Access
and Transport Division,
Wallingford, CT: July 13, 2005.
TA–W–59,718C; Summit Technical
Services, Leased Wkrs On-Site at CCor, Inc., Access and Transport
Division, Wallingford, CT: July 13,
2005.
TA–W–59,719; Eaton Corporation,
Torque Control Products Division,
Hastings, NE: July 11, 2005.
TA–W–59,750; Anritsu Instruments Co.,
(Formerly Nettest), Utica, NY: July
18, 2005.
TA–W–59,588; Ames True Temper, Inc.,
Falls City, NE: June 19, 2005.
TA–W–59,652; Stanton International,
Inc., Phoenix, AZ: June 28, 2005.
TA–W–59,740; Federal Mogul Corp.,
Vehicle Safety and Performance
Friction Division, Scottsville, KY:
July 17, 2005.
TA–W–59,763; Carlisle Publishing
Services, A Subsidiary of Carlisle
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 156 / Monday, August 14, 2006 / Notices
Communications LTD, Dubuque,
IA: July 20, 2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
TA–W–59,614; Ottawa Rubber
Company, Bradner, OH: June 21,
2005.
TA–W–59,688; Pace Industries Inc.,
Harrison, AR: July 11, 2005.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and Section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of
age or older.
None.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–59,701; Pilgrim Home and
Hearth LLC, Fairfield, CA.
TA–W–59,649; Rowe Furniture, Inc.,
Elliston, VA.
TA–W–59,594; C and D Technologies,
Inc., Power Electronics Division,
Product Development Department,
Tucson, AZ
TA–W–59,706; Eaton Filtration LLC,
Elizabeth, NJ.
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
Since the workers of the firm are
denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:58 Aug 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–59,577; Union Apparel, Inc.,
Norvelt, PA.
TA–W–59,602; Alliant Techsystems,
Inc., Radford, VA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–59,484; International Paper,
Global Custom Services, Gretna,
VA.
TA–W–59,548; Nishikawa Standard Co.,
New Haven, IN.
The investigation revealed that the
predominate cause of worker
separations is unrelated to criteria
(a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a
foreign country).
None.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–59,500; Connecticut General Life
Insurance Co., Cigna Healthcare
Service Operations, Philadelphia,
PA.
TA–W–59,606; Panasonic Corporation
of North America, Corporate
Headquarters, Secaucus, NJ.
TA–W–59,687; Connecticut General Life
Insurance Co., CIGNA Healthcare,
Columbus, OH.
TA–W–59,697; Scharf and Breit, Inc.,
Franklin Square, NY.
TA–W–59,711; KPMG LLP, Employed
On-Site at Bearing Point, Inc.,
Charlotte, NC.
TA–W–59,749; Mileage Plus, Inc.,
Subsidiary of United AirLines Inc.
(Tucson Call Center), Tucson, AZ.
The investigation revealed that the
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) have not
been met. The workers’ firm (or
subdivision) is not a supplier to or a
downstream producer for a firm whose
workers were certified eligible to apply
for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the month of July 2006.
Copies of these determinations are
available for inspection in Room C–
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46519
5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210 during normal business hours
or will be mailed to persons who write
to the above address.
Dated: August 3, 2006.
Richard Church,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–13262 Filed 8–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,533]
Selco, Inc.; Austin, TX; Affirmative
Determinations for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance; Correction
This notice rescinds the notice of
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance applicable to TA–W–58,533,
which was published in the Federal
Register on March 24, 2006 (71 FR
14953–19455) in FR Document E6–
4308, Billing Code 4517–30–P.
This rescinds the certification of
eligibility for workers of TA–W–58,533,
to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance and confirms
eligibility to apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance as identified on
page 14954 in the first column, the
fourteenth TA–W–number listed.
The Department appropriately
published in the Federal Register March
24, 2006, page 14955, under the notice
of Negative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance, the denial of eligibility
applicable to workers of TA–W–58,533.
The notice appears on page 14955 in the
first column, the twentieth TA–W–
number listed.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
August 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–13251 Filed 8–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 156 (Monday, August 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46517-46519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13262]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of July
2006.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or
[[Page 46518]]
an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issued
a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-59,701; Pilgrim Home and Hearth LLC, Fairfield, CA: July 11, 2005.
TA-W-59,649; Rowe Furniture, Inc., Elliston, VA: June 28, 2006.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-59,594; C and D Technologies, Inc., Power Electronics Division,
Product Development Department, Tucson, AZ: June 20, 2005.
TA-W-59,706; Eaton Filtration LLC, Elizabeth, NJ: July 12, 2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-59,685; Laidlaw Corporation, Metropolis Division, Metropolis, IL:
July 7, 2005.
TA-W-59,549; Manufacturers Products Co., Warren, MI: June 5, 2005.
TA-W-59,593; Rauch Industries, Inc., Gastonia, NC: June 20, 2005.
TA-W-59,631; Moosehead Manufacturing Co., Monson, ME: May 14, 2006.
TA-W-59,631A; Moosehead Manufacturing Co., Dover-Foxcroft, ME: May 14,
2006.
TA-W-59,651; Superior Industries Int'l Inc., Chrome Plating Operation
Div., Fayetteville, AR: June 28, 2005.
TA-W-58,608; Rug Barn (The), Abbeville, SC: January 10, 2005.
TA-W-59,598; Waste Management of Missouri, Inc., Working on Site at
Ford Motor Co. St. Louis Assembly Plant, Hazelwood, MO: June 19, 2005.
TA-W-59,730; Tutee Corp., Vernon, CA: July 6, 2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-59,678; Dna Corporation, Coupled Products, Inc. Division, Andrews,
IN: June 18, 2006.
TA-W-59,684; Whirlpool Corp., Fort Smith, AR: July 7, 2005.
TA-W-59,718; Monroe Staffing, Leased Wkrs On-Site at C-Cor, Inc.,
Access and Transport Division, Wallingford, CT: July 13, 2005.
TA-W-59,718A; Universal Staffing, Leased Wkrs On-Site at C-Cor, Inc.,
Access and Transport Division, Wallingford, CT: July 13, 2005.
TA-W-59,718B; Manpower, Leased Wkrs On-Site at C-Cor, Inc., Access and
Transport Division, Wallingford, CT: July 13, 2005.
TA-W-59,718C; Summit Technical Services, Leased Wkrs On-Site at C-Cor,
Inc., Access and Transport Division, Wallingford, CT: July 13, 2005.
TA-W-59,719; Eaton Corporation, Torque Control Products Division,
Hastings, NE: July 11, 2005.
TA-W-59,750; Anritsu Instruments Co., (Formerly Nettest), Utica, NY:
July 18, 2005.
TA-W-59,588; Ames True Temper, Inc., Falls City, NE: June 19, 2005.
TA-W-59,652; Stanton International, Inc., Phoenix, AZ: June 28, 2005.
TA-W-59,740; Federal Mogul Corp., Vehicle Safety and Performance
Friction Division, Scottsville, KY: July 17, 2005.
TA-W-59,763; Carlisle Publishing Services, A Subsidiary of Carlisle
[[Page 46519]]
Communications LTD, Dubuque, IA: July 20, 2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA-W-59,614; Ottawa Rubber Company, Bradner, OH: June 21, 2005.
TA-W-59,688; Pace Industries Inc., Harrison, AR: July 11, 2005.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of age or older.
None.
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-W-59,701; Pilgrim Home and Hearth LLC, Fairfield, CA.
TA-W-59,649; Rowe Furniture, Inc., Elliston, VA.
TA-W-59,594; C and D Technologies, Inc., Power Electronics Division,
Product Development Department, Tucson, AZ
TA-W-59,706; Eaton Filtration LLC, Elizabeth, NJ.
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Since the workers of the firm are denied eligibility to apply for
TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
TA-W-59,577; Union Apparel, Inc., Norvelt, PA.
TA-W-59,602; Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Radford, VA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
None.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-59,484; International Paper, Global Custom Services, Gretna, VA.
TA-W-59,548; Nishikawa Standard Co., New Haven, IN.
The investigation revealed that the predominate cause of worker
separations is unrelated to criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a foreign
country).
None.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-59,500; Connecticut General Life Insurance Co., Cigna Healthcare
Service Operations, Philadelphia, PA.
TA-W-59,606; Panasonic Corporation of North America, Corporate
Headquarters, Secaucus, NJ.
TA-W-59,687; Connecticut General Life Insurance Co., CIGNA Healthcare,
Columbus, OH.
TA-W-59,697; Scharf and Breit, Inc., Franklin Square, NY.
TA-W-59,711; KPMG LLP, Employed On-Site at Bearing Point, Inc.,
Charlotte, NC.
TA-W-59,749; Mileage Plus, Inc., Subsidiary of United AirLines Inc.
(Tucson Call Center), Tucson, AZ.
The investigation revealed that the criteria of Section 222(b)(2)
have not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier
to or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified
eligible to apply for TAA.
None.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the month of July 2006. Copies of these determinations are
available for inspection in Room C-5311, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during normal business
hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above address.
Dated: August 3, 2006.
Richard Church,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-13262 Filed 8-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
