Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review: Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube from Turkey, 43444-43446 [E6-12372]

Download as PDF 43444 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 1, 2006 / Notices DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country A–560–812 ............... A–834–806 ............... A–421–807 ............... A–485–806 ............... A–791–809 ............... A–583–835 ............... A–549–817 ............... A–823–811 ............... A–822–804 ............... A–570–860 ............... A–560–811 ............... A–449–804 ............... A–841–804 ............... A–455–803 ............... A–580–844 ............... A–823–809 ............... Countervailing Duty Proceedings. C–357–815 .............. C–533–821 .............. C–560–813 .............. C–791–810 .............. C–549–818 .............. 731–TA–901 731–TA–902 731–TA–903 731–TA–904 731–TA–905 731–TA–906 731–TA–907 731–TA–908 731–TA–873 731–TA–874 731–TA–875 731–TA–878 731–TA–879 731–TA–880 731–TA–877 731–TA–882 Indonesia Kazakhstan Netherlands Romania South Africa Taiwan Thailand Ukraine Belarus PRC Indonesia Latvia Moldova Poland South Korea Ukraine Certain Certain Certain Certain Certain Certain Certain Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars Zev Primor (202) Dana Mermelstein (202) Dana Mermelstein (202) Zev Primor (202) Dana Mermelstein (202) Dana Mermelstein (202) Dana Mermelstein (202) Dana Mermelstein (202) Brandon Farlander (202) Brandon Farlander (202) Brandon Farlander (202) Brandon Farlander (202) Brandon Farlander (202) Brandon Farlander (202) Brandon Farlander (202) Brandon Farlander (202) 482–4114 482–1391 482–1391 482–4114 482–1391 482–1391 482–1391 482–1391 482–0182 482–0182 482–0182 482–0182 482–0182 482–0182 482–0182 482–0182 701–TA–404 701–TA–405 701–TA–406 701–TA–407 701–TA–408 Argentina India Indonesia South Africa Thailand Certain Certain Certain Certain Certain Hot–Rolled Hot–Rolled Hot–Rolled Hot–Rolled Hot–Rolled Brandon Farlander Brandon Farlander Brandon Farlander Dana Mermelstein Dana Mermelstein 482–0182 482–0182 482–0182 482–1391 482–1391 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to Sunset proceedings, including copies of the Department’s regulations regarding Sunset Reviews (19 CFR 351.218) and Sunset Policy Bulletin, the Department’s schedule of Sunset Reviews, case history information (i.e., previous margins, duty absorption determinations, scope language, import volumes), and service lists available to the public on the Department’s sunset Internet website at the following address: ‘‘https://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.’’ All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with the Department’s regulations regarding format, translation, service, and certification of documents. These rules can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties to apply for access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately following publication in the Federal Register of the notice of initiation of the sunset review. The Department’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:00 Jul 31, 2006 Jkt 208001 Product Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon Carbon Department Contact Steel Steel Steel Steel Steel Flat Flat Flat Flat Flat information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Information Required from Interested Parties Domestic interested parties (defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)) wishing to participate in these Sunset Reviews must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the Department’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, the Department will automatically revoke the orders without further review. See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). If we receive an order–specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, the Department’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order–specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that the Department’s information requirements are distinct from the Commission’s information PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Products Products Products Products Products (202) (202) (202) (202) (202) requirements.1 Please consult the Department’s regulations for information regarding the Department’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Please consult the Department’s regulations at 19 CFR Part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at the Department. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: July 27, 2006. Thomas F. Futtner, Acting Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–12339 Filed 7–31–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (A–489–501) Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review: Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube from Turkey Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. AGENCY: 1 In comments made on the interim final sunset regulations, a number of parties stated that the proposed five-day period for rebuttals to substantive responses to a notice of initiation was insufficient. This requirement was retained in the final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the Department will consider individual requests for extension of that five-day deadline based upon a showing of good cause. E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM 01AUN1 43445 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 1, 2006 / Notices SUMMARY: On April 26, 2006, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published the preliminary results of its new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain welded carbon steel pipe and tube (‘‘welded pipe and tube’’) from Turkey. This review covers one producer/ exporter of the subject merchandise. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is May 1, 2004, through April 30, 2005. On June 2, 2006, we received a case brief from petitioner.1 On June 9, 2006, we received a rebuttal brief from respondent.2 Based on the Department’s analysis of the issues, these final results have not changed from the preliminary results. The final results are listed in the section below entitled ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’ EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Cho or George McMahon, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5075, or (202) 482–1167, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 3, 2006, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of this new shipper review and invited interested parties to comment on those results.3 Consequently, the Department received comments from petitioner and respondent. However, the Department did not receive a request for a hearing from interested parties. Scope of the Order The products covered by this order include circular welded non–alloy steel pipes and tubes, of circular crosssection, not more than 406.4 millimeters (16 inches) in outside diameter, regardless of wall thickness, surface finish (black, or galvanized, painted), or end finish (plain end, beveled end, threaded and coupled). Those pipes and tubes are generally known as standard pipe, though they may also be called structural or mechanical tubing in certain applications. Standard pipes and tubes are intended for the low pressure conveyance of water, steam, natural gas, air, and other liquids and gases in plumbing and heating systems, air conditioner units, automatic sprinkler systems, and other related uses. Standard pipe may also be used for light load–bearing and mechanical applications, such as for fence tubing, and for protection of electrical wiring, such as conduit shells. The scope is not limited to standard pipe and fence tubing, or those types of mechanical and structural pipe that are used in standard pipe applications. All carbon steel pipes and tubes within the physical description outlined above are included in the scope of this order, except for line pipe, oil country tubular goods, boiler tubing, cold–drawn or cold–rolled mechanical tubing, pipe and tube hollows for redraws, finished scaffolding, and finished rigid conduit. Imports of these products are currently classifiable under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: 7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32, 7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this review are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the New Shipper Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube from Turkey’’ from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated July 25, 2006 (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues which parties have raised and to which we have responded, all of which are addressed in the Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as an Appendix. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendation in the Decision Memorandum, which is on file in the Central Records Unit, room B–099 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https:// ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Fair Value Comparisons We calculated export price (‘‘EP’’) and normal value (‘‘NV’’) based on the same methodology used in the preliminary results. Cost of Production We calculated the cost of production (‘‘COP’’) for the merchandise based on the same methodology used in the preliminary results. Final Results of Review As a result of our review, we determine that the following weighted– average percentage margins exist for the period May 1, 2004, through April 30, 2005: Manufacturer/Exporter Margin (percent) rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S., and its affiliated export trading company, Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. ......................................................................................................................................... 0.00 percent Assessment The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department calculated importer– specific duty assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales for that importer. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties, all entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which the importer–specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. The Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP within 15 days of publication of these final results of review. 1 The petitioners are Allied Tube and Conduit Corporation, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., Sharon Tube Company, and Wheatland Tube Company (collectively, ‘‘petitioner’’). 2 The respondent is Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S., and its affiliated export trading company, Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. (collectively, ‘‘Toscelik’’). 3 See Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review: Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube from Turkey, 71 FR 26043 (May 3, 2006) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:04 Jul 31, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM 01AUN1 43446 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 1, 2006 / Notices rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES Cash Deposits Requirements Bonding will no longer be permitted to fulfill security requirements for shipments from Toscelik of subject merchandise from Turkey entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in the United States on or after the publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The following cash deposit rates shall be required for merchandise subject to the order entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results for this new shipper review, as provided for by section 751(a)(1) of the Act, as amended: (1) The cash deposit rates for Toscelik (i.e., for subject merchandise both manufactured and exported by Toscelik) will be zero; (2) the cash deposit rate for exporters who received a rate in a prior segment of the proceeding will continue to be the rate assigned in that segment of the proceeding; (3) the cash deposit rate for entries of subject merchandise exported by Toscelik but not manufactured by Toscelik will continue to be the ‘‘All Others’’ rate (i.e., 14.74 percent) or the rate applicable to the manufacturer, if so established; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm covered in this review or a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will be 14.74 percent, the ‘‘All Others’’ rate established in the less–than-fair–value investigation. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the next administrative review. There are no changes to the rates applicable to any other companies under this antidumping duty order. This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and countervailing duties occurred, and in the subsequent assessment of antidumping duties increased by the amount of antidumping and/or countervailing duties reimbursed. This notice also is the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return/ destruction or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:04 Jul 31, 2006 Jkt 208001 Failure to comply is a violation of the APO. This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: July 25, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. APPENDIX List of Comments in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Comment 1: Bona Fides of Toscelik’s U.S. Sale [FR Doc. E6–12372 Filed 7–31–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [I.D. 072606J] Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; General Provisions for Domestic Fisheries; Application for Exempted Fishing Permit National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries, Northeast Region, NMFS (Assistant Regional Administrator) has made a preliminary determination that the subject Exempted Fishing Permit (EFP) application from the University of New Hampshire (UNH) for an exemption from the days-at-sea (DAS) requirements of the Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (FMP), for the purpose of testing the ability of specific fish traps to catch haddock, contains all of the required information and warrants further consideration. The Assistant Regional Administrator has also made a preliminary determination that the activities authorized under the EFP would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the FMP. However, further review and consultation may be necessary before a final determination is made to issue the EFP. Therefore, NMFS announces that the Assistant Regional Administrator proposes to issue an EFP that would allow vessels to conduct fishing operations that are otherwise restricted by the regulations governing the fisheries of the Northeastern United States. Regulations under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Management Act require publication of this notification to provide interested parties the opportunity to comment on applications for proposed EFPs. DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 16, 2006. ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be submitted by e-mail. The mailbox address for providing e-mail comments is DA6l210@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line of the e-mail comment the following document identifier: ‘‘Comments on UNH Haddock Trap (DA6–210).’’ Written comments should be sent to Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 1 Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope ‘‘Comments on UNH Haddock Trap (DA6–210).’’ Comments may also be sent via facsimile (fax) to (978) 281–9135. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Moira Kelly, Fishery Management Specialist, phone: (978) 281–9218, fax: (978) 281–9135. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A complete application for an EFP was submitted by Dr. Ken La Valley of the University of New Hampshire, on July 7, 2006. The EFP would exempt one federally permitted commercial fishing vessel from the following requirement of the FMP: NE multispecies DAS requirements, specified at 50 CFR 648.82(a). This project is funded by the Northeast Consortium. UNH has requested an exemption from the DAS requirements in order to test the effectiveness of two demersal fish trap designs, i.e., Pacific and Norwegian cod pots, modified for catching Atlantic haddock of a larger size and condition for use in the live fish market. A DAS exemption is requested in order to allow the exempted fishing vessel to economically assist in this research, because no fish will be retained or landed. The Norwegian two-chamber fish pot has two fairly wide entrance funnels leading into the lower chamber, with a narrow entrance leading to an upper chamber. Typically, a bait bag is fixed with squid for cod on a string or longline at varying depths. This fish trap would be modified to use vertical mounted triggers to allow easy entrance while providing an increased internal volume available for fish compared to the Norwegian design. The Pacific cod pot is a 6 ft x 6 ft x 3 ft (1.83 m x 1.83 m x .91 m) design that has triggers on three sides of the pot to allow increased opportunities to enter the trap, with shallow leads leading to the tunnel eye. The Pacific trap would be modified to a collapsible version that would also E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM 01AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 147 (Tuesday, August 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43444-43446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-489-501)


Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review: 
Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube from Turkey

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce.

[[Page 43445]]

SUMMARY: On April 26, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published the preliminary results of its new shipper 
review of the antidumping duty order on certain welded carbon steel 
pipe and tube (``welded pipe and tube'') from Turkey. This review 
covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise. The period of 
review (``POR'') is May 1, 2004, through April 30, 2005. On June 2, 
2006, we received a case brief from petitioner.\1\ On June 9, 2006, we 
received a rebuttal brief from respondent.\2\ Based on the Department's 
analysis of the issues, these final results have not changed from the 
preliminary results. The final results are listed in the section below 
entitled ``Final Results of Review.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The petitioners are Allied Tube and Conduit Corporation, 
IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., Sharon Tube Company, and Wheatland Tube 
Company (collectively, ``petitioner'').
    \2\ The respondent is Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., 
Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S., and its affiliated export trading 
company, Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. (collectively, ``Toscelik'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Cho or George McMahon, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5075, or (202) 482-1167, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 3, 2006, the Department published in the Federal Register 
the preliminary results of this new shipper review and invited 
interested parties to comment on those results.\3\ Consequently, the 
Department received comments from petitioner and respondent. However, 
the Department did not receive a request for a hearing from interested 
parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New 
Shipper Review: Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube from 
Turkey, 71 FR 26043 (May 3, 2006) (``Preliminary Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this order include circular welded non-
alloy steel pipes and tubes, of circular cross-section, not more than 
406.4 millimeters (16 inches) in outside diameter, regardless of wall 
thickness, surface finish (black, or galvanized, painted), or end 
finish (plain end, beveled end, threaded and coupled). Those pipes and 
tubes are generally known as standard pipe, though they may also be 
called structural or mechanical tubing in certain applications. 
Standard pipes and tubes are intended for the low pressure conveyance 
of water, steam, natural gas, air, and other liquids and gases in 
plumbing and heating systems, air conditioner units, automatic 
sprinkler systems, and other related uses. Standard pipe may also be 
used for light load-bearing and mechanical applications, such as for 
fence tubing, and for protection of electrical wiring, such as conduit 
shells.
    The scope is not limited to standard pipe and fence tubing, or 
those types of mechanical and structural pipe that are used in standard 
pipe applications. All carbon steel pipes and tubes within the physical 
description outlined above are included in the scope of this order, 
except for line pipe, oil country tubular goods, boiler tubing, cold-
drawn or cold-rolled mechanical tubing, pipe and tube hollows for 
redraws, finished scaffolding, and finished rigid conduit.
    Imports of these products are currently classifiable under the 
following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') 
subheadings: 7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32, 
7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90. 
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, our written description of the scope of this proceeding is 
dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this review are addressed in the ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for 
the Final Results of the New Shipper Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order on Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube from Turkey'' from 
Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 
Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import 
Administration, dated July 25, 2006 (``Decision Memorandum''), which is 
hereby adopted by this notice.
    A list of the issues which parties have raised and to which we have 
responded, all of which are addressed in the Decision Memorandum, is 
attached to this notice as an Appendix. Parties can find a complete 
discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding 
recommendation in the Decision Memorandum, which is on file in the 
Central Records Unit, room B-099 of the main Department of Commerce 
building.
    In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be 
accessed directly on the Internet at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The 
paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Fair Value Comparisons

    We calculated export price (``EP'') and normal value (``NV'') based 
on the same methodology used in the preliminary results.

Cost of Production

    We calculated the cost of production (``COP'') for the merchandise 
based on the same methodology used in the preliminary results.

Final Results of Review

    As a result of our review, we determine that the following 
weighted-average percentage margins exist for the period May 1, 2004, 
through April 30, 2005:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Manufacturer/Exporter                  Margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S.,                     0.00 percent
 Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S., and its
 affiliated export trading company,
 Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S..................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department 
calculated importer-specific duty assessment rates on the basis of the 
ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the 
examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales for 
that importer. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties, all 
entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which the importer-
specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. The Department will 
issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP within 15 
days of publication of these final results of review.

[[Page 43446]]

Cash Deposits Requirements

    Bonding will no longer be permitted to fulfill security 
requirements for shipments from Toscelik of subject merchandise from 
Turkey entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in the 
United States on or after the publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register. The following cash deposit rates shall be required for 
merchandise subject to the order entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results 
for this new shipper review, as provided for by section 751(a)(1) of 
the Act, as amended: (1) The cash deposit rates for Toscelik (i.e., for 
subject merchandise both manufactured and exported by Toscelik) will be 
zero; (2) the cash deposit rate for exporters who received a rate in a 
prior segment of the proceeding will continue to be the rate assigned 
in that segment of the proceeding; (3) the cash deposit rate for 
entries of subject merchandise exported by Toscelik but not 
manufactured by Toscelik will continue to be the ``All Others'' rate 
(i.e., 14.74 percent) or the rate applicable to the manufacturer, if so 
established; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm 
covered in this review or a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash 
deposit rate will be 14.74 percent, the ``All Others'' rate established 
in the less-than-fair-value investigation. These deposit requirements 
shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the 
next administrative review. There are no changes to the rates 
applicable to any other companies under this antidumping duty order.
    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure 
to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and countervailing duties 
occurred, and in the subsequent assessment of antidumping duties 
increased by the amount of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
reimbursed.
    This notice also is the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective 
order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO.
    This determination is issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: July 25, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

APPENDIX

List of Comments in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Bona Fides of Toscelik's U.S. Sale
[FR Doc. E6-12372 Filed 7-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.