Collins And Aikman Products Company, Division 016, Roxboro, NC (Including Employees Working Out of Troy, MI); Notice of Revised Determination of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on Reconsideration, 43212-43213 [E6-12198]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
43212
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
The company plans to manufacture
small quantities of the listed controlled
substances for use in diagnostic
products.
Any other such applicant and any
person who is presently registered with
DEA to manufacture such a substance
may file comments or objections to the
issuance of the proposed registration
pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a).
Any such written comments or
objections being sent via regular mail
may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to
the Deputy Assistant Administrator,
Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA
Federal Register Representative, Liaison
and Policy Section (ODL); or any being
sent via express mail should be sent to
DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA
Federal Register Representative/ODL,
2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway,
Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be
filed no later than September 29, 2006.
Dated: July 25, 2006.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–12174 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,628]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Cadence Innovation, New Venture
Industries, Grand Blanc, MI; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on June 26,
2006 in response to a petition filed by
the United Automobile, Aerospace &
Agricultural Implement Workers of
America International Union 1C and
Local Union 524, on behalf of workers
of Cadence Innovation, New Venture
Industries, Grand Blanc, Michigan.
The petitioning worker group is
covered by an active certification, TA–
W–58,625 (amended July 6, 2006),
which does not expire until February
23, 2008. Consequently, further
investigation in this case would serve
no purpose, and the investigation has
been terminated.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
July 2006.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–12202 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,815]
Coating and Assembly, Inc., Mt.
Pleasant, MI; Affirmative
Determinations for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance; Correction
This notice rescinds the notice of
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance applicable to TA–W–58,815,
which was published in the Federal
Register on April 13, 2006 (71 FR
19208–19210) in Document E–5518,
Billing Code 4510–30–P.
This rescinds the certification of
eligibility for workers of TA–W–58,815,
to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance and confirms
eligibility to apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance as identified on
page 19209 in the first column, the
seventh TA–W–number listed.
The Department appropriately
published in the Federal Register April
13, 2006, page 19210, under the notice
of Negative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance, the denial of eligibility
applicable to workers of TA–W–58,815.
The notice appears on page 19210 in the
third column, the seventh TA–W–
number listed.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of
July 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–12195 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,258]
Collins And Aikman Products
Company, Division 016, Roxboro, NC
(Including Employees Working Out of
Troy, MI); Notice of Revised
Determination of Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on
Reconsideration
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
On February 24, 2005, workers and
former workers of Collins and Aikman
Products Company, Division 016,
Roxboro, North Carolina (subject firm)
were certified eligible to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) but not
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA). The Notice of
determination was published in the
Federal Register on April 1, 2005 (70 FR
16847). An amendment was issued on
June 6, 2006 to include employees
working out of Troy, Michigan. The
Notice of amendment was published in
the Federal Register on June 22, 2006
(71 FR 35951).
Based on information produced on
the initial investigation that workers the
subject workers possess skills that are
easily transferable, the workers were
denied eligibility to apply for ATAA.
Administrative reconsideration was not
requested.
After the Notice of amendment was
issued, the Department received new
information indicating that the subject
workers may possess skills that are not
easily transferable. As such, the
Department reopened the investigation.
Based on information obtain during
the reconsideration investigation, the
Department determines that the subject
workers do not possess skills that are
easily transferable.
At least five percent of the workforce
at the subject from is at least fifty years
of age. Competitive conditions within
the industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained on reconsideration, I
conclude that the requirements of
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, have been met for the workers
of the subject firm. In accordance with
the provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
All workers of Collins and Aikman
Products Company, Division 016, Roxboro,
North Carolina, including employees
working out of Troy, Michigan, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after December 13, 2003
through February 24, 2007, are eligible to
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
apply for adjustment assistance under section
223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also
eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of
July, 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–12198 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
TA–W–54,434
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,925]
Eaton Corporation, Everett, WA;
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance;
Correction
This notice rescinds the notice of
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance applicable to TA–W–58,925,
which was published in the Federal
Register on April 12, 2006 (71 FR
18771–18773) in FR Document E6–
5369, Billing Code 4510–30–P.
This rescinds the certification of
eligibility for workers of TA–W–58,925,
to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance and confirms
eligibility to apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance as identified on
page 18772 in the first column, the fifth
TA–W–number listed.
The Department appropriately
published in the Federal Register April
12, 2006, page 18773, under the notice
of Negative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance, the denial of eligibility
applicable to workers of TA–W–58,925.
The notice appears on page 18773 in the
first column, the third TA–W–number
listed.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of
July 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–12191 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:49 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
Employment and Training
Administration
Gale Group, Inc., A Division of the
Thompson Corporation, Belmont, CA;
Notice of Revised Determination on
Remand
On June 2, 2006, the United States
Court of International Trade (USCIT)
granted the Department of Labor’s
motion for voluntary remand for further
investigation in Former Employees of
Gale Group, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of
Labor, Court No. 04–00374. These
workers created electronic documents
and performed electronic indexing
services and occasionally wrote
abstracts of articles.
On May 20, 2004, the Department of
Labor (Department) issued a negative
determination regarding eligibility to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA) for workers of Gale Group, A
Division of the Thompson Corporation,
Belmont, California (Gale Group). The
negative determination was based on
the investigation’s finding that the
workers did not produce an article in
accordance with Section 222 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (Trade Act). The
Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance for the
subject firm was published in the
Federal Register on June 17, 2004 (69
FR 33940).
In response to the petitioner’s request
for administrative reconsideration, the
Department affirmed its finding that the
subject workers did not produce an
article within the meaning of the Trade
Act. The Department’s Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration was
issued on July 16, 2004 and the Notice
of Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration was published in the
Federal Register on July 23, 2004 (69 FR
44064).
The petitioners appealed the denial to
the USCIT. The Department made a
motion for voluntary remand for further
investigation. The CIT granted the
Department’s motion in an October 25,
2004 Order. In response to that Order,
the Department conducted a further
investigation to determine whether the
petitioners were eligible to apply for
TAA. On January 27, 2005, the
Department affirmed its conclusion that
the workers did not produce an article
within the meaning of the Trade Act.
The Department’s Notice was published
in the Federal Register on February 8,
2005 (70 FR 6732).
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43213
The CIT subsequently ruled that the
Department’s denial of TAA
certification because the plaintiffs did
not produce an ‘‘article’’ was reasonable
and supported by substantial evidence.
The petitioners appealed to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit.
After the case reached the Court of
Appeals the Department revised its
policy to acknowledge that there are
tangible and intangible articles.
Products that would have been
considered an article if embodied in a
physical medium will now be
considered an article for purposes of the
Trade Act even if transmitted or stored
electronically. Because it is the
Department’s practice to apply a new
policy if doing so is in the best interest
of the workers, the Department
requested a voluntary remand from the
Court of Appeals to determine whether,
under the new policy, the petitioners
are eligible to apply for TAA. The Court
of Appeals remanded the case to the CIT
which remanded it to the Department.
Upon review, the Department has
determined that the subject workers
produce an intangible article (electronic
documents) and that, following the shift
of production abroad, documents like or
directly competitive with those
produced at the subject firm were
brought back into the United States.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts
generated through the remand
investigation, I determine that a shift in
production abroad of electronic
documents like or directly competitive
to that produced at the subject facility
followed by increased imports
contributed to the total or partial
separation of a significant number or
proportion of workers at the subject
facilities. In accordance with the
provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
All workers of Gale Group, A Division of
the Thompson Corporation, Belmont,
California, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after
February 23, 2003, through two years from
the issuance of this revised determination,
are eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance under Section 223 of the Trade
Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of
July 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–12192 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 146 (Monday, July 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43212-43213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12198]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-56,258]
Collins And Aikman Products Company, Division 016, Roxboro, NC
(Including Employees Working Out of Troy, MI); Notice of Revised
Determination of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on
Reconsideration
On February 24, 2005, workers and former workers of Collins and
Aikman Products Company, Division 016, Roxboro, North Carolina (subject
firm) were certified eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA) but not Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The
Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on April
1, 2005 (70 FR 16847). An amendment was issued on June 6, 2006 to
include employees working out of Troy, Michigan. The Notice of
amendment was published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2006 (71 FR
35951).
Based on information produced on the initial investigation that
workers the subject workers possess skills that are easily
transferable, the workers were denied eligibility to apply for ATAA.
Administrative reconsideration was not requested.
After the Notice of amendment was issued, the Department received
new information indicating that the subject workers may possess skills
that are not easily transferable. As such, the Department reopened the
investigation.
Based on information obtain during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department determines that the subject workers do
not possess skills that are easily transferable.
At least five percent of the workforce at the subject from is at
least fifty years of age. Competitive conditions within the industry
are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional facts obtained on
reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for the workers of the
subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
All workers of Collins and Aikman Products Company, Division
016, Roxboro, North Carolina, including employees working out of
Troy, Michigan, who became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after December 13, 2003 through February 24, 2007,
are eligible to
[[Page 43213]]
apply for adjustment assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of July, 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-12198 Filed 7-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
