Midland Prints and Fabrics, Inc., Stenfield, NC; Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance; Correction, 43215 [E6-12190]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner asserts that the subject
workers supported the production of
components (ink) of articles produced
by the subject firm (ink and printer
cartridges) and that their support
functions were shifted abroad when
cartridge production shifted abroad.
New information provided by the
subject firm during the reconsideration
investigation supports the finding that
the subject workers purchased ink
components which were used in the ink
that was inserted into the ink cartridges
which were used in the printers
produced by the subject firm. As such,
the workers are an integral part of ink
and printer cartridge production.
Under the statute, the subject worker
group must be employed by a firm (or
an appropriate subdivision) which
produced an article domestically during
the twelve month period prior to the
petition date. During the
reconsideration investigation, the
Department confirmed that neither the
subject firm nor Lexmark International,
Inc. produced ink or cartridges
domestically during the relevant
perioid.
Therefore, the Department determines
that the subject workers are not
employed by a company covered by the
statute and are not eligible to apply for
TAA.
In addition, in accordance with
section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department herein presents the results
of its investigation regarding
certification of eligibility to apply for
ATAA for older workers.
In order for the Department to issue
a certification of eligibility to apply for
ATAA, the subject worker group must
be certified eligible to apply for TAA.
Since the subject workers are denied
eligibility to apply for TAA, they cannot
be certified eligible for ATAA.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,859]
Midland Prints and Fabrics, Inc.,
Stenfield, NC; Affirmative
Determinations for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance; Correction
This notice rescinds the notice of
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance applicable to TA–W–58,859,
which was published in the Federal
Register on April 12, 2006 (71 FR
18771–18773) in FR Document E6–
5369, Billing Code 4510–30–P.
This rescinds the certification of
eligibility for workers of TA–W–58,859,
to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance and confirms
eligibility to apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance as identified on
page 18771 in the third column, the
eleventh TA–W–number listed.
The Department appropriately
published in the Federal Register April
12, 2006, page 18773, under the notice
of Negative Determinations for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance, the denial of eligibility
applicable to workers of TA–W–58,859.
The notice appears on page 18773 in the
first column, the second TA–W–number
listed.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of
July 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–12190 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–58,929]
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify revision of the
Department of Labor’s prior decision.
Accordingly, the application is denied.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Conclusion
Milprint, Inc., a Division of Bemis
Company, Denmark, WI; Notice of
Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of
July 2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–12196 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
On May 10, 2006, the Department
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of the subject firm. The
Notice was published in the Federal
Register on May 17, 2006 (71 FR 28712).
The workers produce flexible plastic
packaging, used largely in confectionary
and snack food markets, and paper for
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43215
packaging cigarettes. Workers are not
separately identifiable by product line.
The petition for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) filed on
behalf of the workers of Milprint, Inc.,
A Division of Bemis Company,
Denmark, Wisconsin (subject firm) was
denied because the subject firm neither
imported flexible plastic packaging or
cigarette paper, nor shifted production
of either article abroad during the
relevant period. The investigation also
revealed that the parent firm
experienced increased sales of articles
like or directly competitive with those
produced by the subject facility during
the investigatory period.
The petitioners had also filed as
workers of a secondarily-affected
company (supplied component parts for
articles produced by a firm with a
currently TAA-certified worker group).
In the initial determination, the
Department stated that the subject
facility does not supply cigarette paper
component parts to any TAA-certified
firm in the relevant time period and that
flexible plastic packaging is not a
component part of confectionaries.
In the request for reconsideration, the
United Steel Workers, Local 7–1203
(Union) stated that cigarette packaging
paper constituted ten percent of subject
firm production and that it was
supplied to a TAA-certified firm, P.H.
Gladfether, Neenah, Wisconsin (TA–W–
53,612). The Union also stated that
flexible plastic packaging constituted
ninety percent of subject firm
production and that this article was
supplied to TAA-certified companies:
Farley’s and Sather Candy (TA–W–
51,546), Archibald Candy (TA–W–
53,983), American Safety Razor (TA–W–
57,323), and Bob’s Candy (TA–W–
57,772).
To be certified as a secondarilyaffected company, the subject firm must
have a customer with a currently TAAcertified worker group and the subject
firm produces a component part of the
product that was the basis for the
customer’s certification. In addition, the
TAA-certified customer must account
for at least twenty percent of subject
firm’s sales or production or the loss of
business with the customer contributed
importantly to the workers’ separations.
According to the Union, cigarette
paper production constituted only ten
percent of subject firm production. Even
if P.H. Gladfether, Neenah, Wisconsin
was the subject firm’s only customer of
this product, sales to P.H. Gladfether
would have accounted for less than
twenty percent of overall sales or
production of the subject firm. Further,
P.H. Gladfether, Neenah, Wisconsin was
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 146 (Monday, July 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 43215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12190]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-58,859]
Midland Prints and Fabrics, Inc., Stenfield, NC; Affirmative
Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance; Correction
This notice rescinds the notice of certification of eligibility to
apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance applicable to TA-W-
58,859, which was published in the Federal Register on April 12, 2006
(71 FR 18771-18773) in FR Document E6-5369, Billing Code 4510-30-P.
This rescinds the certification of eligibility for workers of TA-W-
58,859, to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance and
confirms eligibility to apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance as
identified on page 18771 in the third column, the eleventh TA-W-number
listed.
The Department appropriately published in the Federal Register
April 12, 2006, page 18773, under the notice of Negative Determinations
for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, the denial of eligibility
applicable to workers of TA-W-58,859. The notice appears on page 18773
in the first column, the second TA-W-number listed.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of July 2006.
Erica R. Cantor,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-12190 Filed 7-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P