Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a New York Stock Exchange LLC); Order Approving Proposed Rule Change to Require Specialists to Publish a 100 x 100 Share Market to Suspend Direct+ for Exchange Rule 127 Block Cross Transactions, 43260 [E6-12147]
Download as PDF
43260
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 146 / Monday, July 31, 2006 / Notices
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
[Release No. 34–54195; File No. SR–NYSE–
2006–01]
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NSX–2006–10 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a New
York Stock Exchange LLC); Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change to
Require Specialists to Publish a 100 x
100 Share Market to Suspend Direct+
for Exchange Rule 127 Block Cross
Transactions
July 24, 2006.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
On January 17, 2006, the New York
Stock Exchange, Inc.1 (n/k/a New York
Stock Exchange LLC) (‘‘NYSE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
All submissions should refer to File
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
Number SR–NSX–2006–10. This file
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4
number should be included on the
3
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the thereunder, a proposed rule change to
eliminate Exchange Rule 1000(v), which
Commission process and review your
suspends the Exchange’s Direct+ facility
comments more efficiently, please use
if the specialist publishes a bid and/or
only one method. The Commission will
offer that is more than five cents away
post all comments on the Commission’s
from the last reported transaction price
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
when an Exchange Rule 127 block cross
rules/ sro.shtml). Copies of the
transaction is being executed. The
submission, all subsequent
Exchange proposes to replace this
amendments, all written statements
procedure with a rule that requires the
with respect to the proposed rule
specialist to quote a 100 x 100 share
change that are filed with the
market when all Exchange Rule 127
Commission, and all written
block cross transactions are being
communications relating to the
executed, regardless of the amount the
proposed rule change between the
cross price is away from the last
Commission and any person, other than reported transaction price. The
proposed rule change was published for
those that may be withheld from the
comment in the Federal Register on
public in accordance with the
June 8, 2006.4 The Commission received
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
no comments regarding the proposal.
available for inspection and copying in
The Commission finds that the
the Commission’s Public Reference
proposed rule change is consistent with
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
the requirements of the Act and the
available for inspection and copying at
rules and regulations thereunder
the principal office of NSX. All
applicable to a national securities
comments received will be posted
exchange, and, in particular, with the
without change; the Commission does
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.5
not edit personal identifying
Specifically, the Commission finds that
information from submissions. You
the proposed rule change is consistent
should submit only information that
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 6 in that
you wish to make available publicly. All it is designed to promote just and
submissions should refer to File
equitable principles of trade, to foster
Number SR–NSX–2006–10 and should
cooperation and coordination with
be submitted on or before August 21,
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–12149 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
17 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jul 28, 2006
Jkt 208001
1 The Exchange is now known as the New York
Stock Exchange LLC. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 53382 (February 27, 2006), 71 FR 11251
(March 6, 2006).
2 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53932
(June 1, 2006), 71 FR 33328.
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule
change, the Commission considered the proposed
rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00167
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
settling, processing information with
respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
The Commission believes that
eliminating the requirement that
specialists quote a price that is more
than five cents away from the last
reported transaction price when a Rule
127 transaction is being executed
should simplify the procedure for
suspending Direct+ while a Rule 127
block transaction is being executed.7
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2006–
01) is hereby approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–12147 Filed 7–28–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54205; File No. SR–NYSE–
2005–38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a New
York Stock Exchange LLC); Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto to Rules 104
(‘‘Dealings by Specialists’’) and 123E
(‘‘Specialist Combination Review
Policy’’) To Change the Exchange’s
Capital Requirements for Specialist
Organizations
July 25, 2006.
I. Introduction
On May 26, 2005, the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a New York Stock
Exchange LLC) (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘NYSE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or the
‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
to amend Rules 104 (‘‘Dealings by
Specialists’’) and 123E (‘‘Specialist
Combination Review Policy’’) in order
to change the Exchange’s capital
requirements for specialist organizations
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
7 The Commission notes that this rule will not be
in effect upon the implementation of the Hybrid
Market. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
53539 (March 22, 2006), 71 FR 16353 (March 31,
2006).
8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 146 (Monday, July 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 43260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12147]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54195; File No. SR-NYSE-2006-01]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (n/
k/a New York Stock Exchange LLC); Order Approving Proposed Rule Change
to Require Specialists to Publish a 100 x 100 Share Market to Suspend
Direct+ for Exchange Rule 127 Block Cross Transactions
July 24, 2006.
On January 17, 2006, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.\1\ (n/k/a
New York Stock Exchange LLC) (``NYSE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \2
\and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ a proposed rule change to eliminate
Exchange Rule 1000(v), which suspends the Exchange's Direct+ facility
if the specialist publishes a bid and/or offer that is more than five
cents away from the last reported transaction price when an Exchange
Rule 127 block cross transaction is being executed. The Exchange
proposes to replace this procedure with a rule that requires the
specialist to quote a 100 x 100 share market when all Exchange Rule 127
block cross transactions are being executed, regardless of the amount
the cross price is away from the last reported transaction price. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on June 8, 2006.\4\ The Commission received no comments regarding the
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Exchange is now known as the New York Stock Exchange
LLC. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53382 (February 27,
2006), 71 FR 11251 (March 6, 2006).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53932 (June 1,
2006), 71 FR 33328.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in
particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\5\
Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \6 \in that it is designed
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule change,
the Commission considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that eliminating the requirement that
specialists quote a price that is more than five cents away from the
last reported transaction price when a Rule 127 transaction is being
executed should simplify the procedure for suspending Direct+ while a
Rule 127 block transaction is being executed.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Commission notes that this rule will not be in effect
upon the implementation of the Hybrid Market. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 53539 (March 22, 2006), 71 FR 16353 (March
31, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\8\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2006-01) is hereby
approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9 \
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-12147 Filed 7-28-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P