Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results and Final Results of the Reconsideration of the Sunset Review for Large Newspaper Printing Presses and Components Thereof, Whether Assembled or Unassembled, from Japan, 42801 [E6-12119]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 145 / Friday, July 28, 2006 / Notices
of FTZ Subzone 84C, on behalf of the
Port of Houston Authority, grantee of
FTZ 84, requesting export–only
temporary/interim manufacturing (T/
IM) authority within Subzone 84C, at
Du Pont’s facilities located in La Porte,
Texas.
The application was processed in
accordance with T/IM procedures, as
authorized by FTZ Board Order 1347,
including notice in the Federal Register
inviting public comment (71 FR 16756–
16757, 4/4/06). The FTZ staff examiner
reviewed the application and
determined that it meets the criteria for
approval under T/IM procedures.
Pursuant to the authority delegated to
the FTZ Board Executive Secretary in
Board Order 1347, the application was
approved, effective June 6, 2006, until
June 6, 2008, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.28.
Assembled or Unassembled, From
Japan: Reconsideration of Sunset
Review, 71 FR 19164 (April 13, 2006).
On May 15, 2006, the Department
received substantive responses from
Goss International Corp., a domestic
interested party, and from Mitsubishi
Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Tokyo Kikai
Seisakusho, Ltd., foreign producers and
exporters of the subject merchandise,
during the review period of September
4, 1996, through September 3, 2001. In
the adequacy determination
memorandum dated June 8, 2006, the
Department stated that it would conduct
a full review for this reconsideration of
the sunset review, as provided for in
section 751(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR
351.218 (e)(2)(i).
Dated: July 18, 2006.
Andrew McGilvray,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–12061 Filed 7–27–06; 8:45 am]
In accordance with section
751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department
may extend the period of time for
making its determination by not more
than 90 days, if it determines that the
review is extraordinarily complicated.
The Department has determined,
pursuant to section 751(c)(5)(C)(ii) of
the Act, that the reconsideration of the
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on LNPP from Japan is
extraordinarily complicated due to the
complex issues raised by parties to this
proceeding. Therefore, the Department
requires additional time to complete its
analysis. The Department’s preliminary
results of the sunset review
reconsideration of the antidumping duty
order on LNPP are scheduled for August
1, 2006. However, the Department will
extend the deadline in this proceeding
for the above–stated reason. As a result,
the Department intends to issue the
preliminary results of the full sunset
review reconsideration by October 30,
2006, and the final results of that review
by March 9, 2007. These dates are 90
days from the original scheduled dates
of the preliminary and final results of
the sunset review reconsideration. This
notice is issued in accordance with
sections 751(c)(5)(B) and (C) of the Act.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–588–837
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results and Final Results
of the Reconsideration of the Sunset
Review for Large Newspaper Printing
Presses and Components Thereof,
Whether Assembled or Unassembled,
from Japan
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 28, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Goldberger or Katherine Johnson,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–4136, or (202) 482–
4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On April 13, 2006, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated a
reconsideration of the sunset review of
the antidumping duty order on large
newspaper printing presses and
components thereof, whether assembled
or unassembled (LNPP), from Japan. See
Large Newspaper Printing Presses and
Components Thereof, Whether
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:47 Jul 27, 2006
Jkt 208001
Extension of Time Limits
Dated: July 24, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–12119 Filed 7–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
42801
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–533–813)
Certain Preserved Mushrooms from
India: Notice of Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 28, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terre Keaton or David J. Goldberger,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280 or
(202) 482–4136, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On February 1, 2006, the Department
published in the Federal Register (70
FR 5239) a notice of ‘‘Opportunity To
Request Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms from India for the
period February 1, 2005, through
January 31, 2006. On February 28, 2006,
Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd. (Agro
Dutch) requested an administrative
review of its sales. On February 28,
2006, the petitioner1 requested an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order for the
following companies: Agro Dutch and
Himalya International, Ltd. (Himalya).
On April 5, 2006, the Department
published a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms from India with
respect to these companies. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Deferral of Administrative
Reviews, 71 FR 17077 (April 5, 2006).
On July 10, 2006, the petitioner
withdrew its request for review of
Himalya and requested that the
Department under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1)
retroactively extend the July 5, 2006,
deadline to July 19, 2006, in order to
consider its withdrawal request.
Partial Rescission of Review
Section 351.213(d)(1) of the
Department’s regulations stipulates that
the Secretary will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
1 The petitioner is the Coalition for Fair Preserved
Mushroom Trade which includes: L.K. Bowman,
Inc., Monterey Mushrooms, Inc., Mushroom
Canning Company, and Sunny Dell Foods, Inc.
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 145 (Friday, July 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 42801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12119]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-588-837
Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results and Final
Results of the Reconsideration of the Sunset Review for Large Newspaper
Printing Presses and Components Thereof, Whether Assembled or
Unassembled, from Japan
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 28, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Katherine Johnson,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-
4136, or (202) 482-4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 13, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
initiated a reconsideration of the sunset review of the antidumping
duty order on large newspaper printing presses and components thereof,
whether assembled or unassembled (LNPP), from Japan. See Large
Newspaper Printing Presses and Components Thereof, Whether Assembled or
Unassembled, From Japan: Reconsideration of Sunset Review, 71 FR 19164
(April 13, 2006). On May 15, 2006, the Department received substantive
responses from Goss International Corp., a domestic interested party,
and from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho,
Ltd., foreign producers and exporters of the subject merchandise,
during the review period of September 4, 1996, through September 3,
2001. In the adequacy determination memorandum dated June 8, 2006, the
Department stated that it would conduct a full review for this
reconsideration of the sunset review, as provided for in section
751(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR
351.218 (e)(2)(i).
Extension of Time Limits
In accordance with section 751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department
may extend the period of time for making its determination by not more
than 90 days, if it determines that the review is extraordinarily
complicated. The Department has determined, pursuant to section
751(c)(5)(C)(ii) of the Act, that the reconsideration of the sunset
review of the antidumping duty order on LNPP from Japan is
extraordinarily complicated due to the complex issues raised by parties
to this proceeding. Therefore, the Department requires additional time
to complete its analysis. The Department's preliminary results of the
sunset review reconsideration of the antidumping duty order on LNPP are
scheduled for August 1, 2006. However, the Department will extend the
deadline in this proceeding for the above-stated reason. As a result,
the Department intends to issue the preliminary results of the full
sunset review reconsideration by October 30, 2006, and the final
results of that review by March 9, 2007. These dates are 90 days from
the original scheduled dates of the preliminary and final results of
the sunset review reconsideration. This notice is issued in accordance
with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and (C) of the Act.
Dated: July 24, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-12119 Filed 7-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-S
