Quality Cleaning Service Employed at Western Graphics Corporation; Eugene, OR; Notice of Termination of Investigation, 42128 [E6-11859]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
42128
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 25, 2006 / Notices
[FR Doc. E6–11860 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,491]
Quality Cleaning Service Employed at
Western Graphics Corporation;
Eugene, OR; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on May 31,
2006 in response to a worker petition
filed by a company official on behalf of
workers at Quality Cleaning Service
employed at Western Graphics
Corporation, Eugene, Oregon.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an active certification (TA–
W–59,074) which expires on March 30,
2008. This certification was amended on
June 7, 2006 to include any employees
of Quality Cleaning Service employed at
Western Graphics Corporation in
Eugene, Oregon. Consequently, further
investigation in this case would serve
no purpose, and the investigation has
been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
June 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–11859 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am]
finding that the subject firm did not
separate or threaten to separate a
significant number or proportion of
workers as required by section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974. Significant
number or proportion of the workers in
a firm or appropriate subdivision
thereof, means that at least three
workers with a workforce of fewer than
50 workers or five percent of the
workers with a workforce of 50 or more.
The Department reviewed the request
for reconsideration and has determined
that the petitioner has provided
additional information. Therefore, the
Department will conduct further
investigation to determine if the workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th of July
2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–11861 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
ACTION:
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,227]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
The York Group Metal Casket
Assembly; Matthews Casket Division;
A Subsidiary of Matthews
International; Marshfield, MO; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By letter dated June 18, 2006, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance, applicable to workers of the
subject firm. The denial notice was
signed on May 17, 2006, and published
in the Federal Register on June 9, 2006
(71 FR 33488).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:02 Jul 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. Currently, the
Employment and Training
Administration is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed extension of
the data collection for the Evaluation of
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Individual Training Account
Experiment (1205–0441, expires
October 31, 2006). A copy of the
proposed information collection request
(ICR) can be obtained by contacting the
office listed below in the addressee
section of this notice or at this Web site:
https://www.doleta.gov/Performance/
guidance/OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before
September 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Janet Javar, Office of Policy
Development and Research,
Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5637, 200 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Phone (202) 693–3677 (this is not a tollfree number), fax (202) 693–3584, or
e-mail Javar.Janet@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: The Individual Training
Account (ITA) experiment is designed
to test different approaches to managing
customer choice in the administration of
Individual Training Accounts (ITAs).
Established under the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA) of 1998, ITAs are
intended to empower U.S. Department
of Labor (DOL) customers to choose the
training services they need.
WIA allows state and local offices a
great deal of flexibility in deciding how
much guidance and financial support
they will provide to ITA recipients. The
ITA experiment tests three approaches
that differ widely in both the resources
made available to customers and the
involvement of local counselors to guide
customer choice. The three ITA
approaches range from a highly
structured model to a pure voucher
model:
• In Approach 1, local counselors
steer their customers to training that is
expected to yield a high return (in the
form of increased earnings) relative to
the resources invested in training.
Moreover, counselors can approve or
disapprove customers’ program
selections and set the value of the ITA
to fund approved selections.
• In Approach 2, customers receive a
fixed ITA award. Local counselors then
help customers select training that
seems appropriate and feasible, given
customers’ skills and their fixed ITA
awards and other financial resources
they have available to pay for training.
• In Approach 3, customers are
offered a fixed ITA award, but they are
allowed to choose any state-approved
training option and to formulate their
program selections independently if
they so desire.
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 42128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11859]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-59,491]
Quality Cleaning Service Employed at Western Graphics
Corporation; Eugene, OR; Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on May 31, 2006 in response to a worker
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Quality
Cleaning Service employed at Western Graphics Corporation, Eugene,
Oregon.
The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active
certification (TA-W-59,074) which expires on March 30, 2008. This
certification was amended on June 7, 2006 to include any employees of
Quality Cleaning Service employed at Western Graphics Corporation in
Eugene, Oregon. Consequently, further investigation in this case would
serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of June 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6-11859 Filed 7-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
