Coe Manufacturing; Tigard, OR; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration, 42122 [E6-11853]

Download as PDF 42122 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 25, 2006 / Notices and/or agencies to whom the individual is indebted, seeks benefits, or has furnished information; attorneys or other representatives of debtor and/or payors; and Federal, State, local, tribal, foreign, or private organizations or individuals who may have information regarding the debt, the debtor’s ability to pay, or any other information relevant or necessary to assist in debt collection efforts. EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: None. [FR Doc. E6–11803 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–07–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Indiana. The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA–W–59,473; Briggs Plumbing Products, Inc., Flora, Indiana (July 12, 2006) Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of July 2006. Richard Church, Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6–11858 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am] Employment and Training Administration BILLING CODE 4510–30–P [TA–W–59,453] DEPARTMENT OF LABOR A.W. Bohanan Co., Inc.; Dalls, NC; Notice of Termination of Investigation Employment and Training Administration Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 24, 2006 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at A.W. Bohanan Company, Inc., Dallas, North Carolina. The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA–W– 59,428) filed on May 17, 2006 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Further investigation in this case would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose; therefore the investigation under this petition has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC this 23rd day of June 2006. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6–11857 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am] Coe Manufacturing; Tigard, OR; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Coe Manufacturing, Tigard, Oregon. The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA–W–59,067; Coe Manufacturing Tigard, Oregon (July 12, 2006). BILLING CODE 4510–30–P Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of July 2006. Richard Church, Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6–11853 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–59,473] Briggs Plumbing Products, Inc.; Flora, IN; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES [TA–W–59,067] 18:02 Jul 24, 2006 Jkt 208001 Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–59,197] Collins and Aikman Products Company; Farmville, NC; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application June 12, 2006, a company official requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers of the subject firm. The Department’s negative determination was issued on May 11, 2006. On June 9, 2006, the Department’s Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register (71 FR 33488). In the request for reconsideration, the company official alleges that the Department investigated only one of the two articles produced at the subject facility (automotive interior fabrics and specialty products). The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation based on new information provided by the company official. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of June 2006. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E6–11854 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–59,600] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P Cooper Hand Tools Nicholson File; Cullman, AL; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Briggs Plumbing Products, Inc., Flora, VerDate Aug<31>2005 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PO 00000 Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on June 21, 2006 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Cooper Hand Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM 25JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 42122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-59,067]


Coe Manufacturing; Tigard, OR; Dismissal of Application for 
Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Coe Manufacturing, Tigard, Oregon. 
The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion 
that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a 
justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based 
on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. 
Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-59,067; Coe Manufacturing Tigard, Oregon (July 12, 2006).

    Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of July 2006.
Richard Church,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E6-11853 Filed 7-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.