Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 42128-42129 [E6-11851]
Download as PDF
42128
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 25, 2006 / Notices
[FR Doc. E6–11860 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,491]
Quality Cleaning Service Employed at
Western Graphics Corporation;
Eugene, OR; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on May 31,
2006 in response to a worker petition
filed by a company official on behalf of
workers at Quality Cleaning Service
employed at Western Graphics
Corporation, Eugene, Oregon.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an active certification (TA–
W–59,074) which expires on March 30,
2008. This certification was amended on
June 7, 2006 to include any employees
of Quality Cleaning Service employed at
Western Graphics Corporation in
Eugene, Oregon. Consequently, further
investigation in this case would serve
no purpose, and the investigation has
been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
June 2006.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–11859 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am]
finding that the subject firm did not
separate or threaten to separate a
significant number or proportion of
workers as required by section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974. Significant
number or proportion of the workers in
a firm or appropriate subdivision
thereof, means that at least three
workers with a workforce of fewer than
50 workers or five percent of the
workers with a workforce of 50 or more.
The Department reviewed the request
for reconsideration and has determined
that the petitioner has provided
additional information. Therefore, the
Department will conduct further
investigation to determine if the workers
meet the eligibility requirements of the
Trade Act of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th of July
2006.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–11861 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
ACTION:
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–59,227]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
The York Group Metal Casket
Assembly; Matthews Casket Division;
A Subsidiary of Matthews
International; Marshfield, MO; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By letter dated June 18, 2006, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance, applicable to workers of the
subject firm. The denial notice was
signed on May 17, 2006, and published
in the Federal Register on June 9, 2006
(71 FR 33488).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:02 Jul 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed. Currently, the
Employment and Training
Administration is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed extension of
the data collection for the Evaluation of
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Individual Training Account
Experiment (1205–0441, expires
October 31, 2006). A copy of the
proposed information collection request
(ICR) can be obtained by contacting the
office listed below in the addressee
section of this notice or at this Web site:
https://www.doleta.gov/Performance/
guidance/OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before
September 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Janet Javar, Office of Policy
Development and Research,
Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5637, 200 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Phone (202) 693–3677 (this is not a tollfree number), fax (202) 693–3584, or
e-mail Javar.Janet@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: The Individual Training
Account (ITA) experiment is designed
to test different approaches to managing
customer choice in the administration of
Individual Training Accounts (ITAs).
Established under the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA) of 1998, ITAs are
intended to empower U.S. Department
of Labor (DOL) customers to choose the
training services they need.
WIA allows state and local offices a
great deal of flexibility in deciding how
much guidance and financial support
they will provide to ITA recipients. The
ITA experiment tests three approaches
that differ widely in both the resources
made available to customers and the
involvement of local counselors to guide
customer choice. The three ITA
approaches range from a highly
structured model to a pure voucher
model:
• In Approach 1, local counselors
steer their customers to training that is
expected to yield a high return (in the
form of increased earnings) relative to
the resources invested in training.
Moreover, counselors can approve or
disapprove customers’ program
selections and set the value of the ITA
to fund approved selections.
• In Approach 2, customers receive a
fixed ITA award. Local counselors then
help customers select training that
seems appropriate and feasible, given
customers’ skills and their fixed ITA
awards and other financial resources
they have available to pay for training.
• In Approach 3, customers are
offered a fixed ITA award, but they are
allowed to choose any state-approved
training option and to formulate their
program selections independently if
they so desire.
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
42129
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 142 / Tuesday, July 25, 2006 / Notices
Each of the local sites that participated
in the study operated all three of these
ITA approaches. Local customers that
were determined eligible for an ITA
were randomly assigned to one of the
approaches.
The evaluation of the ITA experiment
includes an analysis of the
implementation and operation of the
three ITA approaches, based on data
collected during three rounds of visits to
the six sites participating in the
experiment. The evaluation also
consists of an analysis of customer
outcomes and the returns on the
investment in training. This analysis
will focus on the differences in
customer outcomes, such as training
choices, employment, and earnings,
generated by the three ITA approaches.
II. Review Focus: The Department of
Labor is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
III. Current Actions: This is a notice
to extend the collection period that is
currently approved by OMB (1205–0446
expires October 31, 2006).
The follow-up survey will collect data
items unavailable from administrative
Total
respondents
Cite/reference
ITA Follow-up survey ..................................................................................
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
$0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintaining): $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information
collection request; they will also
become a matter of public record.
Dated: July 19, 2006.
Maria K. Flynn,
Administrator, Office of Policy Development
and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–11851 Filed 7–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
18:02 Jul 24, 2006
Average time
per response
One time ......
30 min ..........
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements on respondents can be
properly assessed.
Currently, the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) is soliciting
comments concerning the extension of
the information collection related to the
30 CFR 77.1101; Escape and Evacuation
Plans.
Submit comments on or before
September 25, 2006.
Jkt 208001
Send comments to U.S.
Department of Labor, Mine Safety and
Health Administration, John Rowlett,
Director, Management Services
Division, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room
2134, Arlington, VA 22209–3939.
Commenters are encouraged to send
their comments on a computer disk, or
via Internet e-mail to
Rowlett.John@dol.gov, along with an
original printed copy. Mr. Rowlett can
be reached at (202) 693–9827 (voice), or
(202) 693–9801 (facsimile).
ADDRESSES:
Proposed Information Collection
Request Submitted for Public
Comment and Recommendations;
Escape and Evacuation Plans
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Frequency
DATES:
Mine Safety and Health Administration
ACTION:
3,840
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
records. It will provide more detailed
information on training and
employment outcomes than UI wage
records and more detailed information
on household composition and other
demographic characteristics. The
follow-up survey will be the only source
for data on: perceptions of and attitudes
toward the services and levels of
customer choice provided by each ITA
approach, job search behavior after
random assignment, and characteristics
of post-training jobs.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Agency: Employment and Training
Administration.
Title: Evaluation of the Individual
Training Account Experiment
OMB Number: 1205–0441.
Affected Public: Individuals of
households.
Total Respondents: 3,840.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,920.
Burden
1,920 hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact the employee listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 77.1101(a) requires operators
of surface coal mines and surface work
areas of underground coal mines to
establish and keep current a specific
escape and evacuation plan to be
followed in the event of a fire.
Section 77.1101(b) requires that all
employees be instructed in current
escape and evacuation plans, fire alarm
signals, and applicable procedures to be
followed in case of fire. The training
and record keeping requirements
associated with this standard are
addressed under OMB No. 1219–0070
(Certificate of Training, MSHA Form
5000–23).
Section 77.1101(c)requires escape and
evacuation plans to include the
designation and proper maintenance of
an adequate means for exiting areas
where persons are required to work or
travel including buildings, equipment,
and areas where persons normally
congregate during the work shift.
While escape and evacuation plans
are not subject to approval by MSHA
district managers, MSHA inspectors
evaluate the adequacy of the plans
during their inspections of surface coal
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42128-42129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11851]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance
consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing
collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed.
Currently, the Employment and Training Administration is soliciting
comments concerning the proposed extension of the data collection for
the Evaluation of the Individual Training Account Experiment (1205-
0441, expires October 31, 2006). A copy of the proposed information
collection request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the office
listed below in the addressee section of this notice or at this Web
site: https://www.doleta.gov/Performance/guidance/OMBControlNumber.cfm.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before September 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Janet Javar, Office of Policy Development and Research,
Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N-5637, 200 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20210. Phone (202)
693-3677 (this is not a toll-free number), fax (202) 693-3584, or e-
mail Javar.Janet@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background: The Individual Training
Account (ITA) experiment is designed to test different approaches to
managing customer choice in the administration of Individual Training
Accounts (ITAs). Established under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA)
of 1998, ITAs are intended to empower U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)
customers to choose the training services they need.
WIA allows state and local offices a great deal of flexibility in
deciding how much guidance and financial support they will provide to
ITA recipients. The ITA experiment tests three approaches that differ
widely in both the resources made available to customers and the
involvement of local counselors to guide customer choice. The three ITA
approaches range from a highly structured model to a pure voucher
model:
In Approach 1, local counselors steer their customers to
training that is expected to yield a high return (in the form of
increased earnings) relative to the resources invested in training.
Moreover, counselors can approve or disapprove customers' program
selections and set the value of the ITA to fund approved selections.
In Approach 2, customers receive a fixed ITA award. Local
counselors then help customers select training that seems appropriate
and feasible, given customers' skills and their fixed ITA awards and
other financial resources they have available to pay for training.
In Approach 3, customers are offered a fixed ITA award,
but they are allowed to choose any state-approved training option and
to formulate their program selections independently if they so desire.
[[Page 42129]]
Each of the local sites that participated in the study operated all
three of these ITA approaches. Local customers that were determined
eligible for an ITA were randomly assigned to one of the approaches.
The evaluation of the ITA experiment includes an analysis of the
implementation and operation of the three ITA approaches, based on data
collected during three rounds of visits to the six sites participating
in the experiment. The evaluation also consists of an analysis of
customer outcomes and the returns on the investment in training. This
analysis will focus on the differences in customer outcomes, such as
training choices, employment, and earnings, generated by the three ITA
approaches.
II. Review Focus: The Department of Labor is particularly
interested in comments which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions: This is a notice to extend the collection
period that is currently approved by OMB (1205-0446 expires October 31,
2006).
The follow-up survey will collect data items unavailable from
administrative records. It will provide more detailed information on
training and employment outcomes than UI wage records and more detailed
information on household composition and other demographic
characteristics. The follow-up survey will be the only source for data
on: perceptions of and attitudes toward the services and levels of
customer choice provided by each ITA approach, job search behavior
after random assignment, and characteristics of post-training jobs.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Agency: Employment and Training Administration.
Title: Evaluation of the Individual Training Account Experiment
OMB Number: 1205-0441.
Affected Public: Individuals of households.
Total Respondents: 3,840.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,920.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Average time per
Cite/reference respondents Frequency response Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITA Follow-up survey.......... 3,840 One time.......... 30 min............ 1,920 hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): $0.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintaining): $0.
Comments submitted in response to this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information collection request; they will also
become a matter of public record.
Dated: July 19, 2006.
Maria K. Flynn,
Administrator, Office of Policy Development and Research.
[FR Doc. E6-11851 Filed 7-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P