TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc., Application for Expansion of Recognition, 41841-41843 [E6-11676]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Notices
Dated: July 10, 2006.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–11690 Filed 7–21–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Manufacturer of Controlled
Substances; Notice of Registration
By Notice dated March 20, 2006, and
published in the Federal Register on
March 27, 2006, (71 FR 15219),
Organichem Corporation, 33 Riverside
Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144,
made application by renewal to the
Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) to be registered as a bulk
manufacturer of the basic classes of
controlled substances listed in
Schedules I and II:
Drug
Schedule
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Marihuana (7360) .........................
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370) .....
Amphetamine (1100) ....................
Methylphenidate (1724) ................
Pentobarbital (2270) .....................
Hydrocodone (9193) .....................
Meperidine (9230) ........................
Dextropropoxyphene (9273) .........
Fentanyl (9801) ............................
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
The company plans to manufacture
bulk controlled substances for use in
product development and for
distribution to its customers. In
reference to drug code 7360
(Marihuana), the company plans to bulk
manufacture cannabindiol as a synthetic
intermediate. This controlled substance
will be further synthesized to bulk
manufacture a synthetic THC (7370). No
other activity for this drug code is
authorized for this registration.
No comments or objections have been
received. DEA has considered the
factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and
determined that the registration of
Organichem Corporation to manufacture
the listed basic classes of controlled
substances is consistent with the public
interest at this time. DEA has
investigated Organichem Corporation to
ensure that the company’s registration is
consistent with the public interest. The
investigation has included inspection
and testing of the company’s physical
security systems, verification of the
company’s compliance with state and
local laws, and a review of the
company’s background and history.
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823,
and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33,
the above named company is granted
registration as a bulk manufacturer of
the basic classes of controlled
substances listed.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
National Institute of Corrections
Advisory Board Meeting
Time and Date: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on
Monday, September 25, 2006. 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 26,
2006.
Place: Courtyard by Marriott Detroit,
333 E. Jefferson Avenue, Detroit,
Michigan 48226, Phone: 313–222–7700.
Status: Open.
Matters to be Considered: Site Visit to
Michigan Department of Corrections;
Observation of Michigan Prisoner
ReEntry Initiative; Faith Based;
Evidence-based practices, Institutional
culture work; and pubic/private funding
partnerships; PREA Update; Agency
Reports.
For Further Information Contact:
Larry Solomon, Deputy Director, 202–
307–3106, ext. 44254.
Morris L. Thigpen,
Director.
[FR Doc. 06–6427 Filed 7–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–36–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. NRTL3–92]
TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc.,
Application for Expansion of
Recognition
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
application of TUV Rheinland of North
America, Inc., (TUV) for expansion of its
recognition to use additional test
standards, and presents the Agency’s
preliminary finding to grant this request
for expansion. This preliminary finding
does not constitute an interim or
temporary approval of this application.
DATES: You must submit information or
comments, or any request for extension
of the time to comment, by the
following dates:
• Hard copy: postmarked or sent by
August 8, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41841
• Electronic transmission or
facsimile: sent by August 8, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit
information or comments to this
notice—identified by docket number
NRTL3–92—by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• OSHA Web site: https://
ecomments.osha.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on OSHA’s Web page.
• Fax: If your written comments are
10 pages or fewer, you may fax them to
the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–
1648.
• Regular mail, express delivery,
hand delivery and courier service:
Submit three copies to the OSHA
Docket Office, Docket No. NRTL3–92,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N–
2625, Washington, DC 20210; telephone
(202) 693–2350. (OSHA’s TTY number
is (877) 889–5627). OSHA Docket Office
hours of operation are 8:15 a.m. to 4:45
p.m., EST.
Instructions: All comments received
will be posted without change to
https://dockets.osha.gov, including any
personal information provided. OSHA
cautions you about submitting personal
information such as social security
numbers and birth dates.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
dockets.osha.gov. Contact the OSHA
Docket Office for information about
materials not available through the
OSHA Web page and for assistance in
using the Web page to locate docket
submissions.
Extension of Comment Period: Submit
requests for extensions concerning this
notice to the Office of Technical
Programs and Coordination Activities,
NRTL Program, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Room N–3655, Washington, DC
20210. Or, fax to (202) 693–1644.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Office of Technical Programs
and Coordination Activities, NRTL
Program, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Room N–3655, Washington, DC
20210, or phone (202) 693–2110.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice of Application
The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) hereby gives
notice that TUV Rheinland of North
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
41842
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Notices
America, Inc., (TUV) has applied for
expansion of its current recognition as
a Nationally Recognized Testing
Laboratory (NRTL). TUV’s expansion
request covers the use of additional test
standards. OSHA’s current scope of
recognition for TUV may be found in
the following informational Web page:
https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/
tuv.html.
OSHA recognition of an NRTL
signifies that the organization has met
the legal requirements in Section 1910.7
of Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations
(29 CFR 1910.7). Recognition is an
acknowledgment that the organization
can perform independent safety testing
and certification of the specific products
covered within its scope of recognition
and is not a delegation or grant of
government authority. As a result of
recognition, employers may use
products ‘‘properly certified’’ 1 by the
NRTL to meet OSHA standards that
require testing and certification.
The Agency processes applications by
an NRTL for initial recognition or for
expansion or renewal of this recognition
following requirements in Appendix A
to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix
requires that the Agency publish two
notices in the Federal Register in
processing an application. In the first
notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides its preliminary
finding and, in the second notice, the
Agency provides its final decision on
the application. These notices set forth
the NRTL’s scope of recognition or
modifications of that scope. We
maintain an informational Web page for
each NRTL, which details its scope of
recognition. These pages can be
accessed from our Web site at https://
www.osha-slc.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/
index.html.
The most recent notice published by
OSHA specifically related to TUV’s
recognition granted an expansion of its
NRTL scope, which became effective on
June 20, 2003 (68 FR 37030).
The current address of the TUV
facility already recognized by OSHA is:
TUV Rheinland of North America,
Inc., 12 Commerce Road, Newtown, CT
06470.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
General Background on the Application
TUV has submitted an application,
dated December 20, 2004 (see Exhibit
32–1) to expand its recognition to
include 5 additional test standards. TUV
then amended its application through
1 Properly certified means, in part, that the
product is labeled or marked with the NRTL’s
‘‘registered’’ certification mark (i.e., the mark the
NRTL uses for its NRTL work) and that the product
certification falls within the scope of recognition of
the NRTL.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
follow-up requests to add 4 more test
standards to its request (see Exhibit 32–
2). The NRTL Program staff has
determined that each of these nine
standards is an ‘‘appropriate test
standard’’ within the meaning of 29 CFR
1910.7(c). However, one of the
standards is already in TUV’s scope.
Therefore, OSHA would approve eight
test standards for the expansion.
Following review of the application,
OSHA deferred action on this notice
pending resolution by the NRTL of
certain findings from our on-site visit of
the NRTL. These findings have been
satisfactorily resolved, permitting this
notice to be processed. This notice has
also been delayed through no fault of
the NRTL.
TUV seeks recognition for testing and
certification of products for
demonstration of conformance to the
following test standards:
UL 943 Ground-Fault CircuitInterrupters
UL 991 Tests for Safety-Related
Controls Employing Solid-State
Devices
UL 1047 Isolated Power Systems
Equipment
UL 1363 Relocatable Power Taps
UL 1662 Electric Chain Saws
UL 1664 Immersion-Detection CircuitInterrupters
UL 1741 Inverters, Converters,
Controllers and Interconnection
System Equipment for Use With
Distributed Energy Resources
UL 1863 Communications-Circuit
Accessories
The designations and titles of the
above test standards were current at the
time of the preparation of this notice.
OSHA’s recognition of TUV, or any
NRTL, for a particular test standard is
limited to equipment or materials (i.e.,
products) for which OSHA standards
require third party testing and
certification before use in the
workplace. Consequently, if a test
standard also covers any product(s) for
which OSHA does not require such
testing and certification, an NRTL’s
scope of recognition does not include
that product(s).
Many UL test standards also are
approved as American National
Standards by the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI). However, for
convenience, we use the designation of
the standards developing organization
for the standard as opposed to the ANSI
designation. Under our procedures, any
NRTL recognized for an ANSI-approved
test standard may use either the latest
proprietary version of the test standard
or the latest ANSI version of that
standard. You may contact ANSI to find
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
out whether or not a test standard is
currently ANSI-approved.
Preliminary Finding on the Application
TUV has submitted an acceptable
request for expansion of its recognition
as an NRTL. In connection with this
request, NRTL Program assessment staff
evaluated information pertinent to the
request during an on-site visit of the
NRTL and recommended that TUV’s
recognition be expanded to include the
additional test standards (see Exhibit
32–3). Our review of the application
file, the staff’s recommendation, and
other pertinent documents indicate that
TUV can meet the requirements, as
prescribed by 29 CFR 1910.7, for the
expansion for the eight additional test
standards listed above. This preliminary
finding does not constitute an interim or
temporary approval of the application.
OSHA welcomes public comments, in
sufficient detail, as to whether TUV has
met the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7
for expansion of its recognition as a
Nationally Recognized Testing
Laboratory. Your comments should
consist of pertinent written documents
and exhibits. Should you need more
time to comment, you must request it in
writing, including reasons for the
request. OSHA must receive your
written request for extension at the
address provided above no later than
the last date for comments. OSHA will
limit any extension to 30 days, unless
the requester justifies a longer period.
We may deny a request for extension if
it is not adequately justified. You may
obtain or review copies of TUV’s
requests, the staff’s recommendation,
and all submitted comments, as
received, by contacting the Docket
Office, Room N2625, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, at the above
address. Docket No. NRTL3–92 contains
all materials in the record concerning
TUV’s application.
The NRTL Program staff will review
all timely comments and, after
resolution of issues raised by these
comments, will recommend whether to
grant TUV’s expansion request. The
Assistant Secretary will make the final
decision on granting the expansion and,
in making this decision, may undertake
other proceedings that are prescribed in
Appendix A to 29 CFR Section 1910.7.
OSHA will publish a public notice of
this final decision in the Federal
Register.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 141 / Monday, July 24, 2006 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of
June, 2006.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–11676 Filed 7–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–271–LR; ASLBP No. 06–
849–03–LR]
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; In
the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Vermont
Yankee, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. (Vermont Yankee
Nuclear Power Station)
July 18, 2006.
Before Administrative Judges: Alex S. Karlin,
Chairman, Dr. Richard E. Wardwell, Dr.
Thomas S. Elleman.
Order (Setting Oral Argument Schedule
and Inviting Written Limited
Appearance Statements)
On June 20, 2006, the Board issued an
order tentatively scheduling oral
argument in this proceeding on
Tuesday, August 1, 2006, and
Wednesday, August 2, 2006. That order
indicated that the time and location of
the oral argument would be set forth in
a subsequent order.
The Board hereby orders and confirms
that it will hear oral argument from
representatives of the petitioners, the
applicant, and the NRC Staff,1
commencing at 9 a.m. on Tuesday,
August 1, 2006, in the multi-purpose
room at Brattleboro Union High School,
located at 131 Fairground Road in
Brattleboro, Vermont. As necessary, oral
argument will continue and
recommence at 9 a.m. on Wednesday,
August 2, 2006. The Board plans to
adjourn each day no later than 6 p.m.
The oral argument will proceed as
follows. First, we will hear a short
opening statement, limited to ten
minutes, from each participant. Second,
the Board will hear argument on the
individual contentions listed below.2
Except where otherwise specified, for
each listed contention the petitioner
will have a total of twenty minutes, the
applicant will have fifteen minutes, and
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
1 The
four petitioners are the Vermont
Department of Public Service; the Massachusetts
Attorney General; the New England Coalition
(NEC); and the Town of Marlboro, Vermont. The
applicant consists of two entities, Entergy Nuclear
Vermont Yankee, L.L.C., and Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. The petitioners, applicant, and the
NRC Staff are sometimes collectively referred to as
the ‘‘participants.’’
2 The participants are encouraged to enter into
stipulations that will serve to reduce or eliminate
issues or contentions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Jul 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
the NRC Staff will have ten minutes.
Five minutes of a petitioner’s time will
be reserved for rebuttal unless, at the
outset of argument on that contention,
the petitioner chooses an alternative
allocation (up to a maximum of ten
minutes rebuttal). All time periods
include the time for responding to
questions from the Board. For those
contentions not listed below, no oral
argument is necessary in order for the
Board to reach its decision.
In formulating their arguments,
participants should keep in mind that
the Board will have read their pleadings
and should focus solely on the critical
points in controversy as those issues
have emerged in the pleadings. The
main purpose of the oral argument is to
allow the Board to clarify its
understanding of legal and factual
points to assist it in deciding the issues
presented by the pleadings. Oral
arguments will be conducted in
accordance with the following schedule:
1. Call to order, introductory remarks.
2. Opening statement by each
participant.
3. State of Massachusetts Contention
1. For this contention the petitioner will
have a total of thirty minutes, the
applicant will have twenty minutes, and
the NRC Staff will have twenty minutes.
4. State of Vermont Contention 2. For
this contention the petitioner will have
a total of twenty-five minutes, the
applicant will have twenty minutes, and
the NRC Staff will have ten minutes.
5. State of Vermont Contention 1.
6. State of Vermont Contention 3.
7. NEC Contention 1.
8. NEC Contention 2.
9. NEC Contention 3.
10. NEC Contention 4.
11. NEC Contention 5.
12. NEC Contention 6.3
13. Adjourn.
Given that the purpose of this
proceeding is to evaluate the
admissibility of the petitioners’
contentions and the legal issues
presented in the participants’ pleadings,
oral argument will only be heard from
the participants. Members of the public
are welcome to attend and observe this
proceeding. As this is an adjudicatory
proceeding, the Board intends to
conduct an orderly hearing and signs,
banners, posters, and displays are
prohibited in accordance with NRC
policy. See Procedures for Providing
3 The Board will not hear oral argument from any
participant on the contention proffered by the Town
of Marlboro. However the Town of Marlboro may
want to use some of the ten minutes allocated for
its opening statement to address the issue as to
whether the town is an ‘‘interested * * * local
governmental body’’ within the meaning of 10 CFR
2.315(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41843
Security Support for NRC Public
Meetings/Hearings, 66 FR 31,719 (June
12, 2001). All interested persons should
arrive early and allow sufficient time to
pass through security screening.
Oral limited appearance statements in
accord with 10 CFR 2.315(a) will not be
heard on August 1 and 2, 2006. If
contentions are admitted after the oral
argument is complete, then oral limited
appearance statements may be heard at
a later date. In the interim, interested
individuals may submit written limited
appearance statements related to the
issues in this proceeding. Such written
statements may be submitted at any
time and should be sent either by (1)
mail to the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff,
with a copy to the Chairman of this
Licensing Board at Mail Stop T–3F23,
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; (2) e-mail to the Office of the
Secretary at hearingdocket@nrc.gov,
with a copy to the Board Chairman (c/
o Marcia Carpentier, mxc7@nrc.gov); or
(3) fax to the Office of the Secretary at
301–415–1101 (facsimile verification
number: 301–415–1966), with a copy to
the Board Chairman at 301–415–5599
(facsimile verification number: 301–
415–7550).
It is so ordered.
For the Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board.4
Dated: July 18, 2006 in Rockville,
Maryland.
Alex S. Karlin,
Administrative Judge.
[FR Doc. E6–11675 Filed 7–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–483]
Union Electric Company; Notice of
Consideration of Issuance of
Amendment to Facility Operating
License, Proposed No Significant
Hazards Consideration Determination,
and Opportunity for a Hearing
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission) is
considering issuance of an amendment
4 Copies of this order were sent this date by
Internet e-mail transmission to counsel or a
representative for (1) applicant Entergy Nuclear
Vermont Yankee, L.L.C., and Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc.; (2) petitioners Town of Marlboro,
Vermont, the Massachusetts Attorney General, the
Vermont Department of Public Service, and the
New England Coalition; and (3) the NRC staff.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 141 (Monday, July 24, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41841-41843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11676]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
[Docket No. NRTL3-92]
TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc., Application for Expansion
of Recognition
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the application of TUV Rheinland of
North America, Inc., (TUV) for expansion of its recognition to use
additional test standards, and presents the Agency's preliminary
finding to grant this request for expansion. This preliminary finding
does not constitute an interim or temporary approval of this
application.
DATES: You must submit information or comments, or any request for
extension of the time to comment, by the following dates:
Hard copy: postmarked or sent by August 8, 2006.
Electronic transmission or facsimile: sent by August 8,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit information or comments to this notice--
identified by docket number NRTL3-92--by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
OSHA Web site: https://ecomments.osha.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments on OSHA's Web page.
Fax: If your written comments are 10 pages or fewer, you
may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-1648.
Regular mail, express delivery, hand delivery and courier
service: Submit three copies to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
NRTL3-92, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room
N-2625, Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-2350. (OSHA's TTY
number is (877) 889-5627). OSHA Docket Office hours of operation are
8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., EST.
Instructions: All comments received will be posted without change
to https://dockets.osha.gov, including any personal information
provided. OSHA cautions you about submitting personal information such
as social security numbers and birth dates.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://dockets.osha.gov. Contact the OSHA
Docket Office for information about materials not available through the
OSHA Web page and for assistance in using the Web page to locate docket
submissions.
Extension of Comment Period: Submit requests for extensions
concerning this notice to the Office of Technical Programs and
Coordination Activities, NRTL Program, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210. Or, fax to (202) 693-1644.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Office of Technical Programs
and Coordination Activities, NRTL Program, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210, or phone (202) 693-
2110.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice of Application
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) hereby
gives notice that TUV Rheinland of North
[[Page 41842]]
America, Inc., (TUV) has applied for expansion of its current
recognition as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL). TUV's
expansion request covers the use of additional test standards. OSHA's
current scope of recognition for TUV may be found in the following
informational Web page: https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/tuv.html.
OSHA recognition of an NRTL signifies that the organization has met
the legal requirements in Section 1910.7 of Title 29, Code of Federal
Regulations (29 CFR 1910.7). Recognition is an acknowledgment that the
organization can perform independent safety testing and certification
of the specific products covered within its scope of recognition and is
not a delegation or grant of government authority. As a result of
recognition, employers may use products ``properly certified'' \1\ by
the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require testing and certification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Properly certified means, in part, that the product is
labeled or marked with the NRTL's ``registered'' certification mark
(i.e., the mark the NRTL uses for its NRTL work) and that the
product certification falls within the scope of recognition of the
NRTL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Agency processes applications by an NRTL for initial
recognition or for expansion or renewal of this recognition following
requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires
that the Agency publish two notices in the Federal Register in
processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides its preliminary finding and, in the second
notice, the Agency provides its final decision on the application.
These notices set forth the NRTL's scope of recognition or
modifications of that scope. We maintain an informational Web page for
each NRTL, which details its scope of recognition. These pages can be
accessed from our Web site at https://www.osha-slc.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/
index.html.
The most recent notice published by OSHA specifically related to
TUV's recognition granted an expansion of its NRTL scope, which became
effective on June 20, 2003 (68 FR 37030).
The current address of the TUV facility already recognized by OSHA
is:
TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc., 12 Commerce Road, Newtown, CT
06470.
General Background on the Application
TUV has submitted an application, dated December 20, 2004 (see
Exhibit 32-1) to expand its recognition to include 5 additional test
standards. TUV then amended its application through follow-up requests
to add 4 more test standards to its request (see Exhibit 32-2). The
NRTL Program staff has determined that each of these nine standards is
an ``appropriate test standard'' within the meaning of 29 CFR
1910.7(c). However, one of the standards is already in TUV's scope.
Therefore, OSHA would approve eight test standards for the expansion.
Following review of the application, OSHA deferred action on this
notice pending resolution by the NRTL of certain findings from our on-
site visit of the NRTL. These findings have been satisfactorily
resolved, permitting this notice to be processed. This notice has also
been delayed through no fault of the NRTL.
TUV seeks recognition for testing and certification of products for
demonstration of conformance to the following test standards:
UL 943 Ground-Fault Circuit-Interrupters
UL 991 Tests for Safety-Related Controls Employing Solid-State Devices
UL 1047 Isolated Power Systems Equipment
UL 1363 Relocatable Power Taps
UL 1662 Electric Chain Saws
UL 1664 Immersion-Detection Circuit-Interrupters
UL 1741 Inverters, Converters, Controllers and Interconnection System
Equipment for Use With Distributed Energy Resources
UL 1863 Communications-Circuit Accessories
The designations and titles of the above test standards were
current at the time of the preparation of this notice.
OSHA's recognition of TUV, or any NRTL, for a particular test
standard is limited to equipment or materials (i.e., products) for
which OSHA standards require third party testing and certification
before use in the workplace. Consequently, if a test standard also
covers any product(s) for which OSHA does not require such testing and
certification, an NRTL's scope of recognition does not include that
product(s).
Many UL test standards also are approved as American National
Standards by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). However,
for convenience, we use the designation of the standards developing
organization for the standard as opposed to the ANSI designation. Under
our procedures, any NRTL recognized for an ANSI-approved test standard
may use either the latest proprietary version of the test standard or
the latest ANSI version of that standard. You may contact ANSI to find
out whether or not a test standard is currently ANSI-approved.
Preliminary Finding on the Application
TUV has submitted an acceptable request for expansion of its
recognition as an NRTL. In connection with this request, NRTL Program
assessment staff evaluated information pertinent to the request during
an on-site visit of the NRTL and recommended that TUV's recognition be
expanded to include the additional test standards (see Exhibit 32-3).
Our review of the application file, the staff's recommendation, and
other pertinent documents indicate that TUV can meet the requirements,
as prescribed by 29 CFR 1910.7, for the expansion for the eight
additional test standards listed above. This preliminary finding does
not constitute an interim or temporary approval of the application.
OSHA welcomes public comments, in sufficient detail, as to whether
TUV has met the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for expansion of its
recognition as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory. Your
comments should consist of pertinent written documents and exhibits.
Should you need more time to comment, you must request it in writing,
including reasons for the request. OSHA must receive your written
request for extension at the address provided above no later than the
last date for comments. OSHA will limit any extension to 30 days,
unless the requester justifies a longer period. We may deny a request
for extension if it is not adequately justified. You may obtain or
review copies of TUV's requests, the staff's recommendation, and all
submitted comments, as received, by contacting the Docket Office, Room
N2625, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department
of Labor, at the above address. Docket No. NRTL3-92 contains all
materials in the record concerning TUV's application.
The NRTL Program staff will review all timely comments and, after
resolution of issues raised by these comments, will recommend whether
to grant TUV's expansion request. The Assistant Secretary will make the
final decision on granting the expansion and, in making this decision,
may undertake other proceedings that are prescribed in Appendix A to 29
CFR Section 1910.7. OSHA will publish a public notice of this final
decision in the Federal Register.
[[Page 41843]]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of June, 2006.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-11676 Filed 7-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P