Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Its Marketing Fee Program, 41485-41487 [E6-11568]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 140 / Friday, July 21, 2006 / Notices
Meeting will be held on Thursday, July 27,
2006 at 2 p.m.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters may also be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (6), (7), (9)(B), (10)
and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (6), (7), (9)(ii),
and (10) permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed
Meeting.
Commissioner Nazareth, as duty
officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the closed meeting in closed
session.
The subject matter of the Open
Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, July
26, 2006 will be:
[Release No. 34–54153; File No. SR–CBOE–
2006–63]
The Commission will consider whether to
adopt amendments to the disclosure
requirements for executive and director
compensation, related party transactions,
director independence and other corporate
governance matters, and security ownership
of officers and directors. The Commission
will also consider whether to adopt final
rules requiring that disclosure under the
amended items generally be provided in
plain English.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_1
The subject matter of the closed
meeting scheduled for Thursday, July
27, 2006 will be: Formal orders of
investigation; Institution and settlement
of injunctive actions; Institution and
settlement of administrative
proceedings of an enforcement nature;
Collection matters; Resolution of
litigation claims; Litigation matters; and
An adjudicatory matter.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact: The Office of the Secretary at
(202) 551–5400.
Dated: July 18, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–6408 Filed 7–19–06; 10:55 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Its Marketing
Fee Program
July 14, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 30,
2006, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The CBOE
has designated this proposal as one
establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by the CBOE
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3
and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which
renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The CBOE proposes to amend its
marketing fee program. Below is the text
of the proposed rule change. Proposed
new language is in italics; deleted
language is in [brackets].
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.
Fees Schedule
June [2]30, 2006
1. No Change.
2. MARKETING FEE (6)(16)—$.65
3.–4. No Change.
Footnotes:
(1)–(5) No Change.
(6) The Marketing Fee will be
assessed only on transactions of MarketMakers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs, and
LMMs resulting from orders for less
than 1,000 contracts (i) from payment
accepting firms, or (ii) that have
designated a ‘‘Preferred Market-Maker’’
under CBOE Rule 8.13 at the rate of $.65
per contract on all classes of equity
options, options on HOLDRs, options on
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
2 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:59 Jul 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41485
SPDRs, options on DIA, options on
NDX, and options on RUT. The fee will
not apply to: Market-Maker-to-MarketMaker transactions including
transactions resulting from orders from
non-member market-makers;
transactions resulting from inbound P/A
orders or a transaction resulting from
the execution of an order against the
DPM’s account if an order directly
related to that order is represented and
executed through the Linkage Plan
using the DPM’s account; transactions
resulting from accommodation
liquidations (cabinet trades); and
transactions resulting from dividend
strategies, merger strategies, and short
stock interest strategies as defined in
footnote 13 of this Fees Schedule. This
fee shall not apply to index options and
options on ETFs (other than options on
SPDRs, options on DIA, options on
NDX, and options on RUT). A Preferred
Market-Maker will only be given access
to the marketing fee funds generated
from a Preferred order if the Preferred
Market-Maker has an appointment in
the class in which the Preferred order is
received and executed.
DPM/LMM Rebate/Carryover Process.
If less than 80% of the marketing fee
funds collected in a given month are
paid out by the DPM/LMM [or Preferred
Market-Maker in a given month], then
the Exchange would refund such
surplus at the end of the month on a pro
rata basis based upon contributions
made by the Market-Makers, RMMs, eDPMs, DPMs and LMMs in that month.
However, if 80% or more of the
[accumulated] funds collected in a given
month are paid out by the DPM/LMM
[or Preferred Market-Maker], there will
not be a rebate for that month and the
excess funds will [carry over and will]
be included in [the] an Excess [p]Pool
of funds to be used by the DPM/LMM
[or Preferred Market-Maker the
following] in subsequent months. The
total balance of the Excess Pool of funds
cannot exceed $25,000, and if in any
month the balance were to exceed
$25,000, the funds in excess of $25,000
would be refunded[At the end of each
quarter, the Exchange would then
refund any surplus, if any,] on a pro rata
basis based upon contributions made by
the Market-Makers, RMMs, DPMs, eDPMs and LMMs in that month.
Preferred Market-Maker Rebate/
Carryover Process. If less than 80% of
the marketing fee funds are paid out by
the Preferred Market-Maker in a given
month, then the Exchange would refund
such surplus at the end of the month on
a pro rata basis based upon
contributions made by the MarketMakers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs and
LMMs in that month. However, if 80%
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
41486
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 140 / Friday, July 21, 2006 / Notices
or more of the accumulated funds in a
given month are paid out by the
Preferred Market-Maker, there will not
be a rebate for that month and the funds
will carry over and will be included in
the pool of funds to be used by the
Preferred Market-Maker the following
month. At the end of each quarter, the
Exchange would then refund any
surplus, if any, on a pro rata basis based
upon contributions made by the MarketMakers, RMMs, DPMs, e-DPMs and
LMMs in the final month of the quarter.
CBOE’s marketing fee program as
described above will be in effect until
June 2, 2007.
Remainder of Fees Schedule—No
change.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change, and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth
in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_1
1. Purpose
The CBOE proposes to amend its
marketing fee to modify the manner in
which marketing fee funds collected
during a calendar quarter are refunded.
The CBOE states that its marketing fee
currently provides that if less than 80%
of the marketing fee funds are paid out
by the DPM/LMM or Preferred MarketMaker in a given month, then the
Exchange would refund such surplus at
the end of the month on a pro rata basis
based upon contributions made by the
Market-Makers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs,
and LMMs. However, if 80% or more of
the accumulated funds in a given month
are paid out by the DPM/LMM or
Preferred Market-Maker, there will not
be a rebate for that month and the funds
will carry over and will be included in
the pool of funds to be used by the
DPM/LMM or Preferred Market-Maker
the following month. At the end of each
quarter, the Exchange would then
refund any surplus, if any, on a pro rata
basis based upon contributions made by
the Market-Makers, RMMs, DPMs, eDPMs, and LMMs.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:59 Jul 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
The CBOE states that the purpose of
this rule change is to modify the rebate
process as it relates to DPMs. As
amended, if less than 80% of the
marketing fee funds collected in a given
month are paid out by the DPM/LMM,
then the Exchange would refund such
surplus at the end of the month on a pro
rata basis based upon contributions
made by the Market-Makers, RMMs, eDPMs, DPMs, and LMMs in that month.
However, if 80% or more of the funds
collected in a given month are paid out
by the DPM/LMM, there would not be
a rebate for that month and the excess
funds would be included in an excess
pool (‘‘Excess Pool’’) of funds to be used
by the DPM/LMM in subsequent
months. The CBOE states that the total
balance of the Excess Pool of funds
could not exceed $25,000, and if in any
month the balance were to exceed
$25,000, the funds in excess of $25,000
would be refunded on a pro rata basis
based upon contributions made by the
Market-Makers, RMMs, DPMs, e-DPMs,
and LMMs in that month. As before, in
the event a DPM/LMM is also marked as
a Preferred Market-Maker on a
particular order, the funds collected
from the order will be allocated to the
DPM in its capacity as a DPM and not
as a Preferred Market-Maker.
The Exchange states that the rebate
and carryover process for Preferred
Market-Makers will continue to operate
on a quarterly basis. However, CBOE
proposes to make one clarification to the
rebate process for Preferred MarketMakers in the text of the Fees Schedule
to make it consistent with the current
process and procedure for rebating
excess funds. As noted above, if less
than 80% of the marketing fee funds are
paid out by the Preferred Market-Maker
in a given month, then the Exchange
would refund such surplus at the end of
the month on a pro rata basis based
upon contributions made by the MarketMakers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs, and
LMMs. CBOE states that it refunds the
money based on the contributions made
by these market participants in that
specific month.
If there are surplus funds at the end
of the quarter, CBOE represents that it
refunds the money on a pro rata basis
based upon contributions made by the
Market-Makers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs,
and LMMs in the final month of the
quarter. CBOE believes that refunding
surplus funds to market participants on
a pro rata basis based upon
contributions made in the final month
of the quarter, as opposed to based upon
contributions made during the
preceding three months, would be an
equitable allocation of dues and fees
due to the manner in which the
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
marketing fee funds collected are paid
out and how CBOE accounts for the
funds on a month-to-month basis. For
example, if at least 80%, but less than
100%, of the funds collected in the 1st
month of a quarter is paid out, the
balance that carries over to the 2nd
month is paid out first in that 2nd
month. Similarly, if at least 80%, but
less than 100%, of the funds collected
in the 2nd month is paid out, the
balance that carries over to the 3rd
month is paid out first in that 3rd
month. As a result, any surplus of funds
at the end of the quarter (the 3rd month)
was contributed by the Market-Makers,
RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs, and LMMs who
were assessed the fee in that month.
CBOE states that it is not amending its
marketing fee program in any other
respects.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,5 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act,6 in particular, in that it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among CBOE members.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change
has been designated as a fee change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Act 7 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 8 thereunder,
because it establishes or changes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange. Accordingly, the proposal
will take effect upon filing with the
Commission. At any time within 60
days of the filing of such proposed rule
change the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
5 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
8 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
6 15
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 140 / Friday, July 21, 2006 / Notices
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54147; File No. SR–CBOE–
2006–64]
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2006–63 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES_1
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–11568 Filed 7–20–06; 8:45 am]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change to Extend Two Pilot
Programs Until July 18, 2007 Related
to the Exchange’s Automated
Improvement Mechanism
July 14, 2006.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 6,
2006, the Chicago Board Options
All submissions should refer to File
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘Exchange’’ or
Number SR–CBOE–2006–63. This file
‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
Commission process and review your
change as described in Items I and II
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will below, which Items have been prepared
post all comments on the Commission’s by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,4 which renders
submission, all subsequent
the proposed rule change effective upon
amendments, all written statements
filing with the Commission. The
with respect to the proposed rule
Commission is publishing this notice to
change that are filed with the
solicit comments on the proposed rule
Commission, and all written
change from interested persons.
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Commission and any person, other than Statement of the Terms of Substance of
those that may be withheld from the
the Proposed Rule Change
public in accordance with the
CBOE proposes to extend two pilot
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
programs related to the Exchange’s
available for inspection and copying in
Automated Improvement Mechanism
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be (‘‘AIM’’) for one year, until July 18,
2007. The text of the proposed rule
available for inspection and copying at
change is available on the Exchange’s
the principal office of the CBOE. All
Web site (https://www.cboe.com), at the
comments received will be posted
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
without change; the Commission does
at the Commission’s Public Reference
not edit personal identifying
Room.
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
submissions should refer to File
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Number SR–CBOE–2006–63 and should
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
be submitted on or before August 11,
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
2006.
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:59 Jul 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41487
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
In February 2006, CBOE obtained
approval of a filing adopting the AIM
auction process.5 AIM exposes certain
orders electronically to an auction
process to provide such orders with the
opportunity to receive an execution at
an improved price. The AIM auction is
available only for orders that an
Exchange member represents as agent
and for which a second order of the
same size as the ‘‘Agency Order’’ (and
on the opposite side of the market) is
also submitted (effectively stopping the
Agency Order at a given price).
Two components of AIM were
approved on a pilot basis: (1) That there
is no minimum size requirement for
orders to be eligible for the auction, and
(2) that the auction will conclude
prematurely anytime there is a quote
lock on the Exchange pursuant to
Exchange Rule 6.45A(d).6 In connection
with the pilot programs, the Exchange
has been submitting to the Commission
monthly reports providing detailed AIM
auction and order execution data.
Extending the pilots for an additional
year will allow the Commission more
time to consider the impact of the pilot
programs on AIM order executions. The
proposed rule change merely extends
the duration of the pilot programs until
July 18, 2007.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with section
6(b) of the Act,7 in general, and furthers
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53222
(February 3, 2006), 71 FR 7069 (February 10, 2006).
6 That rule relates to situations where a MarketMaker’s quote interacts with the quote of another
CBOE Market-Maker (i.e., when internal quotes
lock).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 140 (Friday, July 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41485-41487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11568]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54153; File No. SR-CBOE-2006-63]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Its Marketing Fee Program
July 14, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 30, 2006, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The CBOE has designated this proposal as one establishing or
changing a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the CBOE under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The CBOE proposes to amend its marketing fee program. Below is the
text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is in italics;
deleted language is in [brackets].
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.
Fees Schedule
June [2]30, 2006
1. No Change.
2. MARKETING FEE (6)(16)--$.65
3.-4. No Change.
Footnotes:
(1)-(5) No Change.
(6) The Marketing Fee will be assessed only on transactions of
Market-Makers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs, and LMMs resulting from orders for
less than 1,000 contracts (i) from payment accepting firms, or (ii)
that have designated a ``Preferred Market-Maker'' under CBOE Rule 8.13
at the rate of $.65 per contract on all classes of equity options,
options on HOLDRs, options on SPDRs, options on DIA, options on NDX,
and options on RUT. The fee will not apply to: Market-Maker-to-Market-
Maker transactions including transactions resulting from orders from
non-member market-makers; transactions resulting from inbound P/A
orders or a transaction resulting from the execution of an order
against the DPM's account if an order directly related to that order is
represented and executed through the Linkage Plan using the DPM's
account; transactions resulting from accommodation liquidations
(cabinet trades); and transactions resulting from dividend strategies,
merger strategies, and short stock interest strategies as defined in
footnote 13 of this Fees Schedule. This fee shall not apply to index
options and options on ETFs (other than options on SPDRs, options on
DIA, options on NDX, and options on RUT). A Preferred Market-Maker will
only be given access to the marketing fee funds generated from a
Preferred order if the Preferred Market-Maker has an appointment in the
class in which the Preferred order is received and executed.
DPM/LMM Rebate/Carryover Process. If less than 80% of the marketing
fee funds collected in a given month are paid out by the DPM/LMM [or
Preferred Market-Maker in a given month], then the Exchange would
refund such surplus at the end of the month on a pro rata basis based
upon contributions made by the Market-Makers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs and
LMMs in that month. However, if 80% or more of the [accumulated] funds
collected in a given month are paid out by the DPM/LMM [or Preferred
Market-Maker], there will not be a rebate for that month and the excess
funds will [carry over and will] be included in [the] an Excess [p]Pool
of funds to be used by the DPM/LMM [or Preferred Market-Maker the
following] in subsequent months. The total balance of the Excess Pool
of funds cannot exceed $25,000, and if in any month the balance were to
exceed $25,000, the funds in excess of $25,000 would be refunded[At the
end of each quarter, the Exchange would then refund any surplus, if
any,] on a pro rata basis based upon contributions made by the Market-
Makers, RMMs, DPMs, e-DPMs and LMMs in that month.
Preferred Market-Maker Rebate/Carryover Process. If less than 80%
of the marketing fee funds are paid out by the Preferred Market-Maker
in a given month, then the Exchange would refund such surplus at the
end of the month on a pro rata basis based upon contributions made by
the Market-Makers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs and LMMs in that month. However,
if 80%
[[Page 41486]]
or more of the accumulated funds in a given month are paid out by the
Preferred Market-Maker, there will not be a rebate for that month and
the funds will carry over and will be included in the pool of funds to
be used by the Preferred Market-Maker the following month. At the end
of each quarter, the Exchange would then refund any surplus, if any, on
a pro rata basis based upon contributions made by the Market-Makers,
RMMs, DPMs, e-DPMs and LMMs in the final month of the quarter. CBOE's
marketing fee program as described above will be in effect until June
2, 2007.
Remainder of Fees Schedule--No change.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change, and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections
A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The CBOE proposes to amend its marketing fee to modify the manner
in which marketing fee funds collected during a calendar quarter are
refunded. The CBOE states that its marketing fee currently provides
that if less than 80% of the marketing fee funds are paid out by the
DPM/LMM or Preferred Market-Maker in a given month, then the Exchange
would refund such surplus at the end of the month on a pro rata basis
based upon contributions made by the Market-Makers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs,
and LMMs. However, if 80% or more of the accumulated funds in a given
month are paid out by the DPM/LMM or Preferred Market-Maker, there will
not be a rebate for that month and the funds will carry over and will
be included in the pool of funds to be used by the DPM/LMM or Preferred
Market-Maker the following month. At the end of each quarter, the
Exchange would then refund any surplus, if any, on a pro rata basis
based upon contributions made by the Market-Makers, RMMs, DPMs, e-DPMs,
and LMMs.
The CBOE states that the purpose of this rule change is to modify
the rebate process as it relates to DPMs. As amended, if less than 80%
of the marketing fee funds collected in a given month are paid out by
the DPM/LMM, then the Exchange would refund such surplus at the end of
the month on a pro rata basis based upon contributions made by the
Market-Makers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs, and LMMs in that month. However, if
80% or more of the funds collected in a given month are paid out by the
DPM/LMM, there would not be a rebate for that month and the excess
funds would be included in an excess pool (``Excess Pool'') of funds to
be used by the DPM/LMM in subsequent months. The CBOE states that the
total balance of the Excess Pool of funds could not exceed $25,000, and
if in any month the balance were to exceed $25,000, the funds in excess
of $25,000 would be refunded on a pro rata basis based upon
contributions made by the Market-Makers, RMMs, DPMs, e-DPMs, and LMMs
in that month. As before, in the event a DPM/LMM is also marked as a
Preferred Market-Maker on a particular order, the funds collected from
the order will be allocated to the DPM in its capacity as a DPM and not
as a Preferred Market-Maker.
The Exchange states that the rebate and carryover process for
Preferred Market-Makers will continue to operate on a quarterly basis.
However, CBOE proposes to make one clarification to the rebate process
for Preferred Market-Makers in the text of the Fees Schedule to make it
consistent with the current process and procedure for rebating excess
funds. As noted above, if less than 80% of the marketing fee funds are
paid out by the Preferred Market-Maker in a given month, then the
Exchange would refund such surplus at the end of the month on a pro
rata basis based upon contributions made by the Market-Makers, RMMs, e-
DPMs, DPMs, and LMMs. CBOE states that it refunds the money based on
the contributions made by these market participants in that specific
month.
If there are surplus funds at the end of the quarter, CBOE
represents that it refunds the money on a pro rata basis based upon
contributions made by the Market-Makers, RMMs, e-DPMs, DPMs, and LMMs
in the final month of the quarter. CBOE believes that refunding surplus
funds to market participants on a pro rata basis based upon
contributions made in the final month of the quarter, as opposed to
based upon contributions made during the preceding three months, would
be an equitable allocation of dues and fees due to the manner in which
the marketing fee funds collected are paid out and how CBOE accounts
for the funds on a month-to-month basis. For example, if at least 80%,
but less than 100%, of the funds collected in the 1st month of a
quarter is paid out, the balance that carries over to the 2nd month is
paid out first in that 2nd month. Similarly, if at least 80%, but less
than 100%, of the funds collected in the 2nd month is paid out, the
balance that carries over to the 3rd month is paid out first in that
3rd month. As a result, any surplus of funds at the end of the quarter
(the 3rd month) was contributed by the Market-Makers, RMMs, e-DPMs,
DPMs, and LMMs who were assessed the fee in that month.
CBOE states that it is not amending its marketing fee program in
any other respects.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it
is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among CBOE members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change has been designated as a fee
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) \8\ thereunder, because it establishes or changes a due, fee,
or other charge imposed by the Exchange. Accordingly, the proposal will
take effect upon filing with the Commission. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of such proposed rule change the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public
[[Page 41487]]
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2006-63 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2006-63. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the CBOE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-CBOE-2006-63 and should be submitted on or before August
11, 2006.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-11568 Filed 7-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P