Preliminary Results of Full Sunset Review: Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the United Kingdom, 40993-40994 [E6-11458]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 19, 2006 / Notices
not later than five days from the filing
of the case briefs, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.309(d). Any hearing, if
requested, will be held on or about
August 14, 2006. The Department will
issue a notice of final results of this
sunset review, which will include the
results of our analysis of issues raised in
any such comments, no later than
September 27, 2006.
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752,
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 12, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–11455 Filed 7–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–412–815]
Preliminary Results of Full Sunset
Review: Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel
Plate From the United Kingdom
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 1, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (Department)
initiated a sunset review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on cutto-length carbon steel plate (CTL plate)
from the United Kingdom, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act). On the basis of a
notice of intent to participate and an
adequate substantive response filed on
behalf of the domestic interested parties
and an adequate response from
respondent interested parties, the
Department determined to conduct a
full sunset review of this CVD order
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(2). As a result of
our analysis, the Department
preliminarily finds that revocation of
the CVD order would likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of a
countervailable subsidy at the level
indicated in the ‘‘Preliminary Results of
Review’’ section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 19, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Hoadley or Kimberley Hunt, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC. 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3148 or (202) 482–
1272, respectively.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:28 Jul 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 1, 2005, the Department
initiated a sunset review of the CVD
order on cut-to-length carbon steel plate
from the United Kingdom pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation
of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 70 FR
65884 (November 1, 2005). The
Department received a notice of intent
to participate from the following
domestic interested parties: Nucor
Corporation (Nucor), IPSCO, Inc., Mittal
Steel USA Inc., Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.,
and United Steel, Paper and Forestry,
Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied
Industrial and Service Workers
International Union, AFL–CIO–CLC
(USW) (hereinafter, collectively
domestic interested parties), within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). The domestic
interested parties claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of
the Act, as domestic producers of CTL
plate in the United States. The
Department received substantive
responses from both domestic interested
parties and the following respondent
interested parties: the Government of
the United Kingdom (UKG), the
European Union Delegation of the
European Commission (EC), Corus
Group plc. (Corus) 1, Niagara LaSalle
(UK) Limited (Niagara) 2, and Spartan
UK Ltd (Spartan).
On December 21, 2005, the
Department determined that the
participation of the respondent
interested parties was adequate, and
that it was appropriate to conduct a full
sunset review. See Memorandum to
Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant
Secretary, Import Administration, Re:
Adequacy Determination; Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
on Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate
from the United Kingdom, dated
December 21, 2005, and on file in the
Central Records Unit, Room B–099 of
the Department of Commerce building.
1 British Steel Corporation (British Steel) was a
government-owned entity, and in 1988, prior to the
period of investigation (POI), it was privatized and
reorganized as British Steel plc (BS plc). On
September 17, 1995, the Department issued its Final
Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand on General Issue of Privatization, British
Steel plc v. United States, Slip Op. 95–17 and Order
(CIT Feb 9, 1995) (1995 Redetermination Final) and
determined the net subsidy rate for BS plc to be
21.30 percent ad valorem. BS plc has reported that
in 1999, it became part of Corus Group plc. (Corus)
after merging with Koninklijke Hoogovens.
2 The Department determined that Niagara
LaSalle was the successor-in-interest of Glynwed in
Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel
Products from the United Kingdom: Final Results of
Changed Circumstances Antidumping
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 64 FR
66880 (November 30, 1999).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40993
On February 10, 2006, the Department
extended the time limit for the
preliminary and final results of the
sunset review of the CVD order on CTL
plate from the United Kingdom (UK).
See Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate
from Belgium, Sweden, and the United
Kingdom; Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary and Final Results of Full
Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of
Countervailing Duty Orders, 71 FR 7017.
The Department extended the
preliminary results to no later than July
14, 2006, and the final results to no later
than September 27, 2006.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this
countervailing duty order are certain
cut-to-length carbon steel plates from
the United Kingdom, including hotrolled carbon steel universal mill plates
(i.e., flat-rolled products rolled on four
faces or in a closed box pass, of a width
exceeding 150 millimeters but not
exceeding 1,250 millimeters and of a
thickness of not less than 4 millimeters,
not in coils and without patterns in
relief), of rectangular shape, neither
clad, plated nor coated with metal,
whether or not painted, varnished, or
coated with plastics or other
nonmetallic substances; and certain hotrolled carbon steel flat-rolled products
in straight lengths, of rectangular shape,
hot rolled, neither clad, plated, nor
coated with metal, whether or not
painted, varnished, or coated with
plastics or other nonmetallic substances,
4.75 millimeters or more in thickness
and of a width which exceeds 150
millimeters and measures at least twice
the thickness, as currently classifiable in
the United States Harmonized Tariff
Schedule (HTSUS) under item numbers
7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060,
7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045,
7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000,
7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000,
7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000,
7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030,
7211.14.0045, 7211.90.0000,
7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, and
7212.50.0000. Included are flat-rolled
products of non-rectangular crosssection where such cross-section is
achieved subsequent to the rolling
process (i.e., products which have been
‘‘worked after rolling’’)—for example,
products which have been beveled or
rounded at the edges. Excluded is grade
X–70 plate. These HTSUS item numbers
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes. The written
description remains dispositive. As a
result of a changed circumstances
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
40994
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 19, 2006 / Notices
review3, the order excludes certain cutto-length carbon steel plate with a
maximum thickness of 80 mm in steel
grades BS 7191, 355 EM and 355 EMZ,
as amended by Sable Offshore Energy
Project specification XB MOO Y 15
0001, types 1 and 2.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the Preliminary Issues and
Decision Memorandum (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum) from Stephen J.
Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, to David M.
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated concurrently
with this notice and which is hereby
adopted by this notice. Parties can find
a complete discussion of all issues
raised in this review and the
corresponding recommendation in this
public memorandum which is on file in
the Central Records Unit room B–099 of
the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy
and electronic version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that revocation of the CVD
order would likely lead to continuation
or recurrence of a countervailable
subsidy. The net countervailable
subsidy likely to prevail if the order
were revoked is 0.00 percent ad valorem
for Glynwed/Niagara and 0.77 percent
ad valorem for ‘‘all other’’ producers/
exporters of CTL plate from the United
Kingdom, including British Steel, plc.
Interested parties may submit case briefs
and hearing requests no later than two
weeks after the date of publication of
these preliminary results, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.309 (c)(1)(i) and 19
CFR 351.310(c). Rebuttal briefs, which
must be limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed not later than
five days from the filing of the case
briefs, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.309(d). If a hearing is requested,
parties will be notified of the date, time
and location. The Department will issue
a notice of final results of this sunset
review no later than September 27,
2006, which will include the results of
its analysis of issues raised in any such
comments.
3See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate
from Finland, Germany and the United Kingdom:
Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Reviews, and Revocation of Orders in Part, 64 FR
46343 (August 25, 1999).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:28 Jul 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752,
and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 12, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–11458 Filed 7–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 071306G]
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted
Fishing Permits
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; receipt of exempted
fishing permit application.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional
Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries,
Northeast Region, NMFS (Assistant
Regional Administrator) has made a
preliminary determination that the
subject exempted fishing permit (EFP)
application contains all the required
information and warrants further
consideration. The Assistant Regional
Administrator has also made a
preliminary determination that the
activities authorized under the EFP
would be consistent with the goals and
objectives of the Northeast (NE)
Multispecies Fishery Management Plan
(FMP). However, further review and
consultation may be necessary before a
final determination is made to issue the
EFP. Therefore, NMFS announces that
the Assistant Regional Administrator
proposes to recommend that an EFP be
issued that would allow one commercial
fishing vessel to conduct fishing
operations that are otherwise restricted
by the regulations governing the
fisheries of the Northeastern United
States. The EFP, which would enable
researchers to investigate the efficacy of
a 4–seam bottom trawl to improve
escapement of small cod and haddock,
would allow for exemptions from the
FMP as follows: Gulf of Maine (GOM)
Regulated Mesh Area minimum mesh
size and gear restrictions, and two NE
multispecies days-at-sea (DAS) out of a
total of 12 days of gear testing.
Regulations under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act require publication of
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
this notification to provide interested
parties the opportunity to comment on
applications for proposed EFPs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Northeast
Regional Office, 1 Blackburn Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside
of the envelope ‘‘Comments on the GOM
4–Seam Trawl Study.’’ Comments may
also be sent via facsimile (fax) to (978)
281–9135, or submitted via e-mail to the
following address: DA6191@noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tobey Curtis, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281–9273, fax (978)
281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
complete application for an EFP was
submitted on June 12, 2006, by Dana
Morse and Lynn Wardwell of the Maine
Sea Grant College Program, University
of Maine Cooperative Extension. This
project is funded by the Northeast
Consortium. The primary goal of the
research is to test the efficacy of a 4–
seam bottom trawl to improve
escapement of small haddock and cod.
The intent of the researchers is that the
experimental net, if successful, could
potentially be an acceptable alternative
trawl design to be used in the
groundfish fishery.
The project expands on previous work
conducted by Maine Sea Grant, and is
anticipated to sharpen the net
selectivity observed in earlier studies.
Specifically, the researchers propose to
compare the effectiveness of regulated
6–inch (15.2–cm) diamond mesh side
panels to 6–inch (15.2–cm) hexagonal
mesh side panels on a 4–seam net
configuration. Two trawl designs will be
used: (1) A control trawl (4–seam net,
2:1 belly taper, 6–inch (15.2–cm)
diamond mesh side panels, 6.5–inch
(16.5–cm) diamond mesh codend); and
(2) an experimental trawl (4–seam net,
2:1 belly taper, 6–inch (15.2–cm)
hexagonal mesh side panels, 6.5–inch
(16.5–cm) diamond mesh codend). A
gear exemption is necessary for the
experimental net because hexagonal
mesh is not an allowed regulated mesh
type. Additionally, a set of trials to
quantify side panel escapement of each
net design will be conducted by
attaching small mesh (1–3⁄8–inch (3.5–
cm)) ‘‘pockets’’ to the side panels, each
with their own codend. A minimum
mesh size exemption is necessary
because the 1–3⁄8–inch (3.5–cm) mesh
pockets are smaller than the legal
minimum mesh size for trawls in the
GOM. A submersible video recorder will
be attached to the trawl to observe the
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 19, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40993-40994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11458]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-412-815]
Preliminary Results of Full Sunset Review: Cut-to-Length Carbon
Steel Plate From the United Kingdom
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 1, 2005, the Department of Commerce (Department)
initiated a sunset review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on
cut-to-length carbon steel plate (CTL plate) from the United Kingdom,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and an adequate
substantive response filed on behalf of the domestic interested parties
and an adequate response from respondent interested parties, the
Department determined to conduct a full sunset review of this CVD order
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(2). As a
result of our analysis, the Department preliminarily finds that
revocation of the CVD order would likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the level indicated in the
``Preliminary Results of Review'' section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 19, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hoadley or Kimberley Hunt, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC. 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3148 or (202)
482-1272, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 1, 2005, the Department initiated a sunset review of
the CVD order on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from the United
Kingdom pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of Five-
year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 70 FR 65884 (November 1, 2005). The
Department received a notice of intent to participate from the
following domestic interested parties: Nucor Corporation (Nucor),
IPSCO, Inc., Mittal Steel USA Inc., Oregon Steel Mills, Inc., and
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied
Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC (USW)
(hereinafter, collectively domestic interested parties), within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The domestic interested
parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the
Act, as domestic producers of CTL plate in the United States. The
Department received substantive responses from both domestic interested
parties and the following respondent interested parties: the Government
of the United Kingdom (UKG), the European Union Delegation of the
European Commission (EC), Corus Group plc. (Corus) \1\, Niagara LaSalle
(UK) Limited (Niagara) \2\, and Spartan UK Ltd (Spartan).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ British Steel Corporation (British Steel) was a government-
owned entity, and in 1988, prior to the period of investigation
(POI), it was privatized and reorganized as British Steel plc (BS
plc). On September 17, 1995, the Department issued its Final Results
of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand on General Issue of
Privatization, British Steel plc v. United States, Slip Op. 95-17
and Order (CIT Feb 9, 1995) (1995 Redetermination Final) and
determined the net subsidy rate for BS plc to be 21.30 percent ad
valorem. BS plc has reported that in 1999, it became part of Corus
Group plc. (Corus) after merging with Koninklijke Hoogovens.
\2\ The Department determined that Niagara LaSalle was the
successor-in-interest of Glynwed in Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and
Bismuth Carbon Steel Products from the United Kingdom: Final Results
of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 64 FR 66880 (November 30, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 21, 2005, the Department determined that the
participation of the respondent interested parties was adequate, and
that it was appropriate to conduct a full sunset review. See Memorandum
to Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import
Administration, Re: Adequacy Determination; Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order on Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the
United Kingdom, dated December 21, 2005, and on file in the Central
Records Unit, Room B-099 of the Department of Commerce building. On
February 10, 2006, the Department extended the time limit for the
preliminary and final results of the sunset review of the CVD order on
CTL plate from the United Kingdom (UK). See Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel
Plate from Belgium, Sweden, and the United Kingdom; Extension of Time
Limits for Preliminary and Final Results of Full Five-Year (``Sunset'')
Reviews of Countervailing Duty Orders, 71 FR 7017. The Department
extended the preliminary results to no later than July 14, 2006, and
the final results to no later than September 27, 2006.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this countervailing duty order are certain
cut-to-length carbon steel plates from the United Kingdom, including
hot-rolled carbon steel universal mill plates (i.e., flat-rolled
products rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width
exceeding 150 millimeters but not exceeding 1,250 millimeters and of a
thickness of not less than 4 millimeters, not in coils and without
patterns in relief), of rectangular shape, neither clad, plated nor
coated with metal, whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with
plastics or other nonmetallic substances; and certain hot-rolled carbon
steel flat-rolled products in straight lengths, of rectangular shape,
hot rolled, neither clad, plated, nor coated with metal, whether or not
painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other nonmetallic
substances, 4.75 millimeters or more in thickness and of a width which
exceeds 150 millimeters and measures at least twice the thickness, as
currently classifiable in the United States Harmonized Tariff Schedule
(HTSUS) under item numbers 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030,
7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000,
7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045,
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, and 7212.50.0000. Included
are flat-rolled products of non-rectangular cross-section where such
cross-section is achieved subsequent to the rolling process (i.e.,
products which have been ``worked after rolling'')--for example,
products which have been beveled or rounded at the edges. Excluded is
grade X-70 plate. These HTSUS item numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes. The written description remains dispositive. As a
result of a changed circumstances
[[Page 40994]]
review\3\, the order excludes certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate
with a maximum thickness of 80 mm in steel grades BS 7191, 355 EM and
355 EMZ, as amended by Sable Offshore Energy Project specification XB
MOO Y 15 0001, types 1 and 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Finland,
Germany and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Reviews, and
Revocation of Orders in Part, 64 FR 46343 (August 25, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Preliminary
Issues and Decision Memorandum (Preliminary Decision Memorandum) from
Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated concurrently with this notice and which is hereby
adopted by this notice. Parties can find a complete discussion of all
issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendation in
this public memorandum which is on file in the Central Records Unit
room B-099 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that revocation of the CVD
order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of a
countervailable subsidy. The net countervailable subsidy likely to
prevail if the order were revoked is 0.00 percent ad valorem for
Glynwed/Niagara and 0.77 percent ad valorem for ``all other''
producers/exporters of CTL plate from the United Kingdom, including
British Steel, plc. Interested parties may submit case briefs and
hearing requests no later than two weeks after the date of publication
of these preliminary results, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309
(c)(1)(i) and 19 CFR 351.310(c). Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited
to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five
days from the filing of the case briefs, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.309(d). If a hearing is requested, parties will be notified of the
date, time and location. The Department will issue a notice of final
results of this sunset review no later than September 27, 2006, which
will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any such
comments.
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results and notice
in accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 12, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-11458 Filed 7-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P