Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 2004-2005 Semi-Annual New Shipper Reviews, 40692-40694 [E6-11290]
Download as PDF
40692
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 18, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
knowingly and willfully attempting to
export from the United States to
Pakistan stinger missiles and night
vision goggles, items designated as
defense articles without obtaining the
required approval from the U.S.
Department of State. Mohsen was
sentenced to 30 months imprisonment
followed by three years of supervised
release. He was released from prison on
September 13, 2003 and will be released
from U.S. Probation Office supervision
on September 12, 2006.
Section 11(h) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended
(currently codified at 50 U.S.C. app.
§§ 2401–2420 (2000)) (‘‘Act’’) 1 and
Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations 2
(‘‘Regulations’’) provide, in pertinent
part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of Exporter
Services, in consultation with the
Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of * * *
AECA,’’ for a period not to exceed 10
years from the date of conviction. 15
CFR 766.25(a) and (d). In addition,
Section 750.8 of the Regulations states
that BIS’s Office of Exporter Services
may revoke any BIS licenses previously
issued in which the person had an
interest in at the time of his conviction.
I have received notice of Mohsen’s
indictment for violating the AECA, and
have provided notice and an
opportunity for Mohsen to make a
written submission to the Bureau of
Industry and Security as provided in
Section 766.25 of Regulations. Mohsen
made a telephone call to the Office of
Chief Counsel for Industry and Security
and was instructed to make a written
submission as provided by the
Regulations. Having received no
submission from Mohsen, I, following
consultations with the Export
Enforcement, including the Director,
Office of Export Enforcement, have
decided to deny Mohsen’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of 10 years from the date of
Mohsen’s conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered:
I. Until February 25, 2012, Diaa
Mohsen, 927 Pavonia Avenue,
Apartment 2, Jersey City, NJ 07306, and
when acting for or on behalf of Mohsen,
1 Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse
and the President, through Executive Order 13222
of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)),
as extended by the Notice of August 2, 2005 (70 FR
45273, August 5, 2005), has continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–
1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’).
2 The Regulations are currently codified at 15 CFR
parts 730–774 (2006).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:25 Jul 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
his representatives, assigns, agents, or
employees, (collectively referred to
hereinafter as the ‘‘Denied Person’’) may
not, directly, or indirectly, participate in
any way in any transaction involving
any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
II. No person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
III. After notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Diaa Mohsen by
affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of this
Order.
IV. This Order does not prohibit any
export, reexport, or other transaction
subject to the Regulations where the
only items involved that are subject to
the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin
technology.
V. This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect until
February 15, 2012.
VI. In accordance with part 756 of the
Regulations, Mohsen may file an appeal
of this Order with the Under Secretary
of Commerce for Industry and Security.
The appeal must be filed within 45 days
from the date of this Order and must
comply with the provisions of part 756
of the Regulations.
VII. A copy of this Order shall be
delivered to Mohsen. This Order shall
be published in the Federal Register.
Dated: July 11, 2006.
Eileen M. Albanese,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 06–6273 Filed 7–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–831]
Fresh Garlic from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
2004–2005 Semi–Annual New Shipper
Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 4, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published the preliminary
results of new shipper reviews of the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’). See Fresh Garlic from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of 2004–2005 Semi–Annual New
Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 26322 (May 4,
2006) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). The
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
40693
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 18, 2006 / Notices
merchandise covered by this order is
fresh garlic as described in the ‘‘Scope
of the Order’’ section of this notice. The
period of review (‘‘POR’’) is November
1, 2004, through April 30, 2005. We
invited parties to comment on our
Preliminary Results. We received no
comments, and no new evidence was
placed on the record to cause us to
question that determination. Therefore,
the final results are unchanged from
those presented in the Preliminary
Results. The final dumping margins for
these reviews are listed in the ‘‘Final
Results of the Reviews’’ section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 18, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Douglas or Katharine Huang, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1277 and (202)
482–1271, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 4, 2006, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
2004–2005 semi–annual new shipper
reviews of fresh garlic from the PRC. See
Preliminary Results. These new shipper
reviews cover four respondents,1 and
the period November 1, 2004, through
April 30, 2005. In the Preliminary
Results, we invited parties to comment.
We received no comments.
Scope of the Order
The products subject to the
antidumping duty order are all grades of
garlic, whole or separated into
constituent cloves, whether or not
peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen,
provisionally preserved, or packed in
water or other neutral substance, but not
prepared or preserved by the addition of
other ingredients or heat processing.
The differences between grades are
based on color, size, sheathing, and
level of decay.
The scope of this order does not
include the following: (a) garlic that has
been mechanically harvested and that is
primarily, but not exclusively, destined
for non–fresh use; or (b) garlic that has
been specially prepared and cultivated
prior to planting and then harvested and
otherwise prepared for use as seed.
The subject merchandise is used
principally as a food product and for
seasoning. The subject garlic is
currently classifiable under subheadings
0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0020,
0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060,
0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, and
2005.90.9700 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive. In order to be
excluded from the antidumping duty
order, garlic entered under the HTSUS
subheadings listed above that is (1)
mechanically harvested and primarily,
but not exclusively, destined for non–
fresh use or (2) specially prepared and
cultivated prior to planting and then
harvested and otherwise prepared for
use as seed must be accompanied by
declarations to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to that effect.
Separate Rates
In our Preliminary Results, we
preliminarily found that Chengshun,
Fanhui, Dongbao, and Anqiu Friend had
met the criteria for the application of a
separate antidumping duty rate. See
Preliminary Results, 71 FR at 26325. We
have not received any information since
the issuance of the Preliminary Results
that provides a basis for reconsideration
of these determinations.
Final Results of the Reviews
The Department has determined that
the following final dumping margins
exist for the period November 1, 2004,
through April 30, 2005:
Exporter
Shandong Chengshun Farm Produce Trading Company, Ltd. ...............
Shenzhen Fanhui Import and Export Co., Ltd. .......................................
Qufu Dongbao Import and Export Trade Co., Ltd. ..................................
Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd. ....................................................................
Jinxiang Chengsen Agricultural Trade Company,
Shenzhen Fanhui Import and Export Co.,
Qufu Dongbao Import and Export Trade Co.,
Anqiu Friend Food Co.,
Ltd.
Ltd.
Ltd.
Ltd.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
The Department will determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will
instruct CBP to liquidate, without regard
to antidumping duties, all entries of
subject merchandise during the POR for
which the importer- (or customer-)
specific assessment rate is zero.
Bonding will no longer be permitted
to fulfill security requirements for
shipments of fresh garlic from the PRC
produced by CATC and exported by
Chengshun, produced and exported by
Fanhui, produced and exported by
Dongbao, and produced and exported by
Anqiu Friend that are entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of these new
shipper reviews. The following cash
deposit requirements will be effective
upon publication of the final results of
these new shipper reviews for all
shipments of subject merchandise from
Chengshun, Fanhui, Dongbao, and
Anqiu Friend entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
For subject merchandise produced by
CATC and exported by Chengshun;
produced and exported by Fanhui;
produced and exported by Dongbao; or
produced and exported by Anqiu
Friend, the cash deposit rate will be
zero; (2) for subject merchandise
exported by Chengshun but not
produced by CATC, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the PRC–wide
rate (i.e., 376.67 percent); (3) for subject
merchandise exported by Fanhui,
Dongbao, or Anqiu Friend, but
produced by any party other than itself,
the cash deposit rate will be the PRC–
wide rate (i.e., 376.67 percent); (4) for
subject merchandise produced by
Fanhui, Dongbao, or Anqiu Friend, but
exported by any party other than itself,
the cash deposit rate will be the PRC–
wide rate (i.e., 376.67 percent); and (5)
for subject merchandise produced by
CATC but exported by any party other
than Chengshun, the cash deposit rate
1 The four respondents are Shandong Chengshun
Farm Produce Trading Company, Ltd.
(‘‘Chengshun’’), Shenzhen Fanhui Import and
Export Co., Ltd. (‘‘Fanhui’’), Qufu Dongbao Import
and Export Trade Co., Ltd. (‘‘Dongbao’’), and Anqiu
Friend Food Co., Ltd. (‘‘Anqiu Friend’’). These new
shipper reviews cover shipments of fresh garlic
from the PRC that were produced by Jinxiang
Chengsen Agricultural Trade Company, Ltd.
(‘‘CATC’’) and exported by Chengshun, produced
and exported by Fanhui, produced and exported by
Dongbao, and produced and exported by Anqiu
Friend.
Duty Assessment and Cash–Deposit
Requirements
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Margin
(percent)
Producer
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:25 Jul 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
40694
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 18, 2006 / Notices
will be the PRC–wide rate (i.e., 376.67
percent).
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the review period. Pursuant to 19
CFR 351.402(f)(3), failure to comply
with this requirement could result in
the Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO as explained in
the administrative protective order
itself. Timely written notification of the
return/destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19
CFR 351.214(i)(1), and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: July 11, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–11290 Filed 7–17–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–820]
Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products From India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 12, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
hot–rolled carbon steel flat products
(HRS) from India. See Certain Hot–
Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From
India: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 71 FR 2018 (January 12, 2006)
(Preliminary Results). This review
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:25 Jul 17, 2006
Jkt 208001
covers one producer/exporter of HRS,
Essar Steel Ltd. (Essar). The period of
review (POR) is December 1, 2003,
through November 30, 2004. Based on
our analysis of the comments received,
we made changes to the preliminary
dumping margin calculation. Despite
these changes, the calculated dumping
margin for these final results does not
differ from the dumping margin
determined in the Preliminary Results.
The final weighted–average dumping
margin for the reviewed firm is listed
below in the section entitled ‘‘Final
Results of Review.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 18, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Pedersen or Howard Smith, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–2769 or (202) 482–
5193, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 12, 2006, the Department
published the Preliminary Results in the
Federal Register and invited interested
parties to comment on those results. In
response to the Department’s invitation
to comment on the Preliminary Results
of this review, Essar and Nucor
Corporation (Nucor), one of two
petitioners, filed case briefs on February
22, 2006. Essar, Nucor and United States
Steel Corporation (USSC), the other
petitioner, filed rebuttal briefs on
February 27, 2006. At the Department’s
request, Nucor excluded certain factual
information from its brief and rebuttal
brief and resubmitted its briefs on
March 17, 2006. On March 3, 2006,
Essar withdrew its February 10, 2006,
request for a hearing.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the
antidumping duty order are certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products of a
rectangular shape, of a width of 0.5 inch
or greater, neither clad, plated, nor
coated with metal and whether or not
painted, varnished, or coated with
plastics or other non–metallic
substances, in coils (whether or not in
successively superimposed layers),
regardless of thickness, and in straight
lengths, of a thickness of less than 4.75
mm and of a width measuring at least
10 times the thickness. Universal mill
plate (i.e., flat–rolled products rolled on
four faces or in a closed box pass, of a
width exceeding 150 mm, but not
exceeding 1250 mm, and of a thickness
of not less than 4.0 mm, not in coils and
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
without patterns in relief) of a thickness
not less than 4.0 mm is not included
within the scope of the order.
Specifically included within the
scope of the order are vacuum degassed,
fully stabilized (commonly referred to as
interstitial–free (IF)) steels, high
strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, and
the substrate for motor lamination
steels. IF steels are recognized as low
carbon steels with micro–alloying levels
of elements such as titanium or niobium
(also commonly referred to as
columbium), or both, added to stabilize
carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA
steels are recognized as steels with
micro–alloying levels of elements such
as chromium, copper, niobium,
vanadium, and molybdenum. The
substrate for motor lamination steels
contains micro–alloying levels of
elements such as silicon and aluminum.
Steel products to be included in the
scope of the order, regardless of
definitions in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
are products in which: i) iron
predominates, by weight, over each of
the other contained elements; ii) the
carbon content is 2 percent or less, by
weight; and iii) none of the elements
listed below exceeds the quantity, by
weight, respectively indicated:
1.80 percent of manganese, or
2.25 percent of silicon, or
1.00 percent of copper, or
0.50 percent of aluminum, or
1.25 percent of chromium, or
0.30 percent of cobalt, or
0.40 percent of lead, or
1.25 percent of nickel, or
0.30 percent of tungsten, or
0.10 percent of molybdenum, or
0.10 percent of niobium, or
0.15 percent of vanadium, or
0.15 percent of zirconium.
All products that meet the physical
and chemical description provided
above are within the scope of the order
unless otherwise excluded. The
following products, by way of example,
are outside or specifically excluded
from the scope of the order:
• Alloy HRS products in which at
least one of the chemical elements
exceeds those listed above
(including, e.g., American Society
for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
specifications A543, A387, A514,
A517, A506).
• Society of Automotive Engineers
(SAE)/American Iron & Steel
Institute (AISI) grades of series 2300
and higher.
• Ball bearing steels, as defined in the
HTSUS.
• Tool steels, as defined in the
HTSUS.
E:\FR\FM\18JYN1.SGM
18JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40692-40694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11290]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-831]
Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Final Results
of 2004-2005 Semi-Annual New Shipper Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 4, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published the preliminary results of new shipper reviews
of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People's
Republic of China (``PRC''). See Fresh Garlic from the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 2004-2005 Semi-Annual New
Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 26322 (May 4, 2006) (``Preliminary Results'').
The
[[Page 40693]]
merchandise covered by this order is fresh garlic as described in the
``Scope of the Order'' section of this notice. The period of review
(``POR'') is November 1, 2004, through April 30, 2005. We invited
parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. We received no comments,
and no new evidence was placed on the record to cause us to question
that determination. Therefore, the final results are unchanged from
those presented in the Preliminary Results. The final dumping margins
for these reviews are listed in the ``Final Results of the Reviews''
section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 18, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Douglas or Katharine Huang, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1277 and (202) 482-1271, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 4, 2006, the Department published the preliminary results of
the 2004-2005 semi-annual new shipper reviews of fresh garlic from the
PRC. See Preliminary Results. These new shipper reviews cover four
respondents,\1\ and the period November 1, 2004, through April 30,
2005. In the Preliminary Results, we invited parties to comment. We
received no comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The four respondents are Shandong Chengshun Farm Produce
Trading Company, Ltd. (``Chengshun''), Shenzhen Fanhui Import and
Export Co., Ltd. (``Fanhui''), Qufu Dongbao Import and Export Trade
Co., Ltd. (``Dongbao''), and Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd. (``Anqiu
Friend''). These new shipper reviews cover shipments of fresh garlic
from the PRC that were produced by Jinxiang Chengsen Agricultural
Trade Company, Ltd. (``CATC'') and exported by Chengshun, produced
and exported by Fanhui, produced and exported by Dongbao, and
produced and exported by Anqiu Friend.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products subject to the antidumping duty order are all grades
of garlic, whole or separated into constituent cloves, whether or not
peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen, provisionally preserved, or packed in
water or other neutral substance, but not prepared or preserved by the
addition of other ingredients or heat processing. The differences
between grades are based on color, size, sheathing, and level of decay.
The scope of this order does not include the following: (a) garlic
that has been mechanically harvested and that is primarily, but not
exclusively, destined for non-fresh use; or (b) garlic that has been
specially prepared and cultivated prior to planting and then harvested
and otherwise prepared for use as seed.
The subject merchandise is used principally as a food product and
for seasoning. The subject garlic is currently classifiable under
subheadings 0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060,
0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, and 2005.90.9700 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. In order
to be excluded from the antidumping duty order, garlic entered under
the HTSUS subheadings listed above that is (1) mechanically harvested
and primarily, but not exclusively, destined for non-fresh use or (2)
specially prepared and cultivated prior to planting and then harvested
and otherwise prepared for use as seed must be accompanied by
declarations to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to that
effect.
Separate Rates
In our Preliminary Results, we preliminarily found that Chengshun,
Fanhui, Dongbao, and Anqiu Friend had met the criteria for the
application of a separate antidumping duty rate. See Preliminary
Results, 71 FR at 26325. We have not received any information since the
issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for
reconsideration of these determinations.
Final Results of the Reviews
The Department has determined that the following final dumping
margins exist for the period November 1, 2004, through April 30, 2005:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margin
Exporter Producer (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shandong Chengshun Farm Produce Trading Jinxiang Chengsen Agricultural Trade Company, Ltd. 0.00
Company, Ltd................................
Shenzhen Fanhui Import and Export Co., Ltd... Shenzhen Fanhui Import and Export Co., Ltd. 0.00
Qufu Dongbao Import and Export Trade Co., Qufu Dongbao Import and Export Trade Co., Ltd. 0.00
Ltd.........................................
Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd................... Anqiu Friend Food Co., Ltd. 0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duty Assessment and Cash-Deposit Requirements
The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate, without regard to
antidumping duties, all entries of subject merchandise during the POR
for which the importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rate is
zero.
Bonding will no longer be permitted to fulfill security
requirements for shipments of fresh garlic from the PRC produced by
CATC and exported by Chengshun, produced and exported by Fanhui,
produced and exported by Dongbao, and produced and exported by Anqiu
Friend that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption
on or after the publication date of the final results of these new
shipper reviews. The following cash deposit requirements will be
effective upon publication of the final results of these new shipper
reviews for all shipments of subject merchandise from Chengshun,
Fanhui, Dongbao, and Anqiu Friend entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise produced
by CATC and exported by Chengshun; produced and exported by Fanhui;
produced and exported by Dongbao; or produced and exported by Anqiu
Friend, the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for subject merchandise
exported by Chengshun but not produced by CATC, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the PRC-wide rate (i.e., 376.67 percent); (3) for
subject merchandise exported by Fanhui, Dongbao, or Anqiu Friend, but
produced by any party other than itself, the cash deposit rate will be
the PRC-wide rate (i.e., 376.67 percent); (4) for subject merchandise
produced by Fanhui, Dongbao, or Anqiu Friend, but exported by any party
other than itself, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate
(i.e., 376.67 percent); and (5) for subject merchandise produced by
CATC but exported by any party other than Chengshun, the cash deposit
rate
[[Page 40694]]
will be the PRC-wide rate (i.e., 376.67 percent).
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the review period. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.402(f)(3), failure to comply with this requirement could result in
the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO as explained in the administrative protective order itself. Timely
written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.214(i)(1),
and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: July 11, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-11290 Filed 7-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S