Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results and Final Results of the Full Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Furfuryl Alcohol from Thailand, 40067-40068 [E6-11126]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 135 / Friday, July 14, 2006 / Notices
b. Constructed Export Price
For constructed export–price (CEP)
sales (sampled and non–sampled), we
divided the total dumping margins for
the reviewed sales by the total entered
value of those reviewed sales for each
importer. We will direct CBP to assess
the resulting percentage margin against
the entered customs values for the
subject merchandise on each of that
importer’s entries under the relevant
order during the review period. See 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Cash–Deposit Requirements
To calculate the cash–deposit rate for
each respondent (i.e., each exporter
and/or manufacturer included in these
reviews), we divided the total dumping
margins for each company by the total
net value of that company’s sales of
merchandise during the review period
subject to each order.
To derive a single deposit rate for
each respondent, we weight–averaged
the EP and CEP deposit rates (using the
EP and CEP, respectively, as the
weighting factors). To accomplish this
when we sampled CEP sales, we first
calculated the total dumping margins
for all CEP sales during the review
period by multiplying the sample CEP
margins by the ratio of total days in the
review period to days in the sample
weeks. We then calculated a total net
value for all CEP sales during the review
period by multiplying the sample CEP
total net value by the same ratio.
Finally, we divided the combined total
dumping margins for both EP and CEP
sales by the combined total value for
both EP and CEP sales to obtain the
deposit rate.
We will direct CBP to collect the
resulting percentage deposit rate against
the entered customs value of each of the
exporter’s entries of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of this
notice. Entries of parts incorporated into
finished bearings before sales to an
unaffiliated customer in the United
States will receive the respondent’s
deposit rate applicable to the order.
Furthermore, the following deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results
of administrative reviews for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication, consistent with section
751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash–
deposit rates for the reviewed
companies will be the rates shown
above; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Jul 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
the cash–deposit rate will continue to be
the company–specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
less–than-fair–value (LTFV)
investigation but the manufacturer is,
the cash–deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; (4) the cash–deposit rate
for all other manufacturers or exporters
will continue to be the ‘‘All Others’’ rate
for the relevant order made effective by
the final results of review published on
July 26, 1993. See Antifriction Bearings
(Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings)
and Parts Thereof from France, et al:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews and Revocation
in Part of an Antidumping Duty Order,
58 FR 39729 (July 26, 1993). For ball
bearings from Italy, see Antifriction
Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller
Bearings) and Parts Thereof from
France, et al; Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Reviews and Partial Termination of
Administrative Reviews, 61 FR 66471,
66521 (December 17, 1996). These rates
are the ‘‘All Others’’ rates from the
relevant LTFV investigation.
These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until publication of the
final results of the next administrative
reviews.
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during these
review periods. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40067
Dated: July 7, 2006.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
Appendix
Comments and Responses
1. Offsetting of Negative Margins
2. Model–Match Methodology
3. Sample and Prototype Sales
4. Use of Adverse Facts Available
5. Inventory Carrying Costs
6. Freight Expenses
7. Affiliation
8. Billing and Other Post–Sale Price
Adjustments
9. Ministerial Errors
10. Miscellaneous Issues
A. U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses
B. Bearing Design Types
C. Home–Market Packing
D. Warehousing Expenses
E. Expansion of Window Period
[FR Doc. E6–11123 Filed 7–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–812]
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results and Final Results
of the Full Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Furfuryl
Alcohol from Thailand
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 14, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Audrey R. Twyman, Damian Felton, or
Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 1, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone: 202–482–3534, 202–482–
0133, and 202–482–0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated this second
sunset review of furfuryl alcohol from
Thailand on April 3, 2006. See Initiation
of Five–year ‘‘Sunset’’ Reviews, 71 FR
16551 (April 3, 2006). On April 7, 2006,
we received notification of intent to
participate from the domestic interested
party, Penn Speciality Chemicals, Inc.
We received substantive responses to
the notice of initiation on May 2, 2006,
from the domestic interested party, and
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
40068
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 135 / Friday, July 14, 2006 / Notices
on May 3, 2006, from the respondent
interested party, Indorama Chemicals
(Thailand) Ltd. On May 8, 2006, we
received rebuttal comments from the
domestic interested party.
On May 23, 2006, the Department
determined to conduct a full sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand as
provided at section 751(c)(5)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’) and at section 351.218 (e)(2)(i) of
the Department’s regulations because:
(1) the domestic interested party’s and
respondent interested party’s
substantive responses met the
requirements of section 351.218(d)(3) of
the Department’s regulations, and (2)
both the information on the record and
our review of the proprietary CBP data,
indicated that the respondent interested
party accounts for more than 50 percent
of the exports to the United States, the
level that the Department normally
considers to be an adequate response to
the notice of initiation by respondent
interested parties under section 351.218
(e)(1)(ii)(A).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Extension of Time Limits
In accordance with section
751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department
may extend the period of time for
making its determination by not more
than 90 days, if it determines that the
review is extraordinarily complicated.
On May 2, May 3, and May 8, 2006, the
parties filed comments raising various
issues. Because some of these issues are
complex, the Department has
determined, pursuant to section
751(c)(5)(C)(ii) of the Act, that the
sunset review is extraordinarily
complicated and will require additional
time for the Department to complete its
analysis.
The Department’s preliminary results
of the full sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on furfuryl
alcohol from Thailand are scheduled for
July 22, 2006, and the final results are
scheduled for November 29, 2006. As a
result of our decision to extend the
deadlines, the Department intends to
issue the preliminary results of the full
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand
no later than October 20, 2006, and the
final results of the review no later than
February 27, 2007. These dates are 90
days from the originally scheduled dates
of the preliminary and final results of
this sunset review.
This notice is issued in accordance
with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and (C)(ii) of
the Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Jul 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
Dated: July 10, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–11126 Filed 7–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–820]
Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products From India: Notice of Intent
to Rescind Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department ofCommerce.
SUMMARY: After initiating a review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products from
India covering the period December 1,
2004, through November 30, 2005, the
sole respondent, Essar Steel Ltd.,
claimed it did not ship subject
merchandise to the United States during
the period of review (POR). Based on
record evidence consistent with this
claim, the Department of Commerce
intends to rescind the instant
administrative review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 14, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Pedersen or Howard Smith, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–2769 or (202) 482–
5193, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On December 1, 2005, the Department
of Commerce (the Department)
published, in the Federal Register, a
notice of the opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products (HRS)
from India, covering the period
December 1, 2004, through November
30, 2005. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 70
FR 72109 (December 1, 2005). On
December 30, 2005 and January 3, 2006,
Nucor Corporation and U.S. Steel
Corporation (collectively, petitioners),
respectively, requested an
administrative review of the above–
referenced antidumping order with
respect to Essar Steel Ltd. (Essar). On
February 1, 2006, the Department
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
initiated the requested administrative
review. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 71 FR 5241 (February 1, 2006). On
February 10, 2006, Essar submitted a
letter to the Department in which it
certified that it made no shipments of
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the
antidumping duty order are certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products of a
rectangular shape, of a width of 0.5 inch
or greater, neither clad, plated, nor
coated with metal and whether or not
painted, varnished, or coated with
plastics or other non–metallic
substances, in coils (whether or not in
successively superimposed layers),
regardless of thickness, and in straight
lengths, of a thickness of less than 4.75
mm and of a width measuring at least
10 times the thickness. Universal mill
plate (i.e., flat–rolled products rolled on
four faces or in a closed box pass, of a
width exceeding 150 mm, but not
exceeding 1250 mm, and of a thickness
of not less than 4.0 mm, not in coils and
without patterns in relief) of a thickness
not less than 4.0 mm is not included
within the scope of the order.
Specifically included within the
scope of the order are vacuum degassed,
fully stabilized (commonly referred to as
interstitial–free (IF)) steels, high
strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, and
the substrate for motor lamination
steels. IF steels are recognized as low
carbon steels with micro–alloying levels
of elements such as titanium or niobium
(also commonly referred to as
columbium), or both, added to stabilize
carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA
steels are recognized as steels with
micro–alloying levels of elements such
as chromium, copper, niobium,
vanadium, and molybdenum. The
substrate for motor lamination steels
contains micro–alloying levels of
elements such as silicon and aluminum.
Steel products to be included in the
scope of the order, regardless of
definitions in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
are products in which: i) Iron
predominates, by weight, over each of
the other contained elements; ii) the
carbon content is 2 percent or less, by
weight; and iii) none of the elements
listed below exceeds the quantity, by
weight, respectively indicated:
1.80 percent of manganese, or
2.25 percent of silicon, or
1.00 percent of copper, or
0.50 percent of aluminum, or
1.25 percent of chromium, or
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 135 (Friday, July 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40067-40068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-11126]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-549-812]
Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results and Final
Results of the Full Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Furfuryl Alcohol from Thailand
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 14, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey R. Twyman, Damian Felton, or
Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230; telephone:
202-482-3534, 202-482-0133, and 202-482-0182, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') initiated this
second sunset review of furfuryl alcohol from Thailand on April 3,
2006. See Initiation of Five-year ``Sunset'' Reviews, 71 FR 16551
(April 3, 2006). On April 7, 2006, we received notification of intent
to participate from the domestic interested party, Penn Speciality
Chemicals, Inc. We received substantive responses to the notice of
initiation on May 2, 2006, from the domestic interested party, and
[[Page 40068]]
on May 3, 2006, from the respondent interested party, Indorama
Chemicals (Thailand) Ltd. On May 8, 2006, we received rebuttal comments
from the domestic interested party.
On May 23, 2006, the Department determined to conduct a full sunset
review of the antidumping duty order on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand
as provided at section 751(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (``the Act'') and at section 351.218 (e)(2)(i) of the
Department's regulations because: (1) the domestic interested party's
and respondent interested party's substantive responses met the
requirements of section 351.218(d)(3) of the Department's regulations,
and (2) both the information on the record and our review of the
proprietary CBP data, indicated that the respondent interested party
accounts for more than 50 percent of the exports to the United States,
the level that the Department normally considers to be an adequate
response to the notice of initiation by respondent interested parties
under section 351.218 (e)(1)(ii)(A).
Extension of Time Limits
In accordance with section 751(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department
may extend the period of time for making its determination by not more
than 90 days, if it determines that the review is extraordinarily
complicated. On May 2, May 3, and May 8, 2006, the parties filed
comments raising various issues. Because some of these issues are
complex, the Department has determined, pursuant to section
751(c)(5)(C)(ii) of the Act, that the sunset review is extraordinarily
complicated and will require additional time for the Department to
complete its analysis.
The Department's preliminary results of the full sunset review of
the antidumping duty order on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand are
scheduled for July 22, 2006, and the final results are scheduled for
November 29, 2006. As a result of our decision to extend the deadlines,
the Department intends to issue the preliminary results of the full
sunset review of the antidumping duty order on furfuryl alcohol from
Thailand no later than October 20, 2006, and the final results of the
review no later than February 27, 2007. These dates are 90 days from
the originally scheduled dates of the preliminary and final results of
this sunset review.
This notice is issued in accordance with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and
(C)(ii) of the Act.
Dated: July 10, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E6-11126 Filed 7-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
